Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Altered adult neurogenesis and gliogenesis in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

Nature Neuroscience volume 25, pages 493–503 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The hippocampus is the most common seizure focus in people. In the hippocampus, aberrant neurogenesis plays a critical role in the initiation and progression of epilepsy in rodent models, but it is unknown whether this also holds true in humans. To address this question, we used immunofluorescence on control healthy hippocampus and surgical resections from mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), plus neural stem-cell cultures and multi-electrode recordings of ex vivo hippocampal slices. We found that a longer duration of epilepsy is associated with a sharp decline in neuronal production and persistent numbers in astrogenesis. Further, immature neurons in MTLE are mostly inactive, and are not observed in cases with local epileptiform-like activity. However, immature astroglia are present in every MTLE case and their location and activity are dependent on epileptiform-like activity. Immature astroglia, rather than newborn neurons, therefore represent a potential target to continually modulate adult human neuronal hyperactivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Adult neurogenesis in patients with MTLE declines with disease duration.
Fig. 2: Immature astroglia persist through human MTLE disease duration.
Fig. 3: Generation of newborn granule neurons and astroglia from adult patients with MTLE.
Fig. 4: Newborn neuron behavior with epileptiform activity.
Fig. 5: Alteration of immature astroglia behavior with epileptiform activity.

Data availability

All data are available in the manuscript or supplementary materials. Individual data points for each figure are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. Any further information regarding the availability of raw data, materials and methods can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Bond, A. M., Ming, G. L. & Song, H. Adult mammalian neural stem cells and neurogenesis: five decades later. Cell Stem Cell 17, 385–395 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, S. M. & Sahay, A. Functions of adult-born neurons in hippocampal memory interference and indexing. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1565–1575 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cho, K.-O. et al. Aberrant hippocampal neurogenesis contributes to epilepsy and associated cognitive decline. Nat. Commun. 6, 6606 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parent, J. M. et al. Dentate granule cell neurogenesis is increased by seizures and contributes to aberrant network reorganization in the adult rat hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 17, 3727–3738 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pun, R. Y. K. et al. Excessive activation of mTOR in postnatally generated granule cells is sufficient to cause epilepsy. Neuron 75, 1022–1034 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hattiangady, B., Rao, M. S. & Shetty, A. K. Chronic temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with severely declined dentate neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Neurobiol. Dis. 17, 473–490 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kralic, J. E., Ledergerber, D. A. & Fritschy, J.-M. Disruption of the neurogenic potential of the dentate gyrus in a mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy with focal seizures. Eur. J. Neurosci. 22, 1916–1927 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hattiangady, B. & Shetty, A. K. Implications of decreased hippocampal neurogenesis in chronic temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 49, 26–41 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Marín-Burgin, A., Mongiat, L. A., Pardi, M. B. & Schinder, A. F. Unique processing during a period of high excitation/inhibition balance in adult-born neurons. Science 335, 1238–1242 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou, Q. G. et al. Chemogenetic silencing of hippocampal neurons suppresses epileptic neural circuits. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 310–323 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Varma, P., Brulet, R., Zhang, L. & Hsieh, J. Targeting seizure-induced neurogenesis in a clinically-relevant time-period leads to transient but not persistent seizure reduction. J. Neurosci. 39, 7019–7028 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lybrand, Z. R. et al. A critical period of neuronal activity results in aberrant neurogenesis rewiring hippocampal circuitry in a mouse model of epilepsy. Nat. Commun. 12, 1423 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sierra, A. et al. Neuronal hyperactivity accelerates depletion of neural stem cells and impairs hippocampal neurogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 16, 488–503 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Boldrini, M. et al. Human hippocampal neurogenesis persists throughout aging. Cell Stem Cell 22, 589–599.e5 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sorrells, S. F. et al. Human hippocampal neurogenesis drops sharply in children to undetectable levels in adults. Nature 555, 377–381 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Spalding, K. L. et al. Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell 153, 1219–1227 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Eriksson, P. S. et al. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat. Med. 4, 1313–1317 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tobin, M. K. et al. Human hippocampal neurogenesis persists in aged adults and Alzheimer’s disease patients. Cell Stem Cell 24, 974–982.e3 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Moreno-Jiménez, E. P. et al. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is abundant in neurologically healthy subjects and drops sharply in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 25, 554–560 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cipriani, S. et al. Hippocampal radial glial subtypes and their neurogenic potential in human fetuses and healthy and Alzheimer’s disease adults. Cereb. Cortex 28, 2458–2478 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Knoth, R. et al. Murine features of neurogenesis in the human hippocampus across the lifespan from 0 to 100 years. PLoS One 5, e8809 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Coras, R. et al. Low proliferation and differentiation capacities of adult hippocampal stem cells correlate with memory dysfunction in humans. Brain 133, 3359–3372 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, Y. W. J. et al. Doublecortin expression in the normal and epileptic adult human brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 28, 2254–2265 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Engel, J. & International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). A proposed diagnostic scheme for people with epileptic seizures and with epilepsy: report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia 42, 796–803 (2001).

  25. Wiebe, S., Blume, W. T., Girvin, J. P., Eliasziw, M. & Effectiveness and Efficiency of Surgery for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Study Group. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 311–8 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, Y. et al. Purification and characterization of progenitor and mature human astrocytes reveals transcriptional and functional differences with mouse. Neuron 89, 37–53 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bloch, J. et al. Doublecortin-positive cells in the adult primate cerebral cortex and possible role in brain plasticity and development. J. Comp. Neurol. 519, 775–789 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Johansson, C. B., Svensson, M., Wallstedt, L., Janson, A. M. & Frisén, J. Neural stem cells in the adult human brain. Exp. Cell Res. 253, 733–736 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kukekov, V. G. et al. Multipotent stem/progenitor cells with similar properties arise from two neurogenic regions of adult human brain. Exp. Neurol. 156, 333–44 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hsiao, M.-C. et al. An in vitro seizure model from human hippocampal slices using multi-electrode arrays. J. Neurosci. Methods 244, 154–163 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pillai, J. & Sperling, M. R. Interictal EEG and the diagnosis of epilepsy. Epilepsia 47, 14–22 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gabriel, S. et al. Stimulus and potassium-induced epileptiform activity in the human dentate gyrus from patients with and without hippocampal sclerosis. J. Neurosci. 24, 10416–10430 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Simonato, M. et al. Differential expression of immediate early genes in the hippocampus in the kindling model of epilepsy. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 11, 115–24 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rakhade, S. N. et al. A common pattern of persistent gene activation in human neocortical epileptic foci. Ann. Neurol. 58, 736–747 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Adamsky, A. et al. Astrocytic activation generates de novo neuronal potentiation and memory enhancement. Cell 174, 59–71.e14 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lam, A. D. et al. Silent hippocampal seizures and spikes identified by foramen ovale electrodes in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 23, 678–680 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Vossel, K. A. et al. Incidence and impact of subclinical epileptiform activity in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 80, 858–870 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Sen, A., Capelli, V. & Husain, M. Cognition and dementia in older patients with epilepsy. Brain 141, 1592–1608 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hermann, B., Seidenberg, M., Lee, E. J., Chan, F. & Rutecki, P. Cognitive phenotypes in temporal lobe epilepsy. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 13, 12–20 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Segi-Nishida, E., Warner-Schmidt, J. L. & Duman, R. S. Electroconvulsive seizure and VEGF increase the proliferation of neural stem-like cells in rat hippocampus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11352–11357 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jang, M. H. et al. Secreted frizzled-related protein 3 regulates activity-dependent adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 12, 215–223 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Snyder, J. S. Recalibrating the relevance of adult neurogenesis. Trends Neurosci. 42, 164–178 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen, M. et al. Neural progenitor cells in cerebral cortex of epilepsy patients do not originate from astrocytes expressing GLAST. Cereb. Cortex 27, 5672–5682 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bonaguidi, M. A. et al. Noggin expands neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 28, 9194–9204 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tian, G.-F. et al. An astrocytic basis of epilepsy. Nat. Med. 11, 973–981 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Diaz Verdugo, C. et al. Glia-neuron interactions underlie state transitions to generalized seizures. Nat. Commun. 10, 3830 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Deemyad, T., Lüthi, J. & Spruston, N. Astrocytes integrate and drive action potential firing in inhibitory subnetworks. Nat. Commun. 9, 4336 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Mu, Y. et al. Glia accumulate evidence that actions are futile and suppress unsuccessful behavior. Cell 178, 27–43.e19 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. de Lanerolle, N. C., Kim, J. H., Robbins, R. J. & Spencer, D. D. Hippocampal interneuron loss and plasticity in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain Res. 495, 387–395 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schröder, W. et al. Functional and molecular properties of human astrocytes in acute hippocampal slices obtained from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 41, S181–S184 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Nossenson, N., Magal, A. & Messer, H. Detection of stimuli from multi-neuron activity: empirical study and theoretical implications. Neurocomputing 174, 822–837 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lewis, D. A. The human brain revisited: opportunities and challenges in postmortem studies of psychiatric disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 26, 143–154 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kelly, T. M. & Mann, J. J. Validity of DSM-III-R diagnosis by psychological autopsy: a comparison with clinician ante-mortem diagnosis. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 94, 337–343 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L. & Cohen, J. The global assessment scale: a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 33, 766–771 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the families that gave consent for brain tissue collection and interviews to investigators at Columbia University, the New York State Psychiatric Institute and the University of Southern California. We thank teams performing the psychological autopsy interviews and M. J. Bakalian for assistance with laboratory equipment and software. We thank the USC Neurorestoration administration and clinical research staff for their support on this study. We thank A. P. McMahon and members of the Bonaguidi laboratory for helpful discussions.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R00NS089013, R56AG064077 to M.A.B.; MH83862, NS090415, MH94888 to M.B.; U01MH098937 to R.H.C.; MH64168, MH098786 to A.J.D.; MH40210 to V.A.; MH090964 to J.J.M.), the Donald E. and Delia B. Baxter Foundation, the L.K. Whittier Foundation, the Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation (to M.A.B.), the USC Neurorestoration Center (to J.J.R. and C.Y.L.), the Rudi Schulte Research Institute (to C.Y.L.), the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention SRG-0-129-12, the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation Independent Investigator Grant no. 56388, New York Stem Cell Initiative C029157 and C023054, the Dr Brigitt Rok-Potamkin’s Foundation, the Morris Stroud III Center for Study of Quality of Life in Health and Aging (to M.B.) and the American Epilepsy Society (to A.A.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Aswathy Ammothumkandy, Victoria Wolseley, Luis Corona, Naibo Zhang & Michael A. Bonaguidi

  2. Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Kristine Ravina, George Nune, Brian Lee, J. A. D. Smith, Christianne Heck, Charles Y. Liu, Jonathan J. Russin & Michael A. Bonaguidi

  3. Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Victoria Wolseley & Robert H. Chow

  4. Division of Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology, NYS Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA

    Alexandria N. Tartt, J. John Mann, Gorazd B. Rosoklija, Victoria Arango, Andrew J. Dwork & Maura Boldrini

  5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Pen-Ning Yu, Dong Song, Theodore W. Berger, Robert H. Chow, Charles Y. Liu & Michael A. Bonaguidi

  6. Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    George Nune, Laura Kalayjian & Christianne Heck

  7. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    J. John Mann, Gorazd B. Rosoklija, Victoria Arango, Andrew J. Dwork & Maura Boldrini

  8. Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia

    Gorazd B. Rosoklija & Andrew J. Dwork

  9. Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Andrew J. Dwork

  10. Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Brian Lee, Charles Y. Liu & Jonathan J. Russin

  11. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    J. A. D. Smith

  12. Department of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Michael A. Bonaguidi

  13. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Michael A. Bonaguidi

  14. Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Michael A. Bonaguidi

Authors
  1. Aswathy Ammothumkandy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristine Ravina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Victoria Wolseley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexandria N. Tartt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pen-Ning Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Luis Corona
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Naibo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. George Nune
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Laura Kalayjian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. J. John Mann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Gorazd B. Rosoklija
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Victoria Arango
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Andrew J. Dwork
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Brian Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. J. A. D. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Dong Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Theodore W. Berger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Christianne Heck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Robert H. Chow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Maura Boldrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Charles Y. Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Jonathan J. Russin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Michael A. Bonaguidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.A. and M.A.B. conceived the project. A.A, J.A.D.S., R.H.C., D.S., T.W.B., C.Y.L., J.J.R., M.B. and M.A.B. designed the experiments. A.A., K.R., V.W., N.Z., A.N.T., L.C. and P.-N.Y. performed the experiments. K.R., A.J.D., G.B.R., M.B. and J.J.M. compiled the clinical information. J.J.R., C.Y.L. and B.L. performed the neurosurgeries. G.N., L.K., C.H., M.B., A.J.D., G.B.R., V.A. and J.J.M. conducted clinical review and assisted with specimen collection. A.A. analyzed and compiled the data. A.A., K.R., A.N.T., M.B. and M.A.B. wrote the manuscript. M.A.B. and M.B. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Bonaguidi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.J.M. receives royalties for commercial use of the C-SSRS from the Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene. Work by V.A. related to this paper was completed when she was employed at Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute; the opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not reflect the views of the NIH, the Department of Health and Human Services or the United States government. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Neuroscience thanks Jeong Ho Lee and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Relationship among human immature neurons, age, MTLE onset and disease duration.

(a) Dcx + (green) Prox1 + (purple) immature neuron in late stage maturation across Z stacks. Scale bar 10 µm. (b) Correlation between disease duration (yr.) and age at surgery (yr) (N = 17). Two-tailed Pearson Correlation ** P ≤ 0.01. Pearson r = 0.6299 (c) Number of Dcx+ Prox1 cells/mm3 in the Granule cell layer (GCL) with age of onset (yr.) (N = 17). Two-tailed Pearson Correlation ** P ≤ 0.01. Pearson r = 0.7021 (d) Age of onset for cases in which Dcx+ Prox1+ cells were undetected (-) (N = 10) vs detected (+) (N = 7). The graph represents s.e.m. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. * P ≤ 0.05. (e) Correlation between disease duration (yr.) and age of onset (yr.) (N = 17). Pearson Correlation *** P ≤ 0.001. Pearson r = −0.7728 (b-e) Data points marked in red and blue are from cases in which Dcx+ Prox1+ cells were undetected (-) N = 10 and detected (+) N = 7 respectively. (f, g) Number of Dcx+ Prox1+ cells/mm3 in the GCL in (f) female (N = 11) vs male (N = 6) cases, and (g) left (N = 7) vs right (N = 10) hippocampus. The graph represents s.e.m. (h) Magnified view of Dcx+ Prox1+ cells ranging early, mid and late maturation states morphologically. Scale bar: 10 µm. (i) Fraction of Dcx+ Prox1+ cells in various maturation stages in N = 7 cases with Dcx+ Prox1+ cells detected. One-way ANOVA (F 1.115,6.687 = 18.29, p = 0.0036) Tukey’s multiple comparison’s test. * P ≤ 0.05, *** P ≤ 0.001. (j) Fraction of early, mid and late maturation stage Dcx+ Prox1+ immature neurons in each of N = 7 MTLE cases with Dcx+ Prox1+ cells detected. (k) Dcx + (green) PSA-NCAM + (red) cells with late maturation state morphology identified in the GCL of N = 1 MTLE case. (l) Dcx + (green) PSA-NCAM + (red) Prox1 + (purple) cell across Z-planes for image in Fig. 1i lower panel Representative image from staining done in N = 4 cases.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Identifying Dcx + cells as immature astroglia in MTLE tissue.

(a) Dcx+ stellar cells (green) do not co-express markers for granule neurons (Prox1) (N = 17 MTLE cases), mossy cells (GluR2/3) (N = 2 MTLE cases) inhibitory neurons (Gad65 + 67) (N = 2 MTLE cases) and microglia (Iba1) (N = 2 MTLE cases) stained in red. Scale bar 10 µm. (b) Dcx + (green) Prox1- (purple) stellar cells do not co-express PSA-NCAM (red), a marker for immature neuron Scale bar 10 µm. (N = 4 MTLE cases) (c) Dcx+ stellar cells (green) do not co-express ki-67 (red), a marker for cell proliferation (N = 3 MTLE cases) Scale bar 10 µm.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Dcx + stellar cells co-express glial markers in MTLE patients but not in healthy controls.

(a, b) Dcx + (Green) stellar cells co-express glial markers (a) S100β (Red), and (b) GFAP (Red) mostly in the hilus and GCL (marked by arrow). S100β + Dcx- cells and GFAP + Dcx- cells (marked by arrowhead) are present in the ML. N = 5 MTLE cases. Scale bar 50 µm. (c) Dcx + (Green) GFAP + (Red) cells not detected in GCL, hilus and ML of N = 5 control cases.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Neural differentiation from adult MTLE patients.

(a) Upper 3 panels: Tuj1 + (green) GFAP + (red) newborn astroglia (marked by arrows) and Tuj1+ GFAP- cells (marked by arrowheads) present in neural differentiation cultures at 3-week (N = 6) and 6-week (N = 5) differentiation. Lower 3 panels: Tuj1 + (green) Prox1 + (red) newborn granule neurons (marked by arrows) and Tuj1 + Prox1- cells (marked by arrowheads) present in neural differentiation cultures at 3-week (N = 5) and 6-week (N = 5) differentiation. Scale bar: 50 µm (b) Tuj1- GFAP + mature astroglia were rarely identified in N = 3 cases. Scale bar: 50 µm. (c) Percentage of Tuj1- GFAP + mature astroglia at 3 (N = 6) - and 6-week (N = 5) differentiation. Graph represents s.e.m.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Mapping inter-ictal like activity with multi-electrode array (MEA) in DG-I cases.

(a) Illustrative 8×8 and 6×10 60-electrode MEA configuration and hippocampal slice recording of adult human MTLE tissue (4 representative cases from DG-I group). Inter-ictal like activity detected by electrodes covering the dentate gyrus (DG). Red markings overlaying the brightfield slice image and individual electrode recordings corresponds to inter-ictal like activity with comparatively higher amplitude, yellow markings – electrodes detecting comparatively lower amplitude and black markings – electrodes not detecting inter-ictal like activity.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Mapping inter-ictal like activity with multi-electrode array (MEA) in Whole DG-NI cases.

(a) Illustrative 8×8 60-electrode MEA configuration and hippocampal slice recording of adult human MTLE tissue (4 representative cases from Whole DG-NI group lacking activity in the DG). Inter-ictal like activity not detected by electrodes covering the DG. Red markings in the slice picture and MEA electrode layout indicate electrodes detecting comparatively higher amplitude inter-ictal like activity, yellow markings – electrodes detecting comparatively lower amplitude and black markings – electrodes not detecting inter-ictal like activity.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Ectopic immature neurons in MTLE patient hippocampus.

(a) Representative image of Dcx + (green) Prox1 + (purple) cells in the Hilus (left panel) and ML (right panel). Scale bar: 50 µm. (b) Distance of Dcx+ Prox1+ cell from GCL in the hilus and ML of N = 7 MTLE cases. Graph represents s.e.m. (c) Dcx + (green) PSA-NCAM + (red) immature neurons in hilus and ML are not positive for c-fos (Purple) in N = 5 MTLE cases. (d) Dcx + (green) PSA-NCAM + (red) immature neurons that are Arc- and Arc + (Purple) identified in hilus and ML of N = 5 MTLE cases.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Immediate early genes c-fos and Arc in adult MTLE patient hippocampus.

(a) All Dcx + (green) c-fos + (purple) cells co-express S100β (red) (N = 2 cases) (b) Dcx (green) and Arc (red) co-staining determine the relationship between immature cells and inter-ictal like activity. Increased presence of Arc+ cells in the GCL of Sub DG-I compared to Whole DG-NI and Sub DG-NI. Dcx+ astroglia are preferentially localized to the hilus in Sub DG-I (arrowheads). Scale bar: 100 µm (c) Magnified view of Dcx and Arc co-staining. Scale bar 10 µm. Dcx+ atypical astroglial cells (green) are mostly Arc- in whole DG-NI cases and subregions of cases with inter-ictal like activity. (d) Quantification of Arc expression in immature Dcx+ astroglia in whole DG-NI cases (N = 6) and subregions of cases with inter-ictal like activity (N = 5). Data points are from individual MTLE cases, and the graph represents s.e.m.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary Tables 1–4 with legends.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ammothumkandy, A., Ravina, K., Wolseley, V. et al. Altered adult neurogenesis and gliogenesis in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Nat Neurosci 25, 493–503 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01044-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01044-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing