Abstract

Trillions of microorganisms inhabit the human gut and are regarded as potential key factors for health1,2. Characteristics such as diet, lifestyle, or genetics can shape the composition of the gut microbiota2,3,4,5,6 and are usually shared by individuals from comparable ethnic origin. So far, most studies assessing how ethnicity relates to the intestinal microbiota compared small groups living at separate geographical locations7,8,9,10. Using fecal 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing in 2,084 participants of the Healthy Life in an Urban Setting (HELIUS) study11,12, we show that individuals living in the same city tend to share similar gut microbiota characteristics with others of their ethnic background. Ethnicity contributed to explain the interindividual dissimilarities in gut microbiota composition, with three main poles primarily characterized by operational taxonomic units (OTUs) classified as Prevotella (Moroccans, Turks, Ghanaians), Bacteroides (African Surinamese, South-Asian Surinamese), and Clostridiales (Dutch). The Dutch exhibited the greatest gut microbiota α-diversity and the South-Asian Surinamese the smallest, with corresponding enrichment or depletion in numerous OTUs. Ethnic differences in α-diversity and interindividual dissimilarities were independent of metabolic health and only partly explained by ethnic-related characteristics including sociodemographic, lifestyle, or diet factors. Hence, the ethnic origin of individuals may be an important factor to consider in microbiome research and its potential future applications in ethnic-diverse societies.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Schroeder, B. O. & Bäckhed, F. Signals from the gut microbiota to distant organs in physiology and disease. Nat. Med. 22, 1079–1089 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Lynch, S. V. & Pedersen, O. The human intestinal microbiome in health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2369–2379 (2016).

  3. 3.

    Findley, K., Williams, D. R., Grice, E. A. & Bonham, V. L. Health disparities and the microbiome. Trends Microbiol. 24, 847–850 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Zhernakova, A. et al. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science 352, 565–569 (2016).

  5. 5.

    Falony, G. et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science 352, 560–564 (2016).

  6. 6.

    Goodrich, J. K. et al. Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell 159, 789–799 (2014).

  7. 7.

    Gupta, V. K., Paul, S. & Dutta, C. Geography, ethnicity or subsistence-specific variations in human microbiome composition and diversity. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1162 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Miller, G. E. et al. Lower neighborhood socioeconomic status associated with reduced diversity of the colonic microbiota in healthy adults. PLoS One 11, e0148952 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Huttenhower, C. et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).

  10. 10.

    Rothschild, D. et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature 555, 210–215 (2018).

  11. 11.

    Stronks, K. et al. Unravelling the impact of ethnicity on health in Europe: the HELIUS study. BMC Public Health 13, 402 (2013).

  12. 12.

    Snijder, M. B. et al. Cohort profile: the Healthy Life in an Urban Setting (HELIUS) study in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. BMJ Open 7, e017873 (2017).

  13. 13.

    Yatsunenko, T. et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486, 222–227 (2012).

  14. 14.

    Schnorr, S. L. et al. Gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers. Nat. Commun. 5, 3654 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Bouter, K. E., van Raalte, D. H., Groen, A. K. & Nieuwdorp, M. Role of the gut microbiome in the pathogenesis of obesity and obesity-related metabolic dysfunction. Gastroenterology 152, 1671–1678 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Sonnenburg, J. L. & Bäckhed, F. Diet–microbiota interactions as moderators of human metabolism. Nature 535, 56–64 (2016).

  17. 17.

    De Filippo, C. et al. Diet, environments, and gut microbiota. A preliminary investigation in children living in rural and urban Burkina Faso and Italy. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1979 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Beaumont, M. et al. Heritable components of the human fecal microbiome are associated with visceral fat. Genome Biol. 17, 189 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Le Chatelier, E. et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 500, 541–546 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Stenman, L. K., Burcelin, R. & Lahtinen, S. Establishing a causal link between gut microbes, body weight gain and glucose metabolism in humans—towards treatment with probiotics. Benef. Microbes 7, 11–22 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Oki, K. et al. Comprehensive analysis of the fecal microbiota of healthy Japanese adults reveals a new bacterial lineage associated with a phenotype characterized by a high frequency of bowel movements and a lean body type. BMC Microbiol. 16, 284 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Goodrich, J. K. et al. Genetic determinants of the gut microbiome in UK twins. Cell Host Microbe 19, 731–743 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Qin, J. et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490, 55–60 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Lippert, K. et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis associated with glucose metabolism disorders and the metabolic syndrome in older adults. Benef. Microbes 8, 545–556 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Luthold, R. V., Fernandes, G. R., Franco-de-Moraes, A. C., Folchetti, L. G. D. & Ferreira, S. R. G. Gut microbiota interactions with the immunomodulatory role of vitamin D in normal individuals. Metabolism. 69, 76–86 (2017).

  26. 26.

    Arumugam, M. et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473, 174–180 (2011).

  27. 27.

    Knights, D. et al. Rethinking “enterotypes”. Cell Host Microbe 16, 433–437 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Wu, G. D. et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science 334, 105–108 (2011).

  29. 29.

    Tremaroli, V. & Bäckhed, F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 489, 242–249 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Jones, B. V., Begley, M., Hill, C., Gahan, C. G. M. & Marchesi, J. R. Functional and comparative metagenomic analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 13580–13585 (2008).

  31. 31.

    Nakayama, J. et al. Diversity in gut bacterial community of school-age children in Asia. Sci. Rep. 5, 8397 (2015).

  32. 32.

    Fortenberry, J. D. The uses of race and ethnicity in human microbiome research. Trends Microbiol. 21, 165–166 (2013).

  33. 33.

    Costello, E. K., Stagaman, K., Dethlefsen, L., Bohannan, B. J. M. & Relman, D. A. The application of ecological theory toward an understanding of the human microbiome. Science 336, 1255–1262 (2012).

  34. 34.

    Walter, J. & Ley, R. The human gut microbiome: ecology and recent evolutionary changes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 65, 411–429 (2011).

  35. 35.

    Prideaux, L. et al. Impact of ethnicity, geography, and disease on the microbiota in health and inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 19, 2906–2918 (2013).

  36. 36.

    Borgdorff, H. et al. The association between ethnicity and vaginal microbiota composition in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PLoS One 12, e0181135 (2017).

  37. 37.

    Hellenthal, G. et al. A genetic atlas of human admixture history. Science 343, 747–751 (2014).

  38. 38.

    Stronks, K., Kulu-Glasgow, I. & Agyemang, C. The utility of ‘country of birth’ for the classification of ethnic groups in health research: the Dutch experience. Ethn. Health 14, 255–269 (2009).

  39. 39.

    Dekker, L. H. et al. A prospective cohort study of dietary patterns of non-western migrants in the Netherlands in relation to risk factors for cardiovascular diseases: HELIUS-Dietary Patterns. BMC Public Health 11, 441 (2011).

  40. 40.

    Beukers, M. H. et al. Development of the HELIUS food frequency questionnaires: ethnic-specific questionnaires to assess the diet of a multiethnic population in The Netherlands. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 69, 579–584 (2015).

  41. 41.

    Mobini, R. et al. Metabolic effects of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in people with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 19, 579–589 (2017).

  42. 42.

    Kozich, J. J., Westcott, S. L., Baxter, N. T., Highlander, S. K. & Schloss, P. D. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 5112–5120 (2013).

  43. 43.

    Andrews, S. FastQC: a Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc (2010).

  44. 44.

    Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537–7541 (2009).

  45. 45.

    Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).

  46. 46.

    Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).

  47. 47.

    Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5, e9490 (2010).

  48. 48.

    Oksanen, J et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (2017).

  49. 49.

    McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R Package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8, e61217 (2013).

  50. 50.

    World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO expert committee 854, 1–452 (1995).

  51. 51.

    Langille, M. G. I. et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 814–821 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank R. Jakubowicz and M. Krämer for DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing. The HELIUS study is conducted by the AMC Amsterdam and the Public Health Service of Amsterdam. Both organizations provided core support for HELIUS. The HELIUS study is also funded by the Dutch Heart Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), the European Union (FP-7), and the European Fund for the Integration of non-EU immigrants (EIF). We gratefully acknowledge the AMC Biobank for their support in biobank management and high-quality storage of collected samples. We are most grateful to the participants of the HELIUS study and the management team, research nurses, interviewers, research assistants and other staff who have taken part in gathering the data of this study. The study reported here was additionally supported by Le Ducq consortium grant 17CVD01 to M. Nieuwdorp and F.B., JPI-HDHL MICRODIET consortium grant to M. Nieuwdorp and F.B., on which I.A. is appointed, and Novo Nordisk Foundation Gut-MMM grant to M. Nieuwdorp and F.B. M. Nieuwdorp is supported by a personal ZONMW-VIDI grant 2013 (016.146.327), on which G.J.B. is appointed, and a Dutch Heart Foundation CVON IN CONTROL Young Talent Grant 2013, on which A.P. is appointed. F.B. is Torsten Söderberg Professor in Medicine and recipient of a European Research Council Consolidator Grant (615362— METABASE). D.H.V.R. is supported by a junior fellowship of the Dutch Diabetes Foundation (2015.81.1840) and by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions global fellowship (708193). The funders had no role in the study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, and the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    • Mélanie Deschasaux
    • , Sara-Joan Pinto-Sietsma
    • , Marieke B. Snijder
    •  & Aeilko H. Zwinderman
  2. Amsterdam Diabetes Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    • Kristien E. Bouter
    • , Andrei Prodan
    • , Evgeni Levin
    • , Albert K. Groen
    • , Hilde Herrema
    • , Daniel H. van Raalte
    •  & Max Nieuwdorp
  3. Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    • Valentina Tremaroli
    • , Fredrik Bäckhed
    •  & Max Nieuwdorp
  4. Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    • Guido J. Bakker
    • , Ilias Attaye
    • , Sara-Joan Pinto-Sietsma
    •  & Max Nieuwdorp
  5. Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    • Marieke B. Snijder
    •  & Mary Nicolaou
  6. Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    • Ron Peters
  7. Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Section for Metabolic Receptology and Enteroendocrinology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    • Fredrik Bäckhed

Authors

  1. Search for Mélanie Deschasaux in:

  2. Search for Kristien E. Bouter in:

  3. Search for Andrei Prodan in:

  4. Search for Evgeni Levin in:

  5. Search for Albert K. Groen in:

  6. Search for Hilde Herrema in:

  7. Search for Valentina Tremaroli in:

  8. Search for Guido J. Bakker in:

  9. Search for Ilias Attaye in:

  10. Search for Sara-Joan Pinto-Sietsma in:

  11. Search for Daniel H. van Raalte in:

  12. Search for Marieke B. Snijder in:

  13. Search for Mary Nicolaou in:

  14. Search for Ron Peters in:

  15. Search for Aeilko H. Zwinderman in:

  16. Search for Fredrik Bäckhed in:

  17. Search for Max Nieuwdorp in:

Contributions

M.D. analyzed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript (M. Nieuwdorp supervised). M. Nieuwdorp, F.B., A.H.Z., R.P., M. Nicolaou, M.B.S., V.T., G.J.B., A.P., and E.L. contributed to the acquisition of the data. K.E.B., A.P., E.L., A.K.G., H.H., V.T., G.J.B., I.A., S.-J.P.-S., D.H.V.R., M.B.S., M. Nicolaou, R.P., A.H.Z., and F.B. contributed to data interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors had access to the study data, and reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

M. Nieuwdorp sits on the Scientific Advisory Board of Caelus Health, The Netherlands; F.B. sits on the Scientific Advisory Board of MetaboGen AB, Sweden. Neither of these are directly relevant to the current paper. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products to declare. The other authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mélanie Deschasaux or Max Nieuwdorp.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1–8

  2. Reporting Summary

  3. Supplementary Table 1

    Characteristics of participants

  4. Supplementary Table 2

    OTU, genus and phylum composition across ethnic groups

  5. Supplementary Table 3

    Associations between the characteristics of participants and α- and β-diversity

  6. Supplementary Table 4

    Gut microbiota α-diversity across ethnic groups

  7. Supplementary Table 5

    Dietary pattern loadings, scores and associated nutrient and food group intakes

  8. Supplementary Table 6

    PICRUSt-derived functional profile across ethnic groups

  9. Supplementary Table 7

    Taxonomy classification and representative sequences of the OTUs

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0160-1

Further reading