Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Advancing global antibiotic research, development and access

Abstract

The pipeline of new antibiotics is insufficient to keep pace with the growing global burden of drug-resistant infections. Substantial economic challenges discourage private investment in antibiotic research and development (R&D), with a decline in the number of companies and researchers working in the field. Compounding these issues, many countries (from low income to high income) face a growing crisis of antibiotic shortages and inequitable access to existing and emerging treatments. This has led to an increasing role for public and philanthropic funding in supporting antibiotic R&D via the creation of nonprofit public–private partnerships, including Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Biopharmaceutical Accelerator (CARB-X) and the Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership (GARDP), industry support for the AMR Action Fund, and pilot schemes to evaluate and reimburse antibiotics in innovative ways. Now is the time to raise the urgency, ambition and commitments of the world’s leaders to fully support the antibiotic R&D ecosystem, incentivizing all sectors to conduct public health-driven antibiotic R&D and make effective antibiotics accessible to all who need them.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Financial problems of antibiotic SME (biotech) companies.
Fig. 2: International push mechanisms covering all phases of antibiotic R&D.
Fig. 3: CARB-X support model.
Fig. 4: Allocation of public and philanthropic investments in R&D of human antibacterial therapeutics globally, by research stage.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murray, C. J. L. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399, 629–655 (2022).

  2. AMR Leaders. Towards specific commitments and action in the response to antimicrobial resistance. Global Leaders Group on Antimicrobial Resistance https://www.amrleaders.org/resources/m/item/glg-report (4 April 2024).

  3. World Health Organization. WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed (27 February 2017).

  4. World Health Organization. WHO bacterial priority pathogens list, 2024: bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240093461 (17 May 2024).

  5. Silver, L. L. A Gestalt approach to Gram-negative entry. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 24, 6379–6389 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sundqvist, M. Reversibility of antibiotic resistance. Ups. J. Med. Sci. 119, 142–148 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization. 2023 antibacterial agents in clinical and preclinical development: an overview and analysis. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240094000 (14 June 2024).

  8. O' Neill, J. et al. AMR Review. May 19, 2016 — Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. Review on Antimicrobial Resistance https://amr-review.org/Publications.html (19 May 2016).

  9. Drive-AB Consortium. DRIVE-AB outputs: reports and briefing. Drive AB https://drive-ab.eu/drive-ab-outputs/drive-ab-reports/ (2016).

  10. Stern, S. et al. Breaking through the wall: a call for concerted action on antibiotics research and development. Boston Consulting Group https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/5_Publikationen/Gesundheit/Berichte/GUARD_Follow_Up_Report_Full_Report_final.pdf (February, 2017).

  11. Anderson, M., Panteli, D. & Mossialos, E. Policy Brief 51: How can the EU support sustainable innovation and access to effective antibiotics? policy options for existing and new medicines. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/i/how-can-the-eu-support-sustainable-innovation-and-access-to-effective-antibiotics-policy-options-for-existing-and-new-medicines (21 June 2023).

  12. Turnidge, J. & Christiansen, K. Antibiotic use and resistance—proving the obvious. Lancet 365, 548–549 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization. 2021 AWaRe classification. WHO access, watch, reserve, classification of antibiotics for evaluation and monitoring of use. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/2021-aware-classification (30 September 2021).

  14. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance targets: how can we reach them by 2030? ECDC https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/amr-brief-eaad-2023-update.pdf (2023).

  15. World Health Organization. Lack of innovation set to undermine antibiotic performance and health gains. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/news/item/22-06-2022-22-06-2022-lack-of-innovation-set-to-undermine-antibiotic-performance-and-health-gains (22 June 2022).

  16. Magnano San, L. R. et al. How antimicrobial resistance is linked to climate change: an overview of two intertwined global challenges. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 1681 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dolecek, C., Shakoor, S., Basnyat, B., Okwor, T. & Sartorius, B. Drug-resistant bacterial infections: we need urgent action and investment that focus on the weakest link. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001903 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. Immunization coverage. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/immunization-coverage (15 July 2024).

  19. Chimhini, G., Magwenzi, M. & Fitzgerald, F. C. Infection prevention and control in low-resource settings: the need for the local, the contextual and the pragmatic. Infect. Prev. Pract. 4, 100135 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nour, S., Stokle, E., Ashiru-Oredope, D. & Wesangulae, E. Challenges of implementing antimicrobial stewardship tools in low to middle income countries (LMICs). Infect. Prev. Pract. 5, 100315 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aminov, R. A brief history of the antibiotic era: lessons learned and challenges for the future. Front. Microbiol. 1, 134 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Outterson, K. et al. Patient access in 14 high-income countries to new antibacterials approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, or Health Canada, 2010–2020. Clin. Infect. Dis. 74, 1183–1190 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. World Health Organization. 2021 antibacterial agents in clinical and preclinical development: an overview and analysis. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240047655 (27 May 2022).

  24. Antibiotics: the economics must support the science. Nature 625, 7 (2024).

  25. Thomas, D. & Wessel, C. The state of innovation in antibacterial therapeutics. Biotechnology Innovation Organization https://www.bio.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/The-State-of-Innovation-in-Antibacterial-Therapeutics.pdf (February, 2022).

  26. Strich, J. et al. Assessing clinician utilization of next-generation antibiotics against resistant Gram-negative infections in U.S. hospitals: a retrospective cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 177, 559–572 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas, D. & Wessel, C. The state of innovation in antibacterial therapeutics. Biotechnology Innovation Organization https://www.bio.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/BIO-Antibacterial-Report-2022.pdf (February 2022).

  28. Renwick, M. J., Brogan, D. M. & Mossialos, E. A systematic review and critical assessment of incentive strategies for discovery and development of novel antibiotics. J. Antibiot. 69, 73–88 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority. Research and development of medical countermeasures. European Commission https://health.ec.europa.eu/health-emergency-preparedness-and-response-hera/preparedness/research-and-development-medical-countermeasures_en (2024).

  30. European Commission. Pre-draft proposal for a European partnership under Horizon Europe One Health Antimicrobial Resistance. European Commission https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-02/ec_rtd_he-partnerships-onehealth-amr.pdf (9 February 2022).

  31. Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership. Entasis Therapeutics and the Global Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership to develop a new treatment for gonorrhea. GARDP https://gardp.org/entasis-therapeutics-and-the-global-antibiotic-research-development-partnership-to-develop-a-new-treatment-for-gonorrhea/ (6 July 2017).

  32. Atal, I., Trinquart, L., Porcher, R. & Ravaud, P. Differential globalization of industry- and non-industry-sponsored clinical trials. PLoS ONE 10, e0145122 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. World Health Organization. Number of clinical trial registrations by location, disease, phase of development, age and sex of trial participants (1999–2022). World Health Organization https://www.who.int/observatories/global-observatory-on-health-research-and-development/monitoring/number-of-trial-registrations-by-year-location-disease-and-phase-of-development (February 2023).

  34. Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership. NeoSept1: a study to determine the ranking of existing and new antibiotics combinations to treat newborn babies who are in hospital with severe sepsis. ISRCTN registry https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN48721236 (17 January 2022).

  35. Public Health Agency of Canada. Government of Canada makes important investment to fight antimicrobial resistance (AMR), Government of Canada https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/news/2023/05/government-of-canada-makes-important-investment-to-fight-antimicrobial-resistance-amr.html (11 May 2023).

  36. Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership. Japan government funding supports GARDP’s efforts to counter antibiotic resistance. GARDP https://gardp.org/japan-government-funding-supports-gardps-efforts-to-counter-antibiotic-resistance/ (19 October 2023).

  37. Novo Nordisk Foundation. Novo Nordisk Foundation partners with CARB-X to fight drug-resistant infections. novo nordisk foundation https://novonordiskfonden.dk/en/news/novo-nordisk-foundation-partners-with-carb-x-to-fight-drug-resistant-infections/ (9 January 2024).

  38. European Commission: European Health and Digital Executive Agency. Study on bringing AMR medical countermeasures to the market. Publications Office of the European Union https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/51b2c82c-c21b-11ed-8912-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (2023).

  39. Outterson, K. Estimating the appropriate size of global pull incentives for antibacterial medicines. Health Aff. 40, 1758–1765 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Evans, E. J., Meyer, A. & Conti, R. M. Sizing a market entry reward for the development of new antibiotics. Harvard Kennedy School https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/mrcbg/Final_AWP_232.pdf (May 2024).

  41. Morel, C. M. et al. Industry incentives and antibiotic resistance: an introduction to the antibiotic susceptibility bonus. J. Antibiot. 73, 421–428 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bonnifield, R. & Towse, A. An ambitious USG advanced commitment for subscription-based purchasing of novel antimicrobials and its expected return on investment. Center for Global Development https://www.cgdev.org/publication/ambitious-usg-advanced-commitment-subscription-based-purchasing-novel-antimicrobials (15 November 2022).

  43. Towse, A. & Silverman Bonnifield, R. G7 investments in new antibiotics would pay off — for everyone. Office of Health Economics https://www.ohe.org/insight/g7-investments-in-new-antibiotics-would-pay-off-for-everyone/ (9 December 2022).

  44. NHS England. NHS steps up battle against life-threatening infections following successful world-first pilot. NHS England https://www.england.nhs.uk/2023/07/nhs-steps-up-battle-against-life-threatening-infections-following-successful-world-first-pilot/ (11 July 2023).

  45. US Congress. S.1355 — PASTEUR Act of 2023. congress.gov www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/1355#:~:text=This%20bill%20authorizes%20the%20Department,and%20contains%20other%20related%20provisions (27 April 2023).

  46. European Commission. Reform of the EU pharmaceutical legalisation. European Commission https://health.ec.europa.eu/medicinal-products/pharmaceutical-strategy-europe/reform-eu-pharmaceutical-legislation_en (26 April 2023).

  47. Gotham, D. et al. Reimbursement models to tackle market failures for antimicrobials: approaches taken in France, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Health Policy 125, 296–306 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations. From resistance to resilience: what could the future antibiotic pipeline look like? IFMPA https://www.ifpma.org/publications/from-resistance-to-resilience-what-could-the-future-antibiotic-pipeline-look-like/ (14 May 2024).

  49. Global AMR R&D Hub & World Health Organization. Incentivising the development of new antibacterial treatments: 2023 progress report by the Global AMR R&D Hub and WHO. Global AMR R&D Hub https://globalamrhub.org/publications/incentivising-the-development-of-new-antibacterial-treatments-2023/ (2023).

  50. Glover, R. E., Singer, A., Roberts, A. P. & Kirchhelle, C. Why is the UK subscription model for antibiotics considered successful? Lancet Microbe 4, e852–e853 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Non-paper — novel stimuli for the development and keeping on the market of antimicrobials. Politico https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/01/Non-paper-Transferable-exclusivity-voucher-for-AMR-2.pdf (2022).

  52. Liu, L. et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 385, 430–440 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Quadri, F. et al. Antibacterial drug shortages from 2001 to 2013: implications for clinical practice. Clin. Infect. Dis. 60, 1737–1742 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Benhabib, A. et al. The French reporting system for drug shortages: description and trends from 2012 to 2018: an observational retrospective study. BMJ Open 10, e034033 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Klein, E. Y. et al. Assessment of WHO antibiotic consumption and access targets in 76 countries, 2000–15: an analysis of pharmaceutical sales data. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21, 107–115 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pyzik, O. Z. & Abubakar, I. Fighting the fakes: tackling substandard and falsified medicines. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 8, 55 (2022).

  57. Hayhoe, B., Greenfield, G. & Majeed, A. Is it getting easier to obtain antibiotics in the UK? Br. J. Gen. Pract. 69, 54–55 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. African Society for Laboratory Medicine. Policy brief and infographics on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Africa. ASLM https://aslm.org/resource/policy-brief-and-infographics-on-antimicrobial-resistance-amr-in-africa/ (14 September 2022).

  59. Kanu, J. S. et al. National antibiotic consumption for human use in Sierra Leone (2017–2019): a cross-sectional study. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 6, 77 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Namugambe, J. S. et al. National antimicrobial consumption: analysis of central warehouses supplies to in-patient care health facilities from 2017 to 2019 in Uganda. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 6, 83 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Robertson, J. et al. Variations in the consumption of antimicrobial medicines in the European region, 2014–2018: findings and implications from ESAC-Net and WHO Europe. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 639207 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Shukar, S. et al. Drug shortage: causes, impact, and mitigation strategies. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 693426 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Outterson, K., Orubu, E. S. F., Rex, J., Årdal, C. & Zaman, M. H. Patient access in 14 high-income countries to new antibacterials approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, or Health Canada, 2010–2020. Clin. Infect. Dis. 74, 1183–1190 (2021).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Pulcini, C. et al. Forgotten antibiotics: a follow-up inventory study in Europe, the USA, Canada and Australia. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 49, 98–101 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Rottingen, J. A. & Farrar, J. Targeted health innovation for global health. Br. Med. J. 366, 15601 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  66. AMR Industry Alliance. The 2023 AMR Industry Alliance progress survey: manufacturing and the environment. amr Industry Alliance https://www.amrindustryalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/AMRIA_Manufacturing-and-the-environment-FINAL.pdf (2023).

  67. Munoz, V., Visentin, F., Foray, D. & Gaule, P. Can medical products be developed on a non-profit basis? Exploring product development partnerships for neglected diseases. Sci. Public Policy 42, 315–338 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Swaminathan, S. et al. Reboot biomedical R&D in the global public interest. Nature 602, 207–210 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Africa CDC spearheads bold move to secure Africa’s health future by creating a 50 billion dollar medical market. AfricaCDC https://africacdc.org/news-item/africa-cdc-spearheads-bold-move-to-secure-africas-health-future-by-creating-a-50-billion-dollar-medical-market/ (19 February 2024).

  70. Gore, C., Morin, S., Røttingen, J. A. & Kieny, M. P. Negotiating public-health intellectual property licensing agreements to increase access to health technologies: an insider’s story. BMJ Glob. Health 8, e012964 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Suleman, F., Low, M., Moon, S. & Morgan, S. G. New business models for research and development with affordability requirements are needed to achieve fair pricing of medicines. Br. Med. J. 368, l4408 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Biopharmaceutical Accelerator. Stewardship and access. CARB-X https://carb-x.org/about/stewardship-and-access/ (2024).

  73. Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership. Shinogi, GARDP and CHAI announce landmark license and collaboration agreements to treat bacterial infections by expanding access to cefiderocol in 135 countries. GARDP https://gardp.org/shionogi-gardp-and-chai-announce-landmark-license-and-collaboration-agreements-to-treat-bacterial-infections-by-expanding-access-to-cefiderocol-in-135-countries/ (15 June 2022).

  74. AMR Industry Alliance. Leaving the lab: tracking the decline in AMR R&D professionals. amr Industry Alliance https://www.amrindustryalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Leaving-the-Lab_final-1.pdf (February, 2024).

  75. G7 Health Ministers. G7 Health Ministers’ Communiqué. G7 Germany www.g7germany.de/resource/blob/974430/2042058/5651daa321517b089cdccfaffd1e37a1/2022-05-20-g7-health-ministers-communique-data.pdf (20 May 2022).

  76. G20. G20 call to action on antimicrobial resistance. G7G20 Documents Database https://g7g20-documents.org/database/document/2022-g20-indonesia-sherpa-track-health-ministers-ministers-annex-g20-call-to-action-on-antimicrobial-resistance (28 October 2022).

  77. Global Coalition on Aging & Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2024 AMR preparedness index progress report. Measuring government action on AMR policy. Global Coalition on Aging https://globalcoalitiononaging.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2024-AMR-Index-Progress-Report.pdf (2024).

  78. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations Environment Programme, World Health Organization &. World Organisation for Animal Health. Global database for tracking antimicrobial resistance (AMR): country self-assessment survey (TrACSS). WHO https://amrcountryprogress.org/#/map-viewindicator2.3 (2023).

  79. Van Katwyk, S. R. & Outterson K. Introduction: AMR belongs in the pandemic instrument. Boston University School of Law https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4412&context=faculty_scholarship (2022).

  80. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. Council recommendation on stepping up EU actions to combat antimicrobial resistance in a One Health approach. European Commission https://health.ec.europa.eu/publications/council-recommendation-stepping-eu-actions-combat-antimicrobial-resistance-one-health-approach_en (13 June 2023).

  81. African Union. Africa common position on antimicrobial resistance. African Union https://au.int/sites/default/files/newsevents/workingdocuments/36768-wd-sa24481_e_original_africa_common_position_on_antimicrobial_resistance.pdf (2019).

  82. ASEAN Health Ministers. ASEAN strategic framework to combat antimicrobial resistance through One Health approach (2019–2030). ASEAN https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Agd-6.2.b_ASEAN-Strategic-Framework-to-Combat-AMR_Adopted-by-AHMM.pdf (2021).

  83. Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. African Union framework for antimicrobial resistance control 2020–2025. Africa CDC https://africacdc.org/download/african-union-framework-for-antimicrobial-resistance-control-2020-2025 (19 March 2021).

  84. World Health Organization. Global research agenda for antimicrobial resistance in human health. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/global-research-agenda-for-antimicrobial-resistance-in-human-health (22 June 2023).

  85. World Health Organization. Target product profiles for needed antibacterial agents: enteric fever, gonorrhea, neonatal sepsis, urinary tract infections and meeting report. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240003897 (19 May 2020).

  86. Magiorakos, A. P. et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18, 268–281 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Kadri, S. S. et al. Difficult-to-treat resistance in Gram-negative bacteremia at 173 US hospitals: retrospective cohort analysis of prevalence, predictors, and outcome of resistance to all first-line agents. Clin. Infect. Dis. 67, 1803–1814 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Graham-Rowe, R. Malpani, N. Ndembi, L. Srot, C. Sweeney, A.-M. Nia and D. Patel for helping to prepare this Review. We thank L. Ogilvie (Global AMR R&D Hub) for generating Fig. 4 and giving permission for its use in this Review. CARB-X is supported by federal funds from the US Department of Health and Human Services, the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority under agreement number 75A50122C00028 and by awards from Wellcome (WT224842), Germany’s Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), the UK Department of Health and Social Care as part of the Global Antimicrobial Resistance Innovation Fund, the Public Health Agency of Canada, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Novo Nordisk Foundation. The US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the NIH in Health and Human Services, provides support in the form of in-kind services through access to a suite of preclinical services for product development. The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of any CARB-X funders. The GARDP is supported by the governments of Canada, Germany, Japan, Monaco, the Netherlands, South Africa, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the Canton of Geneva and the European Union, as well as Global Health EDCTP3, the RIGHT Foundation and the Wellcome Trust. The GARDP was created by the WHO and the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative in 2016 and was legally registered as the GARDP Foundation in Geneva, Switzerland in 2018. The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of any GARDP funders. The following companies invest in the AMR Action Fund: Almirall, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai (Roche Group), Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim Stiftung, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, the European Investment Bank, GSK, Leo, the Menarini Group, Merck, Novartis, the Novo Nordisk Fonden, Shionogi, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Takeda and UCB. The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of any AMR Action Fund investors. C.E.M. receives funding from the Wellcome Trust (grant number 222051/Z/20/Z) for her research. J.A. is employed by the IFPMA, which represents the pharmaceutical industry. The content of this Review is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the IFPMA, their funders, employers or members.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura J. V. Piddock.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests. J.A. owns shares in GSK.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Medicine thanks Li Yang Hsu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Karen O’Leary, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piddock, L.J.V., Alimi, Y., Anderson, J. et al. Advancing global antibiotic research, development and access. Nat Med 30, 2432–2443 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03218-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03218-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology