Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Enhancer signatures stratify and predict outcomes of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 09 September 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Most pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) do not produce excess hormones and are therefore considered ‘non-functional’1,2,3. As clinical behaviors vary widely and distant metastases are eventually lethal2,4, biological classifications might guide treatment. Using enhancer maps to infer gene regulatory programs, we find that non-functional PNETs fall into two major subtypes, with epigenomes and transcriptomes that partially resemble islet α- and β-cells. Transcription factors ARX and PDX1 specify these normal cells, respectively5,6, and 84% of 142 non-functional PNETs expressed one or the other factor, occasionally both. Among 103 cases, distant relapses occurred almost exclusively in patients with ARX+PDX1 tumors and, within this subtype, in cases with alternative lengthening of telomeres. These markedly different outcomes belied similar clinical presentations and histology and, in one cohort, occurred irrespective of MEN1 mutation. This robust molecular stratification provides insight into cell lineage correlates of non-functional PNETs, accurately predicts disease course and can inform postoperative clinical decisions.

Fig. 1: Distinctive PNET enhancer profiles.
Fig. 2: PNET subtypes represent distinct endocrine lineages.
Fig. 3: ARX and PDX1 immunostains distinguish PNET subtypes.
Fig. 4: Different prognosis of PNET subtypes.

Data availability

All relevant data are included in the manuscript and/or in its supplementary information files. ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data have been deposited in the National Center Biotechnology Information’s GEO under GSE116356. Other original data that support the findings of this study have been uploaded as Source Data.

Change history

  • 09 September 2019

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Metz, D. C. & Jensen, R. T. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastroenterology 135, 1469–1492 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yao, J. C. et al. One hundred years after ‘carcinoid’: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 3063–3072 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kulke, M. H. et al. NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas. Pancreas 39, 735–752 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lawrence, B. et al. The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 40, 1–18 (2011). vii.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Collombat, P. et al. Opposing actions of Arx and Pax4 in endocrine pancreas development. Genes Dev. 17, 2591–2603 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gannon, M. et al. Pdx-1 function is specifically required in embryonic beta cells to generate appropriate numbers of endocrine cell types and maintain glucose homeostasis. Dev. Biol. 314, 406–417 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rindi, G. et al. Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System 4th edn (eds Bosman, F. T. et al.) (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2017).

  8. 8.

    Falconi, M. et al. ENETS consensus guidelines update for the management of patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 103, 153–171 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kouvaraki, M. A. et al. Surgical treatment of non-functioning pancreatic islet cell tumors. J. Surg. Oncol. 89, 170–185 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jiao, Y. et al. DAXX/ATRX, MEN1, and mTOR pathway genes are frequently altered in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Science 331, 1199–1203 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Scarpa, A. et al. Whole-genome landscape of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Nature 543, 65–71 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Heaphy, C. M. et al. Altered telomeres in tumors with ATRX and DAXX mutations. Science 333, 425 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Marinoni, I. et al. Loss of DAXX and ATRX are associated with chromosome instability and reduced survival of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Gastroenterology 146, 453–460 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Singhi, A. D. et al. Alternative lengthening of telomeres and loss of DAXX/ATRX expression predicts metastatic disease and poor survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 600–609 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhou, V. W., Goren, A. & Bernstein, B. E. Charting histone modifications and the functional organization of mammalian genomes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 7–18 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rivera, C. M. & Ren, B. Mapping human epigenomes. Cell 155, 39–55 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hnisz, D. et al. Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease. Cell 155, 934–947 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Parker, S. C. et al. Chromatin stretch enhancer states drive cell-specific gene regulation and harbor human disease risk variants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17921–17926 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang, X. et al. SMARCB1-mediated SWI/SNF complex function is essential for enhancer regulation. Nat. Genet. 49, 289–295 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ackermann, A. M., Wang, Z., Schug, J., Naji, A. & Kaestner, K. H. Integration of ATAC-seq and RNA-seq identifies human alpha cell and beta cell signature genes. Mol. Metab. 5, 233–244 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wang, H. et al. Insights into beta cell regeneration for diabetes via integration of molecular landscapes in human insulinomas. Nat. Commun. 8, 767 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Barski, A. et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129, 823–837 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Larsen, H. L. & Grapin-Botton, A. The molecular and morphogenetic basis of pancreas organogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 66, 51–68 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sosa-Pineda, B., Chowdhury, K., Torres, M., Oliver, G. & Gruss, P. The Pax4 gene is essential for differentiation of insulin-producing beta cells in the mammalian pancreas. Nature 386, 399–402 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Collombat, P. et al. The simultaneous loss of Arx and Pax4 genes promotes a somatostatin-producing cell fate specification at the expense of the alpha- and beta-cell lineages in the mouse endocrine pancreas. Development 132, 2969–2980 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Collombat, P. et al. Embryonic endocrine pancreas and mature beta cells acquire alpha and PP cell phenotypes upon Arx misexpression. J. Clin. Invest. 117, 961–970 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sussel, L. et al. Mice lacking the homeodomain transcription factor Nkx2.2 have diabetes due to arrested differentiation of pancreatic beta cells. Development 125, 2213–2221 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yang, Y. P., Thorel, F., Boyer, D. F., Herrera, P. L. & Wright, C. V. Context-specific alpha-to-beta-cell reprogramming by forced Pdx1 expression. Genes Dev. 25, 1680–1685 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gutierrez, G. D. et al. Pancreatic beta cell identity requires continual repression of non-beta cell programs. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 244–259 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Swisa, A. et al. PAX6 maintains beta cell identity by repressing genes of alternative islet cell types. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 230–243 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Johansson, K. A. et al. Temporal control of neurogenin3 activity in pancreas progenitors reveals competence windows for the generation of different endocrine cell types. Dev. Cell 12, 457–465 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Arda, H. E. et al. A chromatin basis for cell lineage and disease risk in the human pancreas. Cell Syst. 7, 310–322 e314 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wang, Y. J. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of the human endocrine pancreas. Diabetes 65, 3028–3038 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Conemans, E. B. et al. Expression of p27(Kip1) and p18(Ink4c) in human multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 41, 655–661 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Cejas, P. et al. Chromatin immunoprecipitation from fixed clinical tissues reveals tumor-specific enhancer profiles. Nat. Med. 22, 685–691 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ramond, C. et al. Understanding human fetal pancreas development using subpopulation sorting, RNA sequencing and single-cell profiling. Development 145, 1–15 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    de Laat, J. M. et al. Long-term natural course of pituitary tumors in patients with MEN1: results from the DutchMEN1 study group (DMSG). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 100, 3288–3296 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sadanandam, A. et al. A cross-species analysis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors reveals molecular subtypes with distinctive clinical, metastatic, developmental, and metabolic characteristics. Cancer Discov. 5, 1296–1313 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chan, C. S. et al. ATRX, DAXX or MEN1 mutant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a distinct alpha-cell signature subgroup. Nat. Commun. 9, 4158 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Thorvaldsdottir, H., Robinson, J. T. & Mesirov, J. P. Integrative genomics viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 14, 178–192 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. Feature counts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    McDonald, O. G. et al. Epigenomic reprogramming during pancreatic cancer progression links anabolic glucose metabolism to distant metastasis. Nat. Genet. 49, 367–376 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ooi, W. F. et al. Epigenomic profiling of primary gastric adenocarcinoma reveals super-enhancer heterogeneity. Nat. Commun. 7, 12983 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Cohen, A. J. et al. Hotspots of aberrant enhancer activity punctuate the colorectal cancer epigenome. Nat. Commun. 8, 14400 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pasquali, L. et al. Pancreatic islet enhancer clusters enriched in type 2 diabetes risk-associated variants. Nat. Genet. 46, 136–143 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Cnop, M. et al. RNA sequencing identifies dysregulation of the human pancreatic islet transcriptome by the saturated fatty acid palmitate. Diabetes 63, 1978–1993 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present study has been supported by the Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Foundation (R.A.S., B.E.B., M.H.K. and D.C.C.), the SPORE program in gastrointestinal cancers (P50CA127003—National Cancer Institute, R.A.S.), the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (C.M.H.) and a grant (no. PI18-01604 to P.C.) from Instituto de Salud Carlos III of the Spanish Economy and Competitiveness Ministry.

C.R.C. Pieterman, B. Havekes, A.R. Hermus, O.M. Dekkers, W.W. de Herder, M.L. Drent, A.N.A. van der Horst-Schrivers and P.H. Bisschop contributed to the Dutch MEN1 Study Group database and tissue repository. We thank J. Chan for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.C., Y.D., C.B.E., E.S., D.C.C., B.E.B. and R.A.S. designed the study. P.C. performed the experiments. Y.D. performed the computational analyses. P.C., L.A.A.B. and V.D. analyzed immunohistochemistry data. C.B.E., M.B., E.G., H.J.W., N.S., A.F.-T. and H.W.L. coordinated ChIP- and RNA-seq efforts. K.M.A.D., E.B.C., L.A.A.B., F.H.M.M., G.D.V., M.R.V., C.F.-d.C., C.F., T.A., A.D.S., E.S., M.H.K. and D.C.C. obtained and curated tissue collections and clinical data. P.C. and K.M.A.D. analyzed clinical data. M.K.G. and C.M.H. performed and scored telomere-specific FISH for ALT. B.E.B. and R.A.S. supervised the study. Y.D., P.C. and R.A.S. wrote the first manuscript draft. K.M.A.D., V.D., M.H.K., D.C.C., B.E.B. and R.A.S. revised the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yotam Drier or Bradley E. Bernstein or Ramesh A. Shivdasani.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: J. Carmona was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended Data

Extended Data Fig. 1 PNET subtypes are associated with distinct enhancers of lineage-restricted TFs.

a, H3K27ac, H3K4me2 and mRNA data tracks at ARX and PDX1 in all eight PNETs from the discovery set and from two samples of normal islets of Langerhans (Isl). ChIP-seq signals are scaled by promoter-based DESeq2 normalization (see Methods) and mRNA read counts are normalized by total read numbers (y axis represents 0–2 fragments per million reads). b, Distributions of ARX and PDX1 mRNA levels in A- and B-type PNETs. c, Pearson’s correlations of H3K27ac signals at PNET type A/α-cell and type B/β-cell enhancers in all 21 tumors from the discovery and validation cohorts (n = 8 and n = 13 biologically independent samples, respectively).

Extended Data Fig. 2 ARX and PDX1 immunostain in human normal islets and PNETs.

a, Double immunofluorescence for PDX1 (red) and ARX (green) in normal islets (marked by dashed white outlines). Scale bar, 50 μm. The results, representing hundreds of islets, verify antibody specificity, lineage-restricted expression and cell distributions: abundant PDX1+ β-cells scattered across islets and fewer ARX+ α-cells enriched in the islet periphery. b, Top: ARX and PDX1 IHC selectively mark endocrine α- and β-cells, respectively, in normal human islets. Many exocrine and ductal cells also express PDX1, as is well known24. The results represent hundreds of normal islets from multiple individuals, which revealed no ARX+ PDX1+ DP cells. Thus, although described in rodent embryos24, such cells are absent or extremely rare in the adult human pancreas. Bottom: IHC for ARX in a representative PNET and surrounding normal cells on TMAs from the Dutch cohort. The area boxed in the left image is magnified on the right. ARX+ cells dominate in the tumor and mark invasive foci (arrows). c, Range of IHC signal strength in ARX+ PNETs (+weak, ++ moderate, +++ strong), contrasted with uniformly robust PDX1 staining. Images are examples selected from 34 ARX+ and 31 PDX+ cases (Fig. 3b). Scale bars, 50 μm.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Additional IHC and enhancer characterization of PNETs.

a, Double immunofluorescence of representative ARX+ (type A, n = 34 biologically independent samples) and PDX1+ (type B, n = 31 biologically independent samples) tumors (T) adjacent to normal islets (N), showing selective detection of ARX (green) and PDX1 (red), respectively. Lack of antibody cross-reactivity controls for ARX and PDX1 co-staining (Fig. 3c) in DP tumors. b, SST expression in normal islets (δ-cells) and absence in all 77 Dutch PNETs, including the representative DN tumor (n = 6 biologically independent samples) shown here. c, IHC results for ARX and PDX1 shown alongside H3K27ac FiT-seq data from the same samples in three of the four cases (one of each subtype) from the discovery cohort where both FFPE and frozen samples were available.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Other endocrine-specific loci in PNETs.

a, H3K27ac, H3K4me2 and mRNA data tracks from all eight PNETs in the discovery set and from two normal islet samples at loci that control early pancreas ontogeny: NEUROG3 and PAX4. Histone marks and RNA-seq data are scaled as in Extended Data Fig. 1a. b, IHC for NEUROG3 in rare normal islets (dashed outlines), showing scarce NEUROG3+ endocrine cells (arrows). Hundreds of normal islets and all 19 biologically independent PNETs represented on one TMA (one example is shown) lacked expression. c, H3K27ac, H3K4me2 and mRNA data tracks from all eight PNETs in the discovery set and from two normal islet samples at loci that control terminal endocrine cell maturation, MAFA and FFAR1. Histone marks and RNA-seq data are scaled as in Extended Data Fig. 1a. A single outlier showed strong H3K27ac and mRNA at FFAR1.

Extended Data Fig 5 Differentiation status of PNETs.

a, Correlations of mRNA profiles in individual PNETs with those of pancreatic endocrine progenitor and mature cells37. x axis: Spearman’s correlations between log2(TPM + 1) values of each tumor and the average log2(TPM + 1) values of mature and progenitor populations.

Extended Data Fig 6 Association of PNET subtypes with ALT status.

a,c, Tumor size in all PNET subtypes in the Dutch (a) (n = 56 independent tumors) and the MGH (c) (n = 61 independent tumors) cohorts. Bars represent mean ± s.d. P values for differences in size of primary ARX+ and PDX1+ tumors determined by the two-sided Mann–Whitney U-test. b,d, Analyses of recurrence-free survival in the Dutch (b) (n = 30 cases) and MGH (d) (n = 35 cases) cohorts when ARX+ and PDX1+ tumors were considered separately, ungrouped from DP and DN tumors. P values and HRs were determined using two-sided log-rank and Mantel–Haenszel tests, respectively. e,f, Representative (e) (1 example each from 25 independent ALT+ and 87 independent ALT cases) and aggregate (f) (n = 112 biologically independent cases) results of telomere-specific FISH in cases classified as positive or negative for ALT. The statistical test was two-sided. g, Kaplan–Meier analysis of disease-free survival in all 112 cases with ALT data from both cohorts, without consideration of PNET subtype. Source data

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplememtary Tables

Supplementary Tables 1–6

Source data

Source Data Fig. 3

Unprocessed tissue microarray (TMA) scans with scoring key

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data

Source Data Fig. 3, Fig. 4 and Extended Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cejas, P., Drier, Y., Dreijerink, K.M.A. et al. Enhancer signatures stratify and predict outcomes of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Nat Med 25, 1260–1265 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0493-4

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing