Article

Synaptotagmin-1 drives synchronous Ca2+-triggered fusion by C2B-domain-mediated synaptic-vesicle-membrane attachment

  • Nature Neurosciencevolume 21pages3340 (2018)
  • doi:10.1038/s41593-017-0037-5
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

The synaptic vesicle (SV) protein synaptotagmin-1 (Syt1) is the Ca2+ sensor for fast synchronous release. Biochemical and structural data suggest that Syt1 interacts with phospholipids and SNARE complex, but the manner in which these interactions translate into SV fusion remains poorly understood. Using flash-and-freeze electron microscopy, which triggers action potentials with light and coordinately arrests synaptic structures with rapid freezing, we found that synchronous-release-impairing mutations in the Syt1 C2B domain (K325, 327; R398, 399) also disrupt SV-active-zone plasma-membrane attachment. Single action potential induction rescued membrane attachment in these mutants within less than 10 ms through activation of the Syt1 Ca2+-binding site. The rapid SV membrane translocation temporarily correlates with resynchronization of release and paired pulse facilitation. On the basis of these findings, we redefine the role of Syt1 as part of the Ca2+-dependent vesicle translocation machinery and propose that Syt1 enables fast neurotransmitter release by means of its dynamic membrane attachment activities.

  • Subscribe to Nature Neuroscience for full access:

    $59

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Imig, C. et al. The morphological and molecular nature of synaptic vesicle priming at presynaptic active zones. Neuron 84, 416–431 (2014).

  2. 2.

    Jahn, R. & Fasshauer, D. Molecular machines governing exocytosis of synaptic vesicles. Nature 490, 201–207 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Sudhof, T. C. The synaptic vesicle cycle. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 509–547 (2004).

  4. 4.

    Südhof, T. C. Neurotransmitter release: the last millisecond in the life of a synaptic vesicle. Neuron 80, 675–690 (2013).

  5. 5.

    Brose, N., Petrenko, A. G., Südhof, T. C. & Jahn, R. Synaptotagmin: a calcium sensor on the synaptic vesicle surface. Science 256, 1021–1025 (1992).

  6. 6.

    Geppert, M. et al. Synaptotagmin I: a major Ca2+ sensor for transmitter release at a central synapse. Cell 79, 717–727 (1994).

  7. 7.

    Fernández-Chacón, R. et al. Synaptotagmin I functions as a calcium regulator of release probability. Nature 410, 41–49 (2001).

  8. 8.

    Mackler, J. M., Drummond, J. A., Loewen, C. A., Robinson, I. M. & Reist, N. E. The C(2)B Ca2+-binding motif of synaptotagmin is required for synaptic transmission in vivo. Nature 418, 340–344 (2002).

  9. 9.

    Sutton, R. B., Davletov, B. A., Berghuis, A. M., Südhof, T. C. & Sprang, S. R. Structure of the first C2 domain of synaptotagmin I: a novel Ca2+/phospholipid-binding fold. Cell 80, 929–938 (1995).

  10. 10.

    Chapman, E. R. & Davis, A. F. Direct interaction of a Ca2+-binding loop of synaptotagmin with lipid bilayers. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13995–14001 (1998).

  11. 11.

    Fernandez, I. et al. Three-dimensional structure of the synaptotagmin 1 C2B-domain: synaptotagmin 1 as a phospholipid binding machine. Neuron 32, 1057–1069 (2001).

  12. 12.

    Bacaj, T. et al. Synaptotagmin-1 and -7 are redundantly essential for maintaining the capacity of the readily-releasable pool of synaptic vesicles. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002267 (2015).

  13. 13.

    de Wit, H. et al. Synaptotagmin-1 docks secretory vesicles to syntaxin-1/SNAP-25 acceptor complexes. Cell 138, 935–946 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Kedar, G. H. et al. A post-docking role of Synaptotagmin 1-C2B domain bottom residues R398/399 in mouse chromaffin cells. J. Neurosci. 35, 14172–14182 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Jorgensen, E. M. et al. Defective recycling of synaptic vesicles in synaptotagmin mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 378, 196–199 (1995).

  16. 16.

    Reist, N. E. et al. Morphologically docked synaptic vesicles are reduced in synaptotagmin mutants of Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 18, 7662–7673 (1998).

  17. 17.

    Siksou, L. et al. A common molecular basis for membrane docking and functional priming of synaptic vesicles. Eur. J. Neurosci. 30, 49–56 (2009).

  18. 18.

    Liu, H., Dean, C., Arthur, C. P., Dong, M. & Chapman, E. R. Autapses and networks of hippocampal neurons exhibit distinct synaptic transmission phenotypes in the absence of synaptotagmin I. J. Neurosci. 29, 7395–7403 (2009).

  19. 19.

    Poskanzer, K. E., Marek, K. W., Sweeney, S. T. & Davis, G. W. Synaptotagmin I is necessary for compensatory synaptic vesicle endocytosis in vivo. Nature 426, 559–563 (2003).

  20. 20.

    van den Bogaart, G. et al. Synaptotagmin-1 may be a distance regulator acting upstream of SNARE nucleation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 805–812 (2011).

  21. 21.

    Honigmann, A. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate clusters act as molecular beacons for vesicle recruitment. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 679–686 (2013).

  22. 22.

    Bai, J., Tucker, W. C. & Chapman, E. R. PIP2 increases the speed of response of synaptotagmin and steers its membrane-penetration activity toward the plasma membrane. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 36–44 (2004).

  23. 23.

    Li, L. et al. Phosphatidylinositol phosphates as co-activators of Ca2+ binding to C2 domains of synaptotagmin 1. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 15845–15852 (2006).

  24. 24.

    Xue, M., Ma, C., Craig, T. K., Rosenmund, C. & Rizo, J. The Janus-faced nature of the C(2)B domain is fundamental for synaptotagmin-1 function. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 1160–1168 (2008).

  25. 25.

    Brewer, K. D. et al. Dynamic binding mode of a Synaptotagmin-1-SNARE complex in solution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 555–564 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Seven, A. B., Brewer, K. D., Shi, L., Jiang, Q. X. & Rizo, J. Prevalent mechanism of membrane bridging by synaptotagmin-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E3243–E3252 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Zhou, Q. et al. Architecture of the synaptotagmin-SNARE machinery for neuronal exocytosis. Nature 525, 62–67 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Zhou, A., Brewer, K. D. & Rizo, J. Analysis of SNARE complex/synaptotagmin-1 interactions by one-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry 52, 3446–3456 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Martens, S., Kozlov, M. M. & McMahon, H. T. How synaptotagmin promotes membrane fusion. Science 316, 1205–1208 (2007).

  30. 30.

    Lynch, K. L. et al. Synaptotagmin-1 utilizes membrane bending and SNARE binding to drive fusion pore expansion. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 5093–5103 (2008).

  31. 31.

    Hui, E., Johnson, C. P., Yao, J., Dunning, F. M. & Chapman, E. R. Synaptotagmin-mediated bending of the target membrane is a critical step in Ca2+-regulated fusion. Cell 138, 709–721 (2009).

  32. 32.

    Schaub, J. R., Lu, X., Doneske, B., Shin, Y. K. & McNew, J. A. Hemifusion arrest by complexin is relieved by Ca2+-synaptotagmin I. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 748–750 (2006).

  33. 33.

    Heuser, J. E. & Reese, T. S. Evidence for recycling of synaptic vesicle membrane during transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Cell Biol. 57, 315–344 (1973).

  34. 34.

    Watanabe, S. et al. Ultrafast endocytosis at mouse hippocampal synapses. Nature 504, 242–247 (2013).

  35. 35.

    Young, S. M. Jr. & Neher, E. Synaptotagmin has an essential function in synaptic vesicle positioning for synchronous release in addition to its role as a calcium sensor. Neuron 63, 482–496 (2009).

  36. 36.

    Nishiki, T. & Augustine, G. J. Dual roles of the C2B domain of synaptotagmin I in synchronizing Ca2+-dependent neurotransmitter release. J. Neurosci. 24, 8542–8550 (2004).

  37. 37.

    Gerber, S. H., Rizo, J. & Südhof, T. C. The top loops of the C(2) domains from synaptotagmin and phospholipase A(2) control functional specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 32288–32292 (2001).

  38. 38.

    Schneggenburger, R. & Neher, E. Presynaptic calcium and control of vesicle fusion. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 266–274 (2005).

  39. 39.

    Binz, T. et al. Proteolysis of SNAP-25 by types E and A botulinal neurotoxins. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1617–1620 (1994).

  40. 40.

    Schiavo, G. et al. Tetanus and botulinum-B neurotoxins block neurotransmitter release by proteolytic cleavage of synaptobrevin. Nature 359, 832–835 (1992).

  41. 41.

    Chen, Y. A., Scales, S. J. & Scheller, R. H. Sequential SNARE assembly underlies priming and triggering of exocytosis. Neuron 30, 161–170 (2001).

  42. 42.

    Chernomordik, L. V. & Kozlov, M. M. Protein-lipid interplay in fusion and fission of biological membranes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72, 175–207 (2003).

  43. 43.

    Xu, J., Pang, Z. P., Shin, O. H. & Südhof, T. C. Synaptotagmin-1 functions as a Ca2+ sensor for spontaneous release. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 759–766 (2009).

  44. 44.

    Rosenmund, C. & Stevens, C. F. Definition of the readily releasable pool of vesicles at hippocampal synapses. Neuron 16, 1197–1207 (1996).

  45. 45.

    Min, D. et al. Mechanical unzipping and rezipping of a single SNARE complex reveals hysteresis as a force-generating mechanism. Nat. Commun. 4, 1705 (2013).

  46. 46.

    Jackman, S. L. & Regehr, W. G. The mechanisms and functions of synaptic facilitation. Neuron 94, 447–464 (2017).

  47. 47.

    Lois, C., Hong, E. J., Pease, S., Brown, E. J. & Baltimore, D. Germline transmission and tissue-specific expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors. Science 295, 868–872 (2002).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Plested, M. Herman, J. Rizo, C. Garner and T. Südhof for discussions and comments on the manuscript, S. Watanabe and E. Jorgensen for technical support, the Charité viral core facility for virus production, and B. Söhl-Kielszinski for sample preparation. This work was supported by ERC grant SynVGLUT, Berlin Institute of Health, Stiftung Charite, German Research Council grants SFB958, Ro1296/7-1 and TRR186.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institut für Neurophysiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany

    • Shuwen Chang
    • , Thorsten Trimbuch
    •  & Christian Rosenmund
  2. NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence Cluster, Berlin, Germany

    • Shuwen Chang
    • , Thorsten Trimbuch
    •  & Christian Rosenmund

Authors

  1. Search for Shuwen Chang in:

  2. Search for Thorsten Trimbuch in:

  3. Search for Christian Rosenmund in:

Contributions

S.C. performed experiments and analyzed data. T.T. produced molecular reagents. S.C. and C.R. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Rosenmund.

Integrated Supplementary Information

  1. Supplementary Figure 1 Quantification of expression level of Syt1 mutants at the presynaptic terminals.

    (A) Representative images of Syt1 WT, KO and KO neurons rescued with wild-type Syt1 full length (FL) and mutant constructs immunostained for Syt1 (red) and a synaptic marker Synaptophysin (green). Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) Scatter plot shows averaged fluorescence intensity of Syt1 protein. Data were normalized to the intensity of endogenous Synaptophysin and to the Syt1 intensity in the Syt1 WT neurons (n = 22, 23, 22, 23, 22, 22, 23, 22, respectively). 6DA indicates mutations at both Ca2+ binding sites of the C2A and C2B domains. (C2A: D178, 230, 232A; C2B: D309, 363, 365A). Data were obtained from neurons from 3 independent cultures and are shown as mean ± SEM.

  2. Supplementary Figure 2 Absolute distribution of synaptic vesicles within 30 nm of the AZ.

    Averaged distribution of SVs before and 10 ms after AP stimulation in (A) Syt1 WT (B) Syt1 KO and Syt1 KO rescued with (C) D309, 363, 365A (D) K325, 327A or (E) R398, 399Q. SV numbers are displayed as a function of distance (bin size 1 nm). Bar graph on the right of each panel represents the average number of SVs within 0-5 nm to the AZ before and 10 ms after AP. (F) Averaged distribution of SVs in Syt1 WT (black) and KO (pink). Data were obtained from neurons from at least 3 independent cultures and shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by Mann-Whitney test. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; ns: not significant. n represents the number of electron micrographs (synapses) analyzed.

  3. Supplementary Figure 3 Quantification of total SV number and synapse area.

    (A-F) Representative electron micrographs of Syt1 WT, KO and KO rescued with Syt1 FL and mutant constructs. Scale bar: 200 nm. (G) Scatter plot shows averaged number of total SVs within synapse. (H) Averaged area of the synapses. (I) Normalized number of total SVs in synapse profile. Numbers were normalized to synapse area. (n = 254, 210, 102, 193, 235, 197, respectively) (J) Correlation plot of the number of docked vesicles (per 500 nm of AZ) versus the total number of SVs (per μm2 of synapse area) in Syt1 WT (n = 254). Linear regression fit shows poor correlation with indicated regression coefficient and slope. n represents the number of electron micrographs (synapses) analyzed. Data were obtained from neurons from at least 3 independent cultures and are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test; ns: not significant. For detailed numbers and statistical analysis, see Supplementary Table 1B.

  4. Supplementary Figure 4 Effects of Syt1 C2B mutants on vesicle priming.

    (A) Representative traces of release induced by 5 seconds’ hypotonic stimulation from mass-cultured Syt1WT, Syt1 KO, KO neurons rescued with mutant constructs. Responses from excitatory synapses were obtained by applying extracellular solution containing 500 mM sucrose with the presence of 0.1 μM TTX and 30μM bicuculline. (B) Averaged readily releasable pool (RRP) charge. (n = 30, 33, 30, 29, 27, respectively). (C) Representative images of Syt1 WT, KO and KO neurons rescued with mutant constructs immunostained for MAP2 (red) and a synaptic marker for excitatory neuron Vglut1 (green). Scale bar: 20 μm. (D) Averaged synapse density. Synapses number was measured as the Vglut1 positive puncta. Numbers are normalized to dendritic lengths. (n = 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, respectively). n represents the number of cells analyzed or the number of images analyzed, as applies. Data were obtained from neurons from 3 independent cultures and are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test for (B) and one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test for (D). ***p < 0.001; *p < 0.05; ns: not significant.

  5. Supplementary Figure 5 Mutations at Ca2+ binding site of C2 domains do not impair the membrane attachment activity of Syt1 at rest.

    (A-D) Representative electron micrographs of synapses from Syt1 WT, KO and KO rescued with mutants of Ca2+ binding site at the C2A domain (D178, 230, 232A; termed C2A 3DA) or at both C2A and C2B domains (D178, 230, 232A; D309, 363, 365 A; termed C2AB 6DA mutant). Scale bar: 200 nm (E) Averaged vesicle number within 0-5 nm to the AZ (n = 102, 99, 95, 96, respectively).(F) Averaged AZ length. (G) Normalized vesicle number. Data were normalized to the AZ lengths. n represents the number of electron micrographs (synapses) analyzed. Data were obtained from neurons from 2 independent cultures and shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. ***p < 0.001; ns: not significant.

  6. Supplementary Figure 6 N-terminal of SNAP-25 remains in the presynaptic terminal after BoNT/A cleavage.

    (A) Representative images of WT neurons before or 12 h after BoNT/A treatment immunostained for N-or C-terminal specific antibodies of SNAP-25 (red) and a synaptic marker Synaptophysin (green). Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) Scatter plot shows averaged fluorescence intensity of SNAP-25 before and 12 h or 16 h after exposure to BoNT/A (n = 21, 21, 21, 19, 21, 21, respectively). Data are normalized to endogenous Synaptophysin expression and to the SNAP-25 intensity before toxin treatments. n represents the number of images analyzed. Data were obtained from neurons from 2 independent cultures and are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. ***p < 0.001;*p < 0.05; ns: not significant.

  7. Supplementary Figure 7 Scheme summarizes possible models for Syt1-mediated vesicle membrane attachment events.

    One-side model: Assumes that in the absence of Ca2+, the Syt1 C2B domain is positioned parallel to the SNARE complex where the polybasic region (K) binds to the PIP2 on the plasma membrane and the bottom residues (R) to the SNARE complex. Upon Ca2+ triggering, Ca2+-bound top loops together with (K) and (R) bend the plasma membrane to reduce the repulsive force between membrane further trigger releases. Bridge model: Assumes that in the absence of Ca2+, the bottom residues (R) binds to the plasma membrane, where the polybasic region (K) to the SNARE complex. This configuration restricts C2B domain to turn into a perpendicular orientation to the plasma membrane, leading to an ideal position for the C2B domain to bridge two membranes. Switch model: Assumes Syt1 C2B domain can dynamically switch between two configurations. Upon Ca2+ stimulation, Syt1 rapidly switches its orientation and subsequently triggers release.

Supplementary information