Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease


Dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease (DIAD) causes predictable biological changes decades before the onset of clinical symptoms, enabling testing of interventions in the asymptomatic and symptomatic stages to delay or slow disease progression. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-arm trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in participants with DIAD across asymptomatic and symptomatic disease stages. Mutation carriers were assigned 3:1 to either drug or placebo and received treatment for 4–7 years. The primary outcome was a cognitive end point; secondary outcomes included clinical, cognitive, imaging and fluid biomarker measures. Fifty-two participants carrying a mutation were assigned to receive gantenerumab, 52 solanezumab and 40 placebo. Both drugs engaged their Aβ targets but neither demonstrated a beneficial effect on cognitive measures compared to controls. The solanezumab-treated group showed a greater cognitive decline on some measures and did not show benefits on downstream biomarkers. Gantenerumab significantly reduced amyloid plaques, cerebrospinal fluid total tau, and phospho-tau181 and attenuated increases of neurofilament light chain. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities edema was observed in 19.2% (3 out of 11 were mildly symptomatic) of the gantenerumab group, 2.5% of the placebo group and 0% of the solanezumab group. Gantenerumab and solanezumab did not slow cognitive decline in symptomatic DIAD. The asymptomatic groups showed no cognitive decline; symptomatic participants had declined before reaching the target doses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Randomization, group assignment and follow-up.
Fig. 2: Cognitive and clinical results.
Fig. 3: Key biomarker results.

Data availability

Data access to the DIAN–TU trial data will follow the policies of the DIAN–TU data access policy55, which complies with the guidelines established by the Collaboration for Alzheimer’s Prevention. Patient-related data not included in the paper were generated as part of a clinical trial and may be subject to patient confidentiality. Any data and materials that can be shared will be released via a data/material sharing agreement. Requests to access the DIAN–TU-001 trial data can be made at All code for data cleaning and analysis associated with the current submission is available upon request to the corresponding author and is provided as part of the replication package.

Code availability

All code for data cleaning and analysis associated with the current submission is available upon request to the corresponding author and is provided as part of the replication package.


  1. Jack, C. R. Jr. et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 535–562 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Braak, H., Thal, D. R., Ghebremedhin, E. & Del Tredici, K. Stages of the pathologic process in Alzheimer disease: age categories from 1 to 100 years. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 70, 960–969 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bateman, R. J. et al. Autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease: a review and proposal for the prevention of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 3, 1 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryman, D. C. et al. Symptom onset in autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 83, 253–260 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Morris, J. C. et al. Developing an international network for Alzheimer’s research: the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network. Clin. Investig. (Lond.) 2, 975–984 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bateman, R. J. et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 795–804 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. McDade, E. et al. Longitudinal cognitive and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease. Neurology 91, e1295–e1306 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon, B. A. et al. Spatial patterns of neuroimaging biomarker change in individuals from families with autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol. 17, 241–250 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sevigny, J. et al. The antibody aducanumab reduces Aβ plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 537, 50–56 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Selkoe, D. β-secretase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease: heading in the wrong direction? Lancet Neurol. 18, 624–626 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Henley, D. et al. Preliminary results of a trial of atabecestat in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 1483–1485 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Egan, M. F. et al. Randomized trial of verubecestat for prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 1408–1420 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Karran, E. & De Strooper, B. The amyloid cascade hypothesis: are we poised for success or failure? J. Neurochem. 139, 237–252 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cummings, J. L., Morstorf, T. & Zhong, K. Alzheimer’s disease drug-development pipeline: few candidates, frequent failures. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 6, 37 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Moulder, K. L. et al. Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network: facilitating research and clinical trials. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 5, 48 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mills, S. M. et al. Preclinical trials in autosomal dominant AD: Implementation of the DIAN-TU trial. Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 169, 737–743 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bateman, R. J. et al. The DIAN-TU Next Generation Alzheimer’s prevention trial: adaptive design and disease progression model. Alzheimers Dement. 13, 8–19 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morris, J. C. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43, 2412–2414 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lim, J. et al. Reducing patient burden in clinical trials through the use of historical controls: appropriate selection of historical data to minimize risk of bias. Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci. 54, 850–860 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, G. et al. A novel cognitive disease progression model for clinical trials in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Stat. Med. 37, 3047–3055 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Viele, K. et al. Use of historical control data for assessing treatment effects in clinical trials. Pharm. Stat. 13, 41–54 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berg, L. et al. Mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type: 2. longitudinal assessment. Ann. Neurol. 23, 477–484 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Breines, E. The functional assessment scale as an instrument for measuring changes in levels of function of nursing home residents following occupational therapy. Can. J. Occup. Ther. 55, 135–140 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M. & Ware, J. H. Applied Longitudinal Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, 2012).

  25. Siemers, E. R. et al. Phase 3 solanezumab trials: secondary outcomes in mild Alzheimer’s disease patients. Alzheimers Dement. 12, 110–120 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Honig, L. S. et al. Trial of solanezumab for mild dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 321–330 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cummings, J. et al. Drug development in Alzheimer’s disease: the path to 2025. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 8, 39 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cummings, J. Lessons learned from Alzheimer disease: clinical trials with negative outcomes. Clin. Transl. Sci. 11, 147–152 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McDade, E. & Bateman, R. J. Stop Alzheimer’s before it starts. Nature 547, 153–155 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Su, Y. et al. Utilizing the Centiloid scale in cross-sectional and longitudinal PiB PET studies. Neuroimage Clin. 19, 406–416 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Vlassenko, A. G. et al. Imaging and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in early preclinical Alzheimer disease. Ann. Neurol. 80, 379–387 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Klein, G. et al. Thirty-six-month amyloid positron emission tomography results show continued reduction in amyloid burden with subcutaneous gantenerumab. J. Prev. Alzheimers Dis. 8, 3–6 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shepherd, C., McCann, H. & Halliday, G. M. Variations in the neuropathology of familial Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 118, 37–52 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ringman, J. M. et al. Neuropathology of autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease in the national Alzheimer coordinating center database. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 75, 284–290 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gordon, B. A. et al. Tau PET in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease: relationship with cognition, dementia and other biomarkers. Brain 142, 1063–1076 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mintun, M. A. et al. Donanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1691–1704 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Haeberlein, S. B. et al. Emerge and Engage topline results: phase 3 studies of aducanumab in early Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 16, e047259 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schuck, E. L. et al. Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses of BAN2401 in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease: correlation of BAN2401 exposure, pet standard uptake value ratio, and cognitive outcomes. Alzheimers Dement. 15, P1582–P1583 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Woodcock, J. & LaVange, L. M. Master protocols to study multiple therapies, multiple diseases, or both. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 62–70 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Taves, D. R. Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 15, 443–453 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ostrowitzki, S. et al. A phase III randomized trial of gantenerumab in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 9, 95 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wechsler, D. WMS-R: Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised: manual (Psychological Corporation, 1987).

  43. Wechsler, D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised (Psychological Corporation, 1981).

  44. Lim, Y. Y. et al. A method for cross-cultural adaptation of a verbal memory assessment. Behav. Res. Methods 41, 1190–1200 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Thompson, T. A. C. et al. Sensitivity and test–retest reliability of the International Shopping List Test in assessing verbal learning and memory in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 26, 412–424 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. & McHugh, P. R. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12, 189–198 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sperling, R. et al. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in patients with Alzheimer’s disease treated with bapineuzumab: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Neurol. 11, 241–249 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774–781 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fischl, B. et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 14, 11–22 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Buckner, R. L. et al. A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume. Neuroimage 23, 724–738 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Su, Y. et al. Partial volume correction in quantitative amyloid imaging. Neuroimage 107, 55–64 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rousset, O. G., Ma, Y. & A. C. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. J. Nucl. Med. 39, 904–911 (1998).

  53. Farlow, M. et al. Safety and biomarker effects of solanezumab in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 8, 261–271 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Robert, C. P. & Casella, G. Monte Carlo Statistical Methods (Springer, 2004).

  55. Weninger, S. et al. Collaboration for Alzheimer’s prevention: principles to guide data and sample sharing in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease trials. Alzheimers Dement. 12, 631–632 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We gratefully acknowledge the outstanding commitment of the participants, family members and caregivers whose participation was critical to the success of the DIAN–TU trial. We thank the DIAN–TU Funding and Study Team ( for their exceptional dedication and accomplishments, which ensured the success of the trial. We thank the DIAN–EXR and DIAN–OBS study teams for their support on recruitment and commitment to family members. We acknowledge the robust intellectual collaboration between the DIAN–TU investigators, participants and family members, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd/Genentech and Eli Lilly and Company, the DIAN–TU Pharma Consortium (, the NIH, and regulatory representatives who were critical in making this study possible. We thank the Alzheimer’s Association, GHR Foundation, an anonymous organization, other industry partners (Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company, Signant Health and Cogstate) and regulatory representatives for their support. We also thank L. Ryan from the National Institute on Aging (NIA) for her key contributions in leadership and scientific guidance on this project. The research reported in this publication was supported by the NIA of the NIH under award nos. U01AG042791, U01AG042791-S1 (FNIH and Accelerating Medicines Partnership), R01AG046179 and R01AG053267-S1. This research was also supported by the Alzheimer’s Association, Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals GHR Foundation and an anonymous organization. Cogstate and Signant Health offered in-kind support. The DIAN–OBS was supported by the NIA of the NIH (DIAN, U19AG032438), the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Raúl Carrea Institute for Neurological Research, partial support by the Research and Development Grants for Dementia from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) and the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations




R.J.B., S.S., M. Farlow, D.B.C., E.M., G.W., S.L.M., A.M.S., J.H., T.L.S.B., A.M.F., A.A.G., C.C., R.J.P., C.X., J.C.M., S.W.A., K.C.H., R.Y., J.R.S., M.B., P.D., R.S.D., P.F., C.G. and G.A.K. designed the study and wrote the study protocol. J.M.H., A.J.A., Y.L., J.J.L.G., B.A.G., S.M.B., R.K., P.J.S., P.S.A., R.G.T., M.A.M. and B.A.W. provided additional input to the study design. R.J.B., S.S., M. Farlow, D.B.C., E.M., S.L.M. and A.M.S. coordinated the trial. B.J.S., C.M., G.M.S., D.H., D.W., S.B.B., J.J.L., I.Z.J.V., E.D.R., C.H.V.D., L.S.H., R.S.V., W.S.B., S.G., D.R.G., C.L.M., J.R.B., G.R.H., S.J., M. Formaglio, M.M., R.C., J.P., B.D. and F.P. recruited and treated the patients and collected the data. G.W., Y.L., C.X., S.M.B., B.A.W., S.W.A. and P.D. performed the statistical analysis. S.L.M. and A.M.S. were responsible for central and local data management. A.F. and K.A.C. performed the analysis of the CSF biomarkers data. C.R.J.J., T.L.S.B. and B.A.G. performed the processing and analysis of the neuroimaging data. A.G. and C.C. were responsible for the sequencing and genetic analysis. Every author contributed to the initial draft of the manuscript and agreed on submission for publication. All authors interpreted the data, reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randall J. Bateman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.S. was the Project Arm Leader for the gantenerumab arm. He also receives research support and is a consultant to Eisai, Novartis, Genentech, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, GemVax, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly and Company. M. Farlow was the Project Arm Leader for the solanezumab arm. He receives research support and is consultant to Eli Lilly and Company, Eisai, Novartis, Green Valley, AbbVie, Biogen, Eisai, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Suvan, vTv Therapeutics, Vaccinex, QR Pharma, Avanir Pharmaceuticals, AZTherapies, Cerecin, Cognition Therapeutics, Cortexyme, Longeveron, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Samumed and Takeda. A.M.F. is the Biomarker Core Leader of DIAN–TU. She is a member of the scientific advisory boards (SABs) for Roche Diagnostics, Genentech and AbbVie and also consults for Araclon/Grifols, DiademRes, DiamiR and Otsuka Pharmaceuticals. T.L.S.B. has investigator-initiated research funding from the NIH, the Alzheimer’s Association, the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals. She participates as a site investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, Biogen, Eisai, Janssen and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. She serves as an unpaid consultant to Eisai and Siemens. She is on the Speaker’s Bureau for Biogen. J.C.M. is the Friedman Distinguished Professor of Neurology, Director of the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Associate Director of DIAN and Founding Principal Investigator of DIAN. He is funded by NIH grant nos. P30 AG066444, P01AG003991, P01AG026276, U19 AG032438 and U19 AG024904. Neither J.C.M. nor his family owns stock or has equity interest (outside of mutual funds or other externally directed accounts) in any pharmaceutical or biotechnology company. J.H. is an employee of Hitchcock Regulatory Consulting and has consulted for Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Axon Advisors, Critical Path Institute, Gerson Lehrman Group, H. Lundbeck, High Lantern Group, Regenera Pharma Ltd, UCB Biopharma SPRL, United Neuroscience, Vaccinex and Washington University. She is retired from Eli Lilly and Company and is an Eli Lilly and Company shareholder. E.M. is the Associate Director of the DIAN–TU. He reports serving on a Data Safety Committee for Eli Lilly and Company and Alector. He is scientific consultant for Eisai and Eli Lilly and Company and has received institutional grant support from Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. and Janssen. D.B.C. is Medical Director of DIAN–TU and serves as scientific consultant to Biogen, Takeda, Millennium, Genzyme, Amgen, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Serono, Inhibikase Therapeutics, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories, Bristol Myers Squibb, Atara, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Excision BioTherapeutics, UpToDate and Wolters Kluwer. He serves on the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB)/Data Monitoring Committees for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Wave, EMD Serono, Shire, Pfizer and Sanofi. He has carried out legal consulting for Cook County, State Farm, Wilke & Wilke PC, Shevlin Smith and Sal Indomenico & Associates PC. He receives research support from the NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and NIA. A.J.A. has served as a consultant for Biogen and H. Lundbeck. J.H. is a paid consultant for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Takeda and H. Lundbeck and is on the Data Safety and Monitoring Board for Eisai. C.R.J. Jr serves on an independent data monitoring board for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, has consulted for and served as a speaker for Eisai and consulted for Biogen, but he receives no personal compensation from any commercial entity. He receives research support from the NIH and the Alexander Family Alzheimer’s Disease Research Professorship of the Mayo Clinic. C.C. receives research support from Biogen, Eisai, Alector and Parabon. C.C. is a member of the advisory board of Vivid Genetics, Halia Therapeutics and ADx Healthcare. C.M. is a consultant for Biogen. L.S.H. is a consultant for Cortexyme, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Medscape and Prevail. He receives research grant support from Abbvie, Alector, Biogen, Genentech, Eli Lilly and Company and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. J.P. is on the Speakers’ Bureau for Biogen. E.D.R. is a consultant for Biogen, Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation and AVROBIO, receives funding from Alector and is the owner of intellectual property related to tau. S.G. is a member of the SAB for Alzheon, Biogen, Eli Lilly and Company and TauRx and a member of the Data Safety Monitoring Board for Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study, ATRI and Banner Health. C.H.V.D. has served as a consultant for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Eisai and received grant support for clinical trials from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Eli Lilly and Company, Biogen, Genetech, Merck, Janssen, Eisai, Novartis and Biohaven Pharmaceuticals. R.S.V. served on a SAB for Ionis Pharmaceuticals. B.D. receives research support from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. M.M. is a consultant to Arkuda Therapeutics, Ionis and Alector and receives research funding from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Novartis and Alector. D.R.G. is a consultant to Biogen, Esai, Fujirebio and Amprion and is on the DSMB for Cognition Therapeutics. G.R.H. has received research support as a clinical trial site investigator for Anavax, Biogen and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. He has received research funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Alzheimer Society of Canada and the NIH. P.S.A. collaborates with Eli Lilly and Company and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd on drug development in AD and has a research grant from Eli Lilly and Company. M.B., P.D., R.S.D., P.F., C.G. and G.A.K. are employees and shareholders of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. S.W.A., K.C.H., M.A.M., J.R.S. and R.Y. are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. R.J.B. is Director of DIAN–TU and Principal Investigator of DIAN–TU-001. He receives research support from the NIA of the NIH, DIAN–TU trial pharmaceutical partners (Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals), Alzheimer’s Association, GHR Foundation, Anonymous Organization, DIAN–TU Pharma Consortium (active: Biogen, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech; previous: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Forum, Mithridion, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, United Neuroscience). He has been an invited speaker and consultant for AC Immune, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd and Janssen and a consultant for Amgen and Eisai. D.H., the Department Head of Neurology where the research is being conducted, is an inventor on patents for solanezumab, currently being tested in the DIAN–TU clinical trials. If solanezumab is approved as a treatment for AD or dominantly inherited AD, Washington University and D.H. will receive part of the net sales of solanezumab from Eli Lilly and Company, which has licensed patents related to solanezumab from Washington University. The funders of the study had no role in the collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. S.B.B., S.M.B., W.S.B., K.A.C., D.H., B.A.G., J.J.L., J.J.L.G., M. Formaglio, S.J., R.C., Y.L., R.K., I.Z.J.V., S.L.M., G.M.S., C.X., D.W. and J.R.B. do not declare any competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Medicine thanks Gil Rabinovici, Todd Golde and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Jerome Staal was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

DIAN–TU Study Team, Supplementary Figs. 1–10 and Supplementary Tables 1–4.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salloway, S., Farlow, M., McDade, E. et al. A trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Med 27, 1187–1196 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing