Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Fluorogenic DNA-PAINT for faster, low-background super-resolution imaging

Nature Methods volume 19, pages 554–559 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

DNA-based points accumulation for imaging in nanoscale topography (DNA-PAINT) is a powerful super-resolution microscopy method that can acquire high-fidelity images at nanometer resolution. It suffers, however, from high background and slow imaging speed, both of which can be attributed to the presence of unbound fluorophores in solution. Here we present two-color fluorogenic DNA-PAINT, which uses improved imager probe and docking strand designs to solve these problems. These self-quenching single-stranded DNA probes are conjugated with a fluorophore and quencher at the terminals, which permits an increase in fluorescence by up to 57-fold upon binding and unquenching. In addition, the engineering of base pair mismatches between the fluorogenic imager probes and docking strands allowed us to achieve both high fluorogenicity and the fast binding kinetics required for fast imaging. We demonstrate a 26-fold increase in imaging speed over regular DNA-PAINT and show that our new implementation enables three-dimensional super-resolution DNA-PAINT imaging without optical sectioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Imager probes for DNA-PAINT.
Fig. 2: Fast fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging of DNA origami nanostructures.
Fig. 3: Comparison of regular and fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging.
Fig. 4: Fast 3D fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging without optical sectioning.
Fig. 5: Fast two-color fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging without optical sectioning.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The majority of datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available at the Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6315337). Remaining raw datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

PYME is available at https://python-microscopy.org/. The PYME modules that we have developed are shared at https://github.com/bewersdorflab. Codes for simulating multi-emitters (Supplementary Fig. 2) and for screening docking strands (Supplementary Note 3) are available at the GitHub repository (https://github.com/bewersdorflab/fluorogenic-dna-paint-manuscript-supplement).

References

  1. Baddeley, D. & Bewersdorf, J. Biological insight from super-resolution microscopy: what we can learn from localization-based images. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 87, 965–989 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jungmann, R. et al. Single-molecule kinetics and super-resolution microscopy by fluorescence imaging of transient binding on DNA origami. Nano Lett. 10, 4756–4761 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Agasti, S. S. et al. DNA-barcoded labeling probes for highly multiplexed Exchange-PAINT imaging. Chem. Sci. 8, 3080–3091 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Beliveau, B. J. et al. Single-molecule super-resolution imaging of chromosomes and in situ haplotype visualization using Oligopaint FISH probes. Nat. Commun. 6, 7147 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jungmann, R. et al. Quantitative super-resolution imaging with qPAINT. Nat. Methods 13, 439–442 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dempsey, G. T., Vaughan, J. C., Chen, K. H., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging. Nat. Methods 8, 1027–1036 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jungmann, R. et al. Multiplexed 3D cellular super-resolution imaging with DNA-PAINT and Exchange-PAINT. Nat. Methods 11, 313–318 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, N., Dai, M., Saka, S. K. & Yin, P. Super-resolution labelling with Action-PAINT. Nat. Chem. 11, 1001–1008 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Schlichthaerle, T. et al. Direct visualization of single nuclear pore complex proteins using genetically-encoded probes for DNA-PAINT. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 58, 13004–13008 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schnitzbauer, J., Strauss, M. T., Schlichthaerle, T., Schueder, F. & Jungmann, R. Super-resolution microscopy with DNA-PAINT. Nat. Protoc. 12, 1198–1228 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schueder, F. et al. Multiplexed 3D super-resolution imaging of whole cells using spinning disk confocal microscopy and DNA-PAINT. Nat. Commun. 8, 2090 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schueder, F. et al. An order of magnitude faster DNA-PAINT imaging by optimized sequence design and buffer conditions. Nat. Methods 16, 1101–1104 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Filius, M. et al. High-speed super-resolution imaging using protein-assisted DNA-PAINT. Nano Lett. 20, 2264–2270 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, J., Park, S., Kang, W. & Hohng, S. Accelerated super-resolution imaging with FRET-PAINT. Mol. Brain 10, 63 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, J., Park, S. & Hohng, S. Accelerated FRET-PAINT microscopy. Mol. Brain 11, 70 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Auer, A., Strauss, M. T., Schlichthaerle, T. & Jungmann, R. Fast, background-free DNA-PAINT imaging using FRET-based probes. Nano Lett. 17, 6428–6434 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tyagi, S. & Kramer, F. R. Molecular beacons: probes that fluoresce upon hybridization. Nat. Biotechnol. 14, 303–308 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsourkas, A., Behlke, M. A., Rose, S. D. & Bao, G. Hybridization kinetics and thermodynamics of molecular beacons. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 1319–1330 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Clegg, R. M., Murchie, A. I., Zechel, A. & Lilley, D. M. Observing the helical geometry of double-stranded DNA in solution by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 2994–2998 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cock, P. J. et al. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25, 1422–1423 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zadeh, J. N. et al. NUPACK: analysis and design of nucleic acid systems. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 170–173 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher, P. D. E. et al. A programmable DNA origami platform for organizing intrinsically disordered nucleoporins within nanopore confinement. ACS Nano 12, 1508–1518 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li, Y. et al. Real-time 3D single-molecule localization using experimental point spread functions. Nat. Methods 15, 367–369 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang, F. et al. Ultra-high resolution 3D imaging of whole cells. Cell 166, 1028–1040 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, Y. et al. Nanoscale subcellular architecture revealed by multicolor three-dimensional salvaged fluorescence imaging. Nat. Methods 17, 225–231 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Malkusch, S. et al. Coordinate-based colocalization analysis of single-molecule localization microscopy data. Histochem. Cell Biol. 137, 1–10 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wade, O. K. et al. 124-color super-resolution imaging by engineering DNA-PAINT blinking kinetics. Nano Lett. 19, 2641–2646 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Strauss, S. & Jungmann, R. Up to 100-fold speed-up and multiplexing in optimized DNA-PAINT. Nat. Methods 17, 789–791 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Clowsley, A. H. et al. Repeat DNA-PAINT suppresses background and non-specific signals in optical nanoscopy. Nat. Commun. 12, 501 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Stahl, E., Martin, T. G., Praetorius, F. & Dietz, H. Facile and scalable preparation of pure and dense DNA origami solutions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 12735–12740 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin, C., Perrault, S. D., Kwak, M., Graf, F. & Shih, W. M. Purification of DNA-origami nanostructures by rate-zonal centrifugation. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e40 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nemoto, Y. & De Camilli, P. Recruitment of an alternatively spliced form of synaptojanin 2 to mitochondria by the interaction with the PDZ domain of a mitochondrial outer membrane protein. EMBO J. 18, 2991–3006 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. McGorty, R., Kamiyama, D. & Huang, B. Active microscope stabilization in three dimensions using image correlation. Opt. Nanoscopy 2, 3 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Takakura, H. et al. Long time-lapse nanoscopy with spontaneously blinking membrane probes. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 773–780 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Tyson, J. et al. Extremely bright, near-IR emitting spontaneously blinking fluorophores enable ratiometric multicolor nanoscopy in live cells. ACS Cent. Sci. 7, 1419–1426 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Marin, Z. et al. PYMEVisualize: an open-source tool for exploring 3D super-resolution data. Nat. Methods 18, 582–584 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lin, R., Clowsley, A. H., Jayasinghe, I. D., Baddeley, D. & Soeller, C. Algorithmic corrections for localization microscopy with sCMOS cameras—characterisation of a computationally efficient localization approach. Opt. Express 25, 11701–11716 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Baddeley, D., Jayasinghe, I. D., Cremer, C., Cannell, M. B. & Soeller, C. Light-induced dark states of organic fluochromes enable 30 nm resolution imaging in standard media. Biophys. J. 96, L22–L24 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Baddeley, D. et al. 4D super-resolution microscopy with conventional fluorophores and single wavelength excitation in optically thick cells and tissues. PLoS ONE 6, e20645 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, Y. et al. Localization events-based sample drift correction for localization microscopy with redundant cross-correlation algorithm. Opt. Express 22, 15982–15991 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Nieuwenhuizen, R. P. et al. Measuring image resolution in optical nanoscopy. Nat. Methods 10, 557–562 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Malkusch, S. & Heilemann, M. Extracting quantitative information from single-molecule super-resolution imaging data with LAMA—LocAlization Microscopy Analyzer. Sci. Rep. 6, 34486 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Fuentes, K. Hu, Z. Marin and F. Schueder for helpful discussions. This work was primarily supported by a 4D Nucleome grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH; U01 DA047734 to J.B. and D.B.) and the Wellcome Trust (203285/B/16/Z). J.B. acknowledges support from NIH grant P30 DK045735 (to R. Sherwin). C.L. acknowledges support from an NIH Director’s New Innovator award (GM114830), an NIH grant (GM132114) and Yale University faculty startup funding. N.D.W. was supported by an NIH training grant (T32 EB019941).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cell Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Kenny K. H. Chung, Zhao Zhang, Phylicia Kidd, Yongdeng Zhang, Nathan D. Williams, Bennett Rollins, Yang Yang, Chenxiang Lin, David Baddeley & Joerg Bewersdorf

  2. Nanobiology Institute, Yale University, West Haven, CT, USA

    Kenny K. H. Chung, Zhao Zhang, Nathan D. Williams, Yang Yang, Chenxiang Lin, David Baddeley & Joerg Bewersdorf

  3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Chenxiang Lin & Joerg Bewersdorf

  4. Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    David Baddeley

Authors
  1. Kenny K. H. Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Phylicia Kidd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yongdeng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nathan D. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bennett Rollins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chenxiang Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. David Baddeley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Joerg Bewersdorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.K.H.C. and J.B. conceived the idea. Z.Z. designed the DNA origami structure. Z.Z., N.D.W. and Y.Y. prepared DNA origami samples. P.K. prepared cell samples. K.K.H.C. and Y.Z. imaged samples and generated the localization data. K.K.H.C. and B.R. performed additional data analyses. K.K.H.C. derived the blinking model and performed simulations. J.B., C.L. and D.B. supervised the project. K.K.H.C. and J.B. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joerg Bewersdorf.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.B. discloses financial interest in Bruker, Hamamatsu Photonics and panluminate. J.B. is co-inventor on a US patent (9,769,399) related to the 4Pi-SMS system and image analysis used in this work. Y.Z. and J.B. are co-inventors on a US patent (11,209,367) related to 4Pi-SMS microscopy. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Methods thanks Matthew Baker and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Rita Strack was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1

List of imager probes and docking strands used in this study.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Alignment between imager probes and their corresponding docking strands.

Fluorogenic DNA-PAINT uses imager probes and docking strands with internal mismatches. Complementary base pairings are colored in blue whereas mismatches in red.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Fast astigmatic 3D fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging without optical sectioning.

The full dataset from which Fig. 4a-c were generated. (a) Fast 3D fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging of immunolabeled microtubules in COS-7 cells under widefield illumination at multiple time points. A reasonable image can be acquired in 30 s. (b) Bleaching is negligible, causing only a small reduction (30%) in blinking rate over an hour. (c) 3D resolution as quantified by Fourier shell correlation (FSC) improves with longer imaging duration as more blinking events are detected. The resolution reaches 34.3 nm after 1 hr. (d) The localization precision peaks at < 5 nm for all three dimensions (X: 1.7 nm, Y: 1.7 nm, Z: 4.5 nm). (e) Fitting an exponential decay function to blink durations (blinks that are only 1 frame in duration were ignored for fitting) estimates the mean off-rate at 46.7 s-1.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Time series of fast 2-color fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging without optical sectioning.

The full dataset from which Fig. 5b-f were generated, rendered at various timepoints. (a-d) Fast 2-color fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging of immunolabeled endoplasmic reticulum (ii; [imager probe A] = 10 nM) and mitochondria (iii; [imager probe B] = 1 nM) in U-2 OS cells under widefield illumination (100 Hz frame rate). There is no well-defined minimum imaging time as it depends on a multitude of factors including the biological question being addressed. The timepoint we reported in the main text (600 s) is more densely sampled than typical single-molecule localization microscopy images. Negligible changes are observed with prolonged imaging (d; 1,200 s) which would suggest oversampling.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Analysis of fast 2-color fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging without optical sectioning.

Detailed analysis of the full 20-minute 2-color fluorogenic DNA-PAINT dataset from which Fig. 5 and Extended Data Fig. 4 were generated. Image colored by the correlation parameter (C) based on Coordinate-Based Colocalization (CBC) analysis at low (a) and high (b) magnification. (c) Histogram of the correlation parameter, C. A value of zero indicates a lack of correlation between the two color channels (C = -0.09 ± 0.30; nblink = 2,322,207; two-sided one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test against zero, T-statistic=9×1011, p < 0.001). (d) Minimal bleaching is observed over a 20-minute timeframe (~20%). (e) The lateral localization precision peaks at < 5 nm for both channels. (f) Blink durations fitted with an exponential decay function to estimate the binding off-rate (blinks that are only 1 frame in duration were ignored for fitting).

Extended Data Fig. 6 Additional examples of fast 2-color fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging without optical sectioning.

Fast 2-color fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging of immunolabeled endoplasmic reticulum (green; [imager probe A] = 10 nM) and mitochondria (magenta; [imager probe B] = 1 nM) in U-2 OS cells under widefield illumination (100 Hz frame rate for 10 minutes) (n = 5 including the dataset presented in detail in Fig. 5 and Extended Data Figs. 4,5).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–3, Tables 1–4 and Figs. 1–3.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Fast 3D fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging (imager probe A concentration = 10 nM, 100 Hz, 10 min) of microtubules in a COS-7 cell without optical sectioning under widefield illumination. The hollow center of microtubules can be observed in both the xy and xz planes when viewing 30-nm-thick cross-sections. Scale bar, 1 µm.

Supplementary Video 2

a, Raw images from fast astigmatic 3D fluorogenic DNA-PAINT imaging (imager probe A concentration = 10 nM, 100 Hz) of microtubules in a COS-7 cell under widefield illumination. b, Live kymograph of the blinking within the dashed box in a.

Supplementary Video 3

a, Images from fast two-color fluorogenic DNA-PAINT using imager probe A (10 nM, Cy3B, green) and imager probe B (1 nM, ATTO 643, magenta) to image the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria, respectively (100 Hz; raw images from the two-color channels were transformed and aligned for display). b, Heatmap of pixel intensities. Negligible spectral cross-talk between the fluorophores (Cy3B and ATTO 643) was observed as indicated by the well-resolved populations (green and magenta dashed lines, respectively).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, K.K.H., Zhang, Z., Kidd, P. et al. Fluorogenic DNA-PAINT for faster, low-background super-resolution imaging. Nat Methods 19, 554–559 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01464-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01464-9

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing