G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in numerous physiological processes and are the most frequent targets of approved drugs. The explosion in the number of new three-dimensional (3D) molecular structures of GPCRs (3D-GPCRome) over the last decade has greatly advanced the mechanistic understanding and drug design opportunities for this protein family. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have become a widely established technique for exploring the conformational landscape of proteins at an atomic level. However, the analysis and visualization of MD simulations require efficient storage resources and specialized software. Here we present GPCRmd (http://gpcrmd.org/), an online platform that incorporates web-based visualization capabilities as well as a comprehensive and user-friendly analysis toolbox that allows scientists from different disciplines to visualize, analyze and share GPCR MD data. GPCRmd originates from a community-driven effort to create an open, interactive and standardized database of GPCR MD simulations.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $20.17 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The MD data have been deposited in the GPCRmd database (http://gpcrmd.org/).
Set-up, simulation and analysis protocols are openly available at https://github.com/GPCRmd.
Hauser, A. S., Attwood, M. M., Rask-Andersen, M., Schiöth, H. B. & Gloriam, D. E. Trends in GPCR drug discovery: mew agents, targets and indications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 829–842 (2017).
Munk, C. et al. GPCRdb in 2018: adding GPCR structure models and ligands. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 440–446 (2017).
Munk, C. et al. An online resource for GPCR structure determination and analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 151–162 (2019).
Latorraca, N. R., Venkatakrishnan, A. J. & Dror, R. O. GPCR dynamics: structures in motion. Chem. Rev. 117, 139–155 (2017).
Hildebrand, P. W., Rose, A. S. & Tiemann, J. K. S. Bringing molecular dynamics simulation data into view. Trends Biochem. Sci. 44, 902–913 (2019).
Rose, A. S. & Hildebrand, P. W. NGL Viewer: a web application for molecular visualization. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W576–W579 (2015).
Tiemann, J. K. S., Guixà-González, R., Hildebrand, P. W. P. W. & Rose, A. S. MDsrv: viewing and sharing molecular dynamics simulations on the web. Nat. Methods 14, 1123–1124 (2017).
Carrillo-Tripp, M. et al. HTMoL: full-stack solution for remote access, visualization, and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 32, 869–876 (2018).
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).
Hauser, A. S. et al. Pharmacogenomics of GPCR drug targets. Cell 172, 41–54 (2018).
Munk, C., Harpsøe, K., Hauser, A. S., Isberg, V. & Gloriam, D. E. Integrating structural and mutagenesis data to elucidate GPCR ligand binding. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 30, 51–58 (2016).
Isberg, V. et al. Generic GPCR residue numbers - aligning topology maps while minding the gaps. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 36, 22–31 (2015).
Venkatakrishnan, A. J. et al. Uncovering patterns of atomic interactions in static and dynamic structures of proteins. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/840694 (2019).
Liu, W. et al. Structural basis for allosteric regulation of GPCRs by sodium ions. Science 337, 232–236 (2012).
Yuan, S., Filipek, S., Palczewski, K. & Vogel, H. Activation of G-protein-coupled receptors correlates with the formation of a continuous internal water pathway. Nat. Commun. 5, 4733 (2014).
Hildebrand, P. W. et al. A ligand channel through the G protein coupled receptor opsin. PloS ONE 4, e4382 (2009).
Guixà-González, R. et al. Membrane cholesterol access into a G-protein-coupled receptor. Nat. Commun. 8, 14505 (2017).
Venkatakrishnan, A. J. et al. Diverse GPCRs exhibit conserved water networks for stabilization and activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 3288–3293 (2019).
Alexander, S. P. et al. The concise guide to pharmacology 2017/18: G protein-coupled receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 174, S17–S129 (2017).
Roth, C. B., Hanson, M. A. & Stevens, R. C. Stabilization of the human β2-adrenergic receptor TM4-TM3-TM5 helix interface by mutagenesis of Glu1223.41, a critical residue in GPCR structure. J. Mol. Biol. 376, 1305–1319 (2008).
Selent, J., Sanz, F., Pastor, M. & De Fabritiis, G. Induced effects of sodium ions on dopaminergic G-protein coupled receptors. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000884 (2010).
Zarzycka, B., Zaidi, S. A., Roth, B. L. & Katritch, V. Harnessing ion-binding sites for GPCR pharmacology. Pharmacol. Rev. 71, 571–595 (2019).
Selvam, B., Shamsi, Z. & Shukla, D. Universality of the sodium ion binding mechanism in class A G-protein-coupled receptors. Angew. Chem. 130, 3102–3107 (2018).
Yuan, S., Vogel, H. & Filipek, S. The role of water and sodium ions in the activation of the μ-Opioid receptor. Angew. Chem. 52, 1–5 (2013).
Gutiérrez-De-Terán, H. et al. The role of a sodium ion binding site in the allosteric modulation of the A2A adenosine G protein-coupled receptor. Structure 21, 2175–2185 (2013).
Bostock, M. J., Solt, A. S. & Nietlispach, D. The role of NMR spectroscopy in mapping the conformational landscape of GPCRs. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 57, 145–156 (2019).
Wingler, L. M. et al. Angiotensin analogs with divergent bias stabilize distinct receptor conformations. Cell 176, 468–478 (2019).
Gregorio, G. G. et al. Single-molecule analysis of ligand efficacy in β2AR–G-protein activation. Nature 547, 68–73 (2017).
Sommer, M. E. et al. The European Research Network on Signal Transduction (ERNEST): toward a multidimensional holistic understanding of G protein-coupled receptor signaling. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 3, 361–370 (2020).
Ballesteros, J. A. et al. Activation of the β2-adrenergic receptor involves disruption of an ionic lock between the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane segments 3 and 6. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 29171–29177 (2001).
Mayol, E. et al. HomolWat: a web server tool to incorporate ‘homologous’ water molecules into GPCR structures. Nucleic Acids Res. (in the press); https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa440
Buch, I., Harvey, M. J., Giorgino, T., Anderson, D. P. & De Fabritiis, G. High-throughput all-atom molecular dynamics simulations using distributed computing. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50, 397–403 (2010).
Heller, S. R., McNaught, A., Pletnev, I., Stein, S. & Tchekhovskoi, D. InChI, the IUPAC International Chemical Identifier. J. Cheminformatics 7, 23 (2015).
Southan, C. et al. The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to pharmacology in 2016: towards curated quantitative interactions between 1300 protein targets and 6000 ligands. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1054–D1068 (2016).
Gilson, M. K. et al. BindingDB in 2015: a public database for medicinal chemistry, computational chemistry and systems pharmacology. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1045–D1053 (2016).
Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).
Karczewski, K. J. et al. Variation across 141,456 human exomes and genomes reveals the spectrum of loss-of-function intolerance across human protein-coding genes. Preprint at bioRxiv 531210 (2019).
Gowers, R. J. et al. MDAnalysis: a python package for the rapid analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. In Proc. 15th Python Sci. Conference 98–105 (2016).
McGibbon, R. T. et al. MDTraj: a modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories. Biophys. J. 109, 1528–1532 (2015).
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).
Chovancova, E. et al. CAVER 3.0: a tool for the analysis of transport pathways in dynamic protein structures. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, 23–30 (2012).
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
The GPCRmd consortium acknowledges the support of COST Action CA18133, the European Research Network on Signal Transduction (https://ernest-gpcr.eu) and COST Action CM1207 GLISTEN. We thank R. Fonseca and A.J. Venkatakrishnan for their help implementing Flareplots into the GPCRmd toolkit. We also thank the volunteers of GPUGRID for donating their computing time for the simulations. M.T.-F. acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (FPU16/01209). T.M.S. acknowledges support from the National Center of Science, Poland (grant no. 2017/27/N/NZ2/02571). I.R.-E. acknowledges Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca del Departament d’Economia i Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya (2015 FI_B00145) for its financial support. X.D. and R.G.-G. acknowledge support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 192780). P.K. thanks the German Research Foundation DFG for the Heisenberg professorship grant nos. KO4095/4-1 and KO4095/5-1 as well as project KO4095/3-1 (funding M.M.-S.). G.D.F. acknowledges support from MINECO (Unidad de Excelencia María de Maeztu, funded by the AEI (CEX2018-000782-M) and BIO2017-82628-P) and FEDER and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 823712 (CompBioMed2 Project). D.L. acknowledges support from the National Centre of Science in Poland (DEC-2012/07/D/NZ1/04244). P.W.H. thanks the DFG (Hi 1502, project number 168703014; SFB1423, project number 421152132, subproject Z04), the Stiftung Charité and the Einstein Foundation. S.F. thanks the National Science Centre Poland grant no. 2017/25/B/NZ7/02788. M.F. acknowledges support by the Office of Research Infrastructure of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers S10OD018522 and S10OD026880, as well as the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) under MCB080077, which is supported by National Science Foundation grant number ACI-1548562. J.K.S.T. acknowledges support from HPC-EUROPA3 (INFRAIA-2016-1-730897) and the EC Research Innovation Action under the H2020 Programme. The work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (2017-4676), the Swedish strategic research program eSSENCE and the Science for Life Laboratory to J.C. H.W. and G.K. acknowledge support from NSF grant no. 1740990 for In Situ Data Analytics for Next Generation Molecular Dynamics Workflows, and the 1923 Fund. D.E.G. acknowledges the Lundbeck Foundation (R163-2013-16327) and European Research Council (639125) for support. F.S. received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement number 802750 (FAIRplus) with the support of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme and EFPIA Companies. The Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB) is a member of the Spanish National Bioinformatics Institute (INB), funded by ISCIII and FEDER (PT17/0009/0014). The DCEXS is a ‘Unidad de Excelencia María de Maeztu’, funded by the AEI (CEX2018-000782-M). The GRIB is also supported by the Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR), Generalitat de Catalunya (2017 SGR 00519). Finally, J.S. acknowledges financial support from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III FEDER (PI15/00460 and PI18/00094) and the ERA-NET NEURON and Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (AC18/00030).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Arunima Singh was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rodríguez-Espigares, I., Torrens-Fontanals, M., Tiemann, J.K.S. et al. GPCRmd uncovers the dynamics of the 3D-GPCRome. Nat Methods 17, 777–787 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0884-y