Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Neoadjuvant clinical trials provide a window of opportunity for cancer drug discovery

An Author Correction to this article was published on 18 July 2022

This article has been updated

Window-of-opportunity trials, during which patients receive short-duration pre-surgical therapies, provide a platform for understanding the therapies’ mechanisms of action, but will require a paradigm shift in trial design, specimen collection and analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A paradigm shift in clinical trials.
Fig. 2: Iterative-design trials enable and inform rapid informative trials.
Fig. 3: Communication and collaboration across medical silos.

Change history

References

  1. Sharma, P. et al. Cancer Discov. 11, 838–857 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Upadhaya, S., Hubbard-Lucey, V. M. & Yu, J. X. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 752 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Forde, P. M. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 1976–1986 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, A. C. et al. Nat. Med. 25, 454–461 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Uppaluri, R. et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 5140–5152 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pinato, D. J., Fessas, P., Sapisochin, G. & Marron, T. U. Hepatology 74, 483–490 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stoeckius, M. et al. Nat. Methods 14, 865–868 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leader, A. M. et al. Cancer Cell 39, I1594–1609.e12 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lambrechts, D. et al. Nat. Med. 24, 1277–1289 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lavin, Y. et al. Cell 169, 750–765.e717 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Giladi, A. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 629–637 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rose, S. A. et al. Nat. Immunol. 22, 914–927 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Remark, R. et al. Sci. Immunol. 1, aaf6925 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goltsev, Y. et al. Cell 174, 968–981.e915 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Giesen, C. et al. Nat. Methods 11, 417–422 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, J.-R. et al. eLife 7, e31657 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhuang, X. Nat. Methods 18, 18–22 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Merritt, C. R. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 586–599 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ståhl, P. L. et al. Science 353, 78–82 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ridker, P. M. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 1119–1131 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruperto, N. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 2396–2406 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ridker, P. M. et al. Lancet 390, 1833–1842 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Buckley, C. D. et al. Nat. Immunol. 22, 1344–1348 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maier, B. et al. Nature 580, 257–262 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, J. et al. Front. Immunol. 11, 597741 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The TARGET and INTERACT teams comprise hundreds of physicians, researchers, coordinators and administrators, and the contributions of all these members is absolutely integral to the success of endeavors discussed here. We would like to acknowledge all these collaborators, as well as the support of S. Burakoff, R. Parsons, K. Goodman, F. R. Hirsch and D. Charney.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.U.M. and M.M. authored the manuscript, with close collaboration, editorial comments and input from the other authors listed, who are founding members of the TARGET and INTERACT programs.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thomas U. Marron or Miriam Merad.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests in regards to the content of this commentary. They receive industry funding from partners to fund window studies, including Regeneron, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Oncovir and Merck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marron, T.U., Galsky, M.D., Taouli, B. et al. Neoadjuvant clinical trials provide a window of opportunity for cancer drug discovery. Nat Med 28, 626–629 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01681-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01681-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research