Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Best practices for reporting throughput in biomedical research

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Throughput definition and common pitfalls.


  1. Robinson, J. P., Rajwa, B., Patsekin, V. & Davisson, V. J. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 7, 679–693 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Macarron, R. et al. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 188–195 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nawaz, A. A. et al. Nat. Methods 17, 595–599 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nitta, N. et al. Cell 175, 266–276.e13 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reuter, J. A., Spacek, D. V. & Snyder, M. P. Mol. Cell 58, 586–597 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Loman, N. J. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 434–439 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Comer, D. Computer Networks and Internets (Pearson, 2016).

  8. Parola, C., Neumeier, D. & Reddy, S. T. Immunology 153, 31–41 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Carlo, D. et al. Science 364, eaav1429 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boutros, M., Heigwer, F. & Laufer, C. Cell 163, 1314–1325 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is supported by JSPS Core-to-Core Program, JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers 19H05633 and 20H00317, JSPS-NUS/NTU Bilateral Joint Research Program 2021, AMED grant numbers JP20wm0325021 and 21ak0101163h0001, the White Rock Foundation, the Ogasawara Foundation, the Nakatani Foundation, the Konica Minolta Foundation and the Chemo-Sero-Therapeutic Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



K.G. conceived the project. M.H. prepared the initial manuscript with the support of K.G. and A.I. All authors revised and edited the manuscript. K.G. acquired funding.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keisuke Goda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

K.G. and N.N. are shareholders of CYBO. All remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Methods thanks Kevin Tsia and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Note 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herbig, M., Isozaki, A., Di Carlo, D. et al. Best practices for reporting throughput in biomedical research. Nat Methods 19, 633–634 (2022).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research