Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

SARS-CoV-2 infection of human ACE2-transgenic mice causes severe lung inflammation and impaired function

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 02 September 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Although animal models have been evaluated for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, none have fully recapitulated the lung disease phenotypes seen in humans who have been hospitalized. Here, we evaluate transgenic mice expressing the human angiotensin I-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor driven by the cytokeratin-18 (K18) gene promoter (K18-hACE2) as a model of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Intranasal inoculation of SARS-CoV-2 in K18-hACE2 mice results in high levels of viral infection in lungs, with spread to other organs. A decline in pulmonary function occurs 4 days after peak viral titer and correlates with infiltration of monocytes, neutrophils and activated T cells. SARS-CoV-2-infected lung tissues show a massively upregulated innate immune response with signatures of nuclear factor-κB-dependent, type I and II interferon signaling, and leukocyte activation pathways. Thus, the K18-hACE2 model of SARS-CoV-2 infection shares many features of severe COVID-19 infection and can be used to define the basis of lung disease and test immune and antiviral-based countermeasures.

Main

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the recently emerged RNA virus responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Clinical disease is variable, ranging from asymptomatic infection to multi-organ failure and death, with a case fatality rate of ~5%. Binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human angiotensin I-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) primarily targets the virus to type II pneumocytes within the lung, resulting in injury, inflammation and subsequent respiratory distress1,2. Other COVID-19 manifestations (for example, cardiac dysfunction, coagulopathy and gastrointestinal tract symptoms) suggest that extra-pulmonary sites of infection contribute to disease pathogenesis in some patients3.

The development of countermeasures that reduce COVID-19 morbidity and mortality is a priority for the global research community, and animal models are essential for this effort. Although several animal species used in laboratory research have been evaluated for susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection, none have recapitulated the severe disease seen in humans who have been hospitalized. Hamsters, ferrets and non-human primates develop mild to moderate viral disease and recover spontaneously4,5. Conventional laboratory strains of mice cannot be infected efficiently with SARS-CoV-2 because hACE2, but not mouse ACE2, supports SARS-CoV-2 binding6,7. Multiple strategies for introducing hACE2 into mice have been developed including: (1) transient introduction of hACE2 via adenoviral or adenoviral-associated vectors8,9; (2) expression of hACE2 as a transgene driven by heterologous gene promoters10,11; or (3) expression of hACE2 by the mouse ACE2 promoter12,13. While these animals all support SARS-CoV-2 infection, only the model with hACE2 expression driven by the HFH4 promoter11 develops severe disease. Thus, additional animal models are needed to enable understanding of the biology of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lung and evaluation of the efficacy of antiviral and immunomodulatory countermeasures.

K18-hACE2-transgenic mice, in which hACE2 expression is driven by the epithelial cell cytokeratin-18 (K18) promoter14, were originally developed for the study of SARS-CoV pathogenesis and cause lethal infection10. Here, we evaluate heterozygous hACE2-transgenic mice as a model for severe COVID-19 disease. After intranasal SARS-CoV-2 inoculation, K18-hACE2 mice rapidly lost weight starting at 4 d post-infection (dpi) and began to succumb to disease at 7 dpi. High levels of viral RNA and infectious virus were detected in the lungs of infected animals at 2, 4 and 7 dpi by quantitative PCR with reverse transcription (RT-qPCR), in situ hybridization and plaque-forming assays. Infection was accompanied by declines in multiple parameters of pulmonary function, substantial cellular infiltrates in the lung (composed of monocytes, neutrophils and activated T cells), high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in lung homogenates, and severe interstitial and consolidative pneumonia. Because of its severe disease and intense immune cell infiltration, the K18-hACE2 model of SARS-CoV-2 infection may facilitate evaluation of immunomodulatory and antiviral drugs against COVID-19 and our understanding of immune-mediated mechanisms of pathogenesis.

Results

K18-hACE2 mice are highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection

We inoculated 8-week-old heterozygous K18-hACE2 mice of both sexes via the intranasal route with 2.5 × 104 plaque-forming units (p.f.u.) of SARS-CoV-2 (strain 2019n-CoV/USA_WA1/2020). Beginning at 4 dpi, K18-hACE2 mice demonstrated marked weight loss, and by 7 dpi most animals had lost approximately 25% of their body weight (Fig. 1a), with many becoming moribund. No sex-based differences in disease were observed. Intranasal inoculation with a lower (1 × 102 p.f.u.) dose also resulted in substantial weight loss by 6 dpi, although this was delayed compared with a higher virus inoculum (Extended Data Fig. 1a). High levels of infectious SARS-CoV-2 (Fig. 1b) and viral RNA (Fig. 1c) were detected in lung homogenates at 2, 4 and 7 dpi, whereas lower levels were present in other tissues (for example, the heart, spleen and kidney). Virtually no viral RNA was measured in gastrointestinal tract tissues or in circulation until 7 dpi in the serum and colon, and this was only in a subset of animals (Fig. 1d). The tissues supporting SARS-CoV-2 infection in this model mirrored the pattern of hACE2 expression, with the highest receptor levels in the lungs, colon, kidney and brain (Extended Data Fig. 1b). Levels of hACE2 declined in the lung over the course of infection (Extended Data Fig. 1c), suggesting either receptor downregulation, hACE2 shedding or death of hACE2-expressing cells after SARS-CoV-2 infection. A subset of infected K18-hACE2 mice had high levels of viral RNA and infectious virus in the brain (Fig. 1d,e), consistent with previous reports on SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2-transgenic mice10,13,15. As no infectious virus and only low levels of viral RNA were detected in the brain of the majority (60%) of animals, the observed clinical disease is more consistent with lung and not brain infection. Staining for viral RNA in brain tissue by in situ hybridization showed that only one of six animals was positive at 7 dpi.; this animal had disseminated infection throughout the cerebral cortex with noticeable sparing of the olfactory bulb and cerebellum (Extended Data Fig. 2a).

Fig. 1: SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18-hACE2 mice.
figure1

ae, Eight- to nine-week-old male and female K18-hACE2-transgenic mice were inoculated via the intranasal route with 2.5 × 104 p.f.u. SARS-CoV-2. a, Weight change was monitored (two experiments; n = 10; two-way ANOVA: ***P = 0.0002; ****P < 0.0001; symbols represent means ± s.e.m.). b,c, Viral burden in the lungs was analyzed at 2, 4 and 7 dpi by plaque assay for infectious virus (b) and RT-qPCR for viral RNA levels (c). For b, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test was used to determine significance (****P < 0.0001; NS, not significant). d, Viral RNA levels in the indicated tissues (heart, brain, kidney, spleen, serum and gastrointestinal tract) at 2, 4 and 7 dpi, as measured by RT-qPCR. e, Viral burden in the brains, as measured by plaque assay. For be, two experiments were performed (n = 10). Bars represent means and dotted horizontal lines indicate the limit of detection.

Source data

Histopathological changes in the lung after SARS-CoV-2 infection

Analysis of hematoxylin and eosin-stained lung sections from K18-hACE2 mice infected with SARS-CoV-2 (Fig. 2a) showed a progressive inflammatory process. At 2 dpi, we observed accumulation of immune cells confined predominantly to perivascular sites. By 4 dpi, these immune cell infiltrates involved a greater area of the lung with focal collections into adjacent alveolar spaces with alveolar wall thickening. By 7 dpi, immune cells, including neutrophils and mononuclear cells, were found throughout the lung in alveolar and interstitial locations, along with interstitial edema and consolidation. To correlate histopathological findings with sites of SARS-CoV-2 infection, we also stained lung sections for viral RNA using in situ hybridization (Fig. 2b). At 2 dpi, expression of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was localized predominantly to alveolar epithelial cells and a few airway epithelial cells. This pattern also was seen at 4 dpi, but with more diffuse spread throughout the lung. By 7 dpi, the level of viral RNA expression was diminished and associated with cellular debris and collapsed alveoli. No significant viral RNA signal was localized to immune cells. Together, these findings provide evidence of a progressive and widespread viral pneumonia with perivascular and pan-alveolar inflammation characterized by immune cell infiltration, edema and lung consolidation.

Fig. 2: Histopathological analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18-hACE2 mice.
figure2

a, Hematoxylin and eosin staining of lung sections from K18-hACE2 mice following mock infection or after intranasal infection with 2.5 × 104 p.f.u. SARS-CoV-2 at 2, 4 and 7 dpi. Images show low- (left; scale bars, 250 μm), medium- (middle; scale bars, 50 μm) and high-power magnification (right; scale bars, 25 μm). b, SARS-CoV-2 RNA in situ hybridization of lung sections from K18-hACE2 mice for the conditions described in a. Images show low- (left; scale bars, 100 μm), medium- (middle; scale bars, 100 μm) and high-power magnification (right; scale bars, 10 μm). In a and b, images are representative of n = 6 per group.

Extra-pulmonary histopathology after SARS-CoV-2 infection

We examined additional tissues implicated in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 in humans, including the brain, heart, liver, kidney and spleen. Brain tissues of K18-hACE2 mice with minimal or no detectable SARS-CoV-2 infection appeared normal without evidence of microglial activation or inflammation, whereas the one brain recovered with a high level of infection at 7 dpi showed inflamed meningeal vessels with extravasation of immune cells (for example, neutrophils, lymphocytes and monocytes) into the brain parenchyma, inflammation of the subarachnoid space and underlying parenchyma including microglial activation (Extended Data Fig. 2b). Abnormalities were observed in two out of nine hearts at 4 dpi (for example, scattered hypereosinophilic cardiomyocytes with pyknotic nuclei) and most livers at 4 and 7 dpi (for example, areas of inflammatory cell infiltrates and hepatocyte loss) (Extended Data Fig. 2c,d). In one kidney at 4 dpi, we observed focal acute tubular injury (Extended Data Fig. 2e); otherwise, the kidneys showed no apparent abnormalities. The spleen in SARS-CoV-2-infected K18-hACE2 mice appeared normal (Extended Data Fig. 2f), and fibrin thrombi were not detected in any of the extra-pulmonary organs examined.

Pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection

To assess for clinically relevant changes in physiology over the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18-hACE2 mice, we measured clinical chemistry and hematological parameters from peripheral blood samples (Fig. 3). Plasma levels of sodium, potassium and chloride concentrations and the anion gap all trended slightly downward at 7 dpi (Fig. 3a–d), whereas plasma bicarbonate noticeably increased (Fig. 3e), possibly as a result of poor gas exchange resulting from lung pathology or decreased respiratory drive. Other plasma analytes, including calcium, glucose and blood urea nitrogen, were unchanged (Fig. 3f–h). Hematocrit and plasma hemoglobin levels increased later in the course of infection, possibly because of reduced water intake and hemoconcentration (Fig. 3i,j). We also observed a modest prolongation in the prothrombin time at 7 dpi that was preceded by an increase in D-dimer concentrations on 2 and 4 dpi (Fig. 3k,l).

Fig. 3: Functional consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18-hACE2 mice.
figure3

ak, Clinical chemistry and hematological parameters (measures of sodium (a), potassium (b), chloride (c), anion gap (d), bicarbonate (e), blood urea nitrogen (f), glucose (g), calcium (h), hematocrit (i), hemoglobin (j) and prothrombin time (k)) from the peripheral blood of mock-treated or SARS-CoV-2-infected animals at 2, 4 and 7 dpi (two independent experiments; n = 15 for naive mice; n = 12 for 2 dpi; n = 15 for 4 dpi; n = 15 for 7 dpi; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test; P values: ***P = 0.0009 (c); *P = 0.0237 and ****P = 0.0001 (d); ****P < 0.0001 (e,ik)). l, Serum D-dimer levels of mock-treated or SARS-CoV-2-infected animals at 2, 4 and 7 dpi (two independent experiments; n = 5 for naive mice; n = 5 for 2 dpi; n = 6 for 4 dpi; n = 5 for 7 dpi; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test; *P = 0.0246). m. Results of a treadmill performance test, as measured by the distance traveled in 6 min (two independent experiments; n = 6 for naive mice; n = 6 for 2 dpi; n = 8 for 4 dpi; n = 6 for 7 dpi; two-way ANOVA; ****P < 0.0001). nw, Respiratory mechanics parameters (respiratory system resistance (n), respiratory system elastance (o), inspiratory capacity (p), quasistatic compliance (q), pressure–volume loops (r), shape parameter K (s), hysteresis area (t), Newtonian resistance (u), tissue damping (v) and tissue elastance (w)) from the lung function assessment in mock-treated or SARS-CoV-2-infected male and female mice at 2, 4 and 7 dpi. Individual results with group means from two independent experiments are shown (n = 6 for naive mice; n = 6 for 2 dpi; n = 8 for 4 dpi; n = 6 for 7 dpi; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test; P values: ***P = 0.0001 (n); ***P = 0.0002 (o); **P = 0.0024 (p); ***P = 0.0008 (q); **P = 0.0015 (s); **P = 0.0044 (t); ***P = 0.0002 (v); ***P = 0.0003 (w)). Bars represent means and dotted horizontal lines indicate the mean value of the mock-infected group. Asterisks indicate statistical significance as compared with mock infection. In m and r, symbols represent means ± s.e.m.

Source data

Next, we examined the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pulmonary and cardiac function using a treadmill stress test to assess exercise tolerance (Fig. 3m). Compared with mock-infected controls, at 4 dpi, a subset of SARS-CoV-2-infected K18-hACE2 mice began to show reduced exercise tolerance, as measured by decreased distance traveled. However, by 5 dpi, all infected K18-hACE2 mice had substantially reduced exercise tolerance compared with mock-infected animals or their own pre-infection baseline performance (Fig. 3m).

To examine changes to the biophysical properties of the lung over the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection, we mechanically ventilated mice via tracheostomy and performed several forced oscillation tests to determine various respiratory mechanics parameters (Fig. 3n–w). Infected animals showed normal lung biomechanics at 2 and 4 dpi but had markedly abnormal values in most parameters at 7 dpi relative to mock-infected controls. These abnormalities included reduced inspiratory capacity as well as increased respiratory system resistance and elastance (Fig. 3n–p). Collectively, these changes resulted in a downward deflection of the pressure–volume loop with concomitant decreases in static compliance (Fig. 3q,r), the shape-describing K parameter (representing the curvature of the upper portion of the deflation limb of the pressure–volume curve) (Fig. 3s) and loop hysteresis (Fig. 3t), which together indicated reduced lung compliance and distensibility. Further analysis using broadband forced oscillation maneuvers16 revealed that SARS-CoV-2-infected mice at 7 dpi had relatively normal Newtonian resistance (Fig. 3u), which is primarily a reflection of resistance in larger conducting airways. In contrast, mice at 7 dpi had marked increases in tissue damping (Fig. 3v) and elastance (Fig. 3w); these parameters measure the dissipation and storage of oscillatory energy in parenchymal tissue and reflect tissue and peripheral airway resistance and elastic recoil (that is, tissue stiffness), respectively. The measurements of mechanical properties of the respiratory system suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18-hACE2 mice predominantly causes disease in the alveoli and lung parenchyma, and not in the conducting airways, which is consistent with both our histopathological analysis in mice and measurements of pulmonary function in humans with viral pneumonia and respiratory failure including COVID-19 (ref. 17).

The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection

An excessive pro-inflammatory host response to SARS-CoV-2 infection is hypothesized to contribute to pulmonary pathology and the development of respiratory distress in some patients with COVID-19 (ref. 18). To evaluate the composition of the immune cell response in SARS-CoV-2-infected K18-hACE2 mice, we performed flow cytometric analysis on lung homogenates and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid at three time points after intranasal virus inoculation (Fig. 4a,b and Extended Data Fig. 3a). Consistent with our histopathological analysis, numbers of CD45+ immune cells trended higher in the BAL beginning at 2 dpi and in the lung at 4 dpi, although these differences did not attain statistical significance. The cellular infiltrates at 4 and 7 dpi in the lung were composed principally of myeloid cell subsets including Ly6G+ neutrophils, Ly6C+ monocytes and CD11b+CD11c+ dendritic cells. In the BAL fluid, monocyte numbers peaked at 4 dpi and levels of neutrophils and dendritic cells continued to rise through 7 dpi. Accumulation of monocytes in the BAL fluid coincided with a decrease in the number of tissue-resident alveolar macrophages—an observation consistent with single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of BAL fluid of patients with severe COVID-19 disease19,20. By 7 dpi, we also observed an increase in several lymphoid cell subsets in the lung, including NK1.1+ natural killer cells, γδ CD3+ T cells, CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells and activated CD44+CD3+CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4: Immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lungs of K18-hACE2 mice.
figure4

a,b, Flow cytometric analysis of lung tissues (a) and BAL (b) at 2, 4 and 7 dpi with SARS-CoV-2 (two independent experiments per group; n = 4 for naive mice; n = 7 for 2 dpi; n = 8 for 4 dpi; n = 8 for 7 dpi; one-way ANOVA; P values: *P = 0.0235, **P = 0.02 and ***P = 0.005 (a); *P = 0.0465 and **P = 0.0062 (b)). Bars represent mean values. Asterisks indicate statistical significance as compared with mock infection. DCs, dendritic cells; NK, natural killer. c, Fold change in the gene expression of the indicated cytokines and chemokines, as determined by RT-qPCR, normalized to Gapdh and compared with naive controls in lung homogenates at 2, 4 and 7 dpi (two independent experiments; n = 11 for 2 dpi; n = 15 for 4 dpi; n = 16 for 7 dpi). Dotted horizontal lines indicate the average level of cytokine or chemokine transcript in naive mice. d, Heat maps of cytokine levels, as measured by multiplex platform, in the lung tissues of SARS-CoV-2-infected mice at 2, 4 and 7 dpi. For each cytokine, the fold change was calculated as compared with mock-infected animals and the log2[fold change] was plotted in the corresponding heat map (two independent experiments; n = 9 for naive mice; n = 12 for 2 dpi; n = 13 for 4 dpi; n = 12 for 7 dpi; associated statistics are reported in Extended Data Fig. 5). EPO, erythropoetin; GM-CSF, granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor; LIF, leukemia inhibitory factor; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; TIMP-1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. e,f, Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood at 5 dpi in 6-week-old male and female mice following intranasal inoculation with the indicated doses of SARS-CoV-2 or mock infection. e, Cell numbers per ml blood (one independent experiment; n = 3 for naive; n = 3 for 102 p.f.u.; n = 4 for 103 p.f.u.; n = 4 for 104 p.f.u.; n = 4 for 105 p.f.u.; one-way ANOVA; P values: *P = 0.0385, **P = 0.0026 and ***P = 0.0006 (B cells); *P = 0.0259 and **P = 0.002 (CD4+ T cells); *P = 0.0284, **P = 0.0020 and ***P = 0.0002 (CD8+ T cells); *P = 0.0129 and **P = 0.0068 (monocytes)). Bars indicate mean values. f, Frequency of lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils (one independent experiment; n = 3 for naive mice; n = 3 for 102 p.f.u.; n = 4 for 103 p.f.u.; n = 4 for 104 p.f.u.; n = 4 for 105 p.f.u.). Bars indicate means ± s.e.m.

Source data

Extensive changes in cytokine profiles are associated with COVID-19 disease progression21,22,23. Compared with the lungs of uninfected K18-hACE2 control mice, we observed induction of Ifnb, Il28, Ifng, Cxcl10, Cxcl11 and Ccl2 messenger RNA (mRNA) over the first week (Fig. 4c), with the highest expression occurring at 2 dpi for all cytokines except Ifng and Ccl2. We also measured protein levels in the lungs using a multiplex assay of 44 different cytokines and chemokines (Fig. 4d and Extended Data Fig. 4). Although mRNA expression was highest at 2 dpi, almost all upregulated pro-inflammatory cytokines (interferon-β (IFN-β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), CXCL9, chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5), CCL12, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)), T cell-associated cytokines (IL-10, IFN-γ and IL-2) and myeloid cell-associated chemokines (CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CXCL1 and leukemia inhibitory factor) peaked at 7 dpi. These data are consistent with cytokine profiling of serum from human patients with COVID-19 and transcriptional analysis of the BAL fluid of human patients, which showed that elevated levels of IL-10, IL-6, IL-2, IL-7, G-CSF, CXCL10, CCL2, CCL3 and TNF-α correlate with disease severity20,24,25,26. Overall, our data suggest that, in the context of the inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 in the lungs of K18-hACE2 mice, many cytokines and chemokines are induced, with some having sustained expression and others showing rapid up- and downregulation patterns.

Lymphopenia—particularly T cell lymphopenia—has been associated with severe COVID-19 in humans27,28,29. In K18-hACE2 mice, SARS-CoV-2 infection resulted in a markedly decreased number of B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and monocytes in peripheral blood at 5 dpi (Fig. 4e and Extended Data Fig. 3b). An increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was also observed (Fig. 4f), which is seen in human patients30. Of note, decreased lymphocyte numbers were observed with different inoculating doses of SARS-CoV-2 and were present, even in mice receiving only 102 p.f.u., before the beginning of weight loss at 6 dpi.

Distinct transcriptional signatures are associated with early and late immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection

Studies in other small animals and humans have reported cytokine signatures coupled with delayed type I IFN signaling or elevated IFN signatures in the lung31,32. To assess how the kinetics of infection and ensuing inflammation modulate the cytokine and IFN response to SARS-CoV-2, we performed RNA-seq of lung homogenates of K18-transgenic mice at 0 (mock), 2, 4 and 7 dpi. Principal component analysis revealed distinct transcriptional signatures that were associated, at 7 dpi (Fig. 5a), with overlapping signatures at 2 and 4 dpi. Hundreds of genes were differentially expressed at all time points compared with mock-infected animals (Fig. 5b), many of which were associated with IFN signaling, nuclear factor-κB-dependent cytokine responses or leukocyte activation. In agreement with the principal component analysis, only 449 differentially expressed genes were shared at all time points when compared with the mock. In contrast, 1,975 unique differentially expressed genes were identified between the mock and 7 dpi, whereas only 59 and 152 genes were different between the mock and 2 and 4 dpi, respectively (Fig. 5c). Gene Ontology analysis of the top upregulated genes at all time points showed enrichment of gene clusters in cytokine-mediated signaling, type I and II IFN signaling, neutrophil activation and pathogen recognition receptor signaling (Fig. 5d). Upregulation of gene sets involved in cytokine-mediated signaling, neutrophil activation, cellular responses to type II IFN and Toll-like receptor signaling were most pronounced at 7 dpi (Fig. 5e–g, Extended Data Fig. 5a–c and Supplementary Table 1). Of note, different genes in the type I IFN signaling pathway were upregulated at 2 and 4 dpi (for example, Irf9, Irf7, Stat1 and certain IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs): Isg15, Mx1, Oas3, Ifit1, Ifit2 and Ifit3) versus 7 dpi (for example, Ifnar1/2, Tyk2, Irf1 and certain ISGs: Samhd1, Oas2 and Ifitm1). This suggests a temporally distinct type I IFN response (Fig. 5f), which has been described previously with IFN-α and IFN-β subtypes33,34,35. Alternatively, the differences in IFN and ISG signatures at early and late time points could reflect differential signaling contributions of type I, II and III IFNs, as these cytokines are both expressed in the lung after SARS-CoV-2 infection36 and induce overlapping yet non-identical sets of ISGs37. Collectively, the RNA-seq data from the lungs of K18-hACE2 mice show distinct immune signatures associated with early (days 2 and 4) and late (day 7) SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Fig. 5: Distinct transcriptional signatures are associated with early and late immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
figure5

ag, RNA-seq analysis of the lung homogenates of naive K18-hACE2 mice and at 2, 4 and 7 dpi (two independent experiments; n = 4 for naive mice; n = 5 for 2 dpi; n = 6 for 4 dpi; n = 5 for 7 dpi). a, Principal component analysis was performed for 20 samples with the log2-transformed gene-level counts per million (log2[CPM]) data. PC, principal component. b, Volcano plots comparing differentially expressed genes from samples taken at day 2 versus day 0, day 4 versus day 0, and day 7 versus day 0. Red and blue indicate upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively, with a fold change > 2 and a false discovery rate (q value) < 0.05. Multiple comparisons were accounted for by calculation of a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate-adjusted P value (that is, q value). Dashed horizontal lines mark a q value of 0.05 and dashed vertical lines indicate a log2[fold change] of 1 and −1. Each dot in the volcano plots represents a single gene. c, Venn diagram of overlapping genes identified in differential expression analysis when comparing the mock treatment with 2, 4 and 7 dpi. Numbers in parentheses under each comparison indicate the total number of significantly differential genes followed by the proportion of the total that are up- and downregulated. d, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of biological process (BP) terms enriched in upregulated genes from comparisons of mice at 2, 4 and 7 dpi versus mock-infected mice. Terms were ranked by the false discovery rate (q value) and the top 20 are listed after eliminating redundant terms. Bars show the percentage of genes enriched. Red lines and data points show the −log10[q value]. NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB. eg, Heat maps of significantly upregulated genes during SARS-CoV-2 infection enriched in the cytokine-mediated signaling pathway (e), type I IFN signaling pathway (f) and cellular response to IFN-γ (g), identified through Gene Ontology analysis. Genes shown in each pathway are the union of the differentially expressed genes from the three comparisons (2, 4 and 7 dpi versus mock infected). Columns represent samples and rows represent genes. Gene expression levels in the heat maps are z score–normalized values determined from log2[CPM] values. D, day.

Source data

Discussion

In this study, we found that SARS-CoV-2 infection of K18-hACE2-transgenic mice causes severe pulmonary disease. After intranasal SARS-CoV-2 inoculation, K18-hACE2 mice rapidly lost weight after 4 dpi and began to succumb to disease at 7 dpi. High levels of viral RNA and infectious virus were detected in the lungs of infected animals at 2, 4 and 7 dpi by RT-qPCR, in situ hybridization and plaque assay. Infection was accompanied by high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the lung and a cellular infiltrate primarily comprising monocytes, neutrophils and T cells. The combined infection and inflammation resulted in severe interstitial pneumonia characterized by collapsed alveolar spaces. This caused detrimental changes in lung physiology, including decreased exercise tolerance, reduced inspiratory capacity and stiffening of the lung parenchyma.

SARS-CoV-2 infection is subclinical or mild in most human cases. A small yet clinically important fraction develop life-threatening disease requiring hospitalization and intensive care. Mild disease is a feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection in naturally susceptible animals including hamsters, ferrets, cats and non-human primates5. This is perhaps unsurprising given that the strongest risk factors for developing severe COVID-19 in humans (for example, old age, cardiovascular disease and diabetes) are absent in many laboratory animals. Mild to moderate disease is seen in many rodent models of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including those expressing hACE2 via viral vectors or transgenes8,12,13,38. Thus, the severity of disease we observed following SARS-CoV-2 infection of K18-hACE2 mice is unique. As the onset of severe clinical disease in K18-hACE2 mice occurs days after peak viral infection and is associated with high levels of infiltrating immune cells and inflammatory mediators in the lung, immune responses probably contribute to pathogenesis.

The histopathological changes we observed in the infected lungs of K18-hACE2 mice correlate with the impaired pulmonary function. Pneumocytes became infected early, which led to recruitment of leukocytes into the pulmonary interstitium, production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, injury to parenchymal cells, collapse of the alveolar space and compromise of gas exchange, all of which could cause the hypercapnia we observed at 7 dpi. This course is remarkably consistent with human disease in which rapid early viral replication is followed by inflammatory responses, which are believed to contribute to pathology, morbidity and mortality39.

A fundamental understanding of the immunological processes that influence COVID-19 disease is needed to select immunomodulatory interventions that target key cell types or pathways. We saw substantial immune cell accumulation in the lungs of K18-hACE2 mice—an observation consistent with postmortem analysis of human patients40. Lung infiltrates were composed primarily of myeloid cells, including monocytes and neutrophils as well as activated CD8+ T cells, and corresponded with high levels of chemokines that drive their migration. The lymphopenia associated with severe COVID-19 in humans is attributed in part to the immune cell migration into inflamed tissues22,41. We also observed lymphopenia in circulating blood cells following SARS-CoV-2 infection, and this often preceded weight loss. This result is consistent with human studies that correlate lymphopenia with the development of severe COVID-19 (ref. 42). In transcriptional analyses of BAL fluid from infected humans with severe COVID-19, an accumulation of CD8+ T cells, neutrophils and monocytes coincided with the loss of alveolar macrophages19,20. In our study, using cytokine analysis and RNA-seq of lung homogenates, we detected enhanced expression of several myeloid cell chemoattractants (for example, CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CXCL1 and CXCL10) and other key inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6 and G-CSF) that correlate with COVID-19 disease severity in humans31,32. Given these parallel findings, studies in K18-hACE2 mice evaluating the role of specific immune pathways and cell subsets in disease pathogenesis could inform the selection of immunomodulatory agents for severe COVID-19.

The role of type I IFN in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis in this model warrants further investigation as it has been suggested that a dysregulated type I IFN response contributes to excessive immunopathology. Indeed, in SARS-CoV infection, type I IFN signaling appears to be pro-inflammatory and not antiviral43. Our RNA-seq analysis revealed differences in the type I IFN gene signatures associated with early and late SARS-CoV-2 infection. Given that ISGs can exert diverse functions apart from their antiviral activities, including inflammatory, metabolic and transcriptional effects44, these two early and late ISG modules may have different functional consequences following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, how these temporally distinct programs are induced and regulated remains uncertain and may be the result of cell type specificity, kinetics and sensitivity to different type I or III IFN subtypes.

The development of severe disease following SARS-CoV-2 infection is an important feature of the K18-hACE2 model, although the precise reason for this susceptibility compared with other hACE2-transgenic models remains unknown. Potential explanations include a high number of hACE2 transgene insertions (https://www.jax.org/strain/034860) and/or the strength and cellular specificity of the K18 promoter. Human ACE2 is expressed in multiple tissues in the K18-hACE2 mouse10, which could allow for SARS-CoV-2 infection of multiple organs. While we detected viral RNA in several tissues, the lung was the most heavily infected and showed the most consistent and severe histopathological changes; these findings were anticipated given the known tropism of SARS-CoV-2 for the respiratory tract and the intranasal route of infection. Moderate levels of viral RNA were also found in the heart, kidney and spleen, with peak titers at 2 and 4 dpi, whereas levels in gastrointestinal tract tissues (duodenum, ileum and colon) were lower. In the gastrointestinal tract of K18-hACE2 mice, hACE2 was expressed most abundantly in the colon, which correlated with infection seen at later time points. Although hACE2 is expressed in the gastrointestinal tract in other hACE2-expressing mice, productive infection was observed only upon intragastric inoculation or at early time points following intranasal infection12,13.

We observed dichotomous SARS-CoV-2 infection in the brain, with high virus levels in approximately 40% of mice at 7 dpi and low levels in the remaining 60% of animals. Infection of the brain also was observed in K18-hACE2 mice infected with SARS-CoV10,15 but occurred earlier (at 3 to 4 dpi) and more uniformly. Similar to the experiments with SARS-CoV, we did not detect SARS-CoV-2 in the olfactory bulb, which suggests that both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 cross the blood–brain barrier instead of traversing the cribriform plate and infecting neuronal processes near the site of intranasal inoculation45. Notwithstanding these data, and unlike SARS-CoV, alterations in smell and taste are features of SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans46, suggesting that cell types within the olfactory system may be susceptible to infection or injury. More study is needed to clarify the routes SARS-CoV-2 dissemination throughout the host and particularly how it accesses the brain in some animals and humans.

While SARS-CoV-2 lung infection in K18-hACE2 mice provides a model for studying severe infection that recapitulates features of COVID-19 in humans, we acknowledge several limitations. The expression of the hACE2 transgene is non-physiological in several respects. It is driven by a non-native (that is, K18) promotor, resulting in tissue expression levels that are distinct from endogenously expressed ACE2. The expression of ACE2 in K18-hACE2 mice is independent of the complex regulatory systems that govern ACE2 levels47. Whereas in humans the ACE2 gene is located on the X chromosome, the hACE2 transgene is inserted as multiple copies in mouse chromosome 2 (https://www.jax.org/strain/034860). As such, comorbid conditions (for example, obesity, hypertension, diabetes and sex) that alter ACE2 expression in humans47 probably cannot be modeled faithfully in this transgenic mouse.

In summary, we found that SARS-CoV-2 infection of K18-hACE2-transgenic mice supports robust viral replication in the lung, which leads to severe immune cell infiltration, inflammation and pulmonary disease. Thus, the K18-hACE2 mouse is an attractive small animal model for defining the mechanisms of the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 and may be useful for evaluating countermeasures that reduce virus infection or associated pathological inflammatory responses.

Methods

Cells and viruses

Vero E6 (CRL-1586; American Type Culture Collection), Vero CCL81 (American Type Culture Collection) and Vero-furin cells48 were cultured at 37 °C in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.3), 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1× non-essential amino acids and 100 U ml−1 penicillin–streptomycin. The 2019n-CoV/USA_WA1/2019 isolate of SARS-CoV-2 was obtained from the US Centers for Disease Control. Infectious stocks were grown by inoculating Vero CCL81 cells and collecting supernatant upon observation of cytopathic effect; debris were removed by centrifugation and passage through a 0.22-μm filter. Supernatant was then aliquoted and stored at −80 °C.

Biosafety

All aspects of this study were approved by the office of Environmental Health and Safety at Washington University School of Medicine before initiation of this study. Work with SARS-CoV-2 was performed in a biosafety level 3 laboratory by personnel equipped with powered air-purifying respirators.

Mice

Animal studies were carried out in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Washington University School of Medicine (assurance number A3381–01). Virus inoculations were performed under anesthesia that was induced and maintained with ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine, and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.

Heterozygous K18-hACE c57BL/6J mice (strain: 2B6.Cg-Tg(K18-ACE2)2Prlmn/J) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. Animals were housed in groups and fed standard chow diets. Mice of different ages and both sexes were administered 2.5 × 104 p.f.u. SARS-CoV-2 via intranasal administration.

Plaque-forming assay

Vero-furin cells48 were seeded at a density of 2.5 × 105 cells per well in flat-bottom 12-well tissue culture plates. The following day, media was removed and replaced with 200 μl of tenfold serial dilutions of the material to be titered, diluted in DMEM + 2% FBS. One hour later, 1 ml methylcellulose overlay was added. Plates were incubated for 72 h, then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (final concentration) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 20 min. Plates were stained with 0.05% (wt/vol) crystal violet in 20% methanol and washed twice with distilled, deionized water.

Measurement of viral burden and hACE2 expression

Tissues were weighed and homogenized with zirconia beads in a MagNA Lyser instrument (Roche Life Science) in 1 ml of DMEM media supplemented with 2% heat-inactivated FBS. Tissue homogenates were clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 r.p.m. for 5 min and stored at −80 °C. RNA was extracted using the MagMAX mirVana Total RNA Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on the KingFisher Flex extraction robot (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified using the TaqMan RNA-to-CT 1-Step Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Reverse transcription was carried out at 48 °C for 15 min followed by 2 min at 95 °C. Amplification was accomplished over 50 cycles as follows: 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Copies of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) gene RNA in samples were determined using a previously published assay8. Briefly, a TaqMan assay was designed to target a highly conserved region of the N gene (forward primer: ATGCTGCAATCGTGCTACAA; reverse primer: GACTGCCGCCTCTGCTC; probe: /56-FAM/TCAAGGAAC/ZEN/AACATTGCCAA/3IABkFQ/). This region was included in an RNA standard to allow for copy number determination down to ten copies per reaction. The reaction mixture contained final concentrations of primers and probe of 500 and 100 nM, respectively.

For hACE2 expression, RNA was DNase treated (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA levels were quantified as described above with the primer/probe set for hACE2 (IDT assay: Hs.PT.58.27645939), compared with an RNA standard curve and normalized to mg of tissue.

Cytokine and chemokine mRNA measurements

RNA was isolated from lung homogenates as described above. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from DNAse-treated RNA using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the addition of RNase inhibitor following the manufacturer’s protocol. Cytokine and chemokine expression was determined using TaqMan Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with commercial primers/probe sets specific for IFNg (IDT: Mm.PT.58.41769240), IL6 (Mm.PT.58.10005566), IL1b (Mm.PT.58.41616450), TNFa (Mm.PT.58.12575861), CXCL10 (Mm.PT.58.43575827), CCL2 (Mm.PT.58.42151692), CCL5 (Mm.PT.58.43548565), CXCL11 (Mm.PT.58.10773148.g), IFNb (Mm.PT.58.30132453.g) and IL28a/b (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Mm04204156_gH) and the results were normalized to GAPDH (Mm.PT.39a.1) levels. Fold changes were determined using the 2ΔΔCt method comparing treated mice with naive controls.

Cytokine and chemokine protein measurements

Lung homogenates were incubated with Triton X-100 (1% final concentration) for 1 h at room temperature to inactivate SARS-CoV-2. Homogenates then were analyzed for cytokines and chemokines by Eve Technologies using their Mouse Cytokine Array/Chemokine Array 44-Plex (MD44) platform.

Histology and RNA in situ hybridization

Animals were euthanized before harvest and fixation of tissues. The left lung was first tied off at the left main bronchus and collected for viral RNA analysis. The right lung was then inflated with ~1.2 ml 10% neutral-buffered formalin (NBF) using a 3-ml syringe and catheter inserted into the trachea. For harvesting of brains for fixation, the mouse was decapitated and the skull cap removed. The whole brain was removed intact, cut mid-sagittally to increase the surface area of fixation and drop-fixed in 10% NBF. For the kidney, spleen, liver and heart, organs were removed and drop-fixed in 10% NBF. For fixation after infection, organs were kept in a 40-ml suspension of NBF for 7 d before further processing. Tissues were embedded in paraffin and sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. RNA in situ hybridization was performed using the RNAscope 2.5 HD Assay (Brown Kit) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Advanced Cell Diagnostics). Briefly, sections were deparaffinized and treated with H2O2 and Protease Plus before probe hybridization. Probes specifically targeting hACE2 (catalog number 848151) or SARS-CoV-2 spike sequence (catalog number 848561) were hybridized followed by proprietary signal amplification and detection with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine. Tissues were counterstained with Gill’s hematoxylin. An uninfected mouse was used as a negative control and stained in parallel. Tissue sections were visualized using a Nikon Eclipse microscope equipped with an Olympus DP71 camera, a Leica DM6B microscope equipped with a Leica DFC7000T camera, or an Olympus BX51 microscope with an attached camera.

Flow cytometry analysis of immune cell infiltrates

For analysis of BAL fluid, mice were sacrificed by ketamine overdose, followed by cannulation of the trachea with a 19-G canula. BAL was performed with three washes of 0.8 ml sterile PBS. BAL fluid was centrifuged and single-cell suspensions were generated for staining. For analysis of lung tissue, mice were perfused with sterile PBS and the right inferior lung lobes were digested at 37 °C with 630 µg ml−1 collagenase D (Roche) and 75 U ml−1 DNase I (Sigma–Aldrich) for 2 h. Single-cell suspensions of BAL and lung digests were preincubated with Fc Block antibody (BD Pharmingen) in PBS + 2% heat-inactivated FBS for 10 min at room temperature before staining. Cells were incubated with antibodies against the following markers: AF700 anti-CD45 (clone 30 F-11), APC-Cy7 anti-CD11c (clone N418), PE anti-Siglec F (clone E50-2440; BD), PE-Cy7 anti-Ly6G (clone 1A8), BV605 anti-Ly6C (clone HK1.4; BioLegend), BV 711 anti-CD11b (clone M1/70), APC anti-CD103 (clone 2E7; eBioscience), PB anti-CD3 (clone 17A2), PE-Cy7, APC anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5), PE-Cy7 anti-CD8 (clone53-6.7), anti-NK1.1 (clone PK136) and BV605 anti-TCR γ/δ (clone GL3). All antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:200. Cells were stained for 20 min at 4 °C, washed, fixed and permeabilized for intracellular staining with a Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with PE-Cy5 anti-Foxp3 (clone FJK-16s), washed, re-fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (EMS) for 20 min and resuspended in permeabilization buffer. Absolute cell counts were determined using Trucount beads (BD). Flow cytometry data were acquired on a cytometer (BD X-20; BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar).

Flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood

Peripheral blood was obtained from the submandibular vein. Erythrocytes were lysed twice with ammonium–chloride–potassium (ACK) lysing buffer (Gibco) and the remaining cells were resuspended in PBS supplemented with 2% FBS and 1 mM EDTA and maintained on ice. After blockade of Fcγ receptors with anti-CD16/32 (eBioscience; clone 93) and confirmation of viability (eBioscience; FVD eFluor 506), staining for the cell-surface antigens CD45 BUV395, CD3 APC, CD19 PE, Ly6G BV650, Ly6C Pacific Blue, CD11b PE/Dazzle 594, NK1.1 FITC, CD4 BV605 and CD8 PerCPCy5.5 was performed at dilutions of 1:200. Cells were incubated for 20 min at 4 °C, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and washed before resuspension in PBS supplemented with 2% FBS and 1 mM EDTA. Absolute cell counts were determined using Trucount beads (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry data were acquired on a BD X-20 cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar).

Clinical laboratory analysis

Testing was performed on fresh whole-blood samples within a biosafety cabinet using point-of-care instruments. Prothrombin time was measured using the CoaguChek (Roche) meter. Electrolyte, acid-base and hematology parameters were assayed on lithium-heparinized whole blood using the iSTAT 1 (Abbot) with the CHEM8+ cartridge.

Respiratory mechanics

Mice were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (100 and 10 mg kg−1 intraperitoneally, respectively). The trachea was isolated via dissection of the neck area and cannulated using an 18-gauge blunt metal cannula (typical resistance of 0.18 cmH2O s ml−1), which was secured in place with a nylon suture. The mouse was then connected to the flexiVent computer-controlled piston ventilator (SCIREQ) via the cannula, which was attached to the FX adaptor Y-tubing. Mechanical ventilation was initiated and mice were given an additional 100 mg kg−1 ketamine and 0.1 mg per mouse of the paralytic pancuronium bromide via the intraperitoneal route to prevent breathing efforts against the ventilator and during measurements. Mice were ventilated using default settings for mice, which consisted of a positive end expiratory pressure at 3 cmH2O, a 10 ml kg−1 tidal volume, a respiratory rate at 150 breaths per minute and a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.21 (that is, room air). Respiratory mechanics were assessed using the forced oscillation technique, as previously described49, using the latest version of the flexiVent operating software (flexiWare version 8.1.3). Pressure–volume loops and measurements of inspiratory capacity were also done.

Treadmill stress test

A six-lane mouse treadmill (Columbus Instruments) was placed within a biosafety cabinet within the animal biosafety level 3 laboratory. Mice were introduced to the treadmill test three times before infection, with each introductory session performed at increasingly faster rates. In general, the treadmill was set to ramp from 0 to maximum speed over the course of the first minute, then to maintain maximum speed for 5 min. Failure to maintain adequate speed resulted in delivery of a shock; this occurred until the animal re-engaged the treadmill for a maximum of five failures. For each sex, we identified a speed at which >80% of mice successfully completed the test before infection (16 m s−1 for females; 14 m s−1 for males).

RNA-seq

cDNA libraries were constructed starting with 10 ng total RNA from lung tissues of each sample that was extracted using a MagMAX mirVana Total RNA Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). cDNA was generated using the SeqPlex kit (Sigma–Aldrich) with amplification of 20 cycles. Library construction was performed using 100 ng cDNA undergoing end repair, A tailing, ligation of universal TruSeq adapters and amplification of eight cycles to incorporate unique dual index sequences. Libraries were sequenced on the NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina) targeting 40 million read pairs and extending 150 cycles with paired-end reads. RNA-seq reads were aligned to the mouse Ensembl GRCh38.76 primary assembly and SARS-CoV-2 NCBI NC_045512 Wuhan-Hu-1 genome with the STAR program (version 2.5.1a)50. Gene counts were derived from the number of uniquely aligned unambiguous reads by Subread:featureCount (version 1.4.6-p5)51. The ribosomal fraction, known junction saturation and read distribution over known gene models were quantified with RSeQC (version 2.6.2)52. All gene counts were preprocessed with the R package EdgeR53 to adjust samples for differences in library size using the trimmed mean of M values (TMM) normalization procedure. Ribosomal genes and genes not expressed at a level greater than or equal to 1 count per million reads in the smallest group size were excluded from further analysis. The R package limma54 with the voomWithQualityWeights function55 was utilized to calculate the weighted likelihoods for all samples, based on the observed mean–variance relationship of every gene and sample. Differentially expressed genes were defined as those with at least twofold difference between two individual groups at the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate-adjusted P value (that is, q value < 0.05).

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was assigned when P values were <0.05 using Prism version 8 (GraphPad) and specific tests with exact n values are indicated in the figure captions. Analysis of weight change was determined by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Changes in functional parameters or immune parameters were compared with mock-infected animals and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA or one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test.

Reporting Summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All of the data supporting the findings of this study can be found within the paper and Extended Data Figs. 15 and are available from the corresponding author upon request or in the corresponding source data files. The RNA-seq datasets generated in this study are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (accession code: GSE154104). The RNA-seq reads were aligned to the mouse Ensembl data (GRCh38.76 primary assembly) and GenBank data (SARS-CoV-2 NCBI NC_045512 Wuhan-Hu-1 genome). Source data are provided with this paper.

Change history

  • 02 September 2020

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Ziegler, C. G. K. et al. SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 is an interferon-stimulated gene in human airway epithelial cells and is detected in specific cell subsets across tissues. Cell 181, 1016–1035.e19 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hamming, I. et al. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 203, 631–637 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lai, C. C., Ko, W. C., Lee, P. I., Jean, S. S. & Hsueh, P. R. Extra-respiratory manifestations of COVID-19. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106024 (2020).

  4. 4.

    Rockx, B. et al. Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model. Science 368, 1012–1015 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cleary, S. J. et al. Animal models of mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 pathology. Br. J. Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15143 (2020).

  6. 6.

    Letko, M., Marzi, A. & Munster, V. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 562–569 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wan, Y., Shang, J., Graham, R., Baric, R. S. & Li, F. Receptor recognition by novel coronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS. J. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00127-20 (2020).

  8. 8.

    Hassan, A. O. et al. A SARS-CoV-2 infection model in mice demonstrates protection by neutralizing antibodies. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.011 (2020).

  9. 9.

    Israelow, B. et al. Mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 reveals inflammatory role of type I interferon signaling. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20201241 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    McCray, P. B. Jr. et al. Lethal infection of K18-hACE2 mice infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Virol. 81, 813–821 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jiang, R. D. et al. Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in transgenic mice expressing human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Cell 182, 50–58.e8 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bao, L. et al. The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2312-y (2020).

  13. 13.

    Sun, S. H. et al. A mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis. Cell Host Microbe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.05.020 (2020).

  14. 14.

    Yang, X., Pabon, L. & Murry, C. E. Engineering adolescence: maturation of human pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 114, 511–523 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Netland, J., Meyerholz, D. K., Moore, S., Cassell, M. & Perlman, S. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection causes neuronal death in the absence of encephalitis in mice transgenic for human ACE2. J. Virol. 82, 7264–7275 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Robichaud, A., Fereydoonzad, L., Urovitch, I. B. & Brunet, J. D. Comparative study of three flexiVent system configurations using mechanical test loads. Exp. Lung Res. 41, 84–92 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Barbeta, E. et al. SARS-CoV-2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange abnormalities. Ann. Am. Thoracic Soc. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202005-462RL (2020).

  18. 18.

    Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E. J. et al. Complex immune dysregulation in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Cell Host Microbe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.009 (2020).

  19. 19.

    Liao, M. et al. Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 842–844 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bost, P. et al. Host–viral infection maps reveal signatures of severe COVID-19 patients. Cell 181, 1475–1488.e12 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mehta, P. et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 395, 1033–1034 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Huang, C. et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395, 497–506 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chua, R. L. et al. COVID-19 severity correlates with airway epithelium–immune cell interactions identified by single-cell analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0602-4 (2020).

  24. 24.

    Chen, X. et al. Detectable serum SARS-CoV-2 viral load (RNAaemia) is closely correlated with drastically elevated interleukin 6 (IL-6) level in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa449 (2020).

  25. 25.

    Liu, J. et al. Longitudinal characteristics of lymphocyte responses and cytokine profiles in the peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. EBioMedicine 55, 102763 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yang, Y. et al. Plasma IP-10 and MCP-3 levels are highly associated with disease severity and predict the progression of COVID-19. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 146, 119–127.e4 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fu, L. et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. 80, 656–665 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Liu, R. et al. Decreased T cell populations contribute to the increased severity of COVID-19. Clin. Chim. Acta 508, 110–114 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wilk, A. J. et al. A single-cell atlas of the peripheral immune response in patients with severe COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 1070–1076 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang, Y. et al. Characterization of an asymptomatic cohort of SARS-COV-2 infected individuals outside of Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa629 (2020).

  31. 31.

    Zhou, Z. et al. Heightened innate immune responses in the respiratory tract of COVID-19 patients. Cell Host Microbe 27, 883–890.e2 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Blanco-Melo, D. et al. Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell 181, 1036–1045.e9 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cook, L. E. et al. Distinct roles of interferon alpha and beta in controlling Chikungunya virus replication and modulating neutrophil-mediated inflammation. J. Virol. 94, e00841-19 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ng, C. T., Mendoza, J. L., Garcia, K. C. & Oldstone, M. B. Alpha and beta type 1 interferon signaling: passage for diverse biologic outcomes. Cell 164, 349–352 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ng, C. T. et al. Blockade of interferon beta, but not interferon alpha, signaling controls persistent viral infection. Cell Host Microbe 17, 653–661 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Park, A. & Iwasaki, A. Type I and type III interferons—induction, signaling, evasion, and application to combat COVID-19. Cell Host Microbe 27, 870–878 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lazear, H. M., Schoggins, J. W. & Diamond, M. S. Shared and distinct functions of type I and type III interferons. Immunity 50, 907–923 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Jiang, D. et al. Identification of three interferon-inducible cellular enzymes that inhibit the replication of hepatitis C virus. J. Virol. 82, 1665–1678 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pan, F. et al. Time course of lung changes at chest CT during recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiology 295, 715–721 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Xu, Z. et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Resp. Med. 8, 420–422 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chen, G. et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 2620–2629 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tan, L. et al. Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: a descriptive and predictive study. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 5, 33 (2020); erratum 5, 61 (2020).

  43. 43.

    Channappanavar, R. et al. Dysregulated type I interferon and inflammatory monocyte–macrophage responses cause lethal pneumonia in SARS-CoV-infected mice. Cell Host Microbe 19, 181–193 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Mostafavi, S. et al. Parsing the interferon transcriptional network and its disease associations. Cell 164, 564–578 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Barnett, E. M., Cassell, M. D. & Perlman, S. Two neurotropic viruses, herpes simplex virus type 1 and mouse hepatitis virus, spread along different neural pathways from the main olfactory bulb. Neuroscience 57, 1007–1025 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Spinato, G. et al. Alterations in smell or taste in mildly symptomatic outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 323, 2089–2090 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Li, Y., Zhou, W., Yang, L. & You, R. Physiological and pathological regulation of ACE2, the SARS-CoV-2 receptor. Pharmacol. Res. 157, 104833 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Mukherjee, S. et al. Enhancing dengue virus maturation using a stable furin over-expressing cell line. Virology 497, 33–40 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    McGovern, T. K., Robichaud, A., Robichaud, L., Schuessler, T. F. & Martin, J. G. Evaluation of respiratory system mechanics in mice using the forced oscillation technique. J. Vis. Exp. 2013, e50172 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wang, L., Wang, S. & Li, W. RSeQC: quality control of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics 28, 2184–2185 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Liu, R. et al. Why weight? Modelling sample and observational level variability improves power in RNA-seq analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e97 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by NIH contracts and grants (75N93019C00062, R01 AI127828, R01 AI130591 and R35 HL145242) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR001117S0019). E.S.W. is supported by T32 AI007163. B.T.M. is supported by F32 AI138392. L.-I.K. is supported by T32 EB021955. We thank S. Whelan, S. Cook and J. Philips for facilitating the studies with SARS-CoV-2 at biosafety level 3; C. Lutz and The Jackson Laboratory for providing mice; A. Kim for purifying the CR3022 anti-S monoclonal antibody; H. Janova and M. Cain for experimental advice; and R. Schmidt for reviewing brain histology slides. We also thank D. Brunet at SCIREQ for facilitating use of the flexiVent mouse ventilator.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.L.B. and E.S.W. performed the intranasal inoculations of SARS-CoV-2 and clinical analysis. E.S.W., J.M.F. and R.E.C. performed the viral burden analysis with support from J.T.E. N.M.K. performed the histopathological studies. B.T.M. performed the in situ hybridization. S.P.K., J.H.R., L.-I.K. and M.J.H. analyzed the tissue sections for histopathology. S.N. and E.S.W. performed immune cell processing for flow cytometry and analysis. A.L.B. performed the pulmonary mechanics analysis with training from S.D. S.D. and A.R. performed the analysis of pulmonary mechanics data. A.L.B. and N.M.K. performed the treadmill stress-testing analyses. J.Y. and R.H. performed the RNA-seq and analysis. E.S.W. compiled all of the figures. A.L.B., E.S.W. and M.S.D. wrote the initial draft, with the other authors providing editorial comments.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Diamond.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.S.D. is a consultant for InBios, Vir Biotechnology and NGM Biopharmaceuticals and is on the scientific advisory board of Moderna. The Diamond laboratory has received funding under sponsored research agreements from Moderna, Vir Biotechnology and Emergent BioSolutions. S.D. and A.R. are employed by SCIREQ—a commercial entity with commercial interest in a subject area related to the content of this article. SCIREQ is an emka TECHNOLOGIES company. M.J.H. is a member of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for AstroZeneca and founder of NuPeak Therapeutics. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Peer reviewer reports are available. Jamie D. K. Wilson was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 SARS CoV-2 infection and hACE2 expression in the K18-hACE2 model.

a. Six-week-old male and female K18-hACE2 transgenic mice were inoculated via the intranasal route with the indicated PFU doses of SARS-CoV-2, and weight change was monitored (one experiment, n = 4, symbols represent the mean ± SEM). b. mRNA expression levels of hACE2 in the lung, kidney, heart, brain, spleen, duodenum, colon, and ileum of naive K18 hACE2 mice (two experiments, n = 5). c. mRNA expression levels of hACE2 in the lungs of K18 hACE2 mice at 2, 4, and 7 dpi following SARS-CoV-2 infection (two experiments, n = 4 per time point, bars represent the mean ± SEM).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 SARS-CoV-2 infection in extra-pulmonary organs.

a. SARS-CoV-2 RNA in situ hybridization of brain sections from K18-hACE2 mice following intranasal infection with 2.5 x 104 PFU of SARS-CoV-2 at 7 dpi. Images show low-power magnification (scale bars, 100 μm) with a high-power inset. One of six infected mice stained positively for viral RNA in the brain. Images are from this mouse and another that showed virtually no infection in the brain. be. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the brain (b), heart (c), liver (d), kidney (e), and spleen (f) from K18-hACE2 mice following SARS CoV-2 infection at 7 dpi. Scale bars indicate 200 μm. For b, hematoxylin and eosin-stained images correspond to the mouse with high levels of viral RNA by ISH and show inflamed vessels with extravasation of immune cells into the brain parenchyma, microglial activation, and subarachnoid inflammation with involvement of the underlying parenchyma. The dashed box in b indicates the location of two higher power magnification images below. For af, Representative images from 2 independent experiments, n = 6 per group.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Flow cytometric analysis.

a. Flow cytometric gating strategy for BAL and lung tissue analysis. b. Flow cytometric gating strategy for peripheral blood leukocyte analysis.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Cytokine induction following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cytokine levels as measured by multiplex platform in lung tissues of SARS-CoV-2-infected mice at 2, 4, and 7 dpi (two independent experiments, n = 9 for naïve, n = 12 for 2 dpi, n = 13 for 4 dpi, n = 12 for 7 dpi; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test; for G-CSF *** P = 0.0001; for CCL22 * P = 0.0181; for IL-11 * P = 0.0133 and ** P= 0.0039; for IFNb *** P = 0.0004; for TIMP-1 * P = 0.0103 and **** P < 0.0001; for CCL19 ** P = 0.0076; for CCL20 ** P = 0.0053 and **** P < 0.0001; for CCL12 * P = 0.0185, ** P = 0.0067, and *** P= 0.0004; for VEGF **** P < 0.0001; for TNFa ** P = 0.0015; for CCL5 * P = 0.0113; for CCL4 * P = 0.0203; for CCL3 ** P = 0.0054; for CXCL9 * P = 0.0167 and **** P < 0.0001; for CCL2 ** P = 0.0019 and **** P < 0.0001; for CXCL5 * P = 0.0186; for LIF **** P < 0.0001; for CXCL10 * P = 0.0354 *** and P = 0.0001; for IL5 *** P = 0.0005; for IFNg *** P = 0.0001. Bars indicate the mean +/- SEM)).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Transcriptional immune signatures following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Heat maps of significantly upregulated genes during SARS-CoV-2 infection enriched in neutrophil activation pathways (a), Toll-like receptor signaling pathway (b), and negative regulation of viral genome replication (c) identified through Gene Ontology analysis. Genes shown in each pathway are the union of differentially expressed genes from the three comparisons (2, 4, and 7 dpi versus mock-infected). Columns represent samples and rows represent genes. Gene expression levels in the heat maps are z score-normalized values determined from log2 [cpm values]).

Source data

Supplementary information

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Winkler, E.S., Bailey, A.L., Kafai, N.M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection of human ACE2-transgenic mice causes severe lung inflammation and impaired function. Nat Immunol 21, 1327–1335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-020-0778-2

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing