Post-approval evidence generation is essential for high-quality clinical care and should be a shared priority for clinicians, health systems, payors, and the medical products industry, as well as the FDA and federal agencies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
21 US Code § 355 (d).
Fanaroff, A. C., Califf, R. M., Windecker, S., Smith, S. C. Jr. & Lopes, R. D. JAMA 321, 1069–1080 (2019).
US Food and Drug Administration. https://go.nature.com/4e5igl9 (12 January 2016).
21 US Code § 355(o)(3) and (c).
21 US Code § 356(c).
Cooke, N. J. & Hilton, M. L. (eds.) Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (National Academies Press, 2015).
Abbasi, A. B., Curtis, L. H., Fleisher, L. A. & Califf, R. M. JAMA 332, 412–417 (2024).
Mackay, C. B., Antonelli, K. R., Bruinooge, S. S., Saint Onge, J. M. & Ellis, S. D. Cancer 123, 2893–2900 (2017).
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. https://go.nature.com/4e5K34V (31 October 2023).
The Reagan-Udall Foundation for the Food and Drug Administration. https://go.nature.com/3MqItik (14 November 2023).
US Food and Drug Administration. https://go.nature.com/43MUG74 (5 February 2023).
US Food and Drug Administration. https://go.nature.com/4dMDYL2 (2 May 2024).
Sweet, K. L. et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 29, 2179–2183 (2023).
Mangoni, A. A. et al. BMC Rheumatol. 3, 10 (2019).
Pulte, E. D. et al. Oncologist 27, 149–157 (2022).
Bhatnagar, V. et al. Blood 130, 4352 (2017).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://go.nature.com/3XoaQE6 (21 September 2022).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge J. Woodcock, P. Marks and P. Stein for their comments on this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.A. is a resident physician at the University of California, San Francisco, is the recipient of an NIH T32 training grant (5T32CA251070-04) on assignment at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and has no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript to disclose; he reports past consulting income from LeMaitre and MIS Technologies, LLC. D.R. is an employee of the FDA and has no conflicts of interest to report. L.H.C. is a faculty member at Duke University who is on assignment at the FDA and has no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript to disclose; she reports past consulting income from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, the NFL Players Association and Boehringer Ingelheim and institutional grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis. R.M.C. is an employee of the FDA and has no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript to disclose; prior to his appointment to the FDA as Commissioner for Food and Drugs, he was an employee of and held equity in Verily Life Sciences and Google Health (Alphabet) and served on boards of directors for Cytokinetics, Centessa, Clinetic, Keystone Symposia, the Critical Path Institute (C-Path), the Clinical Research Forum and One Fifteen.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abbasi, A., Rivera, D., Curtis, L.H. et al. Post-approval evidence generation: a shared responsibility for healthcare. Nat Med (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03241-x
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03241-x