Clinical research often excludes people with disabilities who have impaired decisional capacity, but they can be included through supported decision-making, where their decisions can be assisted by designated supporters of their choosing. This will promote equitable access to research.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Feldman, M. A. et al. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 58, 800–809 (2014).
Friesen, P. et al. Am. J. Bioeth. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2063434 1–14 (2022).
Shogren, K. A. et al. Educ. Train. Autism Dev. Disabil. 52, 144–157 (2017).
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD): Article 12 – Equal Recognition Before the Law; https://go.nature.com/3fh6kUc (UN, accessed 1 September 2022).
Stein, M. A. et al. Mental Health, Legal Capacity, and Human Rights (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Vásquez Encalada, A. et al. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 5204 (2021).
Implementing Supported Decision-Making: Developments Across Europe and the Role of National Human Rights Institutions (ENNHRI, MHE, 2020).
In Your State; https://go.nature.com/3BQPyTD (NRC-SDM, accessed 1 September 2022).
Bard, J. S. JLPA 6, 489–560 (2021).
Howell, B. M. et al. in Research Involving Participants with Cognitive Disability and Difference: Ethics, Autonomy, Inclusion, and Innovation (eds Cascio, M. A. & Racine, E.) Ch. 3. (Oxford Univ. Press, 2019).
Office for Human Research Protections. US Code of Federal Regulations on the Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46); https://go.nature.com/3yl1Rq4 (US HHS, 2018).
Subcommittee on Inclusion of Individuals with Impaired Decision-making in Research: Recommendation 6 https://go.nature.com/3r1Z7Kf (SACHRP, 2009).
Informed Consent: Draft Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors (US FDA, 2014).
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act 29 U.S.C. 794 (US Government, 2022).
Americans with Disabilities Act U.S.C. 12101 (US Government, 2022).
The Right to Make Choices: International Laws and Decision-Making by People with Disabilities (ASAN, 2016).
U.S. Supported Decision-Making Laws; https://go.nature.com/3LGpQ8K (CPR, 1 September 2022).
Supported Decision-Making Act: Delaware Code 16 9401A–9410A (Delaware, 2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.C.S., W.D.P. and B.E.B. wrote the original draft. All authors were responsible for conceptualization, review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.N. received consulting fees from CareSource, Inclusa and the Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights. The analysis presented here was not developed as part of his duties for any of these entities, including the Department of Health and Human Services, and the research, analysis, findings and conclusions were not reviewed by them and do not necessarily represent their views. D.H.S. received consulting fees as an external advisor to the Takeda Pharmaceuticals Ethics Advisory Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silverman, B.C., Ne’eman, A., Strauss, D.H. et al. Supported decision-making can advance clinical research participation for people with disabilities. Nat Med 28, 2250–2253 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02035-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02035-3