Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

TRANSGENERATIONAL IMMUNITY

Reimagining an immunological dogma

Infections are known to induce epigenetic rewiring in myeloid cells, a phenomenon known as trained immunity, which protects against re-infection. New data show that, in mice, trained immunity can be inherited, possibly by gametic DNA methylation and chromatin remodeling linked to immune traits.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Inheritance of trained immunity.

References

  1. Netea, M. G. et al. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 375–388 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Katzmarski, N. et al. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-021-01052-7 (2021).

  3. Richards, E. J. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 395–401 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Remy, J. J. Curr. Biol. 20, R877–R878 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heard, E. & Martienssen, R. A. Cell 157, 95–109 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stegemann, R. & Buchner, D. A. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 43, 131–140 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Berendsen, M. et al. EClinicalMedicine 39, 101049 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leentjens, J. et al. Circ. Res. 122, 664–669 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. De Rosa, V., La Cava, A. & Matarese, G. Nat. Immunol. 18, 1190–1196 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DeFalco, T. et al. Cell Rep. 12, 1107–1119 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bard, J. B. Cell Commun. Signal. 9, 30 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rechavi, O., Minevich, G. & Hobert, O. Cell 147, 1248–1256 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

G.M. is funded by Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM; grants 2016/R/18 and 2018/S/5), Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN; grant 2017 K55HLC 001), and Ministero della Salute (grant RF-2019-12371111). P.d.C. is supported by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS; grant PP-1606-24687), FISM (grants 2016/R/10 and 2018/R/4), and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF; grant 1-SRA-2018-477-S-B). We thank F. Prattichizzo for critically reviewing the manuscript and S. Bruzzaniti for assistance with creating the illustration in Fig. 1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Paola de Candia or Giuseppe Matarese.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Candia, P., Matarese, G. Reimagining an immunological dogma. Nat Immunol 22, 1355–1358 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-021-01046-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-021-01046-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing