Since the identification of the first cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in December 2019, the resulting pandemic has led to more than 130 million confirmed COVID-19 cases, and more than 2.8 million deaths worldwide as of 6 April 2021 (refs. 1,2,3). The development of an efficacious COVID-19 vaccine is currently the world’s leading research priority4. According to a survey conducted by the World Health Organization, 87 vaccine candidates are being assessed in clinical trials, of which 23 are ongoing phase 3 trials, and an additional 186 vaccine candidates are in preclinical trials5.

Compared with other traditional approaches such as those involving inactivated or live virus vaccines or recombinant proteins, the messenger RNA-based prophylactic vaccine platform is a recently developed vaccine technology6,7,8. The RNA-based platform has enabled rapid vaccine development in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and provides flexibility in antigen design9,10. The candidate vaccine BNT162b1 is one of two lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulated, pharmacologically optimized11,12, 1-methylpseudouridine nucleoside-modified mRNA (modRNA)13 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, developed in Project Lightspeed, which was launched by BioNTech in collaboration with Pfizer and Fosun Pharma. BNT162b1 encodes a trimerized, secreted version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) glycoprotein receptor-binding domain (RBD)14, in which the RBD is a key target of virus-neutralizing antibodies15,16. The BioNTech–Pfizer–Fosun RNA vaccine development program involves a series of clinical trials that are currently being conducted in Germany, the United States and China17,18,19, among other countries. At the time of writing, BNT162b2, a second vaccine candidate from the same platform, which encodes a prefusion stabilized, full-length SARS-CoV-2 S protein, has been selected as a pivotal candidate based on the totality of data obtained in the US and German phase 1 and 2 trials and in non-human primate challenge studies14,17,19,20. BNT162b2 has been authorized or approved for emergency or temporary use or granted conditional marketing authorization in more than 50 countries worldwide, including the European Union countries, the United States and the United Kingdom21,22.

The safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of the BNT162b1 vaccine have been reported recently from the ongoing phase 1, 2 and 3 NCT04368728 trials in the United States17,18, and from the phase 1 and 2 NCT04380701 and EudraCT 2020-001038-36 vaccine trials in Germany19.

Here, we present a clinical report on an mRNA-based vaccine in a Chinese population from the China-based ChiCTR2000034825–NCT04523571 study investigating the preliminary safety and immunogenicity data of the BNT162b1 vaccine in healthy, young and older Chinese participants.


Study design and analysis set

Between 18 July 2020 and 14 August 2020, a total of 296 adults aged between 18 and 55 years or between 65 and 85 years were screened at Taizhou Vaccine Clinical Research Center in Jiangsu Province, China. A total of 144 eligible participants consented to participate in the trial and were randomized 1:1:1 to receive prime and boost doses of BNT162b1 at 10 µg or 30 µg, or two placebo (saline) doses, 21 d apart (Fig. 1). Participants in each age group were allocated equally to each treatment group (48 participants per dose or placebo group, consisting of 24 participants aged 18–55 years and 24 participants aged 65–85 years). Following the priming dose, two participants in the 65–85 years age group (one in the 10 µg group and one in the 30 µg group) withdrew before receiving the boost dose (Supplementary Table 1). The demographic characteristics of the participants are listed in Table 1. In the three treatment groups the mean age of the younger participants ranged from 37.9 to 42.0 years, and the mean age of the older participants ranged from 68.5 to 70.7 years, with equal gender distribution across treatment groups. People with a known allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to vaccines or to any excipients in the tested BNT162b1 mRNA vaccine were excluded from the study. The medical history or other existing underlying disorders of the participants were similar across treatment groups, except for hypertension, which was noted at a higher prevalence in all of the older participant groups (i.e., including the placebo group) in the BNT162b1 older participant groups at baseline.

Fig. 1: Study flow diagram.
figure 1

BMI, body mass index; CT, computed tomography; ECG, electrocardiograph.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the participants by age group

Preliminary safety and tolerability data

Adverse events were graded according to the guidelines for vaccine clinical trials issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)23 (Table 2) and the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), China24 (Table 3). In the 7 d after the prime or boost vaccination, 21 (88%) of the younger participants in the 10 µg BNT162b1 dose group and 24 (100%) of the younger participants in the 30 µg BNT162b1 dose group reported at least one solicited adverse reaction, versus four (17%) of the younger participants in the placebo group. A similar trend was seen for older participants, in that 83% of participants (20 of 24) in the 10 µg BNT162b1 dose group and 92% of participants (22 of 24) in the 30 µg BNT162b1 dose group reported at least one solicited adverse reaction, versus 8% of participants (2 of 24) in the placebo group (Table 2). Reactogenicity was dose-level dependent and was most evident in the group receiving 30 µg BNT162b1. The most common solicited adverse reactions reported were injection site pain, fever, headache, fatigue, malaise, joint pain, muscle pain and chills (Tables 2 and 3). The adverse events were transient and were either managed with simple standard of care or resolved spontaneously. Most of the reported adverse reactions were mild or moderate in severity, and resolved in the first 7 d after each BNT162b1 dose for the prime and boost vaccinations. None of the injection site reactions was graded as severe (grade 3). Grade 3 fever was the only severe systemic adverse reaction associated with BNT162b1 vaccination, and it was predominantly observed in participants who received 30 µg BNT162b1. Grade 3 fever was reported in 17% of younger participants (4 of 24) and in 8% of older participants (2 of 24) who received 30 µg BNT162b1, and in 4% of younger participants (1 of 24) who received 10 µg BNT162b1 (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 2). One male participant in the older age group experienced an episodic grade 3 fever accompanied by pain and pruritus at the injection site after the prime BNT162b1 dose at 30 µg, and electively withdrew before receiving the boost vaccination. Mild or moderate headache was predominantly observed in the younger participants who received 30 µg BNT162b1 (79%, 19 of 24 participants); far fewer younger participants who received placebo (13%, 3 of 24) and older participants who received 30 µg BNT162b1 (8%, 2 of 24) had mild or moderate headache (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2 Solicited adverse reactions in the 7 d after prime or boost vaccinations, and unsolicited adverse reactions until d 50, graded by FDA criteria, by age group
Table 3 Solicited adverse reactions in the 14 d after prime or boost vaccinations, and unsolicited adverse reactions until d 50, graded by NMPA criteria, by age group

No pre-specified trial-halting criteria were met during the study. Only one serious adverse event was reported by an older participant, which was considered as not related to the vaccine or study procedure (they were involved in an accident that prevented them from receiving the boost dose). The overall frequencies of the post-vaccination local adverse reactions were similar after the BNT162b1 prime and boost doses. Some systemic adverse reactions such as fever (oral temperature >38 °C), headache, fatigue and malaise occurred more commonly after the BNT162b1 boost dose than after the prime dose in younger adults (Extended Data Fig. 1). Fever generally resolved in the 48 h after onset. In contrast to the younger participants, older participants did not have increased reactogenicity after the BNT162b1 boost dose (Extended Data Fig. 2).

There were no changes reported in participant blood pressure or respiratory rate across the different treatment groups after BNT162b1 administration. Transient increases in temperature and pulse rate in the 24 h after the prime and the boost vaccinations were noted in both younger and older participants, especially in the 30 µg BNT162b1 dose group (Extended Data Fig. 3). The most common abnormalities in laboratory values from baseline were transient decreases in lymphocyte and platelet counts and increases in C-reactive protein (CRP) level. All of the laboratory abnormalities were self-limited and resolved in a short period of time without clinical symptoms (Extended Data Fig. 4). These data are in line with the results seen in the EudraCT 2020-001038-36 study and in other mRNA vaccine trials that have found CRP level25,26 and lymphocyte count27 to act as pharmacodynamic markers for the mode of action of these vaccines.

Results of a long-term follow up of safety and tolerability up to 12 months following vaccination for participants in the BNT162b1 vaccination dose cohorts will be published separately.

Vaccine-induced antibody responses

SARS-CoV-2-neutralization titers as well as RBD-binding and S1-binding antibody titers were assessed at baseline (on d 1, immediately before the priming dose on that day), 7 and 21 d after the priming dose (d 8 and 22, respectively), and 7 and 21 d after the boost dose (d 29 and 43, respectively). The SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing titer is defined as the reciprocal of the highest sample dilution that protects at least 50% of the cells from cytopathic effects (CPEs). The BNT162b1-induced neutralizing antibody responses in vaccinated participants were simultaneously tested against a panel of human COVID-19 convalescent sera obtained at least 14 d after polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed diagnosis from 24 Asian patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 21 (87.5%) of whom had symptomatic disease. All of the participants were seronegative at baseline (on d 1, immediately before the priming dose on that day) and had a modest vaccine-induced antibody response 21 d after the priming dose (d 22), which further increased on d 29 (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 3). The highest neutralizing titers were observed on d 43 (that is, 21 d after the BNT162b1 boost dose) for both the younger and older adults in the BNT162b1 group, indicating a continuous increase in neutralizing titers in this group of Asian participants after d 29. On d 43 the 50% neutralizing geometric mean titer (GMT) in the 10 μg and the 30 μg dose groups was 232.9 (95% confidence interval (CI), 151.3 to 358.5) and 254.0 (95% CI, 184.6 to 349.4) in the younger participants, and 80.0 (95% CI, 49.2 to 130.2) and 160.0 (95% CI, 96.7 to 264.6) in the older participants, respectively, which was significantly higher than that on d 29 for both the dose groups and the age groups (all P < 0.0001). The peak SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibody GMT for the younger participants in the 10 μg and 30 μg dose groups was 1.9-fold and 2.1-fold the GMT of the entire convalescent serum panel (n = 24, GMT = 119.9, 95% CI, 70.4 to 203.9) (Supplementary Table 4). The d 43 GMT of younger participants vaccinated with 30 μg BNT162b1 was significantly higher than the GMT of the entire convalescent serum panel (P = 0.042). In the older participants, the peak neutralizing antibody GMTs on d 43 in the 10 μg and 30 μg dose groups were 0.7-fold and 1.3-fold the GMT of the entire convalescent serum panel, respectively (P = 0.532 for the 30 µg dose group). Participants who received the 30 μg dose appeared to have a relatively higher virus-neutralizing antibody response than those who received the 10 μg dose. The older participants generally had a lower peak neutralizing antibody response than the younger participants.

Fig. 2: BNT162b1-induced 50% virus-neutralizing antibody titers and specific RBD-binding and S1-binding antibody responses, compared with placebo.
figure 2

ac, Serum samples were obtained at baseline (before prime, d 1), d 8 and 22 (before boost), and d 29 and 43 (after boost) in the younger adult group, and at baseline (before prime, d 1), d 22 (before boost), and d 29 and 43 (after boost) in the older adult group. A panel of human COVID-19 convalescent sera (n = 24) was obtained at least 14 d after PCR-confirmed diagnosis in patients with COVID-19. Fifty percent SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibody GMTs (a), RBD-binding (b) and S1-binding (c) antibody GMTs measured by ELISA are shown. Each point represents a serum sample, and each bar represents the GMT with 95% CI. The dashed line indicates the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). The LLOQ was 1:10 for the virus-neutralizing antibody test and 1:100 for ELISA. Comparison of antibody titers between time points in the same group was performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test; peak neutralizing antibody responses of participants in each dose group were compared to the convalescent sera using the Mann–Whitney U-test. NS, not significant; *P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001.

For all of the younger participants, seroconversion (a fourfold or greater increase in neutralizing antibody GMT above baseline) had occurred by d 43, while the rate of seroconversion in the older recipients was 91% at the 10 μg dose and 96% at the 30 μg dose (Extended Data Fig. 5). A post-hoc multivariate repeated measurements analysis of neutralizing antibody GMT on d 1, 22, 29 and 43 across the treatment and age groups showed that GMT significantly correlated with treatment (BNT162b1 vaccine versus placebo), time after treatment (days after immunization), participant age and combinations thereof (time × treatment interaction, age × treatment interaction and time × age interaction) (Supplementary Table 5).

In line with the neutralizing antibody titers, BNT162b1 induced high levels of S1-binding and RBD-binding immunoglobulin-γ (IgG) GMTs after the prime–boost regimen. Binding IgG GMTs from the younger participants who received 30 µg BNT162b1 reached the upper limit of quantification in the ELISA test by d 29 (7 d after the boost dose), indicating that the analysis of the S1-binding and RBD-binding IgG titers in this participant subset could be compromised. Putting aside this methodological limitation, the S1-binding IgG levels were positively correlated with the neutralizing antibody titers across all of the time points evaluated in the participants, regardless of age group or dose level, with a correlation coefficient of 0.66 for younger participants and 0.55 for older participants (both P < 0.0001) (Extended Data Fig. 6a,b).

Vaccine-induced T cell responses

Vaccine-induced T cell responses were analyzed on d 29 (7 d after the boost dose) and on d 43 (21 d after the boost dose), using a direct ex vivo interferon-γ (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) assay with bulk peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (Fig. 3). T cell responses detected for the vaccinated dose groups were compared with those for the placebo control. PBMCs were stimulated overnight with either of two overlapping peptide pools representing the amino-terminal SARS-CoV-2 S protein portion (amino acids 1–643, S pool 1 (Sp1), which includes the RBD sequence (amino acids 319–541)) and the carboxy-terminal S protein portion (amino acids 633–1273, S pool 2 (Sp2)), or a combination of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I-restricted cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and influenza virus T cell epitopes (CEF peptide pool) as a positive control.

Fig. 3: BNT162b1-induced T cell responses in vaccinated participants compared with placebo.
figure 3

Bulk PBMCs obtained on d 29 and 43 (7 d and 21 d after boost) were stimulated overnight with either of two overlapping peptide pools representing different portions of the wild-type sequence of SARS-CoV-2 S (N-terminal Sp1 and the C-terminal Sp2), for assessment in direct ex vivo IFN-γ ELISpot assay, or the CEF peptide pool (immune-dominant HLA class I T cell epitopes of CMV, EBV and influenza virus) as a positive control. Each dot represents the mean spot count from triplicate wells for one participant, after subtraction of the medium-only control. a,b, SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell response in younger adult participants aged 18–55 years (a) and older adult participants aged 65–85 years (b). c, Comparison of Sp1-reactive T cell responses and individual memory responses against CEF on d 29. Group geometric mean spot counts and 95% CIs are shown. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to determine significant differences. ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

Seven days after the BNT162b1 boost dose (d 29), a significant increase in Sp1-reactive T cells compared with the placebo control was detectable independent of dose and age group (Fig. 3a,b, all P < 0.0001). Younger participants (that is, those aged 18–55 years) who had received 10 μg or 30 µg BNT162b1 had geometric mean IFN-γ+ spot counts of 36 per 105 PBMCs (95% CI, 21.44 to 60.42) and 50.45 per 105 PBMCs (95% CI, 29.63 to 85.87), respectively. In the older participants (that is, those aged 65–85 years), somewhat lower geometric mean IFN-γ+ spot counts of 18.9 per 105 PBMCs (95% CI, 3.67 to 97.29) in the 10 µg dose group and 24.96 per 105 PBMCs (95% CI, 5.96 to 104.6) in the 30 µg dose group were noted. The younger and older adult placebo controls had a geometric mean IFN-γ+ spot count of 1.89 per 105 PBMCs (95% CI, 1.30 to 2.74) and 1.92 per 105 PBMCs (95% CI, 0.58 to 6.35), respectively. In the younger participants receiving the prime–boost BNT162b1 regimen, Sp1-reactive T cells at d 43 (21 d after the boost dose) were slightly decreased compared with d 29 (geometric mean IFN-γ+ spot counts of 30.99 per 105 PBMCs (95% CI, 14.79 to 65.34) and 49.52 per 105 PBMCs (95% CI, 31.72 to 77.31), respectively); no blood samples were collected at d 43 from the older participants. In line with BNT162b1 encoding the SARS-CoV-2 S RBD antigen, and as would be expected given that the Sp2 peptide pool does not cover the RBD of the spike protein encoded by the vaccine, no significant change in Sp2-reactive T cell number compared with the placebo control was noted.

In aggregate, BNT162b1 vaccine-induced Sp1-reactive bulk T cell responses were higher (in younger adults) or similar (in older adults) to individual memory responses against the CEF peptide pool positive control (Fig. 3c). For younger adults, the magnitude of Sp1-specific T cell responses correlated positively with SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibody GMTs (Extended Data Fig. 6c, P = 0.0004), indicating a convergent development of the humoral and cellular adaptive immunity. No statistically significant correlation was observed for the older adults (Extended Data Fig. 6d, P = 0.0723).


Both BNT162b1 and BNT162b2 were granted Fast Track designation by the US FDA in July 2020. This trial was conducted in China in parallel with other trials testing BNT162 vaccine candidates in the United States and Germany17,18,19,20. BNT162b1 and BNT162b2 have been shown to elicit similar dose-dependent SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing GMTs, at levels similar to or in excess of those in the convalescent COVID-19 serum panels used as comparators17. However, BNT162b2 has been shown to have a milder systemic reactogenicity profile. Moreover, the BNT162b2 vaccine induces T cell responses against the RBD, S1 and S2 regions of the S protein, indicating immune recognition of multiple, independent MHC I and II epitopes, while as shown here and elsewhere17, BNT162b1 induces a response against only the S1 region.

Given the favorable reactogenicity and immunogenicity profile of BNT162b2, it was selected as the global lead candidate in late July 2020. However, few data are available on the safety and immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines in Asian populations. This preliminary report of the clinical trial of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate BNT162b1 provides an evaluation of both the safety and the immunogenicity profile of such an mRNA vaccine in a Chinese population. Although further development of BNT162b1 in China is not foreseen, this report will contribute to understanding the profile of mRNA vaccines in Chinese populations and will serve to inform ongoing development of similar products to tackle the pandemic.

BNT162b1 has been shown to exhibit a broadly similar immunogenicity profile to that of BNT162b2 (modRNA encoding the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein, derived from the same nucleoside-modified platform), and to induce strong SARS-CoV-2 S-binding and SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibody responses and strong T cell responses in younger and older healthy adults in Germany and the United States17,18,19,20. In line with these findings, our data show that prime–boost vaccination with 10 µg and 30 µg BNT162b1 vaccine is safe and induces a strong humoral and cellular immune response in younger and older healthy Asian adults (18–55 years and 65–85 years of age).

In agreement with the US and German trial results18,19, pain at the injection site was the most common solicited adverse reaction reported in the Chinese participants in this trial. No injection site reactions were graded as severe (grade 3). Also in line with prior reports, fever, headache, fatigue, malaise, joint pain, muscle pain and chills were confirmed in this study as the most common systemic solicited adverse reactions. As previously reported, these adverse events were transient and were either managed with simple standard of care or resolved spontaneously. The observed reactogenicity to BNT162b1 was dose dependent, and a higher frequency of adverse events was generally observed after the second dose. Mild or moderate headache was more prevalent in the younger Chinese participants who received 30 µg BNT162b1 (79%, 19 of 24) than in younger Chinese participants who received placebo (13%, 3 of 24) or older Chinese participants who received 30 µg BNT162b1 (8%, 2 of 24). A mild safety profile was observed in older Chinese people vaccinated with BNT162b1, with fever being the only severe adverse reaction observed (in 2 of 24 participants, 8%). Older Chinese participants who received BNT162b1 at a dose of 30 µg also had a lower frequency of several systemic adverse reactogenicity events than those previously reported in non-Asian older populations (any grade of headache (8% versus 75%), fatigue (33% versus 67%), chills (17% versus 33%), joint pain (4% versus 16.7%)), indicating a potential favorable systemic reactogenicity profile in the Asian older population compared with non-Asian populations17, although it should be noted that differences may be attributable to the relatively small sample size evaluated in this phase 1 study. Furthermore, laboratory investigations showed transient decreases in lymphocyte counts predominantly in the younger recipients who received BNT162b1 at a dose of 30 µg, in line with the reported mode of action of the vaccine, which causes the redistribution of lymphocytes into lymphoid tissues by innate immune stimulation27. In summary, the preliminary data complement and extend the reporting of BNT162b1 and other RNA-based vaccine candidates from clinical trials conducted in Germany and the United States to an Asian population16,17,19,20.

Prime–boost immunization with the vaccine candidate BNT162b1 was effective at eliciting specific humoral and cellular immune responses, with a clear boost effect of the second vaccination on antibody titers in both younger and older adults. Two doses of 30 µg BNT162b1, 21 d apart, induced a strong immune response in terms of virus-neutralizing antibody to SARS-CoV-2, which in younger patients was significantly higher than, and in older adults was similar to, that observed in a panel of convalescent serum samples from Asian people with COVID-19. The highest neutralizing antibody titers were observed on d 43 (that is, 21 d after the BNT162b1 boost dose) regardless of age in this study. In the previously reported German trial of BNT162b1 (NCT04380701), participants had a higher level of neutralizing titers at d 29 compared with that at d 43, indicating that the peak titers occurred earlier19. In the US trial of BNT162b1 (NCT04368728), the highest level of neutralizing titers was observed at d 35, indicating a continuous increase in neutralizing titer level in the participants after d 29 (ref. 17). Here, we also noted a continuous increase in neutralizing titer level in the participants receiving BNT162b1 after d 29. However, given that the neutralizing titers at d 43 were not measured in the US trial, and that the neutralizing titers at d 35 were not measured in the present study, we cannot tell whether the peak of the neutralizing responses in Chinese adults is similar to or later than that in the participants in the United States. Nevertheless, although the timing of the peak neutralizing antibody response induced by BNT162b1 may vary slightly between different populations or in different trials, peak antibody titers are most likely to occur 1–3 weeks after the boost vaccination, based on the collective findings. To definitively address this question, the temporal pattern of BNT162b1-induced humoral immunogenicity needs to be studied in Asian and non-Asian populations side by side, ideally by one laboratory.

Given that the vaccine candidate BNT162b1 encodes a trimerized, secreted version of the SARS-CoV-2 S RBD, the vaccine recipients in this study demonstrated a significant T cell response specific to peptides in the N terminus of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein (including the RBD region; pool Sp1), but not to peptides in the C-terminal S protein portion (pool Sp2). At d 29, BNT162b1-vaccinated younger and older participants had significantly stronger Sp1-specific T cell responses compared with participants receiving placebo. The observed cellular immune response was more widely variable in the older participants than in the younger participants. The vaccine candidate BNT162b2, which encodes an optimized prefusion stabilized full-length S protein, showed a broader immune response spectrum, inducing strong T cell responses against both the Sp1 and Sp2 peptide pools14. Nonetheless, the data show that the BNT162b1 vaccine candidate at a dose of 30 μg is highly immunogenic and is capable of eliciting strong humoral and cell-mediated responses in healthy Chinese adults.

This study has several limitations, including data interpretation based on a limited, small sample size, and the restriction to only adult Chinese participants of 18 years of age and older in this study. Future evaluation of the tolerability, safety and immunogenicity of SARS-COV-2 prophylactic RNA vaccines in Asian children and adolescent populations is warranted. Next, although the serum-neutralizing responses elicited by the BNT162b1 vaccine candidate were similar to those of human convalescent serum panels, the level of serological immunity needed to protect against COVID-19 has not yet been determined28. In addition, the human convalescent serum panels that have been used in different trials are not standardized between laboratories, and each has a different distribution of patient characteristics and time points of collection, which imposes challenges in the comparison of immunogenicity across studies and different vaccines. Furthermore, the persistence of BNT162b1-elicited immune responses is not yet known. However, assessment of vaccine-induced immune persistence is planned in the study protocol (Supplementary Data 1) and these data will be collected and reported later.

In summary, this study confirms the tolerability and favorable immunogenicity profile of the RNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate BNT162b1, and extends the reporting of BNT162b1 and other RNA-based vaccine candidates from clinical trials conducted in Germany and the United States to an Asian population. BNT162b1 encodes a relatively small RBD immunogen, which might induce a narrower spectrum of neutralizing antibodies that are less robust to potential antigenic drift of SARS-CoV-2 compared with BNT162b2, which encodes a full-length spike immunogen. Pfizer and BioNTech have recently announced that the vaccine candidate BNT162b2 was found to be more than 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 in a phase 3 pivotal study, with equally strong efficacy observed in participants under and over 65 years of age (NCT04368728)29. Currently, a phase 2 clinical trial of the vaccine candidate BNT162b2 is underway in 960 Chinese adults between 18 and 85 years of age in China, consistent with BioNTech’s global partnering strategy for the development of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (ChiCTR2000040044 and NCT04523571).


Study design and participants

We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group phase 1 trial in healthy young adults between 18 and 55 years of age, and older adults between 65 and 85 years of age, in Taizhou, Jiangsu Province, China. Participants were in overall good health as established by medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests at the screening visit. Both male and female participants were included and agreed to use contraception during the trial. Participants who were pregnant or breastfeeding were excluded. Participants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 via a commercial rapid diagnostic kit for IgM or IgG antibody to SARS-CoV-2 (Livzon diagnostics) or via testing with a pharyngeal swab nucleic acid diagnostic test (Fosun Pharma) were excluded. The presence of features of COVID-19 on chest computed tomography was a further exclusion criterion. Participants with serious cardiovascular disease or chronic conditions such as uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension, AIDS, hepatitis B and hepatitis C were excluded. A complete list of the inclusion and exclusion criteria is provided in Supplementary Table 6. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before the start of the study.

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. The trial protocol (Supplementary Data 1) was reviewed and approved by the Chinese NMPA and the institutional review board of the Jiangsu Provincial Center of Disease Control and Prevention.

This trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000034825) and with (NCT04523571). The first-patient-in date was 28 July 2020. Enrollment was completed on 14 August 2020.

Randomization and blinding

Eligible participants between 18 and 55 years of age were enrolled in the younger age group, and participants between 65 years and 85 years of age were enrolled in the older age group. Participants were randomized at a ratio of 1:1:1 to receive low-dose BNT162b1 or high-dose BNT162b1 or placebo. Participants were stratified by gender, using a web-based interactive response technology (IRT) system. The blocked randomization list was generated by an independent statistician using SAS version 9.4. This exploratory phase 1 study was not powered to detect statistically significant differences, and a sufficient sample size was selected to facilitate the evaluation of the safety of the investigational vaccine.

Authorized unblinded pharmacists prepared the vaccines or placebo according to the allocation of participants through the IRT system, and nurses gave the investigational products to participants. The unblinded staff had no further involvement in the trial, and were forbidden to disclose allocation information to others. All other investigators, participants, laboratory staff and the sponsor remained blinded throughout the trial.

Vaccine, placebo and vaccination

BNT162b1 consists of a Good Manufacturing Practice-grade mRNA drug substance encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein RBD antigen, formulated with lipids to obtain the RNA–LNP drug product. Vaccine was transported and supplied as a buffered-liquid solution for intramuscular injection, and stored at −80 °C. The details have been published previously19.

The low-dose and high-dose BNT162b1 vaccines contained 10 µg and 30 µg active ingredient, respectively, and the placebo was a commercial, pre-packaged preservative-free saline solution containing 0.9% NaCl. Each participant received a prime dose and a boost dose of vaccine candidate BNT162b1 at either 10 μg in 0.5 ml or 30 μg in 0.5 ml, or 0.5 ml placebo, administered into the deltoid, 21 d apart.

Monitoring of safety

Each participant was asked to remain at the study site for at least 6 h after vaccine administration for safety observation. Vital signs including temperature, blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate were measured at baseline, 1 h, 3 h and 6 h after vaccination. Any adverse events following the vaccination were documented by participants using diaries until 28 d after the boost dose, in line with vaccine clinical development guidance and GCP inspection requirements in China. The participants in the younger age group were enrolled and received the vaccination first. Enrollment of the participants in the older age group was launched following evaluation of the preliminary safety data for the younger age group for the first 14 d after the prime vaccination. Severity of adverse events and laboratory abnormal changes are graded using a scale issued by the China State Food and Drug Administration24 and a scale issued by the US FDA23. Blood samples for safety laboratory testing were taken at baseline, 24 h after the prime dose, d 8 and 29, and at 6 months after the prime dose (thyroid function only). When necessary or when requested, adverse events were handled with simple standard of care.

All of the reported adverse events were reviewed by investigators. Adverse events were categorized as either possibly, probably or definitely related to the vaccine candidate.

A Safety Review Committee reviewed (blinded) safety and tolerability data following the prime vaccination and gave the go-ahead for the boost vaccination for each cohort.

Assessment of immunogenicity

Serum was collected at baseline and at d 8, 22, 29 and 43 to facilitate measurement of specific IgG antibody responses to RBD binding and spike glycoprotein S1 binding, and neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2. To assess T cell responses, PBMC samples were collected at baseline, d 29 (younger and older adults) and d 43 (younger adults only).

Human convalescent sera

A panel of 24 convalescent human serum samples was obtained from donors aged 18–70 years (mean age, 45.8 years) at least 14 d after a SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. The disease severity of these patients varied from non-symptomatic (n = 3, 13%) to mild (n = 8, 33%), moderate (n = 10, 42%) or severe (n = 3, 13%).

Neutralizing GMTs in subgroups of the donors were as follows: 40.0 for the three donors with non-symptomatic infections, 226.3 for the eight donors with mild infection, 91.9 for the ten donors with moderate infection, and 160.0 for the three donors with severe infection. Each serum sample in the panel was from a different donor. Thus, most of the serum samples were obtained from persons with moderate COVID-19. The convalescent serum samples were tested in microneutralization assay side by side as comparators with the serum samples obtained from participants in this trial.


Total anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were assessed using an indirect ELISA assay. In brief, serum samples were twofold serially diluted (1:100 to 1:51,200) with sample diluent (Tris-buffered saline with 3% BSA and 0.05% Tween-20) and tested in 96-well plates coated with recombinant RBD or S1 protein (100 ng in 100 µl, Sino Biological) in sodium carbonate buffer. Bound IgG was detected using a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (cat. no. 2049-05, Southern Biotech) diluted for each ELISA assay (anti-S1 detection, 1:40,000; anti-RBD detection, 1:20,000) and TMB substrate (Surmodics). Data collection was performed using a SpectraMax M5 reader (Molecular Device) of optical density (OD) at 450 nm using the SoftMax Pro GxP Software (version 6.5.1). To obtain a sample titer, the two points adjacent to the assay cutoff value were taken for linear fitting, and the sample dilution corresponding to the cutoff value was the titer value. The sample titer was set to 51,200 if its OD450 was greater than the cutoff value at 1:51,200 dilution; if the sample OD450 was less than the cutoff at an initial dilution of 1:100, an arbitrary titer of 50 (half of the limit of quantification) was reported.

Microneutralization assay

SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibody titer in serum was determined using a CPE-based microneutralization assay with the SARS-CoV-2 virus strain BetaCoV/Jiangsu/JS02/2020 (EPI_ISL_411952) and Vero-E6 cells (National Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures, National Academy of Science, China). In brief, serum samples were heat-inactivated for 30 min at 56 °C and twofold serially diluted from 1:10 to 1:5,120 using DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Serum dilutions were then mixed with the same volume of virus solution to achieve a TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose) of 200 in each well. The serum–virus mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, then added to 96-well plates containing semi-confluent Vero-E6 cells (>80% density). After culturing at 37 °C for 3 d, CPEs on Vero-E6 cells were observed under an inverted microscope. The neutralizing titer is the reciprocal of the highest sample dilution that protects at least 50% of cells from CPE. If no neutralization reaction was observed at the initial serum dilution (1:10), an arbitrary titer of 5 (half of the limit of quantification) was reported.


SARS-CoV-2 S-specific T cell responses were assessed using an ex vivo IFN-γ ELISpot assay (ELISpotPro Kit, cat. no. 3420-2AST-10, Mabtech). Tests were performed in triplicate with a positive control (anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb), diluted 1:1,000; mAb CD3-2, Mabtech). Per well, 1 × 105 freshly isolated PBMCs were stimulated for 21 ± 0.5 h with one of three different peptide pools: two SARS-CoV-2 specific pools of 15-mer peptides overlapping by 11 amino acids and together covering the whole sequence of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S (Wuhan-Hu-1, GenBank QHD43416.1: Sp1 featuring amino acids 1–643, Sp2 featuring amino acids 633–1273) (PepMix SARS-CoV-2 (Spike Glycoprotein), PM-WCPV-S, JPT Peptide Technologies), or the CEF (CMV, EBV, influenza virus) HLA class I epitope peptide pool (CEF peptide pool for human CD8 T cells, 3616-1, Mabtech) as a positive control for general T cell reactivity. Bound IFN-γ was visualized using a secondary antibody directly conjugated with alkaline phosphatase followed by incubation with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3′-indolyl phosphate and nitro blue tetrazolium substrate (Mabtech, cat. no. 3420-2AST-10). Plates were scanned using an AID ELISPOT Reader (AID Autoimmun Diagnostika) and data were exported using AID EliSpot version 7.0. Spot counts were displayed as the mean of each triplicate, which was calculated by subtracting the mean negative control response from the mean of each peptide pool response.


The primary and secondary objectives of this trial were to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the candidate vaccine BNT162b1 in healthy Chinese adults. The primary endpoints for the safety evaluation were the incidence of solicited local reactions at the injection site or systemic adverse reactions in the 14 d after the prime or boost dose, and adverse events after the full immunization in the 28 d after receiving the boost dose. Any clinical laboratory abnormalities from baseline to 24 h or 7 d after the prime or boost dose, and any serious adverse event that occurred, were also recorded.

The secondary endpoints for immunogenicity were GMT, seroconversion rate and fold increase of virus-neutralizing antibody, or ELISA IgG antibodies binding to S1 or RBD measured 7 d and 21 d after both the prime dose and the boost dose. Seroconversion is defined as an increase by a factor of 4 or more in antibody titer over baseline, or the lower limit value if the baseline titer is below the limit of detection. The serum dilution for ELISA started at 1:100, while that for microneutralization assay started at 1:10.

Cellular immune responses in terms of the number of positive cells with IFN-γ secretion in PBMCs at a concentration of 1 × 105 per well at 7 d after the boost dose (that is, d 29), and for younger adults at 21 d after the boost dose (that is, d 43), were investigated as an exploratory endpoint. The outcomes reported in this paper remained unaltered throughout the trial.

Statistical analysis

The total sample size in this study was 144 participants; that is, 24 participants of each age group were included in each of the three treatment groups. The probability to observe a particular adverse event with an incidence of 8% at least once in 24 participants in each dose group was 86.5%.

All of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of the investigational vaccine were included in the safety analysis. Safety endpoints are described as frequency (%) with the 95% CI of the adverse reactions or events during the observation period. We compared the proportions of the participants with adverse reactions or events across the groups using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. All of the participants who received at least one vaccination and who had results of serologic measurements at baseline or after vaccination were included in the immunogenicity analysis. The immunological endpoints were descriptively summarized at the specified time points. Comparisons of antibody titers between time points within the same group were performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for non-normal data.

The peak neutralizing antibody responses of the participants in each dose group were compared with those of patients who had PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection using the Mann–Whitney U-test. Analysis of non-normal ELISpot data was also performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. Non-parametric Spearman correlation analysis of the 50% neutralizing antibody GMTs and S1-binding antibody GMTs or T cell geometric mean IFN-γ spot counts was performed to assess the relationship between responses in different assays.

Funding source

BioNTech RNA Pharmaceuticals and Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Development funded this clinical trial. BioNTech was the regulatory sponsor, manufactured the BNT162b1 clinical trial material, advised on the study design, oversaw the trial execution, and contributed to the interpretation of the data and the writing of the manuscript. Shanghai Fosun was the execution organization of the trial. Fosun was responsible for the study design and conduct of the trial, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation and writing of the clinical study report, and advised on the manuscript. All of the authors had full access to all of the data in the trial and had final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Reporting Summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.