Abstract

The anti-hyperglycemic effect of metformin is believed to be caused by its direct action on signaling processes in hepatocytes, leading to lower hepatic gluconeogenesis. Recently, metformin was reported to alter the gut microbiota community in humans, suggesting that the hyperglycemia-lowering action of the drug could be the result of modulating the population of gut microbiota. However, the critical microbial signaling metabolites and the host targets associated with the metabolic benefits of metformin remained elusive. Here, we performed metagenomic and metabolomic analysis of samples from individuals with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D) naively treated with metformin for 3 d, which revealed that Bacteroides fragilis was decreased and the bile acid glycoursodeoxycholic acid (GUDCA) was increased in the gut. These changes were accompanied by inhibition of intestinal farnesoid X receptor (FXR) signaling. We further found that high-fat-diet (HFD)-fed mice colonized with B. fragilis were predisposed to more severe glucose intolerance, and the metabolic benefits of metformin treatment on glucose intolerance were abrogated. GUDCA was further identified as an intestinal FXR antagonist that improved various metabolic endpoints in mice with established obesity. Thus, we conclude that metformin acts in part through a B. fragilis–GUDCA–intestinal FXR axis to improve metabolic dysfunction, including hyperglycemia.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Sequence data are available for download from the Sequence Read Archive with accession number PRJNA486795.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Zhou, G. et al. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action. J. Clin. Invest. 108, 1167–1174 (2001).

  2. 2.

    Rena, G., Hardie, D. G. & Pearson, E. R. The mechanisms of action of metformin. Diabetologia 60, 1577–1585 (2017).

  3. 3.

    Lien, F. et al. Metformin interferes with bile acid homeostasis through AMPK-FXR crosstalk. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 1037–1051 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Madiraju, A. K. et al. Metformin suppresses gluconeogenesis by inhibiting mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase. Nature 510, 542–546 (2014).

  5. 5.

    Madiraju, A. K. et al. Metformin inhibits gluconeogenesis via a redox-dependent mechanism in vivo. Nat Med 24, 1384–1394 (2018).

  6. 6.

    Bailey, C. J., Wilcock, C. & Scarpello, J. H. Metformin and the intestine. Diabetologia 51, 1552–1553 (2008).

  7. 7.

    Geach, T. Gut microbiota: mucin-munching bacteria modulate glucose metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol 13, 66 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Friedman, S. L., Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A., Rinella, M. & Sanyal, A. J. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat. Med. 24, 908–922 (2018).

  9. 9.

    Forslund, K. et al. Disentangling type 2 diabetes and metformin treatment signatures in the human gut microbiota. Nature 528, 262–266 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Wu, H. et al. Metformin alters the gut microbiome of individuals with treatment-naive type 2 diabetes, contributing to the therapeutic effects of the drug. Nat. Med. 23, 850–858 (2017).

  11. 11.

    Lee, H. & Ko, G. Effect of metformin on metabolic improvement and gut microbiota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 5935–5943 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Zhang, X. et al. Modulation of gut microbiota by berberine and metformin during the treatment of high-fat diet-induced obesity in rats. Sci. Rep. 5, 14405 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Shin, N. R. et al. An increase in the Akkermansia spp. population induced by metformin treatment improves glucose homeostasis in diet-induced obese mice. Gut 63, 727–735 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Bauer, P. V. et al. Metformin alters upper small intestinal microbiota that impact a glucose-SGLT1-sensing glucoregulatory pathway. Cell Metab. 27, 101–117 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Schroeder, B. O. & Backhed, F. Signals from the gut microbiota to distant organs in physiology and disease. Nat. Med. 22, 1079–1089 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Matsubara, T., Li, F. & Gonzalez, F. J. FXR signaling in the enterohepatic system. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 368, 17–29 (2013).

  17. 17.

    de Aguiar Vallim, T. Q., Tarling, E. J. & Edwards, P. A. Pleiotropic roles of bile acids in metabolism. Cell Metab. 17, 657–669 (2013).

  18. 18.

    Degirolamo, C., Rainaldi, S., Bovenga, F., Murzilli, S. & Moschetta, A. Microbiota modification with probiotics induces hepatic bile acid synthesis via downregulation of the Fxr-Fgf15 axis in mice. Cell Rep. 7, 12–18 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Wahlstrom, A., Sayin, S. I., Marschall, H. U. & Backhed, F. Intestinal crosstalk between bile acids and microbiota and its impact on host metabolism. Cell Metab. 24, 41–50 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Kong, B. et al. Mechanism of tissue-specific farnesoid X receptor in suppressing the expression of genes in bile-acid synthesis in mice. Hepatology 56, 1034–1043 (2012).

  21. 21.

    Li, F. et al. Microbiome remodelling leads to inhibition of intestinal farnesoid X receptor signalling and decreased obesity. Nat. Commun. 4, 2384 (2013).

  22. 22.

    Sayin, S. I. et al. Gut microbiota regulates bile acid metabolism by reducing the levels of tauro-beta-muricholic acid, a naturally occurring FXR antagonist. Cell Metab. 17, 225–235 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Gonzalez, F. J., Jiang, C. & Patterson, A. D. An intestinal microbiota-farnesoid X receptor axis modulates metabolic disease. Gastroenterology 151, 845–859 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Jiang, C. et al. Intestinal farnesoid X receptor signaling promotes nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 386–402 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Jiang, C. et al. Intestine-selective farnesoid X receptor inhibition improves obesity-related metabolic dysfunction. Nat. Commun. 6, 10166 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Xie, C. et al. An intestinal farnesoid X receptor-ceramide signaling axis modulates hepatic gluconeogenesis in mice. Diabetes 66, 613–626 (2017).

  27. 27.

    Akwabi-Ameyaw, A. et al. Conformationally constrained farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists: naphthoic acid-based analogs of GW 4064. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18, 4339–4343 (2008).

  28. 28.

    Singhal, A. et al. Metformin as adjunct antituberculosis therapy. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 263ra159 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Cabreiro, F. et al. Metformin retards aging in C. elegans by altering microbial folate and methionine metabolism. Cell 153, 228–239 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Stellwag, E. J. & Hylemon, P. B. Purification and characterization of bile salt hydrolase from Bacteroides fragilis subsp. fragilis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 452, 165–176 (1976).

  31. 31.

    Napolitano, A. et al. Novel gut-based pharmacology of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 9, e100778 (2014).

  32. 32.

    Deschasaux, M. et al. Depicting the composition of gut microbiota in a population with varied ethnic origins but shared geography. Nat. Med. 24, 1526–1531 (2018).

  33. 33.

    Gu, Y. et al. Analyses of gut microbiota and plasma bile acids enable stratification of patients for antidiabetic treatment. Nat. Commun. 8, 1785 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Olgun, A. “Metformin-resistant” folic acid producing probiotics or folic acid against metformin’s adverse effects like diarrhea. Med. Hypotheses 106, 33–34 (2017).

  35. 35.

    Takahashi, S. et al. Cyp2c70 is responsible for the species difference in bile acid metabolism between mice and humans. J. Lipid Res. 57, 2130–2137 (2016).

  36. 36.

    Tsuchida, T., Shiraishi, M., Ohta, T., Sakai, K. & Ishii, S. Ursodeoxycholic acid improves insulin sensitivity and hepatic steatosis by inducing the excretion of hepatic lipids in high-fat diet-fed KK-Ay mice. Metabolism 61, 944–953 (2012).

  37. 37.

    Mueller, M. et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid exerts farnesoid X receptor-antagonistic effects on bile acid and lipid metabolism in morbid obesity. J. Hepatol. 62, 1398–1404 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Fujita, K., Iguchi, Y., Une, M. & Watanabe, S. Ursodeoxycholic acid suppresses lipogenesis in mouse liver: Possible role of the decrease in beta-muricholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor antagonist. Lipids 52, 335–344 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Parseus, A. et al. Microbiota-induced obesity requires farnesoid X receptor. Gut 66, 429–437 (2017).

  40. 40.

    Trabelsi, M. S. et al. Farnesoid X receptor inhibits glucagon-like peptide-1 production by enteroendocrine L cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7629 (2015).

  41. 41.

    Ziętak, M. et al. Altered microbiota contributes to reduced diet-induced obesity upon cold exposure. Cell Metab. 23, 1216–1223 (2016).

  42. 42.

    Bauer, P. V. et al. Lactobacillus gasseri in the upper small intestine impacts an ACSL3-dependent fatty acid-sensing pathway regulating whole-body glucose homeostasis. Cell Metab. 27, 572–587e576 (2018).

  43. 43.

    Zhang, L. et al. Farnesoid X receptor signaling shapes the gut microbiota and controls hepatic lipid metabolism. mSystems 1, e00070–16 (2016).

  44. 44.

    Pathak, P. et al. Farnesoid X receptor induces Takeda G-protein receptor 5 cross-talk to regulate bile acid synthesis and hepatic metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 11055–11069 (2017).

  45. 45.

    Pathak, P. et al. Intestine farnesoid X receptor agonist and the gut microbiota activate G-protein bile acid receptor-1 signaling to improve metabolism. Hepatology 68, 1574–1588 (2018).

  46. 46.

    Schaeffer, L., Pimentel, H., Bray, N., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Pseudoalignment for metagenomic read assignment. Bioinformatics 33, 2082–2088 (2017).

  47. 47.

    Nakada, D., Saunders, T. L. & Morrison, S. J. Lkb1 regulates cell cycle and energy metabolism in haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 468, 653–658 (2010).

  48. 48.

    Vetizou, M. et al. Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota. Science 350, 1079–1084 (2015).

  49. 49.

    Kim, I. et al. Differential regulation of bile acid homeostasis by the farnesoid X receptor in liver and intestine. J. Lipid Res. 48, 2664–2672 (2007).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0903100 and 2016YFC0903102) to C.J., the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91439206 and 91739303 to X.W., and 81522007, 81470554 and 31401011 to C.J.), the National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals (82008Y0005) to C.J., the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities: Clinical Medicine Plus X—Young Scholars Project of Peking University (PKU2018LCXQ013) to C.J., and the National Cancer Institute Intramural Research Program to F.J.G.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally to this study: Lulu Sun, Cen Xie, Guang Wang and Yue Wu.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, and the Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China

    • Lulu Sun
    • , Qing Wu
    • , Xuemei Wang
    • , Jialin Xia
    • , Bo Chen
    • , Songyang Zhang
    • , Chuyu Yun
    • , Guan Lian
    • , Xiujuan Zhang
    • , Xian Wang
    •  & Changtao Jiang
  2. Laboratory of Metabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

    • Cen Xie
    • , Jingmin Shi
    • , Xiaoxia Gao
    • , Kristopher W. Krausz
    •  & Frank J. Gonzalez
  3. Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    • Guang Wang
    • , Jia Liu
    •  & Heng Zhang
  4. Department of Cardiology, Key Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China

    • Yue Wu
    •  & Yangyang Deng
  5. Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

    • William H. Bisson
  6. CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    • Pupu Ge
    •  & Cuihua Liu
  7. Department of Molecular Toxicology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

    • Robert G. Nichols
    • , Jingwei Cai
    • , Bipin Rimal
    •  & Andrew D. Patterson

Authors

  1. Search for Lulu Sun in:

  2. Search for Cen Xie in:

  3. Search for Guang Wang in:

  4. Search for Yue Wu in:

  5. Search for Qing Wu in:

  6. Search for Xuemei Wang in:

  7. Search for Jia Liu in:

  8. Search for Yangyang Deng in:

  9. Search for Jialin Xia in:

  10. Search for Bo Chen in:

  11. Search for Songyang Zhang in:

  12. Search for Chuyu Yun in:

  13. Search for Guan Lian in:

  14. Search for Xiujuan Zhang in:

  15. Search for Heng Zhang in:

  16. Search for William H. Bisson in:

  17. Search for Jingmin Shi in:

  18. Search for Xiaoxia Gao in:

  19. Search for Pupu Ge in:

  20. Search for Cuihua Liu in:

  21. Search for Kristopher W. Krausz in:

  22. Search for Robert G. Nichols in:

  23. Search for Jingwei Cai in:

  24. Search for Bipin Rimal in:

  25. Search for Andrew D. Patterson in:

  26. Search for Xian Wang in:

  27. Search for Frank J. Gonzalez in:

  28. Search for Changtao Jiang in:

Contributions

L.S., C.X., G.W., Y.W., Q.W., Xuemei Wang, J.L., Y.D., J.X., B.C., S.Z., C.Y., G.L., X.Z., H.Z., W.H.B., J.S., X.G., P.G., C.L., K.W.K., R.G.N., J.C., B.R., A.D.P. and Xian Wang performed the experiments and analyzed the data. C.J. designed and supervised the study. L.S., C.X., F.J.G. and C.J. wrote the manuscript. All the authors edited the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changtao Jiang.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1–12 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2

  2. Reporting Summary

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0222-4