Protocol | Published:

Speed breeding in growth chambers and glasshouses for crop breeding and model plant research

Nature Protocolsvolume 13pages29442963 (2018) | Download Citation


‘Speed breeding’ (SB) shortens the breeding cycle and accelerates crop research through rapid generation advancement. SB can be carried out in numerous ways, one of which involves extending the duration of plants’ daily exposure to light, combined with early seed harvest, to cycle quickly from seed to seed, thereby reducing the generation times for some long-day (LD) or day-neutral crops. In this protocol, we present glasshouse and growth chamber–based SB approaches with supporting data from experimentation with several crops. We describe the conditions that promote the rapid growth of bread wheat, durum wheat, barley, oat, various Brassica species, chickpea, pea, grass pea, quinoa and Brachypodium distachyon. Points of flexibility within the protocols are highlighted, including how plant density can be increased to efficiently scale up plant numbers for single-seed descent (SSD). In addition, instructions are provided on how to perform SB on a small scale in a benchtop growth cabinet, enabling optimization of parameters at a low cost.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key references using this protocol

Watson, A. & Ghosh, S. et al. Nat. Plants 4, 23–29 (2018):

Hickey, L. T. et al. Euphytica 168, 303–310 (2009):

O’Connor, D. J. et al. Peanut Sci. 40, 107–114 (2013):


  1. 1.

    Watson, A. et al. Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding. Nat. Plants 4, 23–29 (2018).

  2. 2.

    Sysoeva, M. I., Markovskaya, E. F. & Shibaeva, T. G. Plants under continuous light: a review. Plant Stress 4, 5–17 (2010).

  3. 3.

    Croser, J. S. et al. Time to flowering of temperate pulses in vivo and generation turnover in vivoin vitro of narrow-leaf lupin accelerated by low red to far-red ratio and high intensity in the far-red region. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 127, 591–599 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Mobini, S. H., Lulsdorf, M., Warkentin, T. D. & Vandenberg, A. Low red: far-red light ratio causes faster in vitro flowering in lentil. Can. J. Plant Sci. 96, 908–918 (2016).

  5. 5.

    Mobini, S. H. & Warkentin, T. D. A simple and efficient method of in vivo rapid generation technology in pea (Pisum sativum L.). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 52, 530–536 (2016).

  6. 6.

    Pazos-Navarro, M., Castello, M., Bennett, R. G., Nichols, P. & Croser, J. In vitro-assisted single-seed descent for breeding-cycle compression in subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Crop Pasture Sci. 68, 958–966 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Knott, D. & Kumar, J. Comparison of early generation yield testing and a single seed descent procedure in wheat breeding. Crop Sci. 15, 295–299 (1975).

  8. 8.

    Wheeler, R. et al. NASA’s biomass production chamber: a testbed for bioregenerative life support studies. Adv. Space Res. 18, 215–224 (1996).

  9. 9.

    Hickey, L. T. et al. Grain dormancy in fixed lines of white-grained wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under controlled environmental conditions. Euphytica 168, 303–310 (2009).

  10. 10.

    O’Connor, D. et al. Development and application of speed breeding technologies in a commercial peanut breeding program. Peanut Sci. 40, 107–114 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Alahmad, S. et al. Speed breeding for multiple quantitative traits in durum wheat. Plant Methods 14, 36 (2018).

  12. 12.

    Dinglasan, E., Godwin, I. D., Mortlock, M. Y. & Hickey, L. T. Resistance to yellow spot in wheat grown under accelerated growth conditions. Euphytica 209, 693–707 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Riaz, A., Periyannan, S., Aitken, E. & Hickey, L. A rapid phenotyping method for adult plant resistance to leaf rust in wheat. Plant Methods 12, 17 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Hickey, L. T. et al. Rapid phenotyping for adult-plant resistance to stripe rust in wheat. Plant Breed. 131, 54–61 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Hickey, L.T. et al. Speed breeding for multiple disease resistance in barley. Euphytica 213, 64 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Ortiz, R. et al. High yield potential, shuttle breeding, genetic diversity, and a new international wheat improvement strategy. Euphytica 157, 365–384 (2007).

  17. 17.

    Wada, K. C. & Takeno, K. Stress-induced flowering. Plant Signal. Behav. 5, 944–947 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Collard, B. C. et al. Revisiting rice breeding methods–evaluating the use of rapid generation advance (RGA) for routine rice breeding. Plant Prod. Sci. 20, 337–352 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Yao, Y. et al. How to advance up to seven generations of canola (Brassica napus L.) per annum for the production of pure line populations? Euphytica 209, 113–119 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Bermejo, C., Gatti, I. & Cointry, E. In vitro embryo culture to shorten the breeding cycle in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 127, 585–590 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Mobini, S. H., Lulsdorf, M., Warkentin, T. D. & Vandenberg, A. Plant growth regulators improve in vitro flowering and rapid generation advancement in lentil and faba bean. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 51, 71–79 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Castello, M. et al. In vitro reproduction in the annual pasture legumes subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) and French serradella (Ornithopus sativus Brot.). Grass Forage Sci. 71, 79–89 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Zheng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, G., Yan, G. & Liu, C. A procedure allowing up to eight generations of wheat and nine generations of barley per annum. Euphytica 191, 311–316 (2013).

  24. 24.

    Yao, Y., Zhang, P., Liu, H., Lu, Z. & Yan, G. A fully in vitro protocol towards large scale production of recombinant inbred lines in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 128, 655–661 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Ochatt, S. et al. New approaches towards the shortening of generation cycles for faster breeding of protein legumes. Plant Breed. 121, 436–440 (2002).

  26. 26.

    Roumet, P. & Morin, F. Germination of immature soybean seeds to shorten reproductive cycle duration. Crop Sci. 37, 521–525 (1997).

  27. 27.

    Liu, H. et al. A fast generation cycling system for oat and triticale breeding. Plant Breed. 135, 574–579 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Ribalta, F. et al. Antigibberellin-induced reduction of internode length favors in vitro flowering and seed-set in different pea genotypes. Biol. Plant. 58, 39–46 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Ribalta, F. et al. Precocious floral initiation and identification of exact timing of embryo physiological maturity facilitate germination of immature seeds to truncate the lifecycle of pea. Plant Growth Regul. 81, 345–353 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Wang, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, G. & Ma, Z. An integrated breeding technology for accelerating generation advancement and trait introgression in cotton. Plant Breed. 130, 569–573 (2011).

  31. 31.

    Velez-Ramirez, A. I. et al. A single locus confers tolerance to continuous light and allows substantial yield increase in tomato. Nat. Commun. 5, 4549 (2014).

  32. 32.

    Gebologlu, N., Bozmaz, S., Aydin, M. & Çakmak, P. The role of growth regulators, embryo age and genotypes on immature embryo germination and rapid generation advancement in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10, 4895–4900 (2011).

  33. 33.

    Bhattarai, S. P., de la Pena, R. C., Midmore, D. J. & Palchamy, K. In vitro culture of immature seed for rapid generation advancement in tomato. Euphytica 167, 23–30 (2009).

  34. 34.

    Tanaka, J., Hayashi, T. & Iwata, H. A practical, rapid generation-advancement system for rice breeding using simplified biotron breeding system. Breed. Sci. 66, 542–551 (2016).

  35. 35.

    De La Fuente, G. N., Frei, U. K. & Lubberstedt, T. Accelerating plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 667–672 (2013).

  36. 36.

    Dwivedi, S. L. et al. Haploids: constraints and opportunities in plant breeding. Biotechnol. Adv. 33, 812–829 (2015).

  37. 37.

    Katagiri, F. et al. Design and construction of an inexpensive homemade plant growth chamber. PLoS ONE 10, e0126826 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Tran, T.M. & Braun, D.M. An inexpensive, easy‐to‐use, and highly customizable growth chamber optimized for growing large plants. Curr. Protoc. Plant Biol. 2, 299-317 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Thomas, B. & Vince-Prue, D. Photoperiodism in Plants 2nd edn (Academic Press, San Diego, 1996).

  40. 40.

    Jackson, S. D. Plant responses to photoperiod. New Phytol. 181, 517–531 (2009).

  41. 41.

    Stetter, M. G. et al. Crossing methods and cultivation conditions for rapid production of segregating populations in three grain amaranth species. Front.Plant Sci. 7, 816 (2016).

  42. 42.

    Evans, L. Short day induction of inflorescence initiation in some winter wheat varieties. Funct. Plant Biol. 14, 277–286 (1987).

  43. 43.

    Davidson, J., Christian, K., Jones, D. & Bremner, P. Responses of wheat to vernalization and photoperiod. Crop Pasture Sci. 36, 347–359 (1985).

  44. 44.

    Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14, 415–421 (1974).

  45. 45.

    Sylvester-Bradley, R. A code for stages of development in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Aspects Appl. Biol. 6, 399–418 (1984).

  46. 46.

    Sosa‐Zuniga, V., Brito, V., Fuentes, F. & Steinfort, U. Phenological growth stages of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) based on the BBCH scale. Ann. Appl. Biol. 171, 117–124 (2017).

  47. 47.

    Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T. & Pennington, J. S. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 11, 929–931 (1971).

  48. 48.

    Pretorius, Z. A., Park, R. F. & Wellings, C. R. An accelerated method for evaluating adult-plant resistance to leaf and stripe rust in spring wheat. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 35, 359–364 (2000).

  49. 49.

    Riaz, A. & Hickey, L.T. in Wheat Rust Diseases: Methods and Protocols, Vol. 1659 (ed Periyannan, S.) 183–196 (Humana Press, New York, 2017).

Download references


We acknowledge the support of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) strategic programmes Designing Future Wheat (BB/P016855/1), Molecules from Nature (BB/P012523/1), Understanding and Exploiting Plant and Microbial Metabolism (BB/J004561/1), Food and Health (BB/J004545/1) and Food Innovation and Health (BB/R012512/1), and also support from the Gatsby Charitable Foundation. Development of the benchtop cabinet was supported by an OpenPlant Fund grant from the joint Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and BBSRC-funded OpenPlant Synthetic Biology Research Centre grant BB/L014130/1. S.G. was supported by a Monsanto Beachell-Borlaug International Scholarship and the 2Blades Foundation, A.Sarkar by the BBSRC Detox Grasspea project (BB/L011719/1) and the John Innes Foundation, A.W. by an Australian Post-graduate Award and the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) Industry Top-up Scholarship (project code GRS11008), M.M.-S. by CONACYT-I2T2 Nuevo León (grant code 266954/399852), and L.T.H. by an Australian Research Council Early Career Discovery Research Award (project code DE170101296). We acknowledge M. Grantham and D. Napier from Heliospectra for their help in the choice of LED lights; L. Hernan and C. Ramírez from Newcastle University for their support and advice in the design of the benchtop cabinet; C. Moreau from the John Innes Centre and J. Ghosh from the University of Bedfordshire for help with the pea and grass pea experiments, respectively; and the JIC and UQ horticulture services for plant husbandry and their support in scaling up SB in glasshouses.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Sreya Ghosh, Amy Watson.


  1. John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK

    • Sreya Ghosh
    • , Ricardo H. Ramirez-Gonzalez
    • , James Simmonds
    • , Rachel Wells
    • , Tracey Rayner
    • , Amber Hafeez
    • , Sadiye Hayta
    • , Rachel E. Melton
    • , Andrew Steed
    • , Abhimanyu Sarkar
    • , Jeremy Carter
    • , Lionel Perkins
    • , John Lord
    • , Anne Osbourn
    • , Paul Nicholson
    • , Wendy Harwood
    • , Cathie Martin
    • , Claire Domoney
    • , Cristobal Uauy
    •  & Brande B. H. Wulff
  2. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    • Amy Watson
    •  & Lee T. Hickey
  3. Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK

    • Oscar E. Gonzalez-Navarro
    •  & Brittany Hazard
  4. Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK

    • Luis Yanes
  5. Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    • Marcela Mendoza-Suárez
  6. The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK

    • Phon Green
    •  & Matthew J. Moscou
  7. Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia

    • Mark Tester


  1. Search for Sreya Ghosh in:

  2. Search for Amy Watson in:

  3. Search for Oscar E. Gonzalez-Navarro in:

  4. Search for Ricardo H. Ramirez-Gonzalez in:

  5. Search for Luis Yanes in:

  6. Search for Marcela Mendoza-Suárez in:

  7. Search for James Simmonds in:

  8. Search for Rachel Wells in:

  9. Search for Tracey Rayner in:

  10. Search for Phon Green in:

  11. Search for Amber Hafeez in:

  12. Search for Sadiye Hayta in:

  13. Search for Rachel E. Melton in:

  14. Search for Andrew Steed in:

  15. Search for Abhimanyu Sarkar in:

  16. Search for Jeremy Carter in:

  17. Search for Lionel Perkins in:

  18. Search for John Lord in:

  19. Search for Mark Tester in:

  20. Search for Anne Osbourn in:

  21. Search for Matthew J. Moscou in:

  22. Search for Paul Nicholson in:

  23. Search for Wendy Harwood in:

  24. Search for Cathie Martin in:

  25. Search for Claire Domoney in:

  26. Search for Cristobal Uauy in:

  27. Search for Brittany Hazard in:

  28. Search for Brande B. H. Wulff in:

  29. Search for Lee T. Hickey in:


S.G. and A.W. drafted the manuscript and oversaw many of the experiments. L.T.H. and B.B.H.W. contributed to the design of experiments and manuscript writing. A.W. designed and implemented the SSD approach for wheat and barley in the LED-supplemented glasshouse at UQ. S.G., O.E.G.-N., R.H.R.-G., L.Y. and M.M.-S. designed, constructed, programmed and tested the benchtop growth cabinet. J.C. performed the energy consumption calculations for the LED-supplemented glasshouse at JIC. For the LED-supplemented glasshouse at JIC, J.S. performed the experiments for wheat, including the SSDs; R.W. for brassicas; R.E.M. for oats; S.H. for additional wheat cultivars; P.G. for barley; T.R. for pea; A.H. for quinoa; A. Sarkar for grass pea; and A. Steed for Brachypodium. J.L., L.P., C.D., M.J.M., W.H., A.O., C.M., C.U., B.H., M.T., P.N., B.B.H.W. and L.T.H. contributed intellectually to the experiments and/or the writing of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript before submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Brande B. H. Wulff or Lee T. Hickey.

Integrated supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Figure 1 Mature eight-week-old pea plants grown in limited media and nutrition (“flask method”) in order to achieve rapid generation advancement.

    Pisum sativum (a) accession JI 2822 and (b) cv. Frisson. Dry seeds were sterilised in 10% sodium hypochlorite, rinsed in sterile water, chipped and left to germinate in the dark for 3 days on sterile, wet filter paper. Germinating seeds were transferred to flasks containing 250 mL fine perlite and silver sand (mixed 50:50) and FP nutrient media which had been sterilised (composition described in Supplementary Table 49). Flasks were placed in the dark for a further 5 days. The seedlings were inoculated with Rhizobium, and the elongated shoot passed through the neck of the flask and held in place with a bung. The base of the flask was covered with a black plastic bag. Plants were grown in a Controlled Environment Room at constant 22 °C with a 16-hour photoperiod. After 3 weeks, flasks were watered with 50 mL FP media once a week. After 8 weeks post germination, plants had mature dry seed ready to harvest as shown (indicated by red arrows). JI 2822 plants grown in the glasshouse under lights required 12 weeks post sowing before mature dry seed were ready for harvest.

  2. Supplementary Figure 2 Symptoms of calcium deficiency in wheat grown under speed breeding conditions.

    Right: Small, circular depressions on the leaf blade; Left: Tip leaf necrosis.

  3. Supplementary Figure 3

    Circuit diagram of the monitoring and control system of the benchtop growth cabinet.

  4. Supplementary Figure 4 Benchtop cabinet for conducting speed breeding.

    (a) Front view of the cabinet. (b) Front view of the cabinet with the door open to show the lighting and wheat plants (Triticum aestivum cv. Apogee) growing inside. (c) Apogee wheat plant grown in the cabinet, photographed at 55 DAS (Days after sowing). (d) Pea (Pisum sativum) variety JI 2822 grown in the cabinet, photographed at 50 DAS.

  5. Supplementary Figure 5 Light spectrum measurements in in the benchtop growth cabinet 20 cm below one of the LED bulbs.

    The x-axis represents the wavelength of light in nanometres, and y-axis is the normalised spectral power distribution. (Power distribution is measured in mW.m-2, and all values on y-axis are divided by the maximum value in the distribution in order to obtain normalised values). Graph was produced from measurements made by the MK350S LED meter from UPRtek, using the uSpectrum software produced by the same manufacturer.

  6. Supplementary Figure 6 Barley spikes from plants grown under Heliospectra LED lights.

    Barley cv. Golden Promise from 22-hour light regime (left) and 16-hour light regime (right). Scale bar is 5 cm.

  7. Supplementary Figure 7 Pods from Brassica rapa R-0-13 grown in LED-supplemented glasshouses at the John Innes Centre, UK.

    Plants grown under (a) a 22-hour photoperiod or (b) a 16-hour photoperiod.

  8. Supplementary Figure 8 Pods harvested from Brassica napus RV31 grown in LED-supplemented glasshouses at the John Innes Centre, UK.

    Plants grown under (a) a 22-hour photoperiod or (b) a 16-hour photoperiod.

  9. Supplementary Figure 9 Layout of the glasshouse used for speed breeding at the John Innes Centre, UK.

    (Left) Photograph with Heliospectra LX60C2 LED supplementary lighting; (Right) Schematic of light positioning within the glasshouse relative to the bench, plants and other light fixtures.

  10. Supplementary Figure 10 Layout of the glasshouse used for speed breeding at The University of Queensland, Australia.

    (Left) Photograph with Heliospectra E602G LED supplementary lighting; (Right) Schematic of light positioning within the glasshouse relative to the bench, plants and other light fixtures.

  11. Supplementary Figure 11 Light spectrum measurements under a Heliospectra LX602C LED fixture in JIC glasshouse.

    (a) Spectrum measurement in the glasshouse at bench level (244 cm from light fixture) on a clear, sunny day at 12 noon. (b) Spectrum measurement in the glasshouse at bench level (244 cm from light fixture) on a cloudy day at 12 noon. (c) Spectrum measurement in the glasshouse at bench level (244 cm from light fixture) at night. The x-axis of all three graphs represents the wavelength of light in nanometres, and y-axis is the normalised spectral power distribution. (Power distribution is measured in mW.m-2, and all values on y-axis are divided by the maximum value in the distribution in order to obtain normalised values). All graphs were produced from measurements made by the MK350S LED meter from UPRtek, using the uSpectrum software produced by the same manufacturer.

  12. Supplementary Figure 12 Light spectrum measurements under a Heliospectra E602G LED fixture in the UQ glasshouse.

    Weighted McCree action spectrum and photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD; µmol.m-2.s-1) from under a Heliospectra E602G light using the Spectrum Genius Essence Lighting Passport light sensor and associated Spectrum Genius Agricultural Lighting app (AsenseTek Inc., Taiwan). (1) Centre measurement at 12 noon on a clear, sunny day, (2) Centre measurement at 12 noon on an overcast day and, (3) Centre measurement at night; a, bench level (155 cm from light) and b, approximate wheat spike height (95 cm from light). Figures were exported from the software.

  13. Supplementary Figure 13 Symptoms of copper deficiency in wheat grown under speed breeding conditions.

    Left (top): Curling and death of young leaf tips and down the leaf blade; Left (bottom): Young leaves becoming stuck as they emerge and forming loops or curling; Right (top and bottom): Spikes wither and turn white at the tips. No seed is produced in these areas and spikes may be twisted.

  14. Supplementary Figure 14 Symptoms of iron deficiency in wheat grown under speed breeding conditions.

    Young leaves appear striped with yellowing of the interveinal spaces.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1–14 and Supplementary Tables 1–49

  2. Reporting Summary

About this article

Publication history




By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.