Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Isolation of satellite cells and transplantation into mice for lineage tracing in muscle

Abstract

Limited methods exist to assay the direct effects of therapeutic intervention on muscle stem cell fate, proliferation or differentiation in an in vivo context. Here we provide an optimized protocol for muscle stem cell isolation and transplantation into mice to deconvolute heterogeneity within isolated stem cell populations. Viable and pure cell populations are isolated within 2 h and can then be used for therapeutic intervention or transplantation to uncover the repopulating and differentiation potential in mice, a physiologically relevant in vivo context. Effects can be assessed 9 d after transplantation. This methodology analyzes cell and sort purity prior to transplantation to improve reproducibility and outlines novel blocking steps to improve tissue staining and analysis. Experience with surgical procedures in mice is recommended before attempting this protocol. Our system is widely applicable for exploring stem cell dynamics within muscle and has already been used to study heterogeneity within muscle stem cell populations and efficacy of therapeutic intervention on isolated stem cell populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of the protocol for satellite cell isolation and transplantation.
Fig. 2: Muscle stem cell isolation from hindlimb muscle.
Fig. 3: Muscle stem cell lineage gating and quality control strategy.
Fig. 4: Microdeposition of muscle stem cells into recipient muscle.
Fig. 5: Graft processing and immunohistochemistry strategy.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data supporting Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 1 are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Kuang, S., Kuroda, K., Le Grand, F. & Rudnicki, M. A. Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell 129, 999–1010 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Feige, P., Brun, C. E., Ritso, M. & Rudnicki, M. A. Orienting muscle stem cells for regeneration in homeostasis, aging and disease. Cell Stem Cell 23, 653–664 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Porpiglia, E. et al. High-resolution myogenic lineage mapping by single-cell mass cytometry. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 558–567 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Giordani, L. et al. High-dimensional single-cell cartography reveals novel skeletal muscle-resident cell populations. Mol. Cell 74, 609–621.e6 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sacco, A., Doyonnas, R., Kraft, P., Vitorovic, S. & Blau, H. M. Self-renewal and expansion of single transplanted muscle stem cells. Nature 456, 502–506 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bar-Nur, O. et al. Direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts into functional skeletal muscle progenitors. Stem Cell Rep. 10, 1505–1521 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zismanov, V. et al. Phosphorylation of eIF2α is a translational control mechanism regulating muscle stem cell quiescence and self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 18, 79–90 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Y. X. et al. EGFR-Aurka signaling rescues polarity and regeneration defects in dystrophin-deficient muscle stem cells by increasing asymmetric divisions. Cell Stem Cell 24, 419–432.e6 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pasut, A., Oleynik, P. & Rudnicki, M. A. Isolation of muscle stem cells by fluorescence activated cell sorting cytometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 798, 53–64 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bentzinger, C. F., Wang, Y. X., Dumont, N. A. & Rudnicki, M. A. Cellular dynamics in the muscle satellite cell niche. EMBO Rep. 14, 1062–1072 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilbert, P. M. et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 329, 1078–1081 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beauchamp, J. R., Morgan, J. E., Pagel, C. N. & Partridge, T. A. Dynamics of myoblast transplantation reveal a discrete minority of precursors with stem cell-like properties as the myogenic source. J. Cell Biol. 144, 1113–1122 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Qu, Z. et al. Development of approaches to improve cell survival in myoblast transfer therapy. J. Cell Biol. 142, 1257–1267 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rocheteau, P., Gayraud-Morel, B., Siegl-Cachedenier, I., Blasco, M. A. & Tajbakhsh, S. A subpopulation of adult skeletal muscle stem cells retains all template DNA strands after cell division. Cell 148, 112–125 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tierney, M. T., Stec, M. J., Rulands, S., Simons, B. D. & Sacco, A. Muscle stem cells exhibit distinct clonal dynamics in response to tissue repairand homeostatic aging. Cell Stem Cell 22, 119–127.e3 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Seale, P. et al. Pax7 is required for the specification of myogenic satellite cells. Cell 102, 777–786 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Von Maltzahn, J., Jones, A. E., Parks, R. J. & Rudnicki, M. A. Pax7 is critical for the normal function of satellite cells in adult skeletal muscle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16474–16479 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dumont, N. A. et al. Dystrophin expression in muscle stem cells regulates their polarity and asymmetric division. Nat. Med. 21, 1455–1463 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Machado, L. et al. In situ fixation redefines quiescence and early activation of skeletal muscle stem cells. Cell Rep. 21, 1982–1993 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Velthoven, C. T. J., de Morree, A., Egner, I. M., Brett, J. O. & Rando, T. A. Transcriptional profiling of quiescent muscle stem cells in vivo. Cell Rep. 21, 1994–2004 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van den Brink, S. C. et al. Single-cell sequencing reveals dissociation-induced gene expression in tissue subpopulations. Nat. Methods 14, 935–936 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lepper, C., Partridge, T. A. & Fan, C. M. An absolute requirement for Pax7-positive satellite cells in acute injury-induced skeletal muscle regeneration. Development 138, 3639–3646 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Price, F. D. et al. Inhibition of JAK/STAT signaling stimulates adult satellite cell function. Nat. Med. 20, 1174–1181 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Judson, R. N. et al. Inhibition of methyltransferase Setd7 allows the in vitro expansion of myogenic stem cells with improved therapeutic potential. Cell Stem Cell 22, 177–190 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moreno-Garcia, A., Kun, A., Calero, O., Medina, M. & Calero, M. An overview of the role of lipofuscin in age-related neurodegeneration. Front. Neurosci. 12, 464 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

P.F. is supported by a fellowship from Canadian Institutes for Health Research. M.A.R. holds the Canada Research Chair in Molecular Genetics. These studies were carried out with grant support to M.A.R. from the NIH (R01AR044031), the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (FDN-148387), E-Rare-2: Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Muscular Dystrophy Canada (ERA-132935), the Muscular Dystrophy Association, the Ontario Institute for Regenerative Medicine and the Stem Cell Network.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, P.F. and M.A.R.; methodology, P.F. and M.A.R.; writing, P.F. and M.A.R.; funding acquisition, M.A.R.; resources, M.A.R; supervision, M.A.R.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Rudnicki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Protocols thanks Robert W. Arpke, Dawn Cornelison and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references that demonstrate the development/use of the Protocol

Wang, Y. X. et al. Cell Stem Cell. 24, 419–432.e6 (2019): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2019.01.002

Bentzinger, C. F. et al. Cell Stem Cell. 12, 75–87 (2013): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.09.015

Kuang, S., Kuroda, K., Le Grand, F., & Rudnicki, M. A. Cell. 129, 999–1010 (2007): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.044

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1 Cell purity quality control prior to engraftment.

Representative immunofluorescence images with single channels for committed satellite cell transplants (a) and satellite stem cell transplants (b). Blue, DAPI; green, nGFP; red, nTdTomato; white, Pax7. Scale bar, 50 μm. n = 3, mean ± s.d. Experimental protocols for mice used in this study were performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the University of Ottawa Animal Care Committee, which is based on the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Supplementary Fig. 2 Lipofuscin-quenching validation for transplanted tissue.

a, Representative immunofluorescence images of non-injured, non-transplanted muscle show the high levels of autofluorescence present within skeletal muscle. A trace of the 12 Bit histogram from Zen 2.5 for 488, 546 and 647 nm is shown. b, Lipofuscin-quenched sections from serial sections have significantly decreased background in 488 and 546 nm autofluorescence with a slight increase in 647 nm autofluorescence. c and d, Representative immunofluorescence images from satellite stem cell (nTdTomato) transplants treated without TrueBlack (c) show the significant presence of non-cellular (DAPI-negative) autofluorescence artifact within injured skeletal muscle, which impedes the ability to detect real signal from transplanted cells as shown following blocking with TrueBlack (d). Blue, DAPI; green, nGFP; red, nTdTomato; white, Pax7. Scale bar, 100 μm. Experimental protocols for mice used in this study were performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the University of Ottawa Animal Care Committee, which is based on the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feige, P., Rudnicki, M.A. Isolation of satellite cells and transplantation into mice for lineage tracing in muscle. Nat Protoc 15, 1082–1097 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0278-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0278-8

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing