Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Author Correction: China’s response to a novel coronavirus stands in stark contrast to the 2002 SARS outbreak response

The Original Article was published on 27 January 2020

Correction to: Nature Medicine https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0771-1, published online 27 January 2020.

In the version of this article initially published, the date (year) was incorrect (10 January 2010) in the penultimate sentence of the first paragraph of the third subsection (‘Why Africa should be prepared’). The correct date is 10 January 2020. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Nkengasong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nkengasong, J. Author Correction: China’s response to a novel coronavirus stands in stark contrast to the 2002 SARS outbreak response. Nat Med 26, 441 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0816-5

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing