Citation count has become one of the most important methods to evaluate a scientist’s contributions. In an extensive analysis of citations from a number of leading neuroscience journals, Dworkin and colleagues find evidence of gender bias in citation practices that can have an adverse impact on women’s careers.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Supporting academic equity in physics through citation diversity
Communications Physics Open Access 27 September 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Dworkin, J. D. et al. Nat. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y (2020).
Marder, E., Kettenmann, H. & Grillner, S. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21233 (2010).
Hirsch, J. E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16569–16572 (2005).
Connor, J. Google Scholar citations open to all. Google Scholar Blog https://scholar.googleblog.com/2011/11/google-scholar-citations-open-to-all.html (16 November 2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fairhall, A.L., Marder, E. Acknowledging female voices. Nat Neurosci 23, 904–905 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0667-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0667-x
This article is cited by
-
Citation inequity and gendered citation practices in contemporary physics
Nature Physics (2022)
-
Supporting academic equity in physics through citation diversity
Communications Physics (2022)