Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Carbon nanotube–mediated DNA delivery without transgene integration in intact plants

Abstract

Exogenous biomolecule delivery into plants is difficult because the plant cell wall poses a dominant transport barrier, thereby limiting the efficiency of plant genetic engineering. Traditional DNA delivery methods for plants suffer from host-species limitations, low transformation efficiencies, tissue damage, or unavoidable and uncontrolled DNA integration into the host genome. We have demonstrated efficient plasmid DNA delivery into intact plants of several species with functionalized high-aspect-ratio carbon nanotube (CNT) nanoparticles (NPs), enabling efficient DNA delivery into a variety of non-model plant species (arugula, wheat, and cotton) and resulting in high protein expression levels without transgene integration. Herein, we provide a protocol that can be implemented by plant biologists and adapted to produce functionalized single-walled CNTs (SWNTs) with surface chemistries optimized for delivery of plasmid DNA in a plant species–independent manner. This protocol describes how to prepare, construct, and optimize polyethylenimine (PEI)-functionalized SWNTs and perform plasmid DNA loading. The authors also provide guidance on material characterization, gene expression evaluation, and storage conditions. The entire protocol, from the covalent functionalization of SWNTs to expression quantification, can be completed in 5 d.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of the procedure for plant transformation with PEI-SWNTs.
Fig. 2: Probe-tip sonication setup.
Fig. 3: Suggested usage of Amicon 100,000-MWCO filters for washing.
Fig. 4: Stability of the DNA-loaded PEI-SWNT suspension.
Fig. 5: Infiltration of leaves with DNA-loaded PEI-SWNTs.
Fig. 6: Anticipated results.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All materials are available from commercial sources or can be derived using methods described in this study. All primary data underlying the figures reported in the article can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Goswami, R., Dasgupta, P., Saha, S., Venkatapuram, P. & Nandi, S. Resource integration in smallholder farms for sustainable livelihoods in developing countries. Cogent Food Agric. 2, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2016.1272151 (2016).

  2. Altpeter, F. et al. Advancing crop transformation in the era of genome editing. Plant Cell 28, 1510–1520 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Himmel, M. E. et al. Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315, 804–807 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baltes, N. J., Gil-Humanes, J. & Voytas, D. F. Genome engineering and agriculture: opportunities and challenges. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. 149, 1–26 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Herreraestrella, L., Depicker, A., Vanmontagu, M. & Schell, J. Expression of chimaeric genes transferred into plant-cells using a Ti-plasmid-derived vector. Nature 303, 209–213 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Binns, A. N. Agrobacterium-mediated gene delivery and the biology of host range limitations. Physiol. Plant. 79, 135–139 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Klein, T. M., Wolf, E. D., Wu, R. & Sanford, J. C. High-velocity microprojectiles for delivering nucleic-acids into living cells. Nature 327, 70–73 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cunningham, F. J., Goh, N. S., Demirer, G. S., Matos, J. L. & Landry, M. P. Nanoparticle-mediated delivery towards advancing plant genetic engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 36, 882–897 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Russell, J. A., Roy, M. K. & Sanford, J. C. Physical trauma and tungsten toxicity reduce the efficiency of biolistic transformation. Plant Physiol. 98, 1050–1056 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, Q. et al. Carbon nanotubes as molecular transporters for walled plant cells. Nano Lett. 9, 1007–1010 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Serag, M. F. et al. Trafficking and subcellular localization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in plant cells. ACS Nano 5, 493–499 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang, F.-P. et al. A simple plant gene delivery system using mesoporous silica nanoparticles as carriers. J. Mater. Chem. B 1, 5279–5287 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, H. et al. DNA nanostructures coordinate gene silencing in mature plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7543–7548 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ng, K. K. et al. Intracellular delivery of proteins via fusion peptides in intact plants. PLoS One 11, e0154081 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitter, N. et al. Clay nanosheets for topical delivery of RNAi for sustained protection against plant viruses. Nat. Plants 3, 16207 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Giraldo, J. P. et al. Plant nanobionics approach to augment photosynthesis and biochemical sensing. Nat. Mater. 13, 400–408 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Demirer, G. S., Zhang, H., Goh, N. S., Chang, R. & Landry, M. P. Nanotubes effectively deliver siRNA to intact plant cells and protect siRNA against nuclease degradation. Preprint at bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/564427 (2019).

  18. Demirer, G. S. et al. High aspect ratio nanomaterials enable delivery of functional genetic material without DNA integration in mature plants. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 456–464 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwak, S.-Y. et al. Nanosensor technology applied to living plant systems. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 10, 113–140 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong, M. H. et al. Nitroaromatic detection and infrared communication from wild-type plants using plant nanobionics. Nat. Mater. 16, 264 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Del Bonis-O’Donnell, J. T. et al. Engineering molecular recognition with bio-mimetic polymers on single walled carbon nanotubes. J. Vis. Exp. 2017, e55030 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kwak, S.-Y. et al. Chloroplast-selective gene delivery and expression in planta using chitosan-complexed single-walled carbon nanotube carriers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 447–455 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, Y. et al. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat. Commun. 7, 12617 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, P., Lombi, E., Zhao, F. J. & Kopittke, P. M. Nanotechnology: a new opportunity in plant sciences. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 699–712 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kikkert, J. R., Vidal, J. R. & Reisch, B. I. in Transgenic Plants: Methods and Protocols 61-78 (Springer, 2005).

  26. Liu, Y., Yang, H. & Sakanishi, A. Ultrasound: mechanical gene transfer into plant cells by sonoporation. Biotechnol. Adv. 24, 1–16 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Asad, S. & Arshad, M. Silicon carbide whisker-mediated plant transformation. in Properties and Applications of Silicon Carbide, 345-358 (InTech Open, 2011).

  28. Lakshmanan, M., Kodama, Y., Yoshizumi, T., Sudesh, K. & Numata, K. Rapid and efficient gene delivery into plant cells using designed peptide carriers. Biomacromolecules 14, 10–16 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoo, S.-D., Cho, Y.-H. & Sheen, J. J. Np Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1565-–1572 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vashist, S. K. Comparison of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide based strategies to crosslink antibodies on amine-functionalized platforms for immunodiagnostic applications. Diagnostics 2, (23–33 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dobnik, D., Stebih, D., Blejec, A., Morisset, D. & Zel, J. Multiplex quantification of four DNA targets in one reaction with Bio-Rad droplet digital PCR system for GMO detection. Sci. Rep. 6, 35451 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Collier, R. et al. Accurate measurement of transgene copy number in crop plants using droplet digital PCR. Plant J. 90, 1014–1025 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, J. D., Ruschhaupt, M. & Biczok, R. ddCt method for qRT–PCR data analysis http://bioconductor.jp/packages/2.14/bioc/vignettes/ddCt/inst/doc/rtPCR.pdf (2010).

  34. Zheng, N., Song, Z., Liu, Y., Yin, L. & Cheng, J. Gene delivery into isolated Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts and intact leaves using cationic, α-helical polypeptide. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 11, 521–528 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chugh, A. & Eudes, F. Study of uptake of cell penetrating peptides and their cargoes in permeabilized wheat immature embryos. FEBS J. 275, 2403–2414 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chuah, J.-A., Yoshizumi, T., Kodama, Y. & Numata, K. J. Sr Gene introduction into the mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana via peptide-based carriers. Sci. Rep. 5, 7751 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award at the Scientific Interface (CASI), a Stanley Fahn PDF Junior Faculty Grant under award no. PF-JFA-1760, a Beckman Foundation Young Investigator Award, a USDA AFRI award, a grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, a USDA NIFA award, a USDA-BBT EAGER award, support from the Chan-Zuckerberg Foundation, and an FFAR New Innovator Award (to M.P.L.). G.S.D. was supported by a Schlumberger Foundation Faculty for the Future Fellowship. H.Z. acknowledges the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21605153). We also acknowledge support from the UC Berkeley Molecular Imaging Center (supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation), the QB3 Shared Stem Cell Facility, and the Innovative Genomics Institute (IGI). We are grateful to the Staskawicz lab at UC Berkeley for the N. benthamiana seeds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.S.D. and M.P.L. designed the experiments. G.S.D., H.Z., and N.S.G. performed the experiments. G.S.D. analyzed the data and created the figures. G.S.D., H.Z., N.S.G., and E.G.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markita P. Landry.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Protocols thanks Ardemis Boghossian, Mohammad Ramezani and other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key reference using this protocol

Demirer, G. S. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 456–464 (2019): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-019-0382-5

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Characterization and comparison of heat reaction and EDC/NHS coupling for the synthesis of PEI-SWNTs.

a, XPS nitrogen peaks for the heat reacted PEI-SWNTs: amine peak at 399 eV and amide peak at 401 eV. b, XPS nitrogen peaks for the EDC/NHS reacted PEI-SWNTs. c, Zeta potential measurements of COOH-SWNTs, PEI-SWNTs via heat reaction, and DNA loaded PEI-SWNTs. ****P < 0.0001 and *P = 0.0191 in two-way ANOVA. N=3 and error bars are standard deviation. d, Zeta potential measurements of COOH-SWNTs, PEI-SWNTs via EDC/NHS coupling, and DNA loaded PEI-SWNTs. ****P < 0.0001and **P = 0.0025 in two-way ANOVA. N=3 and error bars are standard deviation. e, Representative confocal images at Day 3 and 10 of wild-type Nicotiana benthamiana leaves infiltrated with DNA-PEI-SWNTs prepared via heat reaction. e, Representative confocal images at Day 3 and 10 of wild-type Nicotiana benthamiana leaves infiltrated with DNA-PEI-SWNTs prepared via EDC/NHS coupling. All scale bars are 50 µm.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demirer, G.S., Zhang, H., Goh, N.S. et al. Carbon nanotube–mediated DNA delivery without transgene integration in intact plants. Nat Protoc 14, 2954–2971 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0208-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0208-9

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research