Chromatin remodelers are diverse enzymes, and different models have been proposed to explain how these proteins work. Here we report the 3.3 Å-resolution cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ISWI (ISW1) in complex with the nucleosome in adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-bound and ADP-BeFx-bound states. The data show that after nucleosome binding, ISW1 is activated by substantial rearrangement of the catalytic domains, with the regulatory AutoN domain packing the first RecA-like core and the NegC domain being disordered. The high-resolution structure reveals local DNA distortion and translocation induced by ISW1 in the ADP-bound state, which is essentially identical to that induced by the Snf2 chromatin remodeler, suggesting a common mechanism of DNA translocation. The histone core remains largely unperturbed, and prevention of histone distortion by crosslinking did not inhibit the activity of yeast ISW1 or its human homolog. Together, our findings suggest a general mechanism of chromatin remodeling involving local DNA distortion without notable histone deformation.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $17.42 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Coordinates and EM maps have been deposited in the EMDataResource and Protein Data Bank (PDB) under accession codes EMD-9718 (PBD ID 6IRM, native complex, ADP-BeFx); EMD-9719 (PBD ID 6IRN, crosslinked complex, ADP-BeFx); and EMD-9720 (PBD ID 6IRO, crosslinked complex, ADP). Source data for Figs. 2c,d, 6a–d and Supplementary Fig. 1a are available with the paper online. All other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Clapier, C. R. & Cairns, B. R. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 273–304 (2009).
Clapier, C. R., Iwasa, J., Cairns, B. R. & Peterson, C. L. Mechanisms of action and regulation of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 407–422 (2017).
Narlikar, G. J., Sundaramoorthy, R. & Owen-Hughes, T. Mechanisms and functions of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes. Cell 154, 490–503 (2013).
Bartholomew, B. Regulating the chromatin landscape: structural and mechanistic perspectives. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 671–696 (2014).
Becker, P. B. & Workman, J. L. Nucleosome remodeling and epigenetics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, 1–19 (2013).
Saha, A., Wittmeyer, J. & Cairns, B. R. Chromatin remodeling through directional DNA translocation from an internal nucleosomal site. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 747–755 (2005).
Saha, A., Wittmeyer, J. & Cairns, B. R. Chromatin remodelling: the industrial revolution of DNA around histones. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 437–447 (2006).
Mueller-Planitz, F., Klinker, H. & Becker, P. B. Nucleosome sliding mechanisms: new twists in a looped history. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1026–1032 (2013).
Bowman, G. D. Mechanisms of ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 20, 73–81 (2010).
Zofall, M., Persinger, J., Kassabov, S. R. & Bartholomew, B. Chromatin remodeling by ISW2 and SWI/SNF requires DNA translocation inside the nucleosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 339–346 (2006).
Liu, X., Li, M., Xia, X., Li, X. & Chen, Z. Mechanism of chromatin remodelling revealed by the Snf2-nucleosome structure. Nature 544, 440–445 (2017).
Li, M. et al. Mechanism of DNA translocation underlying chromatin remodeling by Snf2. Nature (in the press).
Clapier, C. R. & Cairns, B. R. Regulation of ISWI involves inhibitory modules antagonized by nucleosomal epitopes. Nature 492, 280–284 (2012).
Mueller-Planitz, F., Klinker, H., Ludwigsen, J. & Becker, P. B. The ATPase domain of ISWI is an autonomous nucleosome remodeling machine. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 82–89 (2013).
Yan, L., Wang, L., Tian, Y., Xia, X. & Chen, Z. Structure and regulation of the chromatin remodeller ISWI. Nature 540, 466–469 (2016).
Leonard, J. D. & Narlikar, G. J. A nucleotide-driven switch regulates flanking DNA length sensing by a dimeric chromatin remodeler. Mol. Cell 57, 850–859 (2015).
Sinha, K. K., Gross, J. D. & Narlikar, G. J. Distortion of histone octamer core promotes nucleosome mobilization by a chromatin remodeler. Science 355, eaaa3761 (2017).
Flaus, A. & Owen-Hughes, T. Unlocking the nucleosome. Science 355, 245–246 (2017).
Singh, H. R., Murawska, M. & Ladurner, A. G. Remodelers tap into nucleosome plasticity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 341–343 (2017).
Bazett-Jones, D. P., Cote, J., Landel, C. C., Peterson, C. L. & Workman, J. L. The SWI/SNF complex creates loop domains in DNA and polynucleosome arrays and can disrupt DNA-histone contacts within these domains. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 1470–1478 (1999).
Boyer, L. A., Shao, X., Ebright, R. H. & Peterson, C. L. Roles of the histone H2A-H2B dimers and the (H3-H4)(2) tetramer in nucleosome remodeling by the SWI-SNF complex. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 11545–11552 (2000).
Kassabov, S. R., Zhang, B., Persinger, J. & Bartholomew, B. SWI/SNF unwraps, slides, and rewraps the nucleosome. Mol. Cell 11, 391–403 (2003).
Racki, L. R. et al. The chromatin remodeller ACF acts as a dimeric motor to space nucleosomes. Nature 462, 1016–1021 (2009).
Gamarra, N., Johnson, S. L., Trnka, M. J., Burlingame, A. L. & Narlikar, G. The nucleosomal acidic patch relieves auto-inhibition by the ISWI remodeler SNF2h. eLife 7, e35322 (2018).
Clapier, C. R., Langst, G., Corona, D. F., Becker, P. B. & Nightingale, K. P. Critical role for the histone H4 N terminus in nucleosome remodeling by ISWI. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 875–883 (2001).
Corona, D. F., Clapier, C. R., Becker, P. B. & Tamkun, J. W. Modulation of ISWI function by site-specific histone acetylation. EMBO Rep. 3, 242–247 (2002).
Dann, G. P. et al. ISWI chromatin remodellers sense nucleosome modifications to determine substrate preference. Nature 548, 607–611 (2017).
Bilokapic, S., Strauss, M. & Halic, M. Histone octamer rearranges to adapt to DNA unwrapping. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 101–108 (2018).
Makde, R. D., England, J. R., Yennawar, H. P. & Tan, S. Structure of RCC1 chromatin factor bound to the nucleosome core particle. Nature 467, 562–566 (2010).
Frouws, T. D., Barth, P. D. & Richmond, T. J. Site-specific disulfide crosslinked nucleosomes with enhanced stability. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 45–57 (2018).
Farnung, L., Vos, S. M., Wigge, C. & Cramer, P. Nucleosome-Chd1 structure and implications for chromatin remodelling. Nature 550, 539–542 (2017).
Brahma, S. et al. INO80 exchanges H2A.Z for H2A by translocating on DNA proximal to histone dimers. Nat. Commun. 8, 15616 (2017).
Ayala, R. et al. Structure and regulation of the human INO80-nucleosome complex. Nature 556, 391–395 (2018).
Eustermann, S. et al. Structural basis for ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling by the INO80 complex. Nature 556, 386–390 (2018).
Narlikar, G. J., Fan, H. Y. & Kingston, R. E. Cooperation between complexes that regulate chromatin structure and transcription. Cell 108, 475–487 (2002).
Dechassa, M. L. et al. SWI/SNF has intrinsic nucleosome disassembly activity that is dependent on adjacent nucleosomes. Mol. Cell 38, 590–602 (2010).
Dyer, P. N. et al. Reconstitution of nucleosome core particles from recombinant histones and DNA. Methods Enzymol. 375, 23–44 (2004).
Chen, L., Durkin, K. A. & Casida, J. E. Spontaneous mobility of GABAA receptor M2 extracellular half relative to noncompetitive antagonist action. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 38871–38878 (2006).
Ausio, J., Seger, D. & Eisenberg, H. Nucleosome core particle stability and conformational change. Effect of temperature, particle and NaCl concentrations, and crosslinking of histone H3 sulfhydryl groups. J. Mol. Biol. 176, 77–104 (1984).
Xu, J. et al. Structural basis for the initiation of eukaryotic transcription-coupled DNA repair. Nature 551, 653–657 (2017).
Carragher, B. et al. Leginon: an automated system for acquisition of images from vitreous ice specimens. J. Struct. Biol. 132, 33–45 (2000).
Scheres, S. H. A Bayesian view on cryo-EM structure determination. J. Mol. Biol. 415, 406–418 (2012).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D 68, 352–367 (2012).
We thank the Tsinghua University Branch of the China National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing) for the cryo-EM facility (crosslinked dataset) and the computational facility support on the cluster of Bio-Computing Platform. We thank the Electron Microscopy Laboratory of Peking University for collecting the non-crosslinked dataset, X. Wang and P. Yang for providing the EV71 virus and H. Deng and C. Zhang for mass-spectrometry analysis. K. Chen, R. Su and J. Wang performed Rosetta analysis. J. Lei wrote the software. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (nos. 2017YFA0102900 and 2014CB910100 to Z.C., 2016YFA0500700 to N.G.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 31570731, 31270762 and 31630046 to Z.C., 31725007 and 31630087 to N.G.) and the Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Tsinghua–Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Integrated supplementary information
Supplementary Figure 1 Cryo-EM structure analysis of the native ISW1–nucleosome complex in the ADP-BeFx-bound state without fixation.
(a) Chromatin remodeling activity of the mutant ISW1 (ISW1ΔL) with the H4-like L3 loop replaced with a flexible sequence. Control: reaction in the absence of ATP. Error bars indicate s.d. (n=3). Domain architecture of ISW1 is shown and the relative position of L3 is highlighted with a magenta line. (b) Representative Cryo-EM micrograph of the non-cross-linked sample. (c) FFTs of image in (b) with the Thon rings extending to ~3.5 Å. (d) 2D class averages of the cryo-EM particles. (e) Flowchart of cryo-EM data processing for the non-crosslinked dataset. (f) Angular distributions of cryo-EM particles in the final round of refinements of the ISW1-NCP and the (ISW1)2-NCP-complexes. (g) Resolution estimation of the EM maps. Gold standard Fourier shell correlation (FSC) curves, showing the overall nominal resolutions of 3.56 Å, 3.87 Å, 4.11 Å, 4.20 Å, 4.42 Å for the NCP masked region of the ISW1-NCP-complex, ISW1-NCP-complex, ISW1-NCP-SHL-2-complex and ISW1-NCP-SHL2-complex, and (ISW1)2-NCP-complex, respectively. Source data
Supplementary Figure 2 Essentially identical structures of the ADP-BeFx-bound ISW1 complex at different sides of the nucleosome and with two methods of sample preparation.
(a-b) Fitting the final structure of the complex into the SHL-2 (a) and SHL2 (b) maps, respectively. The maps were reconstructed with the samples prepared without glutaraldehyde fixation. (c) Structural alignment of H3-H4 of the SHL+2 (color-coded) and SHL-2 (grey) complexes. (d) Structural alignment of ISW1 of the SHL+2 (color-coded) and SHL-2 (grey) complexes. (e) Two different views of the structures determined with different methods of sample preparation. The structure determined with glutaraldehyde fixation is color coded, with AutoN in magenta. The structure without fixation is in grey. Dashed line, disordered region of AutoN.
(a) The nucleotide binding pocket. (b) Trp600 of ISW1. (c) Arg308 of ISW1. (d) The ‘K16R17H18R19’ motif of the H4 tail. (e) SHL0 of the nucleosome (f) α2 helix of H4. (g) The minor of SHL1.5 of the nucleosome.
Supplementary Figure 4 Cryo-EM structure analysis of the ISW1–nucleosome complex in the ADP-BeFx-bound state fixed with glutaraldehyde.
(a) A representative Cryo-EM micrograph. (b) FFTs of image in (a) with the Thon rings extending to ~3.5 Å. (c) 2D class averages of characteristic projection views of Cryo-EM particles. (d) Flowchart of Cryo-EM data processing for the ISW1-152NCP-ADP-BeFx-crosslinked dataset. (e) Angular distributions of cryo-EM particles in the final round of refinements of the ISW1-NCP-complex sample. (f) Angular distributions of cryo-EM particles in the final round of refinements of the ISW1-NCP-SHL-2-complex sample. (g) Angular distributions of cryo-EM particles in the final round of refinements of the ISW1-NCP-SHL2-complex sample. (h) Resolution estimation of the EM maps. Gold standard Fourier shell correlation (FSC) curves, showing the overall nominal resolutions of 3.25 Å, 3.37 Å, 3.61 Å, 3.77 Å for the NCP masked region of the ISW1-NCP-complex, ISW1-NCP-complex, ISW1-NCP-SHL-2-complex and ISW1-NCP-SHL2-complex, respectively.
Supplementary Figure 5 Cryo-EM structure analysis of the ISW1–nucleosome complex in the ADP-bound state.
(a) A representative Cryo-EM micrograph. (b) FFTs of image in (a) with the Thon rings extending to ~3.5 Å. (c) 2D class averages of characteristic projection views of Cryo-EM particles. (d) Flowchart of Cryo-EM data processing for the ISW1-152NCP-ADP dataset. (e) Angular distributions of cryo-EM particles in the final round of refinements of the ISW1-NCP-complex sample. (f) Resolution estimation of the EM maps. Gold standard Fourier shell correlation (FSC) curves, showing the overall nominal resolutions of 3.29 Å, 3.40 Å for the NCP masked region and ISW1-NCP-complex, respectively.
Supplementary Figure 6 Local density maps of the ISW1–nucleosome complex in the ADP-bound state determined at a resolution of 3.29 Å.
(a) Local maps of the DNA at the positions 61-68. (b) Local maps of the DNA at the positions 32-49.
(a) Superimposition of the structure of ISW1 (color coded) in the ADP-BeFx- nucleosome-bound state and that of MtISWI in the auto-inhibited state (grey, PDB code 5JXR) (Nature 540, 466–469, 2016). Only the region around the catalytic pocket is shown. The alignment was performed on core1 of the enzymes. (b) Superimpositions of the structure of core1 of ISWI in the activated state (color coded) and the inhibited state (grey). Dashed line, the disordered region of AutoN in the activated state. (c) Interactions with the histones H4 and H3 by ISW1 in the context of the nucleosome. (d) Comparison of the H4-binding modes in the contact of the nucleosome and free H4 peptide. MtISWI (PDB code 5JXT), grey; H4 peptide, magenta. Structural alignment was performed on core2 of the enzymes.
Supplementary Figure 8 Structure refinement of H4 within the ISW1–NCP complex in the ADP-BeFx-bound state using Rosetta.
(a) RMSDs of three regions of H4 calculated between the Rosetta-refined ten top-scoring structures and our model. (b-d) Structural comparison at the regions of H4 residues 24-32 (b), residues 45-50 (c), and residues 55-70 (d). Free NCP (PDB code 3MVD) (Nature 467, 562–566, 2010), black; our model, gold; the Rosetta-refined structures are colored differently.
Supplementary Figure 9 Little AFFECTS the remodeling activity of ISWI and Snf2 by cross-linking of H3-H4.
(a) SDS-PAGE analysis of the WT, crosslinked (X, treated with oxidized glutathione), and rescued (X+DDT) nucleosomes. H3*-H4*, crosslinked H3-H4 dimer. (b) Native PAGE analysis of the WT and crosslinked nucleosomes. (c) Mass-Spec analysis of the H3-H4 linkage by S-S bond. (d) SDS-PAGE and native PAGE analyses of crosslinked (X, treated with Cu-phenanthroline) and rescued (X+DDT) nucleosomes. (e-f) Chromatin remodeling activities of Snf2h (e) and ISW1 (f). WT nucleosome, black; crosslinked nucleosome (treated with Cu-phenanthroline), red; rescued nucleosome (treated with Cu-phenanthroline and then reverted with DTT), blue. Error bars indicate s.d. (n=3). (g) SDS-PAGE and native PAGE analyses of crosslinked (X, treated with Cu-phenanthroline) and rescued (X+DDT) H3C110A nucleosomes.
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, L., Wu, H., Li, X. et al. Structures of the ISWI–nucleosome complex reveal a conserved mechanism of chromatin remodeling. Nat Struct Mol Biol 26, 258–266 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-019-0199-9
Nature Communications (2020)
Nature Chemical Biology (2020)
Trends in Biochemical Sciences (2020)
Frontiers in Genetics (2020)
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology (2020)