Abstract
Animal and computational models of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) indicate that early amyloid-β (Aβ) deposits drive neurons into a hyperactive regime, and that subsequent tau depositions manifest an opposite, suppressive effect as behavioral deficits emerge. Here we report analogous changes in macroscopic oscillatory neurophysiology in the human brain. We used positron emission tomography and task-free magnetoencephalography to test the effects of Aβ and tau deposition on cortical neurophysiology in 104 cognitively unimpaired older adults with a family history of sporadic AD. In these asymptomatic individuals, we found that Aβ depositions colocalize with accelerated neurophysiological activity. In those also presenting medial–temporal tau pathology, linear mixed effects of Aβ and tau depositions indicate a shift toward slower neurophysiological activity, which was also linked to cognitive decline. We conclude that early Aβ and tau depositions relate synergistically to human cortical neurophysiology and subsequent cognitive decline. Our findings provide insight into the multifaceted neurophysiological mechanisms engaged in the preclinical phases of AD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The current state of knowledge suggests that the pathological processes underlying Alzheimer’s disease (AD) develop along a continuum1,2, with a prolonged preclinical phase of pathological buildup preceding detectable neurodegeneration, and cognitive symptoms manifesting in the later disease stages3,4,5. The defining histopathological hallmarks of AD are the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and fibrillary tangles of hyperphosphorylated tau proteins in the brain4,6,7,8. Aβ plaques deposition can begin up to two decades before symptom onset1,4,9, initially accumulating in cortical areas with high metabolic baseline activity, such as the precuneus, medial orbitofrontal and posterior cingulate cortices10,11, before spreading to the entire neocortex, brainstem and subcortical nuclei12,13. Tau deposition also follows a relatively stereotypical distribution pattern, accumulating first in the entorhinal cortex before spreading to limbic areas and eventually the neocortex6,14,15. The joint accumulation of Aβ and tau triggers a cascade of deleterious events from synaptic loss, neuronal death, to brain atrophy5,16,17,18, which are thought to underlie the cognitive deficits that characterize the disease4,19. However, the exact mechanisms behind the disruption of human neural function and cognition related to AD proteinopathy remain to be elucidated.
A plausible mechanism of these noxious effects is that the joint accumulation of Aβ and tau alters neurophysiological signaling, triggering further pathological processes in a chain reaction that promotes disease progression20,21. Animal models show that Aβ deposition induces a toxic regime of neuronal hyperactivity, which then contributes to aggravating Aβ pathology itself22,23. This positive feedback process would then promote the accumulation and spread of tau pathology20. Consequently, the joint, colocalized accumulation of Aβ plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles can be conceived as synergistic, potentially driving shifts in neuronal activity toward a regime of relative hypoactivity20,24. At this stage, neuronal activity is considerably diminished, eventually leading to cell death, tissue degeneration and severe behavioral changes20,21,25.
Whether this hypothetical two-pronged shifting regime of neural dynamics induced by AD proteinopathy occurs at the macroscopic scale in the human brain is still debated. In the prodromal stage of AD, increased blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) activations in hippocampal and middle temporal lobe circuits have been reported in memory tasks using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)26,27,28. In contrast, BOLD responses are typically diminished during later disease stages26,29. Considering the magnitude of BOLD signals as a proxy of brain activation, these observations are aligned with the expected gradual shift of brain activity related to the synergistic effects of Aβ and tau pathology, along an inverted U-shape trajectory—from baseline to hyperactive then hypoactive levels across the AD continuum (Fig. 1).
Direct measurements of human brain electrophysiology also indicate aberrant macroscopic neurophysiological signaling in patients with AD-like symptoms30,31,32,33,34. A consistent observation with electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) is that low-frequency neurophysiological activity (delta–theta bands; 2–8 Hz) is increased and higher frequency activity (mainly in the alpha band; 8–12 Hz) is reduced in the symptomatic and prodromal stages of the disease31,35,36,37,38,39,40.
A recent computational model of the neurophysiology of AD proteinopathies points to a possible causal effect of early Aβ and tau depositions via the disruption of the excitatory/inhibitory balance of local neuronal populations, which in turn alters the macroscopic neurophysiological frequency spectrum across brain networks in the later stages of the disease41. According to this model, the accumulation of Aβ and tau induces a gradual shift in neuronal activity from hyperactivity to hypoactivity with respect to baseline healthy variants, notably manifesting at the macroscopic scale with levels of alpha-band activity following an inverted U-shaped trajectory across the AD continuum. For this reason, in the present study, we map with MEG the levels of cortical alpha-band activity with respect to other typical frequency bands as a noninvasive, macroscopic proxy of relative neurophysiological acceleration/slowing effects related to AD proteinopathy.
There is early evidence of these model predictions from human empirical data, albeit still relatively limited in scope. The alpha-band activity in participants with greater Aβ deposition is increased compared to normative healthy controls, but it is reduced in patients presenting mild cognitive impairment (MCl)42. The same study also reported increased, slower delta-band (1–4 Hz) activity in MCI patients, which together with decreased alpha-band activity, is aligned with the prediction of an acceleration effect on oscillatory neurophysiological activity (increased alpha-band activity) followed by a shift towards neurophysiological slowing (decreased alpha-band power and increased delta-band activity) during the prodromal stage of AD, as cognitive decline starts to manifest. These observations were independently confirmed recently in reports of Aβ33,40 and tau32,33 accumulations, which are related to decreased alpha-band and increased delta-band activity—that is neurophysiological slowing—in the later stages of AD. Whether a more subtle neurophysiological shift from enhanced fast-frequency activity to neurophysiological slowing related to AD proteinopathy and cognitive outcomes is detectable macroscopically in the preclinical stages of the disease, when potential therapeutic interventions may have the greatest impact39, was the overarching question of the present study.
We used task-free MEG source imaging of millisecond brain activity and whole-brain quantitative PET imaging of Aβ and tau in 104 asymptomatic older adults with familial history of sporadic AD dementia (Fig. 2a). As anticipated, we found that early Aβ deposition is associated with macroscopic neurophysiological manifestations of hyperactivity, expressed as an acceleration of neurophysiological oscillatory activity reflected by increased alpha-band and decreased delta-band activity. As predicted from disease models, we also found that these effects shift from oscillatory acceleration to slowing in individuals presenting early temporal lobe tau pathology, as denoted by decreased alpha-band and increased delta-band activity (Fig. 1). Finally, we demonstrate that the magnitude of the shift from neurophysiological acceleration to slowing is associated with longitudinal cognitive decline, and that the magnitude of the changes in neurophysiology and proteinopathy predicted by our model aligns with published observations in patients in the later stages of the AD continuum (that is MCI and AD).
Results
Neurophysiological shifts linked to Aβ and tau
Participant demographics and summary descriptive statistics of the PET data analyses and the screening and MEG-PET visit cognitive testing are provided in Table 1. We used ANCOVAs to compare the mean relative spectral power of whole-brain cortical neurophysiological activity across the following three PET-defined subgroups of individuals (Table 2): (1) those with no Aβ nor tau burden (Aβ−/Tau−), (2) those with high levels of global Aβ but no entorhinal tau (Aβ+/Tau−) and (3) those with both high global Aβ and high entorhinal tau (Aβ+/Tau+). In general, participants with greater levels of Aβ and tau exhibited higher levels of slow activity (delta–theta band), and lower levels of faster activity (alpha–beta band; Extended Data Fig. 1). Repeating the analysis after removing the influential cases resulted in similar associations, with significant statistical differences observed for the delta and alpha bands (Extended Data Table 1).
Proteinopathy-related shifts in neurophysiological activity
Considering the sample size imbalance between PET subgroups and the limitations of using a positivity cutoff that ignores potentially meaningful, subthreshold levels of pathology, we implemented nested linear mixed effects models (LME) to better incorporate intraparticipant spatial variability in our modeled associations between Aβ, entorhinal tau and neurophysiological activity (Fig. 2b). We found that the regional deposition of Aβ is related to an enhancement of fast-frequency neurophysiological activity, scaling with increased alpha-band activity (t(6967) = 14.23, PFDR = 0.016) and decreased delta-band activity (t(6967) = −14.69, PFDR = 0.016). Notably, this effect was reduced in individuals with greater tau pathology in both the alpha (t(6966) = −5.46, PFDR < 0.001) and delta (t(6966) = 4.33, PFDR < 0.001) frequency bands, indicating a tau-related shift towards neurophysiological slowing (Fig. 3). The aperiodic component of the neurophysiological power spectrum did not impact the observed associations between neurophysiological activity and Aβ deposition (alpha band—t(6965) = 14.25, PFDR = 0.008; delta band—t(6965) = −15.76, PFDR < 0.001), nor their synergistic effects with entorhinal tau deposition (alpha band—t(6964) = −4.52, PFDR < 0.001; delta band—t(6964) = 5.54, PFDR < 0.001).
To ensure that the moderating effects of tau deposition on the Aβ–neurophysiological relationships are not biased by assessing tau burden from a single region-of-interest (ROI) (entorhinal cortex), we repeated the analyses after assessing tau burden across an expanded set of temporal cortical regions (temporal meta-ROI) which are widely used for assessing early tau deposition43. Higher temporal meta-ROI tau values also related to a shift in the association between Aβ and neurophysiological activity in the alpha (t(6966) = −4.27, PFDR < 0.001) and delta (t(6966) = 3.46, PFDR = 0.004) frequency bands, in the same opposite directions as observed with the entorhinal cortex as tau ROI (Extended Data Fig. 2). Once again, the aperiodic components of the neurophysiological power spectrum did not affect the synergistic effects of Aβ and tau on neurophysiological activity (alpha band—t(6964) = −3.31, PFDR = 0.010; delta band—t(6964) = 4.8, PFDR < 0.001). The same pattern of tau effects remained after removing the entorhinal cortex from the temporal meta-ROI (alpha band—t(6966) = −3.74, PFDR < 0.001; delta band—t(6966) = 3.06, PFDR = 0.008). A similar trend for the interactive effect of Aβ and tau on alpha-band power was observed when using whole-brain tau standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) values as a nested variable, although these associations were no longer significant after permutation and FDR correction (alpha band—t(6965) = −6.42, PFDR = 0.106; delta band—t(6965) = 2.67, PFDR = 0.296; Extended Data Fig. 2).
Proteinopathy-related neurophysiological changes and cognition
In terms of longitudinal cognitive changes evaluated by repeated administration of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) neuropsychological assessment battery, we observed that individuals with high levels of both Aβ and tau showed more pronounced declines in the composite score calculated from the attention and immediate/delayed memory domains (F(2, 93) = 8.81, PFDR = 0.001; Fig. 4a). We then used linear models to test whether the interactive effects of continuous Aβ and tau SUVR values on neurophysiological activity were related to longitudinal cognitive performance (Fig. 2c). We found that individuals with a stronger moderating influence of tau deposition on the association of Aβ deposition with alpha-band activity have experienced a more pronounced cognitive decline, indicated by steeper negative slopes in the attention/memory composite score (t(92) = 3.37, PFDR = 0.002; Fig. 4b). When assessing each cognitive domain separately, we found the same interaction effect on the attention scores (t(92) = 3.58, PFDR = 0.002; Extended Data Table 2). Such associations remained significant after removing influential cases from each of the regression models, also extending to the immediate memory domain. The cognition analysis results were also replicated when using the temporal meta-ROI instead of the entorhinal cortex tau SUVR, both for the attention–memory composite score (t(92) = 2.48, PFDR = 0.038) and the attention scores (t(92) = 2.37, PFDR = 0.038). We did not find such associations with the Aβ–delta-band correlation values.
Predictive analysis of later-stage neurophysiological changes
Finally, we tested whether the magnitude of neurophysiological changes associated with the higher Aβ (whole brain) and tau (temporal meta-ROI) concentrations observed in later disease stages can be predicted from the interactive effects of Aβ and tau on alpha-band activity we observed in the preclinical data reported herein. To that end, we first retrieved the Aβ (cortical meta-ROI) and tau (temporal meta-ROI) deposition values reported in ref. 44, and the relative alpha-band power measurements reported in ref. 34 from independent but age-matched samples of participants presenting with MCI and probable AD. We used relative alpha-band power measures because our data showed this was the neurophysiological feature associated with longitudinal cognitive decline. We found that our model predictions overlapped substantially with these independent, empirical observations (Fig. 5). This analysis therefore supports the notion that the early synergistic interaction we observed between AD proteinopathies and neurophysiological activity in asymptomatic adults is consistent with and might be predictive of the related effects observed in the more advanced stages of the disease. We also emphasize this finding is robust against possible effects caused by different study sites, participant samples, PET tracers and MEG instruments.
Discussion
We report the first observations of interactive effects between early Aβ and tau pathology on cortical neurophysiological activity in asymptomatic adults with a family history of sporadic AD, and their associations with longitudinal cognitive decline. In line with predictions from in vivo and computational disease models, our data show that Aβ deposition and neurophysiological enhancement of fast-frequency activity colocalize in the human cortex, before the emergence of clinical symptoms. We propose that when tau also starts to accumulate in the temporal lobe, the initial acceleration of neurophysiological activity related to Aβ deposition shifts towards neurophysiological slowing, accompanying cognitive decline. Although our interpretations are limited by the cross-sectional nature of our study, this body of results provides empirical evidence in humans for the hypothesized analogous hyperactive and hypoactive effects of Aβ and tau accumulation manifested as macroscopic spectral power changes in neurophysiological activity along the AD continuum, which has been suggested by decades of animal, late-stage human and computational modeling research. Our model estimates are also consistent with previously-reported levels of proteinopathy and neurophysiological changes observed later in the AD continuum (that is MCI and AD). As such, we anticipate that the present findings will inform more accurate models of AD progression and aid in the future identification of new prognostics and preventative targets.
Our study points at possible nonlinear interactions between AD proteinopathy and human cortical neurophysiology in asymptomatic individuals at risk of developing the disease. Our results are aligned with fMRI studies of prodromal AD26,28,29 and confirm the predictions from recent computational models of preclinical AD41. We show that, as predicted from these models, early Aβ deposition is associated with expressions of neurophysiological enhancement of fast-frequency activity, as indexed by increased alpha-band and decreased delta-band activity41,42. Early tau deposition in medial–temporal regions can be hypothesized to synergistically trigger further pathological processes with Aβ41,45, which our data suggest would manifest as a shift in neurophysiological activity. This shift occurs from a regime of accelerated oscillatory activity in the preclinical stage of the disease to a generalized slowing of activity in the subsequent prodromal and clinical stages of AD31,32,33,34,39. This effect was not present when using whole-brain tau measures, which emphasizes the pathological significance of early tau deposition in medial–temporal regions. However, our data also suggest that the shift in neurophysiological activity does affect the cortex broadly and beyond medio-temporal regions, as a possible precursor of the widespread slowing observed in the later phases of AD39,40. We found that this shift in neurophysiological dynamics is essentially driven by rhythmic brain activity, and not by broadband arrhythmic background activity.
Our study also provides direct evidence from human neurophysiology of analogous phenomena previously observed only in animal models of AD. Notably, our data support model predictions of how early, microscopic alterations at the neuronal circuit level also manifest as aberrant patterns at the macroscopic scale of neurophysiological activity. Computational models of AD pathophysiology predict that Aβ deposits induce toxic effects on the dynamics of neuronal circuits, by simultaneously increasing excitation and decreasing inhibition, leading to augmented levels of alpha-band activity41. According to these models, subsequent tau deposition damages axonal connections and reduces excitatory transmission, driving the neuronal dynamics towards a hypoactive regime, which manifests with decreased alpha-band activity at the macroscopic level. Our results support these predictions in human empirical data and are also in agreement with recent findings showing that macroscopic alterations of the neurophysiological frequency spectrum might be attributable to differential effects on the time constants of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal populations46. It is important to note that at least one modeling study has suggested that increased neuronal excitability in AD would instead be expressed as neurophysiological slowing at the macroscopic level47. Future experimental and computational modeling research elucidating the link between micro- and macroscopic expressions of aberrant neurophysiological activity is needed to fully contextualize our results.
Previous studies in patients with MCI and probable AD have reported that delta-band neurophysiological activity tracks disease progression along the AD continuum33,34,42,48, and that the accumulation of Aβ42 and postmortem tau pathology32 are related to the magnitude of alpha-band activity, showing reduced alpha-band activity in later-stage AD32,33,42. Our results provide the first observations of this type in asymptomatic participants with a family history of AD, before they show cognitive symptoms. Notably, we demonstrate that in this group, there is a synergistic association of Aβ and tau pathologies with alpha-band neurophysiological activity, which is related to cognitive decline in attention and memory32,33,42. Reduced levels of alpha-band activity may precede subsequent increases in slower brain activity in the delta and theta bands, which are linked to impairments in additional cognitive domains, such as processing speed34. We further show that this model is also consistent with independent observations in the later stages of Aβ and tau pathology. These observations support the notion that early neurophysiological expressions of enhanced fast-frequency activity might presage the subsequent shift towards neurophysiological slowing and cognitive decline, as Aβ and tau continue to accumulate. However, the cross-sectional nature of our study limits our ability to draw definitive conclusions regarding the direction of these relationships. Future studies with longitudinal collection of neuroimaging data will further shed light on the temporality of AD pathological processes and changes in neurophysiological activity. We also look forward to future translational studies building on these new observations and proposed mechanisms, for new diagnostics, prognostics, outcome monitoring tools and ideally the definition of modifiable therapeutic targets. Our research agenda is to extend the present body of work towards the identification of robust neurophysiological and protein-pathological features to predict the possible progression to clinical AD, as well as to track the evolution of neurophysiological changes with the progressive accumulation of Aβ and tau, as we continue to follow the present cohort longitudinally.
We report synergistic associations between the early pathological deposition of Aβ and tau, and macroscopic neurophysiological activity in asymptomatic humans at risk of developing sporadic AD. By combining time-resolved MEG cortical mapping with Aβ and tau PET imaging, we demonstrate that Aβ depositions parallel an enhancement of fast-frequency neurophysiological activity in the asymptomatic human brain, and that tau deposition promotes a shift towards expressions of neurophysiological slowing related to longitudinal cognitive declines of attention and memory. These results support the long-standing hypothesis that Aβ and tau differentially affect neural activity in the earliest stages of the AD continuum and provide foundations for future research on models and predictors of AD-related neurophysiology.
Methods
Participants
The participants were from the PRe-symptomatic EValuation of Experimental or Novel Treatments for Alzheimer’s Disease (PREVENT-AD) cohort49, a large sample of asymptomatic middle-aged and older individuals with elevated familial risk of sporadic AD, defined as having one parent or multiple siblings affected by the disease50,51. As part of the inclusion criteria for the PREVENT-AD study, participants were required to (1) be at least 60 years of age or between 55 and 59 years if their age was 15 years younger than their first-affected relative’s age at dementia onset, (2) have no history of major psychiatric or neurological disorders and (3) be rated as cognitively normal at the time of enrollment. Normal cognition at enrollment was determined by having a score ≥ 26 in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment52 and a score of 0 in the Clinical Dementia Rating scale53. Normal cognition at the time of the MEG–PET sessions was determined by having a score ≥ 24 in the mini-mental state examination54. Participants whose scores exceeded the thresholds were further examined by a neuropsychologist from the PREVENT-AD group to verify their cognitive status. We retrieved data from a subsample of 124 PREVENT-AD participants, who all underwent Aβ and tau PET and resting-state MEG between 2017 and 2019 (ref. 49). No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size, but our sample size is similar55 or larger34,42 to that reported in previous publications including multimodal imaging data (that is MEG, PET) in similar populations. From this subsample, the data from 20 participants were discarded, either due to issues with MEG data integrity (1 participant), PET data quality (1 participant) or unusable MEG data due to high-amplitude noise caused by ferromagnetic dental implants (18 participants). The final sample was therefore 104 participants (mean age = 67.4 years, s.d. = 4.9; 74 females; mean years of education = 15, s.d. = 3.1), who all provided informed consent that their de-identified data be used for research purposes reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at McGill University, as the present study, with protocols compliant with the Declaration of Helsinki (protocol A05-B16-11B and A05-M55-11B). Participants received compensation to cover travel expenses and time. MEG data collection was performed blind to the Aβ/tau status of the participants. Data analysis was not performed blind to the conditions of the experiment, but group allocation was only implemented in the supplementary between-participants analysis.
Neuropsychological testing
The participants underwent yearly cognitive assessments using one of the four versions of the RBANS56. The RBANS is a practical neuropsychological tool to characterize abnormal cognitive decline in older adults. It yields scaled scores subdivided into five cognitive domains comprising immediate and delayed memory, attention, visuospatial constructional abilities and language. Longitudinal changes in cognition were assessed by estimating the linear slopes from the RBANS scores, computed using all available cognition timepoints obtained either before or after the MEG and PET visits (mean number of longitudinal cognitive assessments per participant = 6.6, s.d. = 2). We then normalized these slopes based on the average number of days between visits, and scaled the values to represent the annualized change in cognition. Considering that our participants were cognitively unimpaired at the time of the scans, and that the earliest cognitive impairments in AD are typically observed in the memory and attention domains40,57,58, we averaged the estimated linear slopes from the attention and memory RBANS scores to derive a composite measure of cognitive decline. As a follow-up analysis, we also assessed each cognitive domain (attention, immediate and delayed memory) separately. To ensure that the effects reported are not biased by the variability of when the MEG visit occurred along this longitudinal trajectory, the relative temporal distance between the dates of the first cognitive assessment and the MEG visit (mean number of days = 1282.4, s.d. = 569.6) was included as a nuisance covariate in all statistical models involving longitudinal cognition.
Neuroimaging data acquisition and analysis
MRI
Structural MRIs were acquired at the Brain Imaging Center of the Douglas Research Centre (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) using a 3T Siemens TIM Trio Scanner equipped with a 12 or 32-channel coil (Siemens Medical Solutions). T1-weighted images were acquired using a MPRAGE sequence with the following parameters: 176 slices (1-mm slice thickness), repetition time = 2,300 ms, echo time = 2.98 ms, flip angle = 9°, FoV = 256 × 240 × 176 mm and voxel size = 1 mm3. In the PREVENT-AD protocol, MRI data are collected annually as part of the longitudinal follow-up51. Here we used the structural scan acquired the closest to the MEG–PET visit (mean difference in days = 318.6, s.d. = 203.7).
We obtained the cortical surface from the T1-weighted structural MRI volumes of each individual using the FreeSurfer software package (version 5.3)59. We then parcellated the cortical surfaces according to the Desikan–Killiany atlas, comprising 34 × 2 bilateral cortical parcels60. This parcellation of individual cortical surfaces was used for MEG source mapping and SUVR quatification of the Aβ and tau PET data.
PET
PET imaging data were collected at the McConnell Brain Imaging Centre of the Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) using a Siemens HRRT head-only, high-resolution PET camera. Aβ scans were performed 40–70 min after injection of ~6 mCi of [18F] NAV4694 (Navidea Biopharmaceuticals), and tau scans were obtained 80–100 min after injection of ~10 mCi [18F] AV-1451 (FTP; Eli Lilly and Company). An attenuation scan was also acquired. Images were reconstructed using a 3D OP OSEM61,62 (10 iterations, 16 subsets) algorithm, and were decay and motion corrected. Scatter correction was performed using a 3D scatter estimation method62. For most participants (n = 96), the two PET scans were acquired one day apart, and all but one were collected less than 5 months apart (mean = 6.9 days, s.d. = 29.3 days).
PET images were preprocessed using an in-house pipeline from the Villeneuve Lab (https://github.com/villeneuvelab/vlpp), as described in ref. 49. Briefly, the 4D image files (six frames of 5 min for NAV and four frames of 5 min for FTP) were realigned, averaged, and registered to their corresponding structural MRI. SUVR maps were generated by using the cerebellum gray matter as a reference region for Aβ scans, and the inferior cerebellum gray matter for tau scans. The PET signal was then averaged across each parcel from the Desikan–Killiany atlas. Considering the characteristics of our cohort, we report Aβ uptakes across the whole-brain and tau PET signal in the entorhinal cortex, because of evidence of early AD-related tau depositions in that region6,7,43. To account for the limitations of using a single small cortical region such as the entorhinal cortex for tau quantification, we repeated all analyses using an early tau-sensitive temporal meta-ROI (Extended Data Fig. 2), obtained by averaging SUVR values over the entorhinal cortex, fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, lingual gyrus, and inferior and medial–temporal gyri43. Considering the high correlation between entorhinal and temporal meta-ROI tau SUVR values, we also repeated these analyses after excluding the entorhinal cortex from the temporal meta-ROI.
MEG
For most participants (n = 80) MEG was collected on the same day as one of the two PET visits using a 275-channel CTF system located inside a three-layer magnetically shielded room. The average time between MEG and PET data collection was 23 days for Aβ and 24.6 days for tau (s.d. = 57.4 and 60, respectively). Two 5-min runs (that is a total of 10 min) of resting state, eyes-open MEG data were collected from the participants, to derive robust measures of ongoing brain activity across the frequency spectrum63. We elected to use an eyes-open resting-state paradigm because, during eyes-open recordings, participants are less prone to experiencing drowsiness, which would confound the interpretation of neurophysiological slowing. Further, eye movements do occur behind the lids with the eyes closed, which are less stereotyped than eye blinks and therefore cause MEG artifacts that are more challenging to correct. Participants were instructed to sit upright while looking at a fixation cross displayed on a screen. The data sampling rate was 2,400 Hz, with a hardware anti-aliasing low-pass filter set at 600 Hz. Built-in third-order gradient compensation was applied to attenuate environmental noise. We collected about 100 scalp points in each participant with a Polhemus Fastrak device, including anatomical landmarks at the nasion and the left and right preauricular points. We monitored head movements during MEG data collection with head position indicators attached to the participants’ forehead and the left and right mastoids. We also collected reference signals for heartbeats and eye movements with concurrent electrocardiographic and electrooculographic recordings. Empty-room recordings (about 2 min) were obtained at the beginning of all MEG visits to characterize environmental noise at the time of each individual session.
We used Brainstorm3 for MEG data preprocessing and analysis64,65 and followed recommended good-practice procedures66. The data were notch filtered to remove power-line noise and harmonics (60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 Hz), and high-pass filtered above 0.3 Hz to remove low-frequency drifts and MEG-sensor DC-offset. We inspected all MEG time series for bad channels and segments with prominent movement artifacts, which were marked and excluded from further analysis. Cardiac and eyeblink events were detected from their respective reference signals using an automated procedure64. We derived specific signal space projectors to attenuate eyeblink and heartbeat contaminants, and other stereotyped artifacts when necessary. We time segmented the MEG recordings into 4-s epochs, excluding segments that still contained major artifacts, as identified from the union of two standardized thresholds of ±3 median absolute deviations from the median—one for peak-to-peak signal amplitude and one for signal gradients.
MEG data were registered to individual structural T1-weighted scans using the scalp’s digitized points. Using Brainstorm3, we obtained a MEG forward model (overlapping spheres) from 15,000 cortical locations for each participant. We estimated individualized sensor noise covariances from the empty-room recordings, which we then used to derive the participants’ imaging kernels of depth-weighted dynamic statistical parametric mapping of cortical current flows oriented perpendicularly to the cortex67. We then derived the power spectrum density for each 4-s epoch of the cortical time series using Welch’s estimator (2-s windows, 50% overlap). We then averaged all available epochs from both MEG runs to produce cortical maps of frequency band-specific activity in canonical frequency bands—delta (2–4 Hz), theta (5–7 Hz), alpha (8–12 Hz) and beta (15–29 Hz), each scaled relatively to the total power across all bands. Finally, we extracted the average relative signal power values in each frequency band of interest, and for each of the 68 cortical regions of the Desikan–Killiany atlas.
Statistics and reproducibility
Joint MEG–PET analysis
We first performed a between-participants analysis to test for potential whole-brain changes of neurophysiological (MEG) activity related to the pathological deposition of cortical Aβ and entorhinal tau. We derived the mean signal power across all cortical regions for each frequency band in the following three groups of participants: (1) participants with no Aβ nor entorhinal tau pathology (Aβ−/Tau−, n = 50), (2) participants with significant global Aβ burden but no entorhinal tau (Aβ+/Tau−, n = 42) and (3) participants with both global Aβ and entorhinal tau burden (Aβ+/Tau+, n = 11). The only participant (male) who was classified as Aβ−/Tau+ was excluded from the analysis. Aβ positivity was defined based on the average SUVR computed over a set of early Aβ sensitive regions (including the precuneus, posterior cingulate, parietal, frontal and lateral temporal cortices)11. Individuals with a global Aβ SUVR >1.18 (13.3 in Centiloid scale) were rated as Aβ+. This threshold was derived by estimating two s.d. above the mean global Aβ SUVR calculated from a normative subset of 11 young individuals who underwent the same PET protocol. Similarly, tau positivity was defined using a threshold of entorhinal SUVR >1.25, corresponding to two s.d. above the entorhinal SUVR values obtained for the young participants. We used the Levene test to assess variance homogeneity between our PET-defined groups, which showed that all of our models fulfilled this assumption (all P > 0.05). We ran an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to test whether the neurophysiological spectrum differed across groups while accounting for age, sex, years of education, hippocampal volume and the number of MEG epochs included as nuisance variables. We applied FDR corrections to account for the multiple (four) statistical tests performed across frequency bands. We then used bootstrapped resampling to derive confidence intervals around the mean statistics for each participant group while keeping the unbalanced proportion of individuals. To assess the robustness of these associations considering the small number of individuals within each group, we evaluated the presence of outliers by calculating the Cook’s distance, a summary metric of how each observation influences the regression model. We repeated the analysis for each frequency band after removing the influential cases, defined as those having a Cook distance above three times the mean distance of all data points included in the model.
Considering that the residuals for some frequency bands (that is theta and alpha) were not normally distributed, and the issues around the imbalance in sample sizes between the PET subgroups defined in our between-participants analysis approach, we designed nested LME models to test the within-participants association between band-specific neurophysiological activity and PET markers of AD pathology, accounting for potential confounds of age, sex, years of education, hippocampal volume and number of MEG epochs included per participant. Specifically, we tested for consistent within-participant relationships between Aβ deposition and neurophysiological activity across all cortical regions (neurophys. ~Aβ + age + sex + education + hippocampal volume + number of MEG epochs, random = ~1|participant), as well as the interactive effect of entorhinal tau deposition on these relationships across individuals (neurophys. ~Aβ × Tau + age + sex + education + hippocampal volume + number of MEG epochs, random = ~1 | participant). Both Aβ and entorhinal tau were treated as continuous variables for this analysis. We repeated our Aβ × Tau models by using the temporal meta-ROI instead of the entorhinal cortex tau SUVR values, and also by incorporating whole-brain estimates of tau deposition across all cortical regions as a nested variable of interest (neurophys. ~Aβ × regional Tau + age + sex + education + hippocampal volume + number of MEG epochs, random = ~1 | participant).
To visualize the synergistic interaction of tau deposition with the Aβ-neurophysiology relationships, we plotted the association between Aβ and neurophysiological activity separately for participants in the Tau+ and Tau− groups, based on the threshold defined for the between-participant analysis. For the models that included whole-brain regional tau as a nested variable, we showed the interaction effect by plotting the line of best fit obtained by separating the cortical regions exhibiting the highest and lowest (that is upper and lower quartiles) levels of tau within each participant. To ensure robustness, we performed 1,000 nonparametric permutations by randomly shuffling the Aβ SUVR values across the 68 cortical regions of each individual while keeping the MEG maps and all other covariates intact. For the models including whole-brain tau as a nested variable, we ran the permutations by shuffling between pairs of Aβ and tau estimates to preserve any interactive association between data points. From these permuted models, we then built a null distribution of the t statistic obtained for the relevant main effect (that is Aβ) or the interaction of Aβ × Tau and calculated the probability (P value) of obtaining the comparable statistic from the original model. We implemented FDR corrections to adjust the permuted P values accounting for the multiple statistical comparisons across the four frequency bands of interest. To test whether these relationships were confounded by global spectral changes of aperiodic neurophysiological activity, we repeated all analyses with LME models that included the region-wise aperiodic slope and offset of the neurophysiological power spectrum as a nuisance covariate68,69. We parameterized the power spectrum data obtained at each atlas region by using the specparam module in Brainstorm3 (Matlab, version R2021b) using the recommended default parameters69—frequency range 1–40 Hz, Gaussian peak model with peak width limits between 0.5 and 12 Hz, and a maximum number of three detectable peaks, a minimum peak height of 0.3 dB and a proximity threshold equivalent to two s.d. from the largest peak, with a fixed aperiodic and no guess weight. As mentioned above, we also repeated all LME analyses using the tau SUVR values from the temporal meta-ROI instead of those from the entorhinal cortex and the nested tau estimates across all cortical regions. All statistical analyses were computed using R (version 4.1.1)70. LME models were computed using the nlme package (version 3.1.152)71, ggplot2 (version 3.4.0)72 and ggseg (version 1.6.5)73 for visualization.
Association with cognitive decline
We first assessed whether longitudinal cognition differed across Aβ−/Tau−, Aβ+/Tau− and Aβ+/Tau+ individuals, by running an ANCOVA and posthoc Tukey’s Honestly Significant Differences (HSD) tests. We then tested whether the strength of any significant relationship between neurophysiological activity and AD proteinopathy was associated with longitudinal changes in cognitive performance. For each participant, we calculated the Fisher-transformed (atanh function in R) Pearson correlation coefficient between Aβ concentrations and neurophysiological signal power across all cortical regions. We restricted the analysis to the alpha and delta frequency bands because they showed significant associations with AD pathology. We fitted a linear model in R between the longitudinal cognitive scores described in neuropsychological testing above and the continuous Aβ–neurophysiology correlation coefficients, with tau concentrations as a moderating factor (lm function; cognitive slope ~(Aβ-neurophys. correlation) × Tau + age + sex + education + hippocampal volume + number of MEG epochs + time between MEG and the first cognition timepoint). We performed these analyses with 102 individuals, after excluding the Aβ−/Tau+ participant and the participant (female) who had completed only one cognitive assessment. We then applied FDR corrections to account for the four statistical comparisons across the composite attention–memory scores and the individual cognitive domains. Once again, we identified influential cases for each regression model using Cook’s distance approach described above and recomputed the analyses after removing individuals identified as potential outliers.
Predicting neurophysiological changes in later disease stages
Finally, we tested whether our linear mixed-effects model estimates matched the levels of neurophysiological changes reported in later disease stages. We used the coefficients from our linear mixed-effect model relating region-wise Aβ, temporal meta-ROI tau deposition and relative alpha-band power to estimate whole-brain relative alpha-band power values across a wider range of increasing levels of Aβ and tau deposition while keeping all other covariates constant (by multiplying their model coefficients by the median values calculated across all participants). To facilitate direct comparison with other studies, we expressed our global Aβ deposition estimates in Centiloid units for visualization, which was achieved by converting our NAV4694 SUVR values following the procedures described in ref. 74 to validate and adapt the NAV4694 SUVR to Centiloid formula proposed in ref. 75. We then compared these estimates against the median global Aβ, temporal meta-ROI tau SUVR and whole-brain relative alpha-band power values reported in two independent studies of participants with MCI and AD34,44. The participant samples were similar to our cohort in terms of age (PREVENT-AD—median = 66.3, IQR = 64.2, 70.6; ref. 44—median = 72.7, IQR = 65.8, 80.1; ref. 34—median = 70, IQR = 64, 74). For Aβ and tau, we used the estimates reported in ref. 44, calculated across 272 cognitively impaired patients. We calculated the weighted mean of the global Aβ Centiloid and tau meta-ROI flortaucipir SUVR values reported for the MCI and AD groups used in this work. For the relative alpha-band power estimates, we used the median and quartiles from 38 MCI and mild probable AD patients reported in ref. 34. Because these measures were from eyes-closed resting-state data, and our data were collected with eyes-open, we adjusted the values from ref. 34 with the multiplicative eyes-open to eyes-closed ratio reported in ref. 76 (median = 0.21, IQR = 0.16, 0.26). We then overlayed the median and quartile estimates of Aβ and tau from ref. 44 and the adjusted relative alpha-band power from ref. 34 on top of a heatmap produced from our model estimates (Fig. 5). We also verified that the alignment between the three independent datasets was similar when using a more conservative eyes-open to eyes-closed correction ratio77 (median = 0.16, IQR = 0.11, 0.21) and when using no correction (median = 0.24, IQR = 0.19, 0.29).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Data used in the preparation of this manuscript were obtained from the Presymptomatic Evaluation of Experimental or Novel Treatments for Alzheimer’s Disease (PREVENT-AD, https://prevent-alzheimer.net/). Some of the data are publicly available (https://openpreventad.loris.ca/, and https://www.mcgill.ca/bic/neuroinformatics/omega). In compliance with the ethical and privacy policies stipulated in the PREVENT-AD study to protect the identity of the participants and to preserve their right to refrain from sharing part of their biological/imaging data openly, the full internal release of the dataset https://registeredpreventad.loris.ca/ can only be shared upon approval by the scientific committee at the Centre for Studies on Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease (StoP-AD) at the Douglas Research Centre. Detailed instructions for accessing the open and requesting access to the full internal release versions of the PREVENT-AD dataset can be found at https://prevent-alzheimer.net/?page_id=1760&lang=en. For more details regarding the organization of the PREVENT-AD dataset, please refer to refs. 50,51. For further about getting access to the PREVENT-AD dataset please contact co-author S. Villeneuve (sylvia.villeneuve@mcgill.ca). The Desikan–Killiany atlas parcellation is included in FreeSurfer version 5.3 (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CorticalParcellation) and the ggseg package version 1.6.5 (https://github.com/ggseg). Centiloid data transformation was done by adapting a formula for our NAV4694 tracer following the steps described in refs. 74,75. The normative NAV4694 data necessary for the Centiloid validation can be found on the GAAIN website of the Alzheimer Association (https://www.gaain.org/centiloid-project).
Code availability
MRI parcellation was done using the FreeSurfer software (version 5.3). PET analysis was performed using a standard pipeline available at https://github.com/villeneuvelab/vlpp. The 3D OSEM algorithm has been described in previous publications61,62. MEG data analysis was implemented using the Brainstorm software package (Brainstorm3) working in Matlab (version 2021b). All the statistical analyses reported in this manuscript were conducted using documented functions from the openly distributed R software (version 4.1.1). Linear mixed-effects models were implemented using nlme (version 3.1.152). Data plots were generated using ggplot2 (version 3.4.0) and brain plots using ggseg (version 1.6.5). The scripts generated to implement the statistical analyses presented in this manuscript are hosted in an open-access GitHub repository, available at https://github.com/jogaru1818/AD_proteinopathy_neurophysiology.
References
Dubois, B. et al. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dement. 12, 292–323 (2016).
Gale, S. A., Acar, D. & Daffner, K. R. Dementia. Am. J. Med. 131, 1161–1169 (2018).
Jack, C. R. et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 9, 119–128 (2010).
Jack, C. R. et al. Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer’s disease: Alzheimer’s Association Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement. 20, 5143–5169 (2024).
Jagust, W. J. Imaging the evolution and pathophysiology of Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 687–700 (2018).
Braak, H. & Braak, E. Staging of Alzheimer’s disease-related neurofibrillary changes. Neurobiol. Aging 16, 271–284 (1995).
Braak, H. & Braak, E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 82, 239–259 (1991).
Alzheimer, A. Über eine eigenartige erkrankung der hirnrinde. Allg. Zschr. Psychiatr. Psych. Gerichtl. Med. 64, 146–148 (1907).
Sperling, R. A. et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 7, 280–292 (2011).
Palmqvist, S. et al. Earliest accumulation of β-amyloid occurs within the default-mode network and concurrently affects brain connectivity. Nat. Commun. 8, 1214 (2017).
Villeneuve, S. et al. Existing Pittsburgh compound-B positron emission tomography thresholds are too high: statistical and pathological evaluation. Brain 138, 2020–2033 (2015).
Mattsson, N., Palmqvist, S., Stomrud, E., Vogel, J. & Hansson, O. Staging β-amyloid pathology with amyloid positron emission tomography. JAMA Neurol. 76, 1319–1329 (2019).
Thal, D. R., Rüb, U., Orantes, M. & Braak, H. Phases of Aβ-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology 58, 1791–1800 (2002).
Leuzy, A. et al. Tau PET imaging in neurodegenerative tauopathies—still a challenge. Mol. Psychiatry 24, 1112–1134 (2019).
Lowe, V. J. et al. Tau-positron emission tomography correlates with neuropathology findings. Alzheimers Dement. 16, 561–571 (2020).
D’Amelio, M. & Rossini, P. M. Brain excitability and connectivity of neuronal assemblies in Alzheimer’s disease: from animal models to human findings. Prog. Neurobiol. 99, 42–60 (2012).
La Joie, R. et al. Prospective longitudinal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease correlates with the intensity and topography of baseline tau-PET. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, 5732 (2020).
Selkoe, D. J. & Hardy, J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol. Med. 8, 595–608 (2016).
Aschenbrenner, A. J., Gordon, B. A., Benzinger, T. L. S., Morris, J. C. & Hassenstab, J. J. Influence of tau PET, amyloid PET, and hippocampal volume on cognition in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 91, e859–e866 (2018).
Busche, M. A. & Hyman, B. T. Synergy between amyloid-β and tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1183–1193 (2020).
Palop, J. J. & Mucke, L. Amyloid-β induced neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: from synapses toward neural networks. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 812–818 (2010).
Stargardt, A., Swaab, D. F. & Bossers, K. The storm before the quiet: neuronal hyperactivity and Aβ in the presymptomatic stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 36, 1–11 (2015).
Zott, B. et al. A vicious cycle of β amyloid-dependent neuronal hyperactivation. Science 365, 559–565 (2019).
Busche, M. A. et al. Tau impairs neural circuits, dominating amyloid-β effects, in Alzheimer models in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 57–64 (2019).
Palop, J. J. & Mucke, L. Network abnormalities and interneuron dysfunction in Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 777–792 (2016).
Foster, C. M., Kennedy, K. M., Horn, M. M., Hoagey, D. A. & Rodrigue, K. M. Both hyper- and hypo-activation to cognitive challenge are associated with increased β-amyloid deposition in healthy aging: a nonlinear effect. Neuroimage 166, 285–292 (2018).
Huijbers, W. et al. Amyloid-β deposition in mild cognitive impairment is associated with increased hippocampal activity, atrophy and clinical progression. Brain 138, 1023–1035 (2015).
Leal, S. L., Landau, S. M., Bell, R. K. & Jagust, W. J. Hippocampal activation is associated with longitudinal amyloid accumulation and cognitive decline. eLife 6, e22978 (2017).
Billette, O. V. et al. Novelty-related fMRI responses of precuneus and medial temporal regions in individuals at risk for Alzheimer disease. Neurology 99, e775–e788 (2022).
Babiloni, C. et al. What electrophysiology tells us about Alzheimer’s disease: a window into the synchronization and connectivity of brain neurons. Neurobiol. Aging 85, 58–73 (2020).
López-Sanz, D., Bruña, R., de Frutos-Lucas, J. & Maestú, F. Magnetoencephalography applied to the study of Alzheimer’s disease. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 165, 25–61 (2019).
Ranasinghe, K. G. et al. Reduced synchrony in α oscillations during life predicts post mortem neurofibrillary tangle density in early-onset and atypical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 17, 2009–2019 (2021).
Ranasinghe, K. G. et al. Neurophysiological signatures in Alzheimer’s disease are distinctly associated with tau, amyloid-β accumulation, and cognitive decline. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaaz4069 (2020).
Wiesman, A. I. et al. Spatio-spectral relationships between pathological neural dynamics and cognitive impairment along the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Alzheimers Dement. (Amst) 13, e12200 (2021).
De Haan, W. et al. Resting-state oscillatory brain dynamics in Alzheimer disease. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 25, 187–193 (2008).
Garcés, P. et al. Brain-wide slowing of spontaneous α rhythms in mild cognitive impairment. Front. Aging Neurosci. 5, 100 (2013).
Poza, J., Hornero, R., Abásolo, D., Fernández, A. & Mayo, A. Evaluation of spectral ratio measures from spontaneous MEG recordings in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 90, 137–147 (2008).
López-Sanz, D., Serrano, N. & Maestú, F. The role of magnetoencephalography in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurosci. 12, 572 (2018).
Maestú, F. et al. The importance of the validation of M/EEG with current biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 17 (2019).
Wiesman, A. I. et al. Spatially resolved neural slowing predicts impairment and amyloid burden in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 145, 2177–2189 (2022).
Alexandersen, C. G., de Haan, W., Bick, C. & Goriely, A. A multi-scale model explains oscillatory slowing and neuronal hyperactivity in Alzheimer’s disease. J. R. Soc. Interface 20, 20220607 (2023).
Nakamura, A. et al. Electromagnetic signatures of the preclinical and prodromal stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 141, 1470–1485 (2018).
Jack, C. R. et al. Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 13, 205–216 (2017).
Jack, C. R. et al. Predicting amyloid PET and tau PET stages with plasma biomarkers. Brain 146, 2029–2044 (2023).
Lee, W. J. et al. Regional Aβ–tau interactions promote onset and acceleration of Alzheimer’s disease tau spreading. Neuron 110, 1932–1943 (2022).
Ranasinghe, K. G. et al. Altered excitatory and inhibitory neuronal subpopulation parameters are distinctly associated with tau and amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. eLife 11, e77850 (2022).
Van Nifterick, A. M. et al. A multiscale brain network model links Alzheimer’s disease-mediated neuronal hyperactivity to large-scale oscillatory slowing. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 14, 101 (2022).
Gouw, A. A. et al. EEG spectral analysis as a putative early prognostic biomarker in nondemented, amyloid positive subjects. Neurobiol. Aging 57, 133–142 (2017).
McSweeney, M. et al. Intermediate flortaucipir uptake is associated with Aβ-PET and CSF tau in asymptomatic adults. Neurology 94, e1190–e1200 (2020).
Breitner, J. C. S., Poirier, J., Etienne, P. E. & Leoutsakos, J. M. Rationale and structure for a new center for Studies on Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease (StoP-AD). J. Prev. Alzheimers Dis. 3, 236–242 (2016).
Tremblay-Mercier, J. et al. Open science datasets from PREVENT-AD, a longitudinal cohort of pre-symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin. 31, 102733 (2021).
Nasreddine, Z. S. et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 53, 695–699 (2005).
Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danziger, W. L., Coben, L. A. & Martin, R. L. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br. J. Psychiatry 140, 566–572 (1982).
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. & Mchugh, P. R. ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12, 189–198 (1975).
López-Sanz, D. et al. Alpha band disruption in the AD-continuum starts in the subjective cognitive decline stage: a MEG study. Sci. Rep. 6, 37685–37695 (2016).
Randolph, C., Tierney, M. C., Mohr, E. & Chase, T. N. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 20, 310–319 (1998).
Malhotra, P. A. Impairments of attention in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 29, 41–48 (2019).
Jahn, H. Memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 15, 445–454 (2013).
Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774–781 (2012).
Desikan, R. S. et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31, 968–980 (2006).
Varrone, A. et al. Advancement in PET quantification using 3D-OP-OSEM point spread function reconstruction with the HRRT. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 36, 1639–1650 (2009).
Sibomana, M., Keller, S. H., Stute, S. & Comtat, C. Benefits of 3D scatter correction for the HRRT—a large axial FOV PET scanner. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC), 2954–2957 (IEEE, 2012).
Wiesman, A. I., da Silva Castanheira, J. & Baillet, S. Stability of spectral estimates in resting-state magnetoencephalography: recommendations for minimal data duration with neuroanatomical specificity. Neuroimage 247, 118823 (2022).
Niso, G. et al. Brainstorm pipeline analysis of resting-state data from the open MEG archive. Front. Neurosci. 13, 284 (2019).
Tadel, F., Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., Pantazis, D. & Leahy, R. M. Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 879716 (2011).
Gross, J. et al. Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Neuroimage 65, 349–363 (2013).
Baillet, S. Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 327–339 (2017).
Wilson, L. E., da Silva Castanheira, J. & Baillet, S. Time-resolved parameterization of aperiodic and periodic brain activity. eLife 11, e77348 (2022).
Donoghue, T. et al. Parameterizing neural power spectra into periodic and aperiodic components. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1655–1665 (2020).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).
Pinheiro, J. & Bates, D. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html (2022).
Wickham, H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).
Mowinckel, A. M. & Vidal-Piñeiro, D. Visualization of brain statistics with R packages ggseg and ggseg3d. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 3, 466–483 (2020).
Klunk, W. E. et al. The Centiloid project: standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET. Alzheimers Dement. 11, 1–15 (2015).
Rowe, C. C. et al. Standardized expression of 18F-NAV4694 and 11C-PiB β-amyloid PET results with the Centiloid scale. J. Nucl. Med. 57, 1233–1237 (2016).
Anwar, A. R. et al. Multi-modal causality analysis of eyes-open and eyes-closed data from simultaneously recorded EEG and MEG. Proceedings of the 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2825–2828 (IEEE, 2014).
Hata, M. et al. Alpha event-related synchronization after eye closing differs in Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies: a magnetoencephalography study. Psychogeriatrics 18, 202–208 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge all the PREVENT-AD participants and their families, the PREVENT-AD team members, as well as the Brain Imaging Center of the Douglas Research Centre and the PET and cyclotron units of the Montreal Neurological Institute for their time and dedication to this project. A complete list of PREVENT-AD contributors can be found at https://preventad.loris.ca/acknowledgements/acknowledgements.php?date=2024-06-26. The investigators of the PREVENT-AD program contributed to the design and implementation of PREVENT-AD and/or provided data but did not participate in analyzing or writing of this report. The authors would also like to thank the reviewers for providing their valuable insight, and V. Ourry, F. St-Onge, Y. Yakoub, M. Javanray, T. Qiu, J. Remz, A. Fajardo-Valdez and J. da Silva Castanheira for providing advice on the study research design. This project has been made possible by the Canada Brain Research Fund (CBRF), an innovative arrangement between the Government of Canada (through Health Canada) and Brain Canada Foundation, and the Alzheimer’s Association, via a grant to S.B. J.G.R. is supported by the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT; 2020-000017-02EXTF-00402) and the Healthy Brains Healthy Lives (HBHL) program at McGill University. A.I.W. is supported by grant F32-NS119375 from the United States National Institutes of Health and a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship (BPF-186555) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. S.V. is supported by the Alzheimer Society of Canada, the Alzheimer Association and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; 438655). S.B. is supported by the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH; R01-EB026299-05), the Tier-1 Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada Research Chair of Neural Dynamics of Brain Systems (CRC-2017-00311) and a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (436355-13). The PREVENT-AD Research Group receives funding from the J.L. Levesque Foundation, Brain Canada and the Fonds de Recherche du Québec—Sante (FRQS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
J.G.R., A.I.W., S.V. and S.B. conceptualized the study, and reviewed, edited and wrote the manuscript. J.G.R., A.I.W., A.P.B., S.V. and S.B. were responsible for methodology. J.G.R., A.I.W. and A.P.B. handled software development and conducted formal analysis. J.G.R. and A.I.W. validated the data. J.G.R., A.P.B., S.V. and S.B. performed data curation. J.G.R. helped in study visualization. J.G.R., S.V. and S.B. led the investigation. S.V. and S.B. contributed to resources, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. J.G.R., A.P.B., S.V. and S.B. are contributors to the PREVENT-AD Research Group.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Neuroscience thanks Willem de Haan, Masud Husain and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Between-subjects spectral power analysis.
Box plots show the median, quartiles, minima and maxima, while violin plots show the density distribution of the mean whole-brain relative spectral power values for the delta, theta, alpha and beta frequency bands across subjects with no AD pathology (Aβ−/Tau−, n = 50), subjects with widespread Aβ expression and low entorhinal tau (Aβ+/Tau−, n = 42) and subjects with both Aβ and entorhinal tau burden (Aβ+/Tau+, n = 11). Mean relative power brain maps for each subgroup are shown on top of each plot. Two-sided, one-factor ANCOVAs were performed to assess the main effect of group on whole-brain relative power. A neurophysiological slowing effect was observed for the Aβ+/Tau+ compared to the Aβ+/Tau− group, reflected as an increase in whole-brain delta (F(2, 95) = 4.58, pFDR = 0.025) and theta (F(2, 95) = 4.76, pFDR = 0.025) power and a decrease in alpha (F(2, 95) = 3.15, pFDR = 0.047) and beta (F(2, 95) = 3.79, pFDR = 0.034) power. Brackets indicate the results from post hoc comparisons to assess significant differences between the groups, with their corresponding Tukey HSD p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons. ns: non-significant.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Interactive Aβ and tau effect on neurophysiological activity using temporal meta-ROI and whole-brain regional tau.
The observation that higher tau deposition relates to a shift in the Aβ-neurophysiology associations was replicated when using the average temporal meta-ROI instead of the entorhinal cortex tau SUVR values (alpha: t(6966) = −4.27, pFDR < 0.001; delta: t(6966) = 3.46, pFDR = 0.004; left panel). The thick colored lines represent the line-of-best fit across the Tau− (black; n = 11) and Tau+ (red; n = 93) participants. The shaded area represents the 95% confidence intervals. The same trend was observed when using nested, whole-brain regional tau SUVR values, although the associations were not significant after permutation and FDR corrections (alpha-band: t(6965) = −6.42, pFDR = 0.106; delta-band: t(6965) = 2.67, pFDR = 0.296; right panel). The thick colored lines represent the line-of-best fit across the bottom quartile low tau (black) and the top quartile high tau (red) regions. The shaded area represents the 95% confidence intervals. Group average delta- and alpha-band relative power maps are shown on the left and average temporal meta-ROI and whole-brain tau SUVR maps are shown on top. Note that tau SUVR values were treated as a continuous variable in all analyses, and that the Tau−/Tau+ and low/high tau distinctions were used only for visualization of the interaction effects. Corresponding t statistic and permuted, one-sided FDR corrected p-values are overlaid on each plot. Shaded regions indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gallego-Rudolf, J., Wiesman, A.I., Pichet Binette, A. et al. Synergistic association of Aβ and tau pathology with cortical neurophysiology and cognitive decline in asymptomatic older adults. Nat Neurosci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01763-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01763-8