Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Huntington modeling improves with age

Direct conversion of adult Huntington’s disease patient fibroblasts into medium spiny neurons recapitulates hallmark phenotypes such as cell death, in contrast to models that lack epigenetic markers of aging. This successful ‘disease-in-a-dish’ highlights the benefits of capturing age in an adult-onset disorder model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Key results from Victor et al.1.

Katie Vicari/Springer Nature.

References

  1. Victor, M. B. et al. Nat. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0075-7 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell 72, 971–983 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mattis, V. B. & Svendsen, C. N. Brain Res. 1656, 76–87 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Takahashi, K. et al. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoo, A. S. et al. Nature 476, 228–231 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Vierbuchen, T. et al. Nature 463, 1035–1041 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Victor, M. B. et al. Neuron 84, 311–323 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mertens, J. et al. Cell Stem Cell 17, 705–718 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huh, C. J. et al. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18648.001 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, Y. et al. PLoS One 9, e109621 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayflick, L. & Moorhead, P. S. Exp. Cell Res. 25, 585–621 (1961).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, J. D. et al. Cell Stem Cell 13, 691–705 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Connor, B. Stem Cells https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2747 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Caiazzo, M. et al. Stem Cell Reports 4, 25–36 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrlich, M. E. Neurotherapeutics 9, 270–284 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clive N. Svendsen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mattis, V.B., Svendsen, C.N. Huntington modeling improves with age. Nat Neurosci 21, 301–303 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0086-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0086-4

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing