Wearable-device-measured physical activity and future health risk


Use of wearable devices that monitor physical activity is projected to increase more than fivefold per half-decade1. We investigated how device-based physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) and different intensity profiles were associated with all-cause mortality. We used a network harmonization approach to map dominant-wrist acceleration to PAEE in 96,476 UK Biobank participants (mean age 62 years, 56% female). We also calculated the fraction of PAEE accumulated from moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA). Over the median 3.1-year follow-up period (302,526 person-years), 732 deaths were recorded. Higher PAEE was associated with a lower hazard of all-cause mortality for a constant fraction of MVPA (for example, 21% (95% confidence interval 4–35%) lower hazard for 20 versus 15 kJ kg−1 d−1 PAEE with 10% from MVPA). Similarly, a higher MVPA fraction was associated with a lower hazard when PAEE remained constant (for example, 30% (8–47%) lower hazard when 20% versus 10% of a fixed 15 kJ kg−1 d−1 PAEE volume was from MVPA). Our results show that higher volumes of PAEE are associated with reduced mortality rates, and achieving the same volume through higher-intensity activity is associated with greater reductions than through lower-intensity activity. The linkage of device-measured activity to energy expenditure creates a framework for using wearables for personalized prevention.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2: Associations between physical activity and mortality.
Fig. 3: Joint activity volume and intensity association with mortality.
Fig. 4: The relative risk of mortality for combinations of PAEE and the fraction that came from MVPA.

Data availability

The UK Biobank data that support the findings of this study can be accessed by researchers on application (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/register-apply/). Variables derived specifically for this study will be returned along with the code to the UK Biobank for future applicants to request.

Code availability

Analysis code is available on request to the corresponding author.


  1. 1.

    Wearable Devices https://www.statista.com/study/15607/wearable-technology-statista-dossier/ (Statista, 2019).

  2. 2.

    Welk, G. J. et al. Standardizing analytic methods and reporting in activity monitor validation studies. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 51, 1767–1780 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pate, R. R. et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 273, 402–407 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    US Department of Health and Human Services. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Washington, DC, 2008).

  5. 5.

    World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health (Geneva, 2010).

  6. 6.

    Department of Health. Start Active, Stay Active: A Report on Physical Activity from the Four Home Countries’ Chief Medical Officers (London, 2011).

  7. 7.

    Ainsworth, B. E. et al. Compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 43, 1575–1581 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2018).

  9. 9.

    Chastin, S. F. M. et al. How does light-intensity physical activity associate with adult cardiometabolic health and mortality? Systematic review with meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies. Br. J. Sports Med. 53, 370–376 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    UK Chief Medical Officers’ Physical Activity Guidelines (Department of Health & Social Care, Welsh Government, Department of Health Northern Ireland & Scottish Government, 2019).

  11. 11.

    Lindsay, T. et al. Descriptive epidemiology of physical activity energy expenditure in UK adults (The Fenland Study). Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0882-6 (2019).

  12. 12.

    Schmid, D., Ricci, C., Baumeister, S. E. & Leitzmann, M. F. Replacing sedentary time with physical activity in relation to mortality. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 48, 1312–1319 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wijndaele, K., Sharp, S. J., Wareham, N. J. & Brage, S. Mortality risk reductions from substituting screen time by discretionary activities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 49, 1111–1119 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Matthews, C. E. et al. Accelerometer-measured dose-response for physical activity, sedentary time, and mortality in US adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 104, 1424–1432 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Saint-Maurice, P. F., Troiano, R. P., Berrigan, D., Kraus, W. E. & Matthews, C. E. Volume of light versus moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: similar benefits for all-cause mortality? J. Am. Heart Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008815 (2018).

  16. 16.

    Dormann, C. F. et al. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36, 27–46 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ekelund, U. et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. Br. Med. J. 366, l4570 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Manson, J. E. et al. A prospective study of walking as compared with vigorous exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease in women. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 650–658 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tanasescu, M. et al. Exercise type and intensity in relation to coronary heart disease in men. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 288, 1994–2000 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    White, T. et al. Estimating energy expenditure from wrist and thigh accelerometry in free-living adults: a doubly labelled water study. Int. J. Obes. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0352-x (2019).

  21. 21.

    White, T., Westgate, K., Wareham, N. J. & Brage, S. Estimation of physical activity energy expenditure during free-living from wrist accelerometry in UK adults. PLoS ONE 11, e0167472 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tikkanen, E., Gustafsson, S. & Ingelsson, E. Associations of fitness, physical activity, strength, and genetic risk with cardiovascular disease: longitudinal analyses in the UK Biobank study. Circulation 137, 2583–2591 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Strain, T. et al. Impact of follow-up time and analytical approaches to account for reverse causality on the association between physical activity and health outcomes in UK Biobank. Int. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz212 (2019).

  24. 24.

    Fry, A. et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186, 1026–1034 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Brage, S. et al. Descriptive epidemiology of energy expenditure in the UK: findings from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2008–15. Int. J. Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa005 (2020).

  26. 26.

    Shephard, R. J. Absolute versus relative intensity of physical activity in a dose-response context. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 33, S400–S420 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Shiroma, E. J., Sesso, H. D., Moorthy, M. V., Buring, J. E. & Lee, I. M. Do moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity physical activities reduce mortality rates to the same extent? J. Am. Heart Assoc. 3, e000802 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gebel, K., Ding, D. & Bauman, A. E. Volume and intensity of physical activity in a large population-based cohort of middle-aged and older Australians: prospective relationships with weight gain, and physical function. Prev. Med. 60, 131–133 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sudlow, C. et al. UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    van Hees, V. T. et al. Autocalibration of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity assessment using local gravity and temperature: an evaluation on four continents. J. Appl. Physiol. 117, 738–744 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Doherty, A. et al. Large scale population assessment of physical activity using wrist worn accelerometers: the UK Biobank study. PLoS ONE 12, e0169649 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    van Hees, V. T. et al. Separating movement and gravity components in an acceleration signal and implications for the assessment of human daily physical activity. PLoS ONE 8, e61691 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pearce, M. et al. Network harmonization of physical activity variables through indirect validation. J. Meas. Phys. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmpb.2019-0001 (2019).

  34. 34.

    Klass, M., Faoro, V. & Carpentier, A. Assessment of energy expenditure during high intensity cycling and running using a heart rate and activity monitor in young active adults. PLoS ONE 14, e0224948 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Brage, S. et al. Estimation of free-living energy expenditure by heart rate and movement sensing: a doubly-labelled water study. PLoS ONE 10, e0137206 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Brage, S. et al. Hierarchy of individual calibration levels for heart rate and accelerometry to measure physical activity. J. Appl. Physiol. 103, 682–692 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Thompson, D., Batterham, A. M., Bock, S., Robson, C. & Stokes, K. Assessment of low-to-moderate intensity physical activity thermogenesis in young adults using synchronized heart rate and accelerometry with branched-equation modeling. J. Nutr. 136, 1037–1042 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Brage, S. et al. Branched equation modeling of simultaneous accelerometry and heart rate monitoring improves estimate of directly measured physical activity energy expenditure. J. Appl. Physiol. 96, 343–351 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Strath, S. J., Brage, S. & Ekelund, U. Integration of physiological and accelerometer data to improve physical activity assessment. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 37, S563–S571 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    White, I. R. & Royston, P. Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model. Stat. Med. 28, 1982–1998 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to the participants of the UK Biobank study and those who collected and managed the data. This work was conducted under UK Biobank application number 20684. T.S., K.W., S.B., S.J.S., T.L., P.C.D., M.P., J.J. and N.W. are supported by the UK Medical Research Council (unit program numbers MC_UU_12015/1 and MC_UU_12015/3). P.C.D. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia research fellowship (no. 1142685). T.L. is supported by the Cambridge Trust and St Catharine’s College.

Author information




S.B., T.S., K.W. and P.C.D. designed the study with input from T.L., J.J., M.P. and N.W. T.S. undertook the analyses with assistance from S.J.S. T.S. drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the critical revision and approved the final version. T.S. had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Søren Brage.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Jennifer Sargent was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Flowchart of participant exclusions.

Numbers and reasons for participant exclusions.

Extended Data Fig. 2

Change in covariates between baseline and visit 2 measurement for those in the main analysis sample that undertook both visits (n = 8,503).

Extended Data Fig. 3

Change in covariates between baseline and visit 3 measurement for those in the main analysis sample that undertook both visits (n = 15,140).

Extended Data Fig. 4

Descriptive statistics for the season of wear variable.

Extended Data Fig. 5

Scatter plot of physical activity energy expenditure versus fraction of physical activity energy expenditure from moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity for the main analysis sample and the two excluded participants (n = 96,478).

Extended Data Fig. 6

Timeline of recruitment and data collection for participants in the main analyses of the present study.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–8.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strain, T., Wijndaele, K., Dempsey, P.C. et al. Wearable-device-measured physical activity and future health risk. Nat Med 26, 1385–1391 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1012-3

Download citation

Further reading


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing