Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Examining microbe–metabolite correlations by linear methods

Matters Arising to this article was published on 04 January 2021

The Original Article was published on 04 November 2019

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Reanalysis of the simulated data from Morton et al.
Fig. 2: Reanalysis of the sparsified simulated data.

Data availability

Data used in Figs. 1 and 2 are available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3610709 and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3833174, respectively.

Code availability

Scripts used in Figs. 1 and 2 are available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3610709 and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3833174, respectively.

References

  1. Lloyd-Price, J. et al. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature 569, 655–662 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tang, Z.-Z. et al. Multi-omic analysis of the microbiome and metabolome in healthy subjects reveals microbiome-dependent relationships between diet and metabolites. Front. Genet. 10, 454 (2019).

  3. Yachida, S. et al. Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses reveal distinct stage-specific phenotypes of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 25, 968–976 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandes, A. D. et al. Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis. Microbiome 2, 15 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lovell, D., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Egozcue, J. J., Marguerat, S. & Bähler, J. Proportionality: a valid alternative to correlation for relative data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004075 (2015).

  6. Morton, J. T. et al. Learning representations of microbe–metabolite interactions. Nat. Methods 16, 1306–1314 (2019).

  7. Erb, I. & Notredame, C. How should we measure proportionality on relative gene expression data? Theory Biosci. 135, 21–36 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aitchison, J. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data (Chapman & Hall, 1986).

  9. Quinn, T. P., Erb, I., Richardson, M. F. & Crowley, T. M. Understanding sequencing data as compositions: an outlook and review. Bioinformatics 34, 2870–2878 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurtz, Z. D. et al. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004226 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Palarea-Albaladejo, J. & Martín-Fernández, J. A. zCompositions—R package for multivariate imputation of left-censored data under a compositional approach. Chemometrics Intel. Lab. Syst. 143, 85–96 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martino, C. et al. A novel sparse compositional technique reveals microbial perturbations. mSystems 4, e00016-19 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morton, J. T. et al. Establishing microbial composition measurement standards with reference frames. Nat. Commun. 10, 2719 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Le, V., Quinn, T. P., Tran, T. & Venkatesh, S. Deep in the bowel: highly interpretable neural encoder–decoder networks predict gut metabolites from gut microbiome. BMC Genomics 21, 256 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Delgado, R. T., Talebi, H., Khodadadzadeh, M. & van den Boogaart, K. G. On machine learning algorithms and compositional data. in CoDaWork2019: Proc. 8th Intl Workshop on Compositional Data Analysis (2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I.E. has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No. 825835 (BovReg), Secretaria de Universidades e Investigación del Departamento de Economía y Conocimiento de la Generalidad de Cataluña, 2017 SGR 447 (SGR), Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and FEDER under Project BFU2017-88264-P (Plan Estatal). I.E. also acknowledges the following CRG funding sources: support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MEIC) to the EMBL partnership, Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa, the CERCA Programme / Generalitat de Catalunya and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.P.Q. performed the analysis. T.P.Q. and I.E. drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas P. Quinn.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quinn, T.P., Erb, I. Examining microbe–metabolite correlations by linear methods. Nat Methods 18, 37–39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01006-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01006-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing