Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

High throughput discovery of functional protein modifications by Hotspot Thermal Profiling

Matters Arising to this article was published on 17 June 2021

Matters Arising to this article was published on 17 June 2021

Abstract

Mass spectrometry enables global analysis of posttranslationally modified proteoforms from biological samples, yet we still lack methods to systematically predict, or even prioritize, which modification sites may perturb protein function. Here we describe a proteomic method, Hotspot Thermal Profiling, to detect the effects of site-specific protein phosphorylation on the thermal stability of thousands of native proteins in live cells. This massively parallel biophysical assay unveiled shifts in overall protein stability in response to site-specific phosphorylation sites, as well as trends related to protein function and structure. This method can detect intrinsic changes to protein structure as well as extrinsic changes to protein–protein and protein–metabolite interactions resulting from phosphorylation. Finally, we show that functional ‘hotspot’ protein modification sites can be discovered and prioritized for study in a high-throughput and unbiased fashion. This approach is applicable to diverse organisms, cell types and posttranslational modifications.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: HTP workflow.
Fig. 2: HTP identifies thousands of unmodified, bulk and phosphomodiform Tm values in HEK293T cells.
Fig. 3: Global relationships between local phosphosite environment and altered phosphomodiform stability.
Fig. 4: HTP detects the known 4EBP1–EIF4E protein–protein interaction mediated by phosphorylation.
Fig. 5: HTP discovery of an uncharacterized phosphorylation site in vinculin that regulates focal adhesion phenotypes.
Fig. 6: Discovery of a previously uncharacterized phosphorylation site affecting GAPDH catalysis.

Data availability

Primary data for proteomic analyses are available for download at: ftp://massive.ucsd.edu/MSV000083786; https://doi.org/10.25345/C5CS7H. Raw data used in this work that are not included in supplementary tables or raw mass spectrometry files are available upon request, which includes primary and processed microscopy image files. A Nature Research Reporting Summary is available.

References

  1. 1.

    Agapakis, C. M., Boyle, P. M. & Silver, P. A. Natural strategies for the spatial optimization of metabolism in synthetic biology. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 527–535 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yu, C. S., Chen, Y. C., Lu, C. H. & Hwang, J. K. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins 64, 643–651 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gawron, D., Ndah, E., Gevaert, K. & Van Damme, P. Positional proteomics reveals differences in N-terminal proteoform stability. Mol. Syst. Biol. 12, 858 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Walsh, C. Posttranslational Modification of Proteins: Expanding Nature’s Inventory (Roberts and Company, 2006).

  5. 5.

    Hunter, T. Tyrosine phosphorylation: thirty years and counting. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 140–146 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    White, F. M. & Wolf-Yadlin, A. Methods for the analysis of protein phosphorylation-mediated cellular signaling networks. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. (Palo Alto Calif.) 9, 295–315 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Martin, L., Latypova, X. & Terro, F. Post-translational modifications of tau protein: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem. Int. 58, 458–471 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function. Nature 537, 347–355 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Huttlin, E. L. et al. A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell 143, 1174–1189 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Olsen, J. V. & Mann, M. Status of large-scale analysis of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 12, 3444–3452 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Walther, T. C. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics in cell biology. J. Cell Biol. 190, 491–500 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Humphrey, S. J., Azimifar, S. B. & Mann, M. High-throughput phosphoproteomics reveals in vivo insulin signaling dynamics. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 990–995 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Olsen, J. V. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal. 3, ra3 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tsai, C. F. et al. Large-scale determination of absolute phosphorylation stoichiometries in human cells by motif-targeting quantitative proteomics. Nat. Commun. 6, 6622 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Huber, K. V. et al. Proteome-wide drug and metabolite interaction mapping by thermal-stability profiling. Nat. Methods 12, 1055–1057 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Martinez Molina, D. et al. Monitoring drug target engagement in cells and tissues using the cellular thermal shift assay. Science 341, 84–87 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Piazza, I. et al. A map of protein-metabolite interactions reveals principles of chemical communication. Cell 172, 358–372.e23 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Savitski, M. M. et al. Tracking cancer drugs in living cells by thermal profiling of the proteome. Science 346, 1255784 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tan, C. S. H. et al. Thermal proximity coaggregation for system-wide profiling of protein complex dynamics in cells. Science 359, 1170–1177 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Smith, L. M. & Kelleher, N. L. Consortium for Top Down Proteomics Proteoform: a single term describing protein complexity. Nat. Methods 10, 186–187 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Fermin, D., Walmsley, S. J., Gingras, A. C., Choi, H. & Nesvizhskii, A. I. LuciPHOr: algorithm for phosphorylation site localization with false localization rate estimation using modified target-decoy approach. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 12, 3409–3419 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    McGowan, C. H. & Russell, P. Human Wee1 kinase inhibits cell division by phosphorylating p34cdc2 exclusively on Tyr15. EMBO J. 12, 75–85 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Watanabe, N., Broome, M. & Hunter, T. Regulation of the human WEE1Hu CDK tyrosine 15-kinase during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 14, 1878–1891 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Blangy, A. et al. Phosphorylation by p34cdc2 regulates spindle association of human Eg5, a kinesin-related motor essential for bipolar spindle formation in vivo. Cell 83, 1159–1169 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Azimi, A. et al. Targeting CDK2 overcomes melanoma resistance against BRAF and Hsp90 inhibitors. Mol. Syst. Biol. 14, e7858 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gnad, F. et al. PHOSIDA (phosphorylation site database): management, structural and evolutionary investigation, and prediction of phosphosites. Genome Biol. 8, R250 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jimenez, J. L., Hegemann, B., Hutchins, J. R., Peters, J. M. & Durbin, R. A systematic comparative and structural analysis of protein phosphorylation sites based on the mtcPTM database. Genome Biol. 8, R90 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kallberg, M. et al. Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1511–1522 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lee, T. Y. et al. dbPTM: an information repository of protein post-translational modification. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D622–D627 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Beretta, L., Gingras, A. C., Svitkin, Y. V., Hall, M. N. & Sonenberg, N. Rapamycin blocks the phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 and inhibits cap-dependent initiation of translation. EMBO J. 15, 658–664 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sekiyama, N. et al. Molecular mechanism of the dual activity of 4EGI-1: dissociating eIF4G from eIF4E but stabilizing the binding of unphosphorylated 4E-BP1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E4036–E4045 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gingras, A. C. et al. Regulation of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation: a novel two-step mechanism. Genes Dev. 13, 1422–1437 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Garakani, K., Shams, H. & Mofrad, M. R. K. Mechanosensitive conformation of vinculin regulates its binding to MAPK1. Biophys. J. 112, 1885–1893 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Humphries, J. D. et al. Vinculin controls focal adhesion formation by direct interactions with talin and actin. J. Cell Biol. 179, 1043–1057 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chorev, D. S. et al. Conformational states during vinculin unlocking differentially regulate focal adhesion properties. Sci. Rep. 8, 2693 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Huang, J. X., Lee, G. & Moellering, R. E. Discovery and interrogation of functional protein modifications by Hotspot Thermal Profiling. Protoc. Exch. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.10602/v1 (2019).

  37. 37.

    Chang, J. W., Lee, G., Coukos, J. S. & Moellering, R. E. Profiling reactive metabolites via chemical trapping and targeted mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 88, 6658–6661 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Rust for discussions surrounding the manuscript and G. Li for discussions regarding microscopy. We are grateful for financial support for this work from the following: Kwanjeong Educational Fellowship (to G.L.); NIH training grant no. GM007183 and National Academy of Sciences Ford Foundation Fellowship (to K.E.C); NIGMS 1R01GM104032-01A1 (to M.L.G.); NCI R00CA175399 and NIGMS DP2GM128199-01 (to R.E.M.); The Dale F. Frey Award for Breakthrough Scientists from the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (to R.E.M.) and The University of Chicago.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.X.H. designed and performed functional biochemical experiments, cell-based experiments, mass spectrometry experiments and analyzed data. G.L. designed, performed and analyzed mass spectrometry experiments. K.E.C. designed, performed and analyzed cell-based and microscopy experiments. J.W.C. performed mass spectrometry experiments and analyzed data. M.L.G. designed and supervised microscopy experiments and analyzed data. R.E.M. conceived of and supervised the study, designed, performed and analyzed experiments, and wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond E. Moellering.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: Allison Doerr was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 HTP data processing workflow.

Schematic showing the total number of detected peptides and phosphopeptides in the unmodified, bulk proteome and phosphoproteome, and the data processing workflow. Stringent filters for qualitative, quantitative, and false localization analyses were used, which resulted in a total of 2,883 high quality ΔTm’s.

Supplementary Figure 2 HTP dataset reproducibility and error analysis.

a) Reproducibility of Tm values assessed with replicate experiments in bulk, unmodified proteome (linear regression). Only Tm values calculated from melting curves with R2 > 0.8 are used for analysis in this paper. Data generated from n = 12 MS technical replicates from n = 6 independent biological replicates. b),Schematic that shows how peptide ΔTm s.d. is calculated for a typical MS technical run. Peptide ΔTm s.d. is the median deviation for a tryptic peptide Tm value relative to its aggregate protein-level Tm and this value demonstrates the “base error” of the HTP workflow. Reporter ion intensities of detected peptides were combined and converted to relative abundance to generate protein composite melt curve (red line) for each protein. cf) The average deviation for any given tryptic peptide Tm value relative to its aggregate protein-level Tm is 1.4 °C from four representative datasets.

Supplementary Figure 3 Effect of temperature pulse on global phosphorylation level.

a, b) Pan phospho-serine, threonine and tyrosine antibody stained western blot (A) on whole cell lysate following indicated temperature pulse for three minutes. Densitometry quantification of immunoblot signal is shown in (B). Data points shown are mean and S.E.M., n = 2 independent biological replicates).

Supplementary Figure 4 Schematic that showing how phosphopeptides containing the same phosphosites are processed.

Unique phosphopeptides that map to a common phosphosite (i.e. different tryptic status or charge state) are collapsed to a single phosphosite reporter, and subsequently to a phosphomodiform Tm value.

Supplementary Figure 5 Acute glucose withdrawal metabolomics and other GAPDH phosphomodiform measurements.

a) Representative HTP curve of GAPDH pT154 phosphomodiform showing no significant ΔTm relative to the bulk, unmodified GAPDH. Tm curve corresponds to mean and S.E.M. from n = 6 (bulk, unmodified) and 5 (phospho) independent biological replicates. b) Relative intracellular GAP level after 30 minutes of acute glucose withdrawal (n = 2 biological replicates, four technical replicates each). c) Crystal structure showing close proximity of T182 to S210 and GAP binding pocket. PDB accession: 1ZNQ. d) Representative Michaelis-Menten kinetic measurement of wild-type, T182A, and T182D mutant GAPDH (n = 3 biological replicates). e) Graph of KM toward GAP for wild-type (WT), T182A and T182D GAPDH enzymes (mean and S.E.M., two-sided t-test).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–5 and Supplementary Protocol.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

List of bulk, unmodified protein-level Tm measurements. Included in this table are protein IDs (Uniprot accession and description), aggregate unmodified, bulk Tm values from duplicate technical replicates of n = 6 biological replicates.

Supplementary Table 2

List of phosphorylation site-specific Tm and ΔTm measurements. Included in this table are phosphomodiform IDs (Gene_pSite), representative peptide sequences, which includes phosphosite location, localization score, Tm and ΔTm measurements from duplicate technical replicates of n = 5 biological replicates. If multiple tryptic peptides were detected for a unique phosphomodiform, one representative peptide is shown. ΔTm values are listed for all peptides in the table, but only phosphomodiforms that satisfy criteria in Supplementary Fig. 1 were included in the final ΔTm database.

Supplementary Table 3

Primer sequences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, J.X., Lee, G., Cavanaugh, K.E. et al. High throughput discovery of functional protein modifications by Hotspot Thermal Profiling. Nat Methods 16, 894–901 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0499-3

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing