Letter | Published:

CAR T cell–induced cytokine release syndrome is mediated by macrophages and abated by IL-1 blockade

Nature Medicinevolume 24pages731738 (2018) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy targeting CD19 is an effective treatment for refractory B cell malignancies, especially acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)1. Although a majority of patients will achieve a complete response following a single infusion of CD19-targeted CAR-modified T cells (CD19 CAR T cells)2,3,4, the broad applicability of this treatment is hampered by severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which is characterized by fever, hypotension and respiratory insufficiency associated with elevated serum cytokines, including interleukin-6 (IL-6)2,5. CRS usually occurs within days of T cell infusion at the peak of CAR T cell expansion. In ALL, it is most frequent and more severe in patients with high tumor burden2,3,4. CRS may respond to IL-6 receptor blockade but can require further treatment with high dose corticosteroids to curb potentially lethal severity2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Improved therapeutic and preventive treatments require a better understanding of CRS physiopathology, which has so far remained elusive. Here we report a murine model of CRS that develops within 2–3 d of CAR T cell infusion and that is potentially lethal and responsive to IL-6 receptor blockade. We show that its severity is mediated not by CAR T cell–derived cytokines, but by IL-6, IL-1 and nitric oxide (NO) produced by recipient macrophages, which enables new therapeutic interventions.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from $8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Sadelain, M., Rivière, I. & Riddell, S. Therapeutic T cell engineering. Nature 545, 423–431 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Davila, M. L. et al. Efficacy and toxicity management of 19-28z CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 224ra25 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Maude, S. L. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 1507–1517 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Park, J. H. et al. Long-term follow-up of CD19 CAR therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 449–459 (2018).

  5. 5.

    Barrett, D. M., Teachey, D. T. & Grupp, S. A. Toxicity management for patients receiving novel T-cell engaging therapies. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 26, 43–49 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Bonifant, C. L., Jackson, H. J., Brentjens, R. J. & Curran, K. J. Toxicity and management in CAR T-cell therapy. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 3, 16011 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Brudno, J. N. & Kochenderfer, J. N. Toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor T cells: recognition and management. Blood 127, 3321–3330 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Oluwole, O. O. & Davila, M. L. At the bedside: clinical review of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for B cell malignancies. J. Leukoc. Biol. 100, 1265–1272 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Neelapu, S. S. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy—assessment and management of toxicities. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 47–62 (2018).

  10. 10.

    Lee, D. W. et al. T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet 385, 517–528 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Teachey, D. T. et al. Identification of predictive biomarkers for cytokine release syndrome after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Discov. 6, 664–679 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Hay, K. A. et al. Kinetics and biomarkers of severe cytokine release syndrome after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell therapy. Blood 130, 2295–2306 (2017).

  13. 13.

    Cray, C., Zaias, J. & Altman, N. H. Acute phase response in animals: a review. Comp. Med. 59, 517–526 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Meek, R. L., Eriksen, N. & Benditt, E. P. Murine serum amyloid A3 is a high density apolipoprotein and is secreted by macrophages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7949–7952 (1992).

  15. 15.

    Vandevelde, M., Higgins, R. & Overmann A. Veterinary Neuropathology: Essentials of Theory and Practice. in Veterinary Neuropathology: Essentials of Theory and Practice 29 (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012).

  16. 16.

    Gust, J. et al. Endothelial activation and blood–brain barrier disruption in neurotoxicity after adoptive immunotherapy with CD19 CAR-T cells. Cancer Discov. 7, 1404–1419 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Rincon, M. Interleukin-6: from an inflammatory marker to a target for inflammatory diseases. Trends Immunol. 33, 571–577 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Quezada, S. A., Jarvinen, L. Z., Lind, E. F. & Noelle, R. J. CD40/CD154 interactions at the interface of tolerance and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 22, 307–328 (2004).

  19. 19.

    Bossen, C. et al. Interactions of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and TNF receptor family members in the mouse and human. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 13964–13971 (2006).

  20. 20.

    Tucker, T. A. & Schwiebert, L. M. CD40 ligation decreases its protein half-life at the cell surface. Eur. J. Immunol. 38, 864–869 (2008).

  21. 21.

    Wang, H. et al. A novel role of the scaffolding protein JLP in tuning CD40-induced activation of dendritic cells. Immunobiology 218, 835–843 (2013).

  22. 22.

    Wang, H. M. et al. Scaffold protein JLP is critical for CD40 signaling in B lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 5256–5266 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Elgueta, R. et al. Molecular mechanism and function of CD40/CD40L engagement in the immune system. Immunol. Rev. 229, 152–172 (2009).

  24. 24.

    Murray, P. J. & Wynn, T. A. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 723–737 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Ohashi, Y. et al. Hypotension and reduced nitric oxide–elicited vasorelaxation in transgenic mice overexpressing endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J. Clin. Invest. 102, 2061–2071 (1998).

  26. 26.

    Titheradge, M. A. Nitric oxide in septic shock. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1411, 437–455 (1999).

  27. 27.

    Moore, W. M. et al. L-N6-(1-iminoethyl)lysine: a selective inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase. J. Med. Chem. 37, 3886–3888 (1994).

  28. 28.

    Garvey, E. P. et al. 1400W is a slow, tight binding, and highly selective inhibitor of inducible nitric-oxide synthase in vitro and in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4959–4963 (1997).

  29. 29.

    Dinarello, C. A. Immunological and inflammatory functions of the interleukin-1 family. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 519–550 (2009).

  30. 30.

    Saini, A. S., Shenoy, G. N., Rath, S., Bal, V. & George, A. Inducible nitric oxide synthase is a major intermediate in signaling pathways for the survival of plasma cells. Nat. Immunol. 15, 275–282 (2014).

  31. 31.

    Sims, J. E. & Smith, D. E. The IL-1 family: regulators of immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 89–102 (2010).

  32. 32.

    Zhao, Z. et al. Structural design of engineered costimulation determines tumor rejection kinetics and persistence of CAR T cells. Cancer Cell 28, 415–428 (2015).

  33. 33.

    van der Stegen, S. J. et al. Preclinical in vivo modeling of cytokine release syndrome induced by ErbB-retargeted human T cells: identifying a window of therapeutic opportunity? J. Immunol. 191, 4589–4598 (2013).

  34. 34.

    Dinarello, C. A., Simon, A. & van der Meer, J. W. Treating inflammation by blocking interleukin-1 in a broad spectrum of diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11, 633–652 (2012).

  35. 35.

    Shultz, L. D. et al. Multiple defects in innate and adaptive immunologic function in NOD/LtSz-scid mice. J. Immunol. 154, 180–191 (1995).

  36. 36.

    Serreze, D. V., Gaedeke, J. W. & Leiter, E. H. Hematopoietic stem-cell defects underlying abnormal macrophage development and maturation in NOD/Lt mice: defective regulation of cytokine receptors and protein kinase C. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9625–9629 (1993).

  37. 37.

    Ohteki, T., Suzue, K., Maki, C., Ota, T. & Koyasu, S. Critical role of IL-15–IL-15R for antigen-presenting cell functions in the innate immune response. Nat. Immunol. 2, 1138–1143 (2001).

  38. 38.

    Gutierrez, E. G., Banks, W. A. & Kastin, A. J. Blood-borne interleukin-1 receptor antagonist crosses the blood–brain barrier. J. Neuroimmunol. 55, 153–160 (1994).

  39. 39.

    Liu, J., Zhao, M. L., Brosnan, C. F. & Lee, S. C. Expression of type II nitric oxide synthase in primary human astrocytes and microglia: role of IL-1β and IL-1 receptor antagonist. J. Immunol. 157, 3569–3576 (1996).

  40. 40.

    Tarassishin, L., Suh, H. S. & Lee, S. C. LPS and IL-1 differentially activate mouse and human astrocytes: role of CD14. Glia 62, 999–1013 (2014).

  41. 41.

    Gade, T. P. et al. Targeted elimination of prostate cancer by genetically directed human T lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 65, 9080–9088 (2005).

  42. 42.

    Maher, J., Brentjens, R. J., Gunset, G., Rivière, I. & Sadelain, M. Human T-lymphocyte cytotoxicity and proliferation directed by a single chimeric TCRζ /CD28 receptor. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 70–75 (2002).

  43. 43.

    Rivière, I., Brose, K. & Mulligan, R. C. Effects of retroviral vector design on expression of human adenosine deaminase in murine bone marrow transplant recipients engrafted with genetically modified cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6733–6737 (1995).

  44. 44.

    Gong, M. C. et al. Cancer patient T cells genetically targeted to prostate-specific membrane antigen specifically lyse prostate cancer cells and release cytokines in response to prostate-specific membrane antigen. Neoplasia 1, 123–127 (1999).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation for their support (T.G.). We thank the following MSK core facilities for their outstanding support: flow cytometry core facility, laboratory of comparative pathology, animal facility, integrated genomics operation and bioinformatics core. We thank G. Gunset, Z. Zhao, A. Dobrin and P. Lindenbergh for their assistance with some experiments. This study was supported by Juno Therapeutics and the MSK Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant (P30 CA008748).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center for Cell Engineering and Immunology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA

    • Theodoros Giavridis
    • , Sjoukje J. C. van der Stegen
    • , Justin Eyquem
    • , Mohamad Hamieh
    •  & Michel Sadelain
  2. Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Rockefeller University, Weill Cornell Medicine and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

    • Alessandra Piersigilli

Authors

  1. Search for Theodoros Giavridis in:

  2. Search for Sjoukje J. C. van der Stegen in:

  3. Search for Justin Eyquem in:

  4. Search for Mohamad Hamieh in:

  5. Search for Alessandra Piersigilli in:

  6. Search for Michel Sadelain in:

Contributions

T.G. designed the study, performed experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. S.J.C.v.d.S. helped design and perform in vivo experiments. J.E. performed in vivo experiments. M.H. performed in vivo experiments. A.P. performed and interpreted histopathological studies. M.S. designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

A patent application on CRS prevention listing T.G. and M.S. as co-inventors has been filed by MSK.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Sadelain.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0041-7