Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Water content, not stiffness, dominates Brillouin spectroscopy measurements in hydrated materials

Nature Methods volume 15, pages 561–562 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

To the Editor: Brillouin microscopy is an optical method to map the mechanical properties of materials1,2,3,4,5. The first Brillouin micrographs with cellular resolution were reported in Nature Methods in 20154 and inspired a growing number of applications in biomechanics and biophotonics. In these publications, Brillouin measurements were considered a proxy for stiffness. In contrast, we show here in hydrogels that water content dominates Brillouin signals in hydrated materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Young’s modulus E, water content ε and longitudinal elastic modulus measured by Brillouin M for polyethylene oxide and polyacrylamide hydrogels.

References

  1. Koski, K. J. & Yarger, J. L. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 061903 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scarcelli, G. & Yun, S. H. Nat. Photonics 2, 39–43 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scarcelli, G., Kim, P. & Yun, S. H. Biophys. J. 101, 1539–1545 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scarcelli, G. et al. Nat. Methods 12, 1132–1134 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Antonacci, G. et al. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20150843 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, D. L. J. Chem. Phys. 77, 1531–1539 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grants EY022359 (D.R.O.) and EY019696 (D.R.O.), a PhD studentship from the Ministry of Education, Republic of China (P.-J.W.) and the Imperial College Junior Research Fellowship (I.V.K.). We thank C. Song (Imperial College London) for help in acquiring the Brillouin measurements.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Irina V. Kabakova

    Present address: School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

  2. Peter Török

    Present address: Division of Physics & Applied Physics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Pei-Jung Wu, Joseph M. Sherwood & Darryl R. Overby

  2. Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Pei-Jung Wu, Irina V. Kabakova, Carl Paterson & Peter Török

  3. Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

    Jeffrey W. Ruberti

  4. Department of Materials, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Iain E. Dunlop

Authors
  1. Pei-Jung Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irina V. Kabakova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeffrey W. Ruberti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joseph M. Sherwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Iain E. Dunlop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Carl Paterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Peter Török
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Darryl R. Overby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.-J.W., I.V.K., C.P., P.T., J.W.R., J.M.S., I.E.D. and D.R.O. planned the study. P.-J.W. and I.K. conducted experiments. All authors participated in and contributed to data analysis. D.R.O. and P.-J.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to editing and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Peter Török or Darryl R. Overby.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Polyacrylamide hydrogel swelling.

a, Hydrogel mass m increased during swelling, with larger swelling observed for lower cross-linker concentrations. b, The swelling ratio Q increased during swelling, as calculated by equation S6. Data are taken from the studies shown in Fig. 1c,d. Each data point represents an individual hydrogel made from the same stock solution. Data from four hydrogels are shown here. Curves show exponential fits.

Supplementary Figure 2 Setup of the Brillouin microscope and associated frequency analysis.

a, Schematic of the Brillouin microscope. Laser light is directed into an inverted confocal microscope. Backscattered light is collected and filtered by an interferometer to reduce the intensity of the Rayleigh peak by up to 40 dB. The filtered signal is passes through a VIPA to separate spectral components that are detected by an sCMOS camera. b, Pixel locations in the spectrum are converted into frequency (Supplementary Methods) to identify the Brillouin frequency shift \(\omega _b\) after the peaks are fitted by a Lorentzian function, where \(\omega _b = \left( {{\mathrm{FSR}} - \Delta f} \right)/2\). FSR, full spectral range. \(f\left( {x_i} \right)\) represents the frequency at pixel location \(x_i\), as needed for equation S8. Similar results were obtained for each individual Brillouin measurement, 50 of which were acquired at each location, averaging over three locations per hydrogel.

Supplementary Figure 3 Representative measurement of the Young’s modulus of a PEO hydrogel by rheometry.

a, The viscoelastic storage modulus (G′) as a function of oscillatory strain magnitude. b, The viscoelastic loss modulus (G″) as a function of frequency. Young’s modulus E was calculated as E=3 G′. For this sample, the molecular weight was 8 MDa with ε = 1.5%. Similar results were obtained for each of the 2–3 hydrogel samples per condition.

Supplementary Figure 4 Representative measurement of the Young’s modulus of a PA hydrogel by uniaxial unconfined compression.

The stress-strain data were used to calculate Young’s modulus as the slope of the linear regression to a full cycle (blue line). The initial bis-acrylamide concentration of this sample was 0.06%, measured after 12 h of swelling. One similar compression measurement was done per hydrogel per time point.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–4, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Note

Reporting Summary

Source Data, Figure 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, PJ., Kabakova, I.V., Ruberti, J.W. et al. Water content, not stiffness, dominates Brillouin spectroscopy measurements in hydrated materials. Nat Methods 15, 561–562 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0076-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0076-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing