Electron cryotomography is currently the only method capable of visualizing cells in three dimensions at nanometer resolutions. While modern instruments produce massive amounts of tomography data containing extremely rich structural information, data processing is very labor intensive and the results are often limited by the skills of the personnel rather than the data. We present an integrated workflow that covers the entire tomography data processing pipeline, from automated tilt series alignment to subnanometer resolution subtomogram averaging. Resolution enhancement is made possible through the use of per-particle per-tilt contrast transfer function correction and alignment. The workflow greatly reduces human bias, increases throughput and more closely approaches data-limited resolution for subtomogram averaging in both purified macromolecules and cells.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Asano, S., Engel, B. D. & Baumeister, W. In situ cryo-electron tomography: a post-reductionist approach to structural biology. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 332–343 (2016).
Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).
Frangakis, A. S. et al. Identification of macromolecular complexes in cryoelectron tomograms of phantom cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14153–14158 (2002).
Amat, F. et al. Markov random field based automatic image alignment for electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 161, 260–275 (2008).
Hrabe, T. et al. PyTom: a python-based toolbox for localization of macromolecules in cryo-electron tomograms and subtomogram analysis. J. Struct. Biol. 178, 177–188 (2012).
Galaz-Montoya, J. G. et al. Alignment algorithms and per-particle CTF correction for single particle cryo-electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 194, 383–394 (2016).
Bharat, T. A. M. & Scheres, S. H. W. Resolving macromolecular structures from electron cryo-tomography data using subtomogram averaging in RELION. Nat. Protoc. 11, 2054–2065 (2016).
Himes, B. A. & Zhang, P. emClarity: software for high-resolution cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging. Nat. Methods 15, 955–961 (2018).
Mastronarde, D. N. & Held, S. R. Automated tilt series alignment and tomographic reconstruction in IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 102–113 (2017).
Noble, A. J. & Stagg, S. M. Automated batch fiducial-less tilt-series alignment in Appion using Protomo. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 270–278 (2015).
Khoshouei, M., Pfeffer, S., Baumeister, W., Förster, F. & Danev, R. Subtomogram analysis using the Volta phase plate. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 94–101 (2017).
Gilbert, P. Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections. J. Theor. Biol. 36, 105–117 (1972).
Penczek, P. A. Image restoration in cryo-electron microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 482, 35–72 (2010).
Taylor, K. A., Tang, J., Cheng, Y. & Winkler, H. The use of electron tomography for structural analysis of disordered protein arrays. J. Struct. Biol. 120, 372–386 (1997).
Bernard Heymann, J., Cardone, G., Winkler, D. C. & Steven, A. C. Computational resources for cryo-electron tomography in Bsoft. J. Struct. Biol. 161, 232–242 (2008).
Chen, Y. et al. FIRT: filtered iterative reconstruction technique with information restoration. J. Struct. Biol. 195, 49–61 (2016).
Du, D. et al. Structure of the AcrAB-TolC multidrug efflux pump. Nature 509, 512–515 (2014).
Noble, A. J. et al. Reducing effects of particle adsorption to the air–water interface in cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 15, 793–795 (2018).
Galaz-Montoya, J. G., Flanagan, J., Schmid, M. F. & Ludtke, S. J. Single particle tomography in EMAN2. J. Struct. Biol. 190, 279–290 (2015).
Chen, M. et al. Convolutional neural networks for automated annotation of cellular cryo-electron tomograms. Nat. Methods 14, 983–985 (2017).
Xiong, Q., Morphew, M. K., Schwartz, C. L., Hoenger, A. H. & Mastronarde, D. N. CTF determination and correction for low dose tomographic tilt series. J. Struct. Biol. 168, 378–387 (2009).
Bohm, J. et al. Toward detecting and identifying macromolecules in a cellular context: template matching applied to electron tomograms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14245–14250 (2000).
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Henderson, R. et al. Outcome of the first electron microscopy validation task force meeting. Structure 20, 205–214 (2012).
Shi, X. et al. In situ structure and assembly of the multidrug efflux pump AcrAB-TolC. Nat. Commun. 10, 2635 (2019).
Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38–46 (2007).
Powell, M. J. D. An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives. Comput. J. 7, 155–162 (1964).
Oliphant, T. E. Python for scientific computing. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 10–20 (2007).
Ortega, D. R., Oikonomou, C. M., Ding, H. J., Rees-Lee, P. & Jensen, G. J. ETDB-Caltech: a blockchain-based distributed public database for electron tomography. PLoS ONE 14, e0215531 (2019).
Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C. & Ferrin, T. E. Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 281–287 (2007).
Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).
This work was partially supported by NIH grant nos. R01GM080139 and P01GM121203, the Welch Foundation (grant no. Q-1967-20180324), BCM BMB department seed funds and a Houston Area Molecular Biophysics Program training grant from the Keck Center of the Gulf Coast Consortium (NIH grant no. T32 GM008280-30). We also thank early users for testing the workflow and providing valuable feedback.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Rita Strack was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Integrated supplementary information
(a) Reconstruction of individual tiles. Each tile is padded to the size of the dashed box during the reconstruction, and clipped to the size of the solid box. (b) The per-tile weighting function and slice view of a masked tile. (c) Overlapping tiles to reduce edge effects. (d) Resulting by-tile reconstruction.
We measure CTF in each tilt image by tiling the tilt images and calculating coherent power spectra along strips parallel to the tilt axis. These power spectra, geometric information from the tilt angle, and the 3D position of each extracted particle are used to determine per-particle defoci. Once CTF curves have been fit to the data, the parameters are used to phase flip individual particle subtilt images for subsequent processing.
(a) Filtered and masked images from the center tilt and a high angle tilt in a tilt series. (b) Coherent average of Fourier transform intensity of all translationally aligned and masked images in the tilt series. (c) Plot of the average intensity of (b) along a ray at different orientation. The peak annotated by the dashed line is the tilt axis orientation. Note the points at 0 and 90 degrees are set to zero to avoid the impact from background pattern.
(a) An example of successful case for both IMOD and EMAN2 pipeline. From left to right: 45 degree tilt image; center slice view of the tomogram from ETDB (using IMOD); center slice view of the tomogram reconstructed in EMAN2. (b) An example of ‘failed’ case for IMOD that is successful aligned by EMAN2. Note the large amount of ice contaimination in high angle tilt images that likely leads to the failure of original IMOD alignment.
(a) A tomogram slice view of the flagellum of an anucleated Trypanosoma brucei cell, recontructed with tiled direct Fourier transform. Cyan box shows the tile to zoom in for comparison. (b) Slice view of tomogram reconstructed by direct Fourier transform (FT), tiled direct Fourier transform, back projection (BP) and SIRT, from left to right. The tomograms are filtered identically to be comparable.
Supplementary Figure 6 Comparison of structures solved by different software packages using the ribosome dataset from EMPIAR-10064.
Averaged structures solved by PEET (grey, 13Å), EMAN2 (cyan, 8.5Å) and PyTom (yellow, 11.2Å) are viewed from three orientations. A high resolution structrue (blue, EMD-5592) filtered to 10Å is shown for comparison.
Supplementary Figure 7 Comparison of structures solved by different software packages using the ribosome dataset from EMPIAR-10045.
Averaged structures solved by EMClarity (grey, 7.8Å), EMAN2 (cyan, 9.3Å) and Relion (yellow, 13Å) are viewed from three orientations. A high resolution structrue (blue, EMD-2858) filtered to 10Å is shown for comparison.
Supplementary Figs. 1–7.
Supplementary Tables 1 and 2
Tomogram of an E. coli bacterium with gold fiducials. Result of automatic tilt series alignment and tomogram reconstruction.
Tomogram of purified apoferritin without fiducials. Result of automatic fiducial-less tilt series alignment. The dataset is from EMPIAR-10171.
Subtomogram averaging of purified ribosomes. Result of subtomogram averaging with subtilt alignment using the dataset from EMPIAR-10064.
Subtomogram averaging of AcrAB-TolC drug pumps from cellular tomograms. Result of subtomogram averaging with subtilt alignment using particles from cellular tomograms of E. coli overexpressing AcrAB-TolC drug pumps.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, M., Bell, J.M., Shi, X. et al. A complete data processing workflow for cryo-ET and subtomogram averaging. Nat Methods 16, 1161–1168 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0591-8