Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

MassIVE.quant: a community resource of quantitative mass spectrometry–based proteomics datasets

Abstract

MassIVE.quant is a repository infrastructure and data resource for reproducible quantitative mass spectrometry–based proteomics, which is compatible with all mass spectrometry data acquisition types and computational analysis tools. A branch structure enables MassIVE.quant to systematically store raw experimental data, metadata of the experimental design, scripts of the quantitative analysis workflow, intermediate input and output files, as well as alternative reanalyses of the same dataset.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Outline of MassIVE.quant repository structure and reanalysis of three DDA-based experiments.
Fig. 2: Reanalyses of DIA:Selevsek2015, profiling changes in proteome abundance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae over six time points: T0 (0 min), T1 (15 min), T2 (30 min), T3 (60 min), T4 (90 min) and T5 (120 min), n = 3 biologically independent samples per each time point, in response to osmotic stress (RMSV000000251).

Data availability

All the datasets that support this study are publicly available in MassIVE.quant (https://massive.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/static/massive-quant.jsp) with MassIVE and ProteomeXchange identifiers. Additionally, identifiers for all the datasets are listed in Supplementary Tables 2, 3 and 5.

References

  1. 1.

    Peng, R. D. Reproducible research in computational science. Science 334, 1226–1227 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D442–D450 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sharma, V. et al. Panorama: a targeted proteomics knowledge base. J. Proteome Res. 13, 4205–4210 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sharma, V. et al. Panorama public: a public repository for quantitative data sets processed in skyline. Mol. Cell Proteom. 17, 1239–1244 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Farrah, T. et al. PASSEL: the PeptideAtlas SRMexperiment library. Proteomics 12, 1170–1175 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vizcaino, J. A. et al. ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 223–226 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Deutsch, E. W. et al. The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2017: supporting the cultural change in proteomics public data deposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D1100–D1106 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    MacLean, B. et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 966–968 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rost, H. L. et al. OpenMS: a flexible open-source software platform for mass spectrometry data analysis. Nat. Methods 13, 741–748 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rost, H. L. et al. OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 219–223 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tsou, C. C. et al. DIA-Umpire: comprehensive computational framework for data-independent acquisition proteomics. Nat. Methods 12, 258–264 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bruderer, R. et al. Extending the limits of quantitative proteome profiling with data-independent acquisition and application to acetaminophen-treated three-dimensional liver microtissues. Mol. Cell Proteom. 14, 1400–1410 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Navarro, P. et al. A multicenter study benchmarks software tools for label-free proteome quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1130–1136 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Choi, M. et al. ABRF Proteome informatics research group (iPRG) 2015 study: detection of differentially abundant proteins in label-free quantitative LC-MS/MS experiments. J. Proteome Res. 16, 945–957 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Choi, M. et al. MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. Bioinformatics 30, 2524–2526 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Selevsek, N. et al. Reproducible and consistent quantification of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome by SWATH-mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell Proteom. 14, 739–749 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by NSF CAREER award no. DBI-1054826, grant no. NSF DBI-1759736 and the Chan-Zuckerberg foundation to O.V., grant no. NIH-NLM 1R01LM013115 to N.B. and O.V., NSF award no. ABI 1759980, NIH award nos. P41GM103484 and R24GM127667 to N.B. and the Personalized Health and Related Technologies (grant no. PHRT 0-21411-18) strategic focus area of ETH to B.W. The CRG/UPF Proteomics Unit is part of the Spanish Infrastructure for Omics Technologies (ICTS OmicsTech) and it is a member of the ProteoRed PRB3 consortium that is supported by grant no. PT17/0019 of the PE I+D+i 2013–2016 from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and ERDF. We acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, ‘Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2013–2017’, SEV-2012–0208 and Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca del Departament d’Economia i Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya (grant no. 2017SGR595). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 823839 (EPIC-XS). Y.P.-R. acknowledges the Wellcome Trust (grant no. 208391/Z/17/Z). We thank the MacCoss laboratory (Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington) for the Skyline analyses and contributing the processed data, the Slavov laboratory (College of Engineering, Northeastern University) for providing the data and the Guo laboratory (School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, China) for providing the data.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.C., J.C., N.B. and O.V. designed the research. M.C. and T.H. collected datasets and performed statistical analysis. J.C. and B.P. implemented MassIVE.quant. T.-H.T. performed statistical analysis. C.C., E.S. and M.T. experimented with new controlled mixtures. C.C., M.T., R.H., G.C.T., Y.P-R., J.M., M.M., S.G., M.P., E.V., B.W., O.M.B., A.I.N., L.R., T.D. and E.S. analyzed data up to quantification. M.C., N.B. and O.V. wrote the manuscript, with input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nuno Bandeira or Olga Vitek.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

O.M.B., J.M. and L.R. are employees of Biognosys AG. Spectronaut is a trademark of Biognosys AG. M.T. and T.D. are employees of Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Arunima Singh was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Note 1, Figs. 1–4, Tables 1–5 and references.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, M., Carver, J., Chiva, C. et al. MassIVE.quant: a community resource of quantitative mass spectrometry–based proteomics datasets. Nat Methods 17, 981–984 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0955-0

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing