Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Caution at psychiatry’s psychedelic frontier

Matters Arising to this article was published on 11 October 2021

The Original Article was published on 10 May 2021

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. Mitchell, J. M. et al. MDMA-assisted therapy for severe PTSD: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Nat. Med. (2021).

  2. Colloca, L. & Barsky, A. J. Placebo and nocebo effects. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 554–561 (2020). 6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashar, Y. K., Chang, L. J. & Wager, T. D. Brain mechanisms of the placebo effect: an affective appraisal account. Annu Rev. Clin. Psychol. 13, 73–98 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, M. J., Kaptchuk, T. J. & Pascual-Leone, A. Challenges of differential placebo effects in contemporary medicine: the example of brain stimulation. Ann. Neurol. 85, 12–20 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feder, A. et al. Efficacy of intravenous ketamine for treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 71, 681–688 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mithoefer, M. C. et al. MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for treatment of PTSD: study design and rationale for phase 3 trials based on pooled analysis of six phase 2 randomized controlled trials. Psychopharmacology 236, 2735–2745 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carhart-Harris, R. et al. Trial of psilocybin versus escitalopram for depression. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1402–1411 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D. & Fergusson, D. CONSORT 2010 changes and testing blindness in RCTs. Lancet 375, 1144–1146 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Colagiuri, B. & Benedetti, F. Testing for blinding is the only way to determine whether a trial is blind. Br. Med. J. 340, c332 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Olson, J. A., Suissa-Rocheleau, L., Lifshitz, M., Raz, A. & Veissière, S. P. Tripping on nothing: placebo psychedelics and contextual factors. Psychopharmacology 237, 1371–1382 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The content of this article is the opinion of the authors. It does not necessarily represent the official views of the University of Toronto or Harvard Medical School (and their affiliated academic health care centers).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



M. J. B., concept/design, drafting manuscript; D. M. B., concept/design, critical revision of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Burke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burke, M.J., Blumberger, D.M. Caution at psychiatry’s psychedelic frontier. Nat Med 27, 1687–1688 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing