Here we present a miniaturized analog of a blinking human eye to reverse engineer the complexity of the interface between the ocular system and the external environment. Our model comprises human cells and provides unique capabilities to replicate multiscale structural organization, biological phenotypes and dynamically regulated environmental homeostasis of the human ocular surface. Using this biomimetic system, we discovered new biological effects of blink-induced mechanical forces. Furthermore, we developed a specialized in vitro model of evaporative dry-eye disease for high-content drug screening. This work advances our ability to emulate how human physiological systems interface with the external world, and may contribute to the future development of novel screening platforms for biopharmaceutical and environmental applications.
Access optionsAccess options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $18.75 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data sets that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All requests for raw and analyzed data and materials are promptly reviewed by the University of Pennsylvania to verify whether the request is subject to any intellectual property or confidentiality obligations. Any data and materials that can be shared will be released via a Material Transfer Agreement.
Proksch, E., Brandner, J. M. & Jensen, J.-M. The skin: an indispensable barrier. Exp. Dermatol. 17, 1063–1072 (2008).
Wanner, A., Salathé, M. & O’Riordan, T. G. Mucociliary clearance in the airways. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 154, 1868–1902 (1996).
Turner, J. R. Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 799 (2009).
Marchiando, A. M., Graham, W. V. & Turner, J. R. Epithelial barriers in homeostasis and disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 5, 119–144 (2010).
Gipson, I. K. The ocular surface: the challenge to enable and protect vision: the Friedenwald lecture. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 4391–4398 (2007).
Ehlers, N. et al. Morphological evaluation of normal human corneal epithelium. Acta Ophthalmol. 88, 858–861 (2010).
Pfister, R. R. & Burstein, N. L. The normal and abnormal human corneal epithelial surface: a scanning electron microscope study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 16, 614–622 (1977).
Nichols, B., Dawson, C. R. & Togni, B. Surface features of the conjunctiva and cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24, 570–576 (1983).
Gipson, I. K. Distribution of mucins at the ocular surface. Exp. Eye Res. 78, 379–388 (2004).
Bron, A. J. et al. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul. Surf. 15, 438–510 (2017).
Meloni, M., De Servi, B., Marasco, D. & Del Prete, S. Molecular mechanism of ocular surface damage: application to an in vitro dry eye model on human corneal epithelium. Mol. Vis. 17, 113–126 (2011).
Lu, Q., Yin, H., Grant, M. P. & Elisseeff, J. H. An in vitro model for the ocular surface and tear film system. Sci. Rep. 7, 6163–6163 (2017).
Kwon, K. A. et al. High-speed camera characterization of voluntary eye blinking kinematics. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130227 (2013).
Farris, R. L., Stuchell, R. N. & Mandel, I. D. Basal and reflex human tear analysis: I. Physical measurements: osmolarity, basal volumes, and reflex flow rate. Ophthalmology 88, 852–857 (1981).
Doane, M. G. Interaction of eyelids and tears in corneal wetting and the dynamics of the normal human eyeblink. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 89, 507–516 (1980).
Jones, M. B., Fulford, G. R., Please, C. P., McElwain, D. L. S. & Collins, M. J. Elastohydrodynamics of the eyelid wiper. Bull. Math. Biol. 70, 323–343 (2008).
Masterton, S. & Ahearne, M. Mechanobiology of the corneal epithelium. Exp. Eye Res. 177, 122–129 (2018).
Sakai, E., Shiraishi, A., Yamaguchi, M., Ohta, K. & Ohashi, Y. Blepharo-tensiometer: new eyelid pressure measurement system using tactile pressure sensor. Eye Contact Lens 38, 326–330 (2012).
Yamamoto, Y. et al. Involvement of eyelid pressure in lid-wiper epitheliopathy. Curr. Eye Res. 41, 171–178 (2016).
Shaw, A. J., Collins, M. J., Davis, B. A. & Carney, L. G. Eyelid pressure and contact with the ocular surface. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51, 1911–1917 (2010).
Shaw, A. J. B. Eyelid Pressure on the Cornea. PhD thesis (Queensland Univ. of Technology; 2009).
Molladavoodi, S., Robichaud, M., Wulff, D. & Gorbet, M. Corneal epithelial cells exposed to shear stress show altered cytoskeleton and migratory behaviour. PloS ONE 12, e0178981 (2017).
Ren, H. & Wilson, G. The effect of a shear force on the cell shedding rate of the corneal epithelium. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 75, 383–387 (1997).
Nowell, C. S. & Radtke, F. Corneal epithelial stem cells and their niche at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 130, 1021–1025 (2017).
Tsubota, K. Tear dynamics and dry eye. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 17, 565–596 (1998).
Willcox, M. D. P. et al. TFOS DEWS II tear film report. Ocul. Surf. 15, 366–403 (2017).
Bunya, V. Y. et al. Variability of tear osmolarity in patients with dry eye. JAMA Ophthalmol. 133, 662–667 (2015).
Stevenson, W., Chauhan, S. K. & Dana, R. Dry eye disease: an immune-mediated ocular surface disorder. Arch. Ophthalmol. 130, 90–100 (2012).
Rhee, M. K. & Mah, F. S. Inflammation in dry eye disease: how do we break the cycle? Ophthalmology 124, S14–S19 (2017).
Schlote, T., Kadner, G. & Freudenthaler, N. Marked reduction and distinct patterns of eye blinking in patients with moderately dry eyes during video display terminal use. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 242, 306–312 (2004).
Abdelfattah, N. S., Dastiridou, A., Sadda, S. R. & Lee, O. L. Noninvasive imaging of tear film dynamics in eyes with ocular surface disease. Cornea 34, S48–S52 (2015).
Tian, L., Qu, J. H., Zhang, X. Y. & Sun, X. G. Repeatability and reproducibility of noninvasive keratograph 5M measurements in patients with dry eye disease. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 8013621 (2016).
Koh, S. et al. Regional differences in tear film stability and meibomian glands in patients with aqueous-deficient dry eye. Eye Contact Lens 42, 250–255 (2016).
Bron, A. J., Argueso, P., Irkec, M. & Bright, F. V. Clinical staining of the ocular surface: mechanisms and interpretations. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 44, 36–61 (2015).
Jay, G. D. & Waller, K. A. The biology of lubricin: near frictionless joint motion. Matrix Biol. 39, 17–24 (2014).
Jay, G. D. Lubricin and surfacing of articular joints. Curr. Opin. Orthop. 15, 355–359 (2004).
Schmidt, T. A., Sullivan, D. A. & Knop, E. et al. Transcription, translation, and function of lubricin, a boundary lubricant, at the ocular surface. JAMA Ophthalmol. 131, 766–776 (2013).
Samsom, M. L. et al. Characterization of full-length recombinant human Proteoglycan 4 as an ocular surface boundary lubricant. Exp. Eye Res. 127, 14–19 (2014).
Regmi, S. C. et al. Degradation of proteoglycan 4/lubricin by cathepsin S: potential mechanism for diminished ocular surface lubrication in Sjögren’s syndrome. Exp. Eye Res. 161, 1–9 (2017).
Lambiase, A. et al. A two-week, randomized, double-masked study to evaluate safety and efficacy of lubricin (150 μg/mL) eye drops versus sodium hyaluronate (HA) 0.18% eye drops (Vismed®) in patients with moderate dry eye disease. Ocul. Surf. 15, 77–87 (2017).
Lee, H. S. et al. Expression of toll-like receptor 4 contributes to corneal inflammation in experimental dry eye disease. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 5632–5640 (2012).
Verstrepen, L. et al. TLR-4, IL-1R and TNF-R signaling to NF-κB: variations on a common theme. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 2964–2978 (2008).
Pitenis, A. A. et al. Friction-induced inflammation. Tribology Lett. 66, 81 (2018).
Pitenis, A. A. et al. Corneal cell friction: survival, lubricity, tear films, and mucin production over extended duration in vitro studies. Biotribology 11, 77–83 (2017).
Chao, W. et al. Report of the inaugural meeting of the TFOS i(2) = initiating innovation series: targeting the unmet need for dry eye treatment. Ocul. Surf. 14, 264–316 (2016).
Baudouin, C. et al. Clinical impact of inflammation in dry eye disease: proceedings of the ODISSEY group meeting. Acta Ophthalmol. 96, 111–119 (2018).
Hall, A. The origin and purposes of blinking. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 29, 445–467 (1945).
Warren, H. S. et al. Mice are not men. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E345 (2015).
Al-Sharif, A. et al. Lubricin/Proteoglycan 4 binding to CD44 receptor: a mechanism of the suppression of proinflammatory cytokine-induced synoviocyte proliferation by lubricin. Arthritis Rheumatol. 67, 1503–1513 (2015).
Iqbal, S. M. et al. Lubricin/Proteoglycan 4 binds to and regulates the activity of toll-like receptors. Vitr. Sci. Rep. 6, 18910 (2016).
Waller, K. A., Zhang, L. X. & Jay, G. D. Friction-induced mitochondrial dysregulation contributes to joint deterioration in prg4 knockout mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1252 (2017).
Shaheen, B., Bakir, M. & Jain, S. Corneal nerves in health and disease. Surv. Ophthalmol. 59, 263–285 (2014).
Belmonte, C. et al. TFOS DEWS II pain and sensation report. Ocul. Surf. 15, 404–437 (2017).
Dartt, D. A. Neural regulation of lacrimal gland secretory processes: relevance in dry eye diseases. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 28, 155–177 (2009).
Morrison, S., Sullivan, D. A., Sullivan, B. D., Sheardown, H. & Schmidt, T. A. Dose-dependent and synergistic effects of proteoglycan 4 on boundary lubrication at a human cornea-polydimethylsiloxane biointerface. Eye Contact Lens 38, 27–35 (2012).
Jay, G. D., Tantravahi, U., Britt, D. E., Barrach, H. J. & Cha, C. J. Homology of lubricin and superficial zone protein (SZP): products of megakaryocyte stimulating factor (MSF) gene expression by human synovial fibroblasts and articular chondrocytes localized to chromosome 1q25. J. Orthop. Res. 19, 677–687 (2001).
Schiffman, R. M., Christianson, M. D., Jacobsen, G., Hirsch, J. D. & Reis, B. L. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch. Ophthalmol. 118, 615–621 (2000).
Bunya, V. Y. et al. Development and evaluation of semiautomated quantification of lissamine green staining of the bulbar conjunctiva from digital images. JAMA Ophthalmol. 135, 1078–1085 (2017).
We thank G. Al, R. Dana and P. Argüeso for their input to this study; I. Gipson at the Schepens Eye Research Institute for providing immortalized human conjunctival epithelial cells; G. Jay at Brown University for providing human lubricin; K. Kwon for providing data on the kinematics of blinking in the human eye; D. Song, J. Vance, D. Caggiano, M. Henderson and J. DuPont for assistance in OCT, TearLab and keratography; L. Du and M. Allen for assistance in mechanical testing; and P. McClanahan for assistance in fluorescence imaging of tear fluids. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant nos. 1DP2HL127720-01 (to D.H.), R01EY026972 (to V.Y.B.) and K08EY025742-01 (to V.L.), the National Science Foundation grant no. CMMI:15-48571 (to V.B.S. and D.H.), the Research to Prevent Blindness (to V.Y.B.) and the University of Pennsylvania. D.H. is a recipient of the NIH Director’s New Innovator Award and the Cancer Research Institute Technology Impact Award.
D.H. holds equity in Emulate Inc. and consults for the company.
Peer review information: Brett Benedetti was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended Data Fig. 1 Formation of corneal and conjunctival epithelia using 3D cell patterning technique.
The concentric pattern of the ocular surface epithelia was replicated by plating human corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells on the surface of the scaffold following the formation of keratocyte-laden stroma. a, A 3D cell patterning technique is enabled by precisely controlled spreading of a cell suspension solution on the dome-shaped scaffold depending on the distance between a concave well and the convex surface of the scaffold. b, At a large distance (D), a cell-suspension solution sandwiched between the concave well and the convex scaffold forms a liquid bridge that wets the center of the scaffold and its vicinity. The meniscus of the solution is marked with a dotted line in the figure. c, When the well is brought in closer proximity to the scaffold (d « D), the liquid bridge spreads outward in the radial direction to increase the wetting area. d, A cell suspension containing corneal cells (green) is dispensed at the bottom of the concave well, which is subsequently inverted and positioned over the dome scaffold to bring the solution in contact with the convex surface of the scaffold. Once contact is established, the device assembly is kept in a humidified cell culture incubator to allow the seeded corneal epithelial cells to adhere to the surface of the scaffold. e, After cell attachment, the same procedure is performed using a solution containing conjunctival epithelial cells (red). In this process, the distance between the concave well and the scaffold is reduced to spread a suspension over the entire scaffold surface and to deposit the conjunctival cells on the peripheral region of the scaffold.
The capacity of conventional in vitro platforms to model dry eye was investigated using air-liquid interface (ALI) culture of primary human corneal epithelial cells and keratocytes in Transwell inserts. a, This in vitro model was constructed as a Transwell equivalent of the eye model by creating a thin layer of collagen hydrogel interspersed with keratocytes on the porous membrane of the insert and then plating corneal epithelial cells on the surface of the hydrogel layer. Before induction of dry eye, the tissue construct was cultured submerged for 3 d and then maintained at the ALI for another 10 d to induce differentiation and stratification of the epithelium. b–d, Simulation of evaporative dry eye in the Transwell model. b, (Control) The tissue was maintained in a regular humidified cell culture incubator (37 °C air, 100% RH). c, (Condition 1) The tissue constructs were moved to the DED simulation chamber to expose them under the same condition used for modeling dry eye in the eye model (25 °C air, 32 °C for culture medium and 50% RH). d, (Condition 2) Desiccating culture conditions previously reported in Transwell-based in vitro models of evaporative dry eye (40 °C air, 30% RH) were used. e–g, Evaluation of the response of the Transwell dry-eye models to the desiccating environment using fluorescein staining after 4 d exposure. In the Control group (e), no fluorescence was detected in the central regions of the epithelium when treated with fluorescein. Similarly, the ocular surface tissues produced in Conditions 1 (f) and 2 (g) showed the absence of fluorescein staining despite their exposure to the desiccating environment. RH, relative humidity.
Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Table and Supplementary video 1–3 legends
Supplementary Video 1 shows the key components of the engineered human ocular surface model and demonstrates how eye blinking and tear film formation are simulated in the device.
Supplementary Video 2 shows a top-down view of a hydrogel eyelid (blue) sliding over the engineered ocular surface. The eyelid is actuated at 0.2 Hz to match the frequency of physiological spontaneous blinking in the human eye. The movie is played in real time.
Supplementary Video 3 shows the digitally controlled DED simulation platform depicted in the Supplementary methods. The entire system is set up in a temperature-controlled cell culture incubator that contains a computer-controlled humidity sensor and humidifier to regulate the relative humidity of air in the surrounding environment of the DED model. The engineered device is mounted vertically on a custom-designed stage equipped with a heating pad and temperature probe. Two programmable syringe pumps are connected to the access ports of the device to perfuse the culture chamber with media and to inject artificial tears into the tear channel. The movie is played in real time.
About this article
Journal of Clinical Medicine (2019)