Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Monitoring early S-phase origin firing and replication fork movement by sequencing nascent DNA from synchronized cells

Abstract

A better understanding of DNA replication initiation in human cells and how this process is altered upon DNA replication stress requires the ability to study origin firing genome wide. Previously described methods of mapping DNA replication origins in higher eukaryotes rely principally on fractionation of DNA fragments based on their size and, optionally, on the presence of ribonucleotides at their 5ʹ end. Here, we describe a protocol for EdUseq-HU, a method for mapping early S-phase replication origins. Cells, synchronized by mitotic shake-off, are released in medium containing 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU; to label nascent DNA) and hydroxyurea (HU; to limit fork progression after origin firing). After using click chemistry to tag the EdU label with a biotin conjugate that is cleavable under mild conditions, the nascent DNA is captured on streptavidin beads. One variant of EdUseq-HU allows mapping of DNA replication origins on the genome at a resolution of 10 kb, and a second variant monitors progression of replication forks. Using EdUseq-HU, the spatiotemporal program of DNA replication in human cell lines can be interrogated in <2 weeks. The protocol requires basic cell culture and molecular biology skills, as well as familiarity with the Perl programming language and the Linux operating system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Outline of the protocol.
Fig. 2: Flow cytometry controls.
Fig. 3: Anticipated results.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fragkos, M., Ganier, O., Coulombe, P. & Méchali, M. DNA replication origin activation in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 360–374 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Macheret, M. & Halazonetis, T. D. Intragenic origins due to short G1 phases underlie oncogene-induced DNA replication stress. Nature 555, 112–116 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Woodward, A. M. et al. Excess Mcm2-7 license dormant origins of replication that can be used under conditions of replicative stress. J. Cell Biol. 173, 673–683 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ge, X. Q., Jackson, D. A. & Blow, J. J. Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replicative stress. Genes Dev. 21, 3331–3341 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anglana, M., Apiou, F., Bensimon, A. & Debatisse, M. Dynamics of DNA replication in mammalian somatic cells: nucleotide pool modulates origin choice and interorigin spacing. Cell 114, 385–394 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rhind, N. & Gilbert, D. M. DNA replication timing. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a010132 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Halazonetis, T. D., Gorgoulis, V. G. & Bartek, J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319, 1352–1355 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Macheret, M. & Halazonetis, T. D. DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 10, 425–448 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeman, M. K. & Cimprich, K. A. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 2–9 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Katou, Y. et al. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424, 1078–1083 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MacAlpine, D. M. Coordination of replication and transcription along a Drosophila chromosome. Genes Dev. 18, 3094–3105 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Karnani, N. & Dutta, A. The effect of the intra-S-phase checkpoint on origins of replication in human cells. Genes Dev. 25, 621–633 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fu, H. et al. Mapping replication origin sequences in eukaryotic chromosomes. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 65, 22.20.1–22.20.17 (2014). (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Brabander, M. J., Van de Veire, R. M., Aerts, F. E., Borgers, M. & Janssen, P. A. The effects of methyl (5-(2-thienyl carbonyl)-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl) carbamate, (R 17934; NSC 238159), a new synthetic antitumoral drug interfering with microtubules, on mammalian cells cultured in vitro. Cancer Res. 36, 905–916 (1976).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meldal, M. & Tornøe, C. W. Cu-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition. Chem. Rev. 108, 2952–3015 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Salic, A. & Mitchison, T. J. A chemical method for fast and sensitive detection of DNA synthesis in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2415–2420 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koç, A., Wheeler, L. J., Mathews, C. K. & Merrill, G. F. Hydroxyurea arrests DNA replication by a mechanism that preserves basal dNTP pools. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 223–230 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dellino, G. I. et al. Genome-wide mapping of human DNA-replication origins: Levels of transcription at ORC1 sites regulate origin selection and replication timing. Genome Res. 23, 1–11 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mesner, L. D., Crawford, E. L. & Hamlin, J. L. Isolating apparently pure libraries of replication origins from complex genomes. Mol. Cell 21, 719–726 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin, M. M. et al. Genome-wide depletion of replication initiation events in highly transcribed regions. Genome Res. 21, 1822–1832 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Besnard, E. et al. Unraveling cell type-specific and reprogrammable human replication origin signatures associated with G-quadruplex consensus motifs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 837–844 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Petryk, N. et al. Replication landscape of the human genome. Nat. Commun. 7, 10208 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Urban, J. M., Foulk, M. S., Casella, C. & Gerbi, S. A. The hunt for origins of DNA replication in multicellular eukaryotes. F1000Prime Rep. 7, 30 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vashee, S. et al. Sequence-independent DNA binding and replication initiation by the human origin recognition complex. Genes Dev. 17, 1894–1908 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Foulk, M. S., Urban, J. M., Casella, C. & Gerbi, S. A. Characterizing and controlling intrinsic biases of lambda exonuclease in nascent strand sequencing reveals phasing between nucleosomes and G-quadruplex motifs around a subset of human replication origins. Genome Res. 25, 725–735 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank present and past laboratory members for helpful discussions, N. Roggli for help with the graphics scripts and M. Docquier and the Genomics Platform of the University of Geneva for scientific input and for performing the high-throughput sequencing. This work was supported by grants from the European Commission (ONIDDAC) and the Swiss Science National Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.D.H. and M.M. designed the experiments and wrote the paper; M.M. performed the experiments; T.D.H. wrote the computer scripts with contributions from M.M.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thanos D. Halazonetis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related link

Key reference using this protocol

Macheret, M. & Halazonetis, T. D. Nature 555, 112–116 (2018): https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25507

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Gating strategy.

Typical flow cytometry profiles of U2OS cells (with normal levels of cyclin E) that were released into medium containing EdU (25 µM) for 14 h after mitosis exit. The strategy used to analyse the flow cytometry profiles consists of first gating the cells based on their distribution in the forward scatter/ side scatter plot (gate A, left panel); then, a second gate is applied to eliminate cell doublets on the propidium iodide (PI) peak height versus integral plot (gate B, center-left panel). After gating, the DNA content histograms and the EdU versus DNA content density scatter plots of the cells are plotted.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Macheret, M., Halazonetis, T.D. Monitoring early S-phase origin firing and replication fork movement by sequencing nascent DNA from synchronized cells. Nat Protoc 14, 51–67 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0081-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0081-y

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing