Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Deep learning identifies A-to-I RNA edits using nanopore sequencing data

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing is a common post-transcriptional modification, but can be challenging to identify correctly from Illumina data. We show that Oxford Nanopore RNA sequencing, combined with deep learning models, can be used to accurately detect inosine-containing sites in native transcriptomes and to estimate the modification rate of each site.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A deep learning method to identify inosine-containing sites in native RNA.


  1. Eisenberg, E. & Levanon, E. Y. A-to-I RNA editing — immune protector and transcriptome diversifier. Nat Rev. Genet. 19, 473–490 (2018). A Review article that presents an up-to-date summary of A-to-I RNA editing and the ADAR enzymes, which perform the deamination reaction.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramaswami, G. & Li, J. B. Identification of human RNA editing sites: a historical perspective. Methods 107, 42–47 (2016). A Review article that outlines how methods used to identify A-to-I RNA editing sites have progressed since the early days of Sanger sequencing.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, H. et al. Accurate detection of m6A RNA modifications in native RNA sequences. Nat Commun. 10, 4079 (2019). This paper reports the development of a machine learning method to identify m6A modifications using nanopore direct RNA sequencing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Begik, O. et al. Quantitative profiling of pseudouridylation dynamics in native RNAs with nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1278–1291 (2021). This paper reports the development of a software to detect pseudouridine and 2′-Omethylationin native RNAs using nanopore sequencing.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiener, D. & Schwartz, S. The epitranscriptome beyond m6A. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 119–131 (2021). A Review article that presents an up-to-date summary of the universe of RNA modifications.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Nguyen, T. A. et al. Direct identification of A-to-I editing sites with nanopore native RNA sequencing. Nat. Methods (2022).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deep learning identifies A-to-I RNA edits using nanopore sequencing data. Nat Methods 19, 797–798 (2022).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research