Publisher Correction: Nuclear pores as versatile reference standards for quantitative superresolution microscopy

The Original Article was published on 27 September 2019

Correction to: Nature Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0574-9, published online 27 September 2019.

In the version of this Article originally published, at the end of the caption for Fig. 3f, the text ‘measured in GLOX/MEA’ was missing; this has now been corrected. Additionally, Supplementary Tables 3 and 4 were missing from the Supplementary Information, and their citations were missing from the main text. The Supplementary Information file has now been updated; and citations have been added in the main text to the sentence beginning “We thus extended our counting references...”, for Supplementary Table 3; and in the sentences beginning “Example images for all labels...” and “Typical acquisition parameters can be found...” for Supplementary Table 4.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Ries.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thevathasan, J.V., Kahnwald, M., Cieśliński, K. et al. Publisher Correction: Nuclear pores as versatile reference standards for quantitative superresolution microscopy. Nat Methods 16, 1332 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0659-5

Download citation

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing