Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Human PRPS1 filaments stabilize allosteric sites to regulate activity

Abstract

The universally conserved enzyme phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase (PRPS) assembles filaments in evolutionarily diverse organisms. PRPS is a key regulator of nucleotide metabolism, and mutations in the human enzyme PRPS1 lead to a spectrum of diseases. Here we determine structures of human PRPS1 filaments in active and inhibited states, with fixed assembly contacts accommodating both conformations. The conserved assembly interface stabilizes the binding site for the essential activator phosphate, increasing activity in the filament. Some disease mutations alter assembly, supporting the link between filament stability and activity. Structures of active PRPS1 filaments turning over substrate also reveal coupling of catalysis in one active site with product release in an adjacent site. PRPS1 filaments therefore provide an additional layer of allosteric control, conserved throughout evolution, with likely impact on metabolic homeostasis. Stabilization of allosteric binding sites by polymerization adds to the growing diversity of assembly-based enzyme regulatory mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Biochemical and structural overview of PRPP synthetase.
Fig. 2: Presence of phosphate or ADP dictate filament structure of PRPS1.
Fig. 3: The allosteric interface coordinates catalysis across protomers.
Fig. 4: Mutation of filament interface residues decreases catalysis.
Fig. 5: Filament formation stabilizes the C terminus and allosteric site.
Fig. 6: Mutations near the N and C termini alter filament formation, which correlates with catalysis.
Fig. 7: PRPS1 filaments stabilize the allosteric site, reinforcing the inhibited and active conformations and facilitating a catalytic reload mechanism.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The cryo-EM maps generated for this manuscript are available from the EMDB (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/) at the accession codes listed in Tables 13 of the manuscript (EMDB IDs: EMD-27279, EMD-27280, EMD-27281, EMD-27282, EMD-27283, EMD-27284, EMD-27285, EMD-27286, EMD-27287, EMD-27288, EMD-27289, EMD-27290, EMD-27291, EMD-27292, EMD-27293, EMD-27294, EMD-27295). The protein models generated for this manuscript are available from the RCSB PDB (https://www.rcsb.org/) at the accession codes listed in Tables 13 of the manuscript (PDB IDs: 8DBC, 8DBD, 8DBE, 8DBF, 8DBG, 8DBH, 8DBI, 8DBJ, 8DBK, 8DBL, 8DBM, 8DBN, 8DBO). Protein sequences identified by the NCBI online portal for BLAST (v2.13.0; https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) were queried on the ‘non-redundant protein sequences (nr)’ database. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Hove-Jensen, B. et al. Phosphoribosyl diphosphate (PRPP): biosynthesis, enzymology, utilization and metabolic significance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 81, e00040-16 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kornberg, A., Lieberman, I. & Simms, E. S. Enzymatic synthesis and properties of 5-phosphoribosylpyrophosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 215, 389–402 (1955).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Uhlén, M. et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fagerberg, L. et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 13, 397–406 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Brouwer, A. P. M. et al. PRPS1 mutations: four distinct syndromes and potential treatment. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86, 506–518 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sperling, O., Eilam, G., And, S.-P.-B. & de Vries, A. A. Familial abnormality associated with excessive uric acid production and gout. Biochem. Med. 6, 310–316 (1972).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wada, Y. et al. Mentally retarded infant with a defect of 5-phosphoribosyl-I-pyrophosphate synthetase of erythrocytes. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 113, 149–157 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Willemoës, M., Hove-Jensen, B. & Larsen, S. Steady state kinetic model for the binding of substrates and allosteric effectors to Escherichia coli phosphoribosyl-diphosphate synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35408–35412 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox, I. H. & Kelley, W. N. Human phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase: distribution, purification and properties. J. Biol. Chem. 246, 5739–5748 (1971).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Switzer, R. L. & Sogin, D. C. Regulation and mechanism of phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 248, 1063–1073 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tatibana, M. et al. Mammalian phosphribosyl-pyrophosphate synthetase. Adv. Enzym. Regul. 35, 229–249 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernando, Y., Carter, A. T., Parr, A., Hove-Jensen, B. & Schweizer, M. Genetic analysis and enzyme activity suggest the existence of more than one minimal functional unit capable of synthesizing phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12480–12487 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taira, M. et al. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of two distinct cDNAs for rat phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 14867–14870 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Taira, M., Lizasa, T., Yamada, K., Shimada, H. & Tatibana, M. Tissue-differential expression of two distinct genes for phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase and existence of the testis-specific transcript. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1007, 203–208 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishizuka, T. et al. Short sequence-paper cloning and sequencing of human complementary DNA for the phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase-associated protein 39. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1306, 27–30 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katashima, R. et al. Molecular cloning of a human cDNA for the 41-kDa phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase-associated protein 1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1396, 245–250 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kita, K., Ishizuka, T., Ishijima, S., Sonoda, T. & Tatibana, M. A novel 39-kDa phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase-associated protein of rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 8334–8340 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eriksen, T. A., Kadziola, A., Bentsen, A.-K., Harlow, K. W. & Larsen, S. Structural basis for the function of Bacillus subtilis phosphoribosyl-pyrophosphate synthetase. Nature 7, 303–308 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, S., Lu, Y., Peng, B. & Ding, J. Crystal structure of human phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase 1 reveals a novel allosteric site. Biochem. J. 401, 39–47 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roth, D. G., Shelton, E. & Deuel, T. F. Purification and properties of phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase from rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 249, 291–296 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Becker, M. A., Meyer, L. J., Huisman, W. H., Lazar, C. & Adams, W. B. Human erythrocyte phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase: subunit analysis and atates of subunit association. J. Biol. Chem. 252, 3911–3918 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meyer, L. J. & Becker, M. A. Human erythrocyte phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase: dependance of activity on state of subunit association. J. Biol. Chem. 252, 3919–3925 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zerez, C. A., Lachant, N. A. & Tanaka, K. R. Decrease in subunit aggregation of phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase: a mechanism for decreased nucleotide concentrations in pyruvate kinase-deficient human erythrocytes. Blood 68, 1024–1029 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baugh, L. et al. Combining functional and structural genomics to sample the essential Burkholderia structome. PLoS ONE 8, e53851 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Donini, S. et al. Biochemical and structural investigations on phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase from mycobacterium smegmatis. PLoS ONE 12, e0175815 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Timofeev, V. I. et al. Crystal structure of recombinant phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase 2 from Thermus thermophilus HB27 complexed with ADP and sulfate ions. Acta Crystallogr. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 73, 369–375 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu, H. H. et al. Filamentation modulates allosteric regulation of PRPS. eLife 11, e79552 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Noree, C. et al. A quantitative screen for metabolic enzyme structures reveals patterns of assembly across the yeast metabolic network. Mol. Biol. Cell 30, 2721–2736 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Begovich, K., Yelon, D. & Wilhelm, J. E. PRPS polymerization influences lens fiber organization in zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 249, 1018–1031 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Park, C. K. & Horton, N. C. Structures, functions and mechanisms of filament forming enzymes: a renaissance of enzyme filamentation. Biophys. Rev. 11, 927–994 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lynch, E. M., Kollman, J. M. & Webb, B. A. Filament formation by metabolic enzymes—a new twist on regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 66, 28–33 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Simonet, J. C., Burrell, A. L., Kollman, J. M. & Peterson, J. R. Freedom of assembly: metabolic enzymes come together. Mol. Biol. Cell 31, 1201–1205 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lynch, E. M. & Kollman, J. M. Coupled structural transitions enable highly cooperative regulation of human CTPS2 filaments. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 42–48 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hershko, A., Razin, A. & Mager, J. Regulation of the synthesis of 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate in intact red blood cells and in cell-free preparations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 184, 64–76 (1969).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Losman, M. J. & Becker, M. A. Human phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate (PRPP) synthetase requirements for subunit aggregation. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 165, 427–432 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Burrell, A. L. et al. IMPDH1 retinal variants control filament architecture to tune allosteric regulation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 47–58 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Johnson, M. C. & Kollman, J. M. Cryo-EM structures demonstrate human IMPDH2 filament assembly tunes allosteric regulation. Elife 9, e53243 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hansen, J. M. et al. Cryo-EM structures of CTP synthase filaments reveal mechanism of pH-sensitive assembly during budding yeast starvation. eLife 10, e73368 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou, W. et al. Crystal structure of E. coli PRPP synthetase. BMC Struct. Biol. 19, 1 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen, P. et al. Crystal and EM structures of human phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthase I (PRS1) provide novel insights into the disease-associated mutations. PLoS ONE 10, e0120304 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cherney, M. M., Cherney, L. T., Garen, C. R. & James, M. N. G. The structures of Thermoplasma volcanium phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase bound to ribose-5-phosphate and ATP analogs. J. Mol. Biol. 413, 844–856 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Almoguera, B. et al. Expanding the phenotype of PRPS1 syndromes in females: neuropathy, hearing loss and retinopathy. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 9, 190 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu, X. et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the PRPS1 gene cause a type of nonsyndromic X-linked sensorineural deafness, DFN2. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86, 65–71 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Robusto, M. et al. The expanding spectrum of PRPS1-associated phenotypes: three novel mutations segregating with X-linked hearing loss and mild peripheral neuropathy. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 23, 766–773 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zoref, E., de Vries, A. & Sperling, O. Mutant feedback resistant phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase associated with purine overproduction and gout. Phosphoribosylpyrophosphate and purine metabolism in cultured fibroblasts. J. Clin. Invest. 56, 1093–1099 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Becker, M. A., Smith, P. R., Taylor, W., Mustafi, R. & Switzer, R. L. The genetic and functional basis of purine nucleotide feedback-resistant phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase superactivity. J. Clin. Invest. 96, 2133–2141 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen, P., Li, J., Ma, J., Teng, M. & Li, X. A small disturbance, but a serious disease: the possible mechanism of D52H-mutant of human PRS1 that causes gout. IUBMB Life 65, 518–525 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sperling, O., Boer, P., Brosh, S., Zoref, E. & de Vries, A. Overproduction disease in man due to enzyme feedback resistance mutation. Enzyme 23, 1–9 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cunningham, J. T., Moreno, M. V., Lodi, A., Ronen, S. M. & Ruggero, D. Protein and nucleotide biosynthesis are coupled by a single rate-limiting enzyme, PRPS2, to drive cancer. Cell 157, 1088–1103 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Lu, G. et al. Structural basis of human PRPS2 filaments. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.07.11.499506v1 (2022).

  51. Calise, S. J., Abboud, G., Kasahara, H., Morel, L. & Chan, E. K. L. Immune response-dependent assembly of IMP dehydrogenase filaments. Front. Immunol. 9, 2789 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Duong-Ly, K. C. et al. T cell activation triggers reversible inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase assembly. J. Cell Sci. 131, cs223289 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zi Tan, Y. et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. Methods 14, 793–796 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Mossessova, E. & Lima, C. D. Ulp1-SUMO crystal structure and genetic analysis reveal conserved interactions and a regulatory element essential for cell growth in yeast. Mol. Cell 5, 865–876 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Suloway, C. et al. Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 41–60 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Scheres, S. H. W. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. CryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Scheres, S. H. W. in Methods in Enzymology Vol. 579 (ed. Crowther, R. A.) 125–157 (Academic Press, 2016).

  61. Terwilliger, T. C., Ludtke, S. J., Read, R. J., Adams, P. D. & Afonine, P. V. Improvement of cryo-EM maps by density modification. Nat. Methods 17, 923–927 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63–65 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera – a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 519–530 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Madeira, F. et al. Search and sequence analysis tools services from EMBL-EBI in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W276–W279 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R (2020); http://www.rstudio.com/

  71. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2022); https://www.R-project.org

  72. Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L. & Müller, K. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation (2022); https://dplyr.tidyverse.org, https://github.com/tidyverse/dplyr

  73. Ritz, C., Baty, F., Streibig, J. C. & Gerhard, D. Dose-response analysis using R. PLoS ONE 10, e0146021 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2016); https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Cryo-EM Center at the University of Washington for electron microscope use. We also thank members of the Kollman group for valuable feedback provided during cryo-EM data collection and processing. This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (grants nos. R01GM118396 and S10OD023476 to J.M.K. and 1F32AI145111 to K.L.H.)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.L.H. performed experiments. K.H. optimized protein purification. J.D.Q. arranged, guided and provided support for EM data collection. K.L.H. and J.M.K. designed experiments, performed data analysis and interpretation, and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin M. Kollman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology thanks Ambroise Desfosses, Arjen Jakobi and Menico Rizzi for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Florian Ullrich, Carolina Perdigoto and Katarzyna Ciazynska, in collaboration with the Nature Structural & Molecular Biology team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Filament formation in PRPS1.

a. Section of negative stain EM of purified PRPS protein in a HEPES/Salt buffer used for purification. b. Panel of negative stain EM sections of PRPS1 in phosphate buffer in the presence of the indicated ligands. c. Elution profile from a size exclusion column (Superose 6) of PRPS1 in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.6. d. Elution profile from a size exclusion column (Superose 6) of PRPS1 in 100 mM KCl, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6 in the presence (black) or absence (grey) of 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.6. PRPS1: monomer, 35 kDa; dimer, 70 kDa; hexamer, 210 kDa; filament, 420 kDa. e. Motion-corrected and summed cryo electron micrographs, Gaussian blurred and contrast adjusted for visualization, from four datasets presented in this manuscript, representing the cameras and tilts used in data collection. Microscopes, cameras, and stage tilts are listed in Data Table 1.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Data processing and statistics for cryo-EM datasets.

Left. Overview of the processing scheme for the datasets presented in this manuscript. Right. Fourier shell correlation curves calculated in Relion (black) and in Phenix (grey). One set of curves per dataset is shown. For full dataset statistics and information, see Data Table 1.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Volumes and models of filament interface residues.

a. Surface representation of filament interface in phosphate- or ADP-bound structures; orange patches indicate residues involved in the interface. b. Model and map of the primary interface residues of filament structures presented in this manuscript (the interface from the ADP bound filament can be found in Fig. 2c). Right panel shows the overlay of the interfaces when aligned by the bottom protomer. ADP-bound structure colored in orange and blue; all others in grey. c. Schematic of primary interactions across the filament interface; rectangular dashed lines indicate pi-stacking interactions and rounded dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds. d. The C-terminal portion of a protein sequence alignment comparing PRPS across kingdoms. Identical residues are highlighted in orange. e. Alignment of the phosphate and ADP-bound structures on the allosteric domain (left) show minimal differences at the protomer level. f. Comparison of phosphate- (dark grey) and ADP-bound (orange/blue) structures to human crystal structures of wild type PRPS1 (light grey, PDB ID 2H06, 2HCR, 3EFH, and 3S5J). Structures have been aligned on the allosteric domain of protomer a. g. Differences in the filaments arise from the orientations of the protomers relative to each other in the hexamers, with rotations of neighboring protomers relative to a as indicated. h. Overlay of the phosphate- (dark grey) and ADP-bound (orange/blue) filament interfaces with the E. coli PRPS filament interfaces (light grey, PDB ID 7XMU, 7XMV) i. Comparison of phosphate- (dark grey) and ADP-bound (orange/blue) structures to E. coli PRPS filament structures (light grey, PDB ID 7XMV). Structures have been aligned on the allosteric domain of protomer a, and phosphates from the phosphate-bound human and E. coli structures have been omitted for clarity.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Substrate- and product-bound filaments.

a. Volume of PRPS1 filaments bound to phosphate/ATP (left), phosphate/ATP/R5P (middle), or phosphate/PRPP (right); protomers colored in blue or orange. b, top. Volume of one hexamer from a filament of PRPS1 bound to PRPP. Protomers are orange and blue, with the active site in yellow. b, bottom. Zoom in of active site indicated in (top), including the catalytic loop (dark blue), ATP (yellow), phosphate, magnesium, and coordinated waters. c–e. Volume showing the catalytic loop (dark blue or dark orange) and the ligands in the active site (yellow) for each of the filament structures presented in this work. f. Overlay of active sites shown in Main Text Fig. 3b–d and also including PRPS1 + ADP (light grey). g. Volume (top) describing location of slices (bottom) showing catalytic domains in two maps with well-resolved catalytic loops. h. Overlay of PRPS1 + ATP/R5P closed catalytic loop and key residues from the three PRPS structures from the PDB that also contain a closed catalytic loop (3MBI from Thermoplasma volcanium; 5T3O and 7PN0 from Thermus thermophilus). PRPS1 with ATP/R5P in blue, PDB models in grey. i. Overlay of PRPS1 with ATP/R5P (blue/orange) and 5T3O and 7PN0 from Thermus thermophilus (greys), showing the neighboring open and closed catalytic loops.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Example classification scheme and directional FSCs.

a. Classification scheme for PRPS1 + ATP/R5P after symmetry expansion. Particles were classified into ten classes, without alignment using a protomer mask. a subset of the resulting volumes was locally refined using a hexamer mask and exported to Phenix for density modification. Two volumes were then used for model building. b. Directional FSC for volumes derived from tilted datasets and volumes and models from the active sites from protomer a of each map.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Ligand volumes from substrate- and product-bound filaments.

Panels show the volume and the ligands for (a) PRPS1 + ATP, (b) PRPS1 + ATP/R5P with open loop, (c) PRPS1 + ATP/R5P with closed loop, (d) PRPS1 + AMP/PRPP with closed loop, (e) PRPS1 + PRPP.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Mutation of filament interface residues.

a. Panel of negative stain EM sections of PRPS1 engineered mutations in phosphate buffer in the presence of the indicated ligands. b. Chromatography curves from a Superose 6 of PRPS1 and three engineered, filament-interface mutations. c. Assay performed in buffer containing: 50 mM Potassium HEPES pH 7.6, 6 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin. Left: Activity assay of the three engineered mutations with or without 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.6 (N = 4 technical replicates). Right: Ratio of 50 mM phosphate: 0 mM phosphate activities (V) from the panel to the left. d. Substrate kinetics of the three engineered mutations at protein concentrations with detectable catalytic activity. Assay performed in buffer containing: 50 mM Potassium Phosphate pH 7.6, 6 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin. Triplicate readings of one well for a single replicate (N = 1 technical replicate) are shown as open circles. e. Kinetic parameters for the wild type protein and the three engineered mutations.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Control assays for catalysis experiments.

a. PRPS1 catalysis over time at the lowest ribose-5-phosphate concentration used (100 μM ATP, 1.5 μM ribose-5-phosphate), plotted before conversion to μM AMP. Individual data points are shown as open circles (N = 3). b. PRPS1 kinetic analysis varying ATP concentration and holding ribose-5-phosphate at 100 μM. Individual data points are shown as open circles. Solid circles and error bars represent mean ± standard deviation (N = 3). Calculated kinetic parameters in inset.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Volumes for C-termini of PRPS1-E307A mutations.

a–d. Panels detailing PRPS1-E307A maps and models, with protomers in blue/orange and C-termini highlighted in red. Row 1: Dataset, symmetry, and number of particles included in the map. Row 2: View of one face of the ResMap filtered volumes from PRPS1-E307A datasets. Row 3: Insert showing volume of C-termini of protomer a from Relion’s implementation of ResMap (grey box) or Phenix’s Density Modification (black/white box). Rows 4 & 5: View of both faces of the density modified volumes from PRPS1-E307A datasets.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Filament formation in PRPS1 disease mutants.

a. Kinetic parameters for the wild type protein and the four disease mutations as determined from the data shown in Main Text Fig. 6. b. Chromatography curves from a Superose 6 of PRPS1 and four disease mutations. c. Panel of negative stain EM sections of PRPS1 disease mutations in phosphate buffer in the presence of the indicated ligands.

Source data

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Peer Review Files

Supplementary Video 1

Morph between phosphate-bound PRPS1 filament and ADP-bound PRPS1 filament. Cartoon of backbone atoms, with the protomers colored in orange and blue, and a phosphate positioned in the allosteric site for reference. Filaments have been aligned at the central interface. The video progresses as follows: phosphate-bound to ADP-bound to phosphate-bound to ADP-bound.

Supplementary Video 2

Morph between the open and closed conformations of PRPS1 incubated with ATP and ribose-5-phosphate. Top and side views of cartoon of backbone atoms of hexamer, with the protomers colored in orange and blue and the catalytic loops in the a and b protomers in dark orange and dark blue, respectively. Active site ligands are shown in yellow. Hexamers have been aligned on protomers c–f. The video progresses from protomer b in the open-loop conformation to protomer b in the closed-loop conformation, back to protomer b in the open-loop conformation to protomer b in the closed-loop conformation.

Supplementary Table 1

Primers used in this manuscript.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 4

Activity assay data points.

Source Data Fig. 6

Activity assay data points.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Size exclusion chromatography curve data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Fourier shell correlation curve data points.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Three-dimensional Fourier shell correlation curve data points and histogram data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Activity assay data points and size exclusion chromatography curve data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Activity assay data points.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10

Size exclusion chromatography curve data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hvorecny, K.L., Hargett, K., Quispe, J.D. et al. Human PRPS1 filaments stabilize allosteric sites to regulate activity. Nat Struct Mol Biol 30, 391–402 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-00921-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-00921-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing