Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Myelin degeneration and diminished myelin renewal contribute to age-related deficits in memory

Nature Neuroscience volume 23, pages 481–486 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Cognitive decline remains an unaddressed problem for the elderly. We show that myelination is highly active in young mice and greatly inhibited in aged mice, coinciding with spatial memory deficits. Inhibiting myelination by deletion of Olig2 in oligodendrocyte precursor cells impairs spatial memory in young mice, while enhancing myelination by deleting the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor 1 in oligodendrocyte precursor cells, or promoting oligodendroglial differentiation and myelination via clemastine treatment, rescues spatial memory decline during aging.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Age-related myelin renewal and memory deficits in aging mice.
Fig. 2: Olig2 deletion in OPCs inhibits myelination and impairs spatial memory in 4-month-old mice.
Fig. 3: Chrm1 deletion in OPCs or clemastine treatment enhances myelination and reverses the spatial memory deficit in aging mice.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data from this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J. & D’Esposito, M. Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1298–1300 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Garde, E. et al. Relation between age-related decline in intelligence and cerebral white-matter hyperintensities in healthy octogenarians: a longitudinal study. Lancet 356, 628–634 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hughes, E. G. & Orthmann-Murphy, J. L. Myelin remodeling through experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis in the adult somatosensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 696–706 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Young, K. M. et al. Oligodendrocyte dynamics in the healthy adult CNS: evidence for myelin remodeling. Neuron 77, 873–885 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill, R. A., Li, A. M. & Grutzendler, J. Lifelong cortical myelin plasticity and age-related degeneration in the live mammalian brain. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 683–695 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lasiene, J. et al. Age-related myelin dynamics revealed by increased oligodendrogenesis and short internodes. Aging Cell 8, 201–213 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McKenzie, I. A. et al. Motor skill learning requires active central myelination. Science 346, 318–322 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zatorre, R. J., Fields, R. D. & Johansen-Berg, H. Plasticity in gray and white: neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 528–536 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes, E. G., Kang, S. H., Fukaya, M. & Bergles, D. E. Oligodendrocyte progenitors balance growth with self-repulsion to achieve homeostasis in the adult brain. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 668–676 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, S. H. et al. NG2+ CNS glial progenitors remain committed to the oligodendrocyte lineage in postnatal life and following neurodegeneration. Neuron 68, 668–681 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, F. et al. Enhancing oligodendrocyte myelination rescues synaptic loss and improves functional recovery after chronic hypoxia. Neuron 99, 689–701e5 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mei, F. et al. Accelerated remyelination during inflammatory demyelination prevents axonal loss and improves functional recovery. eLife 5, 1–21 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mei, F. et al. Stage-specific deletion of Olig2 conveys opposing functions on differentiation and maturation of oligodendrocytes. J. Neurosci. 33, 8454–8462 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Safaiyan, S. et al. Age-related myelin degradation burdens the clearance function of microglia during aging. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 995–998 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cantuti-Castelvetri, L. & Fitzner, D. Defective cholesterol clearance limits remyelination in the aged central nervous system. Science 359, 684–688 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shen, S. et al. Age-dependent epigenetic control of differentiation inhibitors is critical for remyelination efficiency. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1024–1034 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Morrison, J. H. & Baxter, M. G. The ageing cortical synapse: hallmarks and implications for cognitive decline. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 240–250 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mei, F. et al. Micropillar arrays as a high-throughput screening platform for therapeutics in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Med. 20, 954–960 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruckh, J. M. et al. Rejuvenation of regeneration in the aging central nervous system. Cell Stem Cell 10, 96–103 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nave, K. A. Myelination and the trophic support of long axons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 275–283 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vorhees, C. V. & Williams, M. T. Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nat. Protoc. 1, 848–858 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.J. Lawrence (Texas Tech University) and S. Tonegawa (MIT) for the Chrm1 floxed mice and Q.R. Lu (University of Cincinnati) for the Olig2 floxed mice. We appreciate the assistance of N.-X. Huang in image processing. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31970916, 31771120), the Chongqing Education Commission Fund (CXQT19009) and the Chongqing Outstanding Young Investigator Fund Project (grant no. cstc2019jcyjjqx0001); and by the AMU Foundation (grant no. 2018JCZX02) to F.M., Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 7172156) to Z.-F.L., the NSFC (grant nos. 31671117, 31921003) to L.X., the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (grant nos. R01NS062796, R01NS097428, R01NS095889), the Adelson Medical Research Foundation: ANDP (grant no. A130141) and the Rachleff Family Endowment to J.R.C.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Fei Wang, Shu-Yu Ren.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Histology and Embryology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Brain and Intelligence Research Key Laboratory of Chongqing Education Commission, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Fei Wang, Shu-Yu Ren, Jing-Fei Chen, Kun Liu, Rui-Xue Li, Zhi-Fang Li, Jian-Qin Niu, Lan Xiao & Feng Mei

  2. Department of Neurology, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

    Zhi-Fang Li

  3. Department of Physiology, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Bo Hu

  4. UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Jonah R. Chan

Authors
  1. Fei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shu-Yu Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing-Fei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rui-Xue Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhi-Fang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bo Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jian-Qin Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lan Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jonah R. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Feng Mei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.W., S.-Y.R., J.-F.C., F.M., K.L., R.-X.L., Z.-F.L. and L.X. performed experiments. F.W., S.-Y.R., J.-F.C., L.X., R.-X.L., Z.-F.L., B.H., J.-Q.N., J.R.C. and F.M. provided reagents. F.M., S.-Y.R., J.R.C. and F.W. provided intellectual contributions. F.W., S.-Y.R., J.-F.C., F.M. and J.R.C. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jonah R. Chan or Feng Mei.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Age-related myelin and oligodendrocyte loss.

a, Representative images and quantification of mean MBP intensity, n = 3 biologically independent mice, one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used (F(2,6) = 31.35, p < 0.001, TUKEY (4 M versus 13 M): p = 0.002, TUKEY (13 M versus 18 M): p = 0.001). Scale bar = 50 μm; b, Representative images and quantification of CC1 positive cells, n = 4 biologically independent mice, one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used (F(2,9) = 8.466, p = 0.009, TUKEY (4 M versus 13 M): p = 0.026, TUKEY (13 M versus 18 M): p = 0.010), scale bar = 100 μm; c, Representative images and quantification of Cspg4 positive cells, n = 4 biologically independent mice, one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used (F(2,9) = 0.086, p = 0.919), scale bar = 100 μm. Points represented individual animals. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Identification of mGFP positive cells.

a, Schematic illustration showing mGFP expression in the Cspg4-CreERt; Mapt-mGFP mice; b–d, Immunostaining indicates that mGFP positive cell bodies are CC1 positive (b) and mGFP positive segments are co-localized with MBP (c) and associated with NF200 positive axons (d). These experiments were repeated 3 times independently with similar results, scale bar = 20 μm.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Stability of myelin sheaths in PLP-CreERt; mT/mG mice.

a, Representative image showing mGFP positive areas are co-localized with MBP positive myelin sheaths in the cortex of PLP-CreERt; mT/mG mice, 10 days after recombination at 3 months. These experiments were repeated 3 times independently with similar results. Scale bar = 50 μm; b, Schematic diagram displaying the time course of tamoxifen induction and histology, and representative images and quantification of the mGFP positive areas in the layers I-III of the cortex 1 or 10 months after recombination at 3 months. These experiments were repeated 3 times with similar results, n = 3 biologically independent mice for each group, two-tailed unpaired t test was used (t(4) = 3.327, p = 0.0292). Scale bar = 100 μm. Points represented individual animals. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. *p < 0.05.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Recombination efficiency in 4- and 13-month old Cspg4-CreERt; mT/mG mice.

Representative images and quantification of the percentage of mGFP (green) positive cells in the Cspg4 (red) positive cells (OPCs) by immunostaining, 10 days after 4 consecutive days of tamoxifen treatment. Arrows indicating Cspg4/mGFP double positive cells, n = 3 biologically independent mice for each group, two-tailed unpaired t test was used (t(4) = 0.2774, p = 0.7953), scale bar = 100 μm. Points represented individual animals. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Expression of mGFP positive cells in the Cspg4-CreERt; mT/mG CNS.

a, Schematic illustration showing the mGFP expression pattern in the Cspg4-CreERt; mT/mG mice and representative image showing mGFP (green)/Cspg4 (gray) double positive OPCs, putative mGFP positive OLs (arrowhead) and mGFP (green)/mTomato (red) double positive pericytes and blood vessels (right lower panels, arrows), Scale bar: 20 μm; b, Immunostaining showing mGFP (green)/CC1 (red) double positive OLs (arrowheads), Scale bar: 20 μm (left panel); 10 μm (middle and right panel); c, mGFP (green)/MBP (red) double positive myelin sheaths (arrows), sale bar = 10 μm. These experiments were repeated 3 times independently with similar results.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Segregating mGFP positive pericytes, OPCs and OLs in the Cspg4-CreERt; mT/mG brains.

a, The blood vessels (red) /pericytes (green) (mT/mG double positive) are segregated and deducted from the mGFP channel, and the Cspg4 (red)/mGFP (green) double positive OPCs are pseudo-colored in red, Cspg4 immunostaining in Cspg4-CreERt; The experiments were repeated 3 times independently with similar results. Scale bar: 20μm (left panels on the top); 50μm (left panels on the bottom); 0.4 mm (right panels); b, Schematic diagram displaying the time course of tamoxifen induction and histology in the Cspg4-CreERt; mT/mG mice, and representative images of Cspg4 + /mGFP + OPCs (red) and Cspg4-/mGFP + new OLs (green, arrows) in the corpus callosum at 4-, 8- and 13 months, 10 days after induction and quantification of Cspg4 + /mGFP + OPC density and Cspg4-/mGFP + new myelin area, n = 3 biologically independent mice for each group, one-way ANOVA was used followed by post hoc Tukey test (Cspg4-/mGFP+area: F(2,6) = 97.587, p < 0.001, TUKEY (4 M versus 13 M): p = 0.001, TUKEY (8 M versus 13 M): p = 0.010; Cspg4+/mGFP+cell: F(2,6) = 0.066, p = 0.937). Scale bar = 0.4 mm. Points represented individual animals. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. **p < 0.01.

Extended Data Fig. 7 MBP expression in hippocampus at 13- or 18- months of age.

Representative images and quantification of mean MBP intensity in the CA2 region of the hippocampus. N = 3 biologically independent mice for each group, two-tailed unpaired t test was used (t(4) = 3.730, p = 0.0203). Scale bar = 100 μm. Points represented individual animals. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. *p < 0.05.

Extended Data Fig. 8 OPCs, OLs and microglia in Olig2 cKO brains.

a, Representative images and quantification of Iba1, Cspg4, CC1 positive cells in the motor cortex of Olig2 cKO and littermate controls, n = 3 biologically independent mice for the Iba1 and CC1 immunostaining in each group, and n = 4 biologically independent mice for the Cspg4 immunostaining in each group, two-tailed unpaired t test were used (Iba1:t(4) = 0.1257, p = 0.9060; Cspg4:t(6) = 0.2827, p = 0.7869; CC1:t(4) = 0.4201, p = 0.6960); b, Schematic diagram displaying the time course of tamoxifen induction and the water maze test. The Morris water maze test showing latency to platform in acquisition phase and numbers of platform crossing of the Olig2 fl/ + (n = 9 biologically independent mice) and Olig2 + / + (n = 10 biologically independent mice) mice. Two-way repeated ANOVA was used for the latencies to platform (F(1,17) = 0.130, p = 0.723), two-tailed unpaired t test was used for number of platform crossing in the target quadrant (t(17) = 0.03205, p = 0.9748). Scale bar: 100 μm. Points represented individual animals. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Chrm1 deletion in OPCs does not affect blood vessel density and microglia activation.

a, Schematic diagram displaying the time course of tamoxifen induction and histology; b, Representative images and quantification of mGFP positive myelin (yellow arrowheads) in the cortex of Chrm1 cKO mice and age-matched wildtypes, scale bar = 0.2 mm; c, Representative images and quantification of CD31 positive area in the cortex of Chrm1 cKO mice and age-matched wildtypes, Scale bar = 50μm; d, Representative images and quantification of Iba1 positive microglia in the cortex of Chrm1 cKO mice and age-matched wildtypes, Scale bar = 50 μm, n = 3 biologically independent mice for each group for all experiments, two-tailed unpaired t test were used for each group in all experiments (mGFP:t(4) = 11.37, p < 0.001; CD31:t(4) = 1.269, p = 0.2733; Iba1:t(4) = 0.2773, p = 0.7953); Inserted images showing 3D Iba1 positive cells, scale bar = 10 μm. Points represented individual animals. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. ***p < 0.001.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, F., Ren, SY., Chen, JF. et al. Myelin degeneration and diminished myelin renewal contribute to age-related deficits in memory. Nat Neurosci 23, 481–486 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0588-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0588-8

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing