Although structural variation is less explored than single-nucleotide variation, recent studies have shown it to be associated with several human diseases. Three fresh computational methods might help to elucidate this inadequately understood part of our genetic makeup.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Denti, L. et al. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01674-1 (2022).
Popic, V. et al. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01799-x (2023).
Lin, J. et al. Nat. Methods 19, 1230–1233 (2022).
Mahmoud, M. et al. Genome Biol. 20, 246 (2019).
Haas, J. et al. EMBO Mol. Med. 10, 107–120 (2018).
Sherman, M. A. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 197–203 (2021).
Halvorsen, M. et al. Nat. Commun. 11, 1842 (2020).
Li, Y. et al. Nature 578, 112–121 (2020).
Ho, S. S., Urban, A. E. & Mills, R. E. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 171–189 (2020).
Wang, T. et al. Nature 604, 437–446 (2022).
This article has been supported in part by the Croatian Science Foundation under the project Single genome and metagenome assembly (IP-2018-01-5886) and the Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR core funding.
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sikic, M. Facilitating genome structural variation analysis. Nat Methods 20, 491–492 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01767-5