Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

HISTORICAL NEWS & VIEWS: NEURAL CODING

Does predictive coding have a future?

Nature Neuroscience volume 21, pages 1019–1021 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 22 November 2018

This article has been updated

In the 20th century we thought the brain extracted knowledge from sensations. The 21st century witnessed a ‘strange inversion’, in which the brain became an organ of inference, actively constructing explanations for what’s going on ‘out there’, beyond its sensory epithelia. One paper played a key role in this paradigm shift.

Every decade or so, one reads a paper that makes you think “well, that’s quite remarkable”. In 1999, Rao and Ballard1 offered a treatment of visual processing as predictive coding. In their view, backward connections from higher to lower order visual areas try to predict activity in lower order areas, while the counter-stream of ascending, forward connections convey prediction errors, i.e., the ‘newsworthy’ information that cannot be predicted. These prediction errors drive expectations in higher levels toward better explanations for lower levels. Using simulations they showed that this simple (hierarchical) architecture was not only consistent with neuroanatomy and physiology but could also account for a range of subtle response properties such as ‘end-stopping’ among other extraclassical receptive field effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Hierarchical predictive coding: schematics that describe the hierarchical message passing implicit in predictive coding based on deep generative models.

Katie Vicari/Springer Nature

Change history

  • 22 November 2018

    This News & Views article should have been marked as a Historical News & Views and the supertitle was incorrect.

References

  1. Rao, R. P. & Ballard, D. H. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 79–87 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gregory, R. L. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 290, 181–197 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dayan, P., Hinton, G. E., Neal, R. M. & Zemel, R. S. Neural Comput. 7, 889–904 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mumford, D. Biol. Cybern. 66, 241–251 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hohwy, J. Noûs 50, 259–285 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Friston, K. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 127–138 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Knill, D. C. & Pouget, A. Trends Neurosci. 27, 712–719 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, A. Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 181–204 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marques, T., Nguyen, J., Fioreze, G. & Petreanu, L. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 757–764 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanai, R., Komura, Y., Shipp, S. & Friston, K. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0169 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Powers, A. R., Mathys, C. & Corlett, P. R. Science 357, 596–600 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Friston, K. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000211 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bastos, A. M. et al. Neuron 85, 390–401 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Arnal, L. H., Wyart, V. & Giraud, A. L. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 797–801 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shipp, S. Front. Psychol. 7, 1792 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK

    Karl Friston

Authors
  1. Karl Friston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Friston.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Friston, K. Does predictive coding have a future?. Nat Neurosci 21, 1019–1021 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0200-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0200-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing