Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Microtubule lattice spacing governs cohesive envelope formation of tau family proteins

Nature Chemical Biology volume 18, pages 1224–1235 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Tau is an intrinsically disordered microtubule-associated protein (MAP) implicated in neurodegenerative disease. On microtubules, tau molecules segregate into two kinetically distinct phases, consisting of either independently diffusing molecules or interacting molecules that form cohesive ‘envelopes’ around microtubules. Envelopes differentially regulate lattice accessibility for other MAPs, but the mechanism of envelope formation remains unclear. Here we find that tau envelopes form cooperatively, locally altering the spacing of tubulin dimers within the microtubule lattice. Envelope formation compacted the underlying lattice, whereas lattice extension induced tau envelope disassembly. Investigating other members of the tau family, we find that MAP2 similarly forms envelopes governed by lattice spacing, whereas MAP4 cannot. Envelopes differentially biased motor protein movement, suggesting that tau family members could spatially divide the microtubule surface into functionally distinct regions. We conclude that the interdependent allostery between lattice spacing and cooperative envelope formation provides the molecular basis for spatial regulation of microtubule-based processes by tau and MAP2.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Tau cooperativity through local microtubule lattice compaction.
Fig. 2: Lattice expansion induces disassembly of tau envelopes.
Fig. 3: Cooperative envelope formation is a divergent property within the tau family.
Fig. 4: Lattice spacing governs MAP cooperativity in vivo.
Fig. 5: MAP cooperativity results in differential regulation of motor proteins.

Data availability

Source data files for all figures and Supplementary figures, are available with this manuscript. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Alushin, G. M. et al. High-resolution microtubule structures reveal the structural transitions in αβ-tubulin upon GTP hydrolysis. Cell 157, 1117–1129 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hyman, A. A., Salser, S., Drechsel, D. N., Unwin, N. & Mitchison, T. J. Role of GTP hydrolysis in microtubule dynamics: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue, GMPCPP. Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 1155–1167 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dı́az, J. F., Barasoain, I. & Andreu, J. M. Fast kinetics of taxol binding to microtubules: effects of solution variables and microtubule-associated proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 8407–8419 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peet, D. R., Burroughs, N. J. & Cross, R. A. Kinesin expands and stabilizes the GDP-microtubule lattice. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 386–391 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, R., LaFrance, B. & Nogales, E. Separating the effects of nucleotide and EB binding on microtubule structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, E6191–E6200 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shima, T. et al. Kinesin-binding–triggered conformation switching of microtubules contributes to polarized transport. J. Cell Biol. 217, 4164–4183 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Maurer, S. P., Bieling, P., Cope, J., Hoenger, A. & Surrey, T. GTPγS microtubules mimic the growing microtubule end structure recognized by end-binding proteins (EBs). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 3988–3993 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zanic, M., Stear, J. H., Hyman, A. A. & Howard, J. EB1 recognizes the nucleotide state of tubulin in the microtubule lattice. PLoS One 4, e7585 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan, R. et al. Microtubules gate tau condensation to spatially regulate microtubule functions. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1078–1085 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Castle, B. T., McKibben, K. M., Rhoades, E. & Odde, D. J. Tau avoids the GTP cap at growing microtubule plus-ends. iScience 23, 101782 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Guedes-Dias, P. et al. Kinesin-3 responds to local microtubule dynamics to target synaptic cargo delivery to the presynapse. Curr. Biol. 29, 268–282 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dehmelt, L. & Halpain, S. The MAP2/Tau family of microtubule-associated proteins. Genome Biol. 6, 1–10 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sündermann, F., Fernandez, M. & Morgan, R. An evolutionary roadmap to the microtubule-associated protein MAP Tau. BMC Genom. 17, 264 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Götz, J., Halliday, G. & Nisbet, R. M. Molecular pathogenesis of the tauopathies. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 14, 239–261 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, L., Zhang, Q., Lei, X., Huang, Y. & Hu, J. MAP4 as a new candidate in cardiovascular disease. Front. Physiol. 11, 1044 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Monroy, B. Y. et al. A combinatorial MAP code dictates polarized microtubule transport. Dev. Cell 53, 60–72 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Seitz, A. et al. Single-molecule investigation of the interference between kinesin, tau and MAP2c. EMBO J. 21, 4896–4905 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Semenova, I. et al. Regulation of microtubule-based transport by MAP4. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 3119–3132 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Samora, C. P. et al. MAP4 and CLASP1 operate as a safety mechanism to maintain a stable spindle position in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1040–1050 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karasmanis, E. P. et al. Polarity of neuronal membrane traffic requires sorting of kinesin motor cargo during entry into dendrites by a microtubule-associated septin. Dev. Cell 46, 204–218 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bulinski, J. C., McGraw, T. E., Gruber, D., Lan Nguyen, H. & Sheetz, M. P. Overexpression of MAP4 inhibits organelle motility and trafficking in vivo. J. Cell Sci. 110, 3055–3064 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hernández-Vega, A. et al. Local nucleation of microtubule bundles through tubulin concentration into a condensed Tau phase. Cell Rep. 20, 2304–2312 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, X. et al. The proline-rich domain promotes Tau liquid–liquid phase separation in cells. J. Cell Biol. 219, e202006054 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, X. et al. RNA stores tau reversibly in complex coacervates. PLoS Biol. 15, e2002183 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Iqbal, K., Liu, F. & Gong, C.-X. Tau and neurodegenerative disease: the story so far. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 12, 15–27 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dixit, R., Ross, J. L., Goldman, Y. E. & Holzbaur, E. L. F. Differential regulation of dynein and kinesin motor proteins by tau. Science 319, 1086–1089 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. McVicker, D. P., Hoeprich, G. J., Thompson, A. R. & Berger, C. L. Tau interconverts between diffusive and stable populations on the microtubule surface in an isoform and lattice specific manner. Cytoskeleton 71, 184–194 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Siahaan, V. et al. Kinetically distinct phases of tau on microtubules regulate kinesin motors and severing enzymes. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1086–1092 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chaudhary, A. R., Berger, F., Berger, C. L. & Hendricks, A. G. Tau directs intracellular trafficking by regulating the forces exerted by kinesin and dynein teams. Traffic 19, 111–121 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Diaz, J. F. & Andreu, J. M. Assembly of purified GDP-tubulin into microtubules induced by taxol and taxotere: reversibility, ligand stoichiometry, and competition. Biochemistry 32, 2747–2755 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kar, S., Fan, J., Smith, M. J., Goedert, M. & Amos, L. A. Repeat motifs of tau bind to the insides of microtubules in the absence of taxol. EMBO J. 22, 70–77 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin, Y. et al. Toxic PR poly-dipeptides encoded by the C9orf72 repeat expansion target LC domain polymers. Cell 167, 789–802.e12 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Samsonov, A., Yu, J.-Z., Rasenick, M. & Popov, S. V. Tau interaction with microtubules in vivo. J. Cell Sci. 117, 6129–6141 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Balabanian, L., Berger, C. L. & Hendricks, A. G. Acetylated microtubules are preferentially bundled leading to enhanced kinesin-1 motility. Biophys. J. 113, 1551–1560 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ettinger, A., van Haren, J., Ribeiro, S. A. & Wittmann, T. Doublecortin is excluded from growing microtubule ends and recognizes the GDP-microtubule lattice. Curr. Biol. 26, 1549–1555 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. McKenney, R. J., Huynh, W., Vale, R. D. & Sirajuddin, M. Tyrosination of α-tubulin controls the initiation of processive dynein–dynactin motility. EMBO J. 35, 1175–1185 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lam, A. J. et al. A highly conserved 310 helix within the kinesin motor domain is critical for kinesin function and human health. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf1002.

  38. Budaitis, B. G. et al. Pathogenic mutations in the kinesin-3 motor KIF1A diminish force generation and movement through allosteric mechanisms. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202004227 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chiba, K. et al. Disease-associated mutations hyperactivate KIF1A motility and anterograde axonal transport of synaptic vesicle precursors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 116, 18429–18434 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Boyle, L. et al. Genotype and defects in microtubule-based motility correlate with clinical severity in KIF1A-associated neurological disorder. Hum. Genet. Genomics Adv. 2, 100026 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kellogg, E. H. et al. Near-atomic model of microtubule–tau interactions. Science 360, 1242–1246 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wijeratne, S. S., Fiorenza, S. A., Subramanian, R. & Betterton, M. D. Motor guidance by long-range communication through the microtubule highway. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.23.424221 (2020).

  43. Kim, T. & Rice, L. M. Long-range, through-lattice coupling improves predictions of microtubule catastrophe. Mol. Biol. Cell 30, 1451–1462 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Shigematsu, H. et al. Structural insight into microtubule stabilization and kinesin inhibition by Tau family MAPs. J. Cell Biol. 217, 4155–4163 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Gu, Y., Oyama, F. & Ihara, Y. Tau is widely expressed in rat tissues. J. Neurochem. 67, 1235–1244 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shults, N. V. et al. Tau protein in lung smooth muscle cells. J. Respir. 1, 30–39 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Howes, S. C. et al. Structural differences between yeast and mammalian microtubules revealed by cryo-EM. J. Cell Biol. 216, 2669–2677 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Chaaban, S. et al. The structure and dynamics of C. elegans tubulin reveals the mechanistic basis of microtubule growth. Dev. Cell 47, 191–204 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Triclin, S. et al. Self-repair protects microtubules from destruction by molecular motors. Nat. Mater. 20, 883–891 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Soppina, V. & Verhey, K. J. The family-specific K-loop influences the microtubule on-rate but not the superprocessivity of kinesin-3 motors. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 2161–2170 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Henrichs, V. et al. Mitochondria-adaptor TRAK1 promotes kinesin-1 driven transport in crowded environments. Nat. Commun. 2020 111 11, 1–13 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gell, C. et al. Purification of tubulin from porcine brain. Methods Mol. Biol. 777, 15–28 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tan, R., Foster, P. J., Needleman, D. J. & McKenney, R. J. Cooperative accumulation of dynein–dynactin at microtubule minus-ends drives microtubule network reorganization. Dev. Cell 44, 233–247 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. McKenney, R. J., Huynh, W., Tanenbaum, M. E., Bhabha, G. & Vale, R. D. Activation of cytoplasmic dynein motility by dynactin-cargo adapter complexes. Science 345, 337–341 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Chrétien, D., Kenney, J. M., Fuller, S. D. & Wade, R. H. Determination of microtubule polarity by cryo-electron microscopy. Structure 4, 1031–1040 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank members of the MOM lab for feedback and discussion during the project and the Protein Facility of MPI-CBG and V. Váňová for technical support. We also thank A. Carter for critical reading of the manuscript, O. Kučera for establishing the optical tweezers assay and J. Sabó for support in obtaining imaging data. This work was supported by Czech Science Foundation grant 19–27477X to Z.L. and L.L. and grant 20-04068S to M.B. We acknowledge the financial support from the Charles University Grant Agency (GAUK no. 373821 to V.S.) and the project ‘Grant Schemes at CU’ (reg. no. CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/19_073/0016935) to T.H. and V.S., grants 1R35GM124889 to R.J.M. and 1R35GM133688 to K.M.O.M. K.M.O.M. is also supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts grant A19-0406. We acknowledge the institutional support from the CAS (RVO: 86652036), CMS supported by MEYS CR (LM2015043), and the Imaging Methods Core Facility at BIOCEV, an institution supported by the MEYS CR (Large RI Project LM2018129 Czech-BioImaging) and ERDF (project no. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/ 0.0/16_013/0001775) for their support in obtaining imaging data presented in this paper.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ruensern Tan

    Present address: Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

  2. Samuel E. Lacey

    Present address: Human Technopole, Milan, Italy

  3. These authors contributed equally: Valerie Siahaan, Ruensern Tan.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Prague West, Czech Republic

    Valerie Siahaan, Marcus Braun & Zdenek Lansky

  2. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California – Davis, Davis, CA, USA

    Ruensern Tan, Tracy Tan, Mariah Dacy, Kassandra M. Ori-McKenney & Richard J. McKenney

  3. Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

    Tereza Humhalova & Lenka Libusova

  4. Structural Studies Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK

    Samuel E. Lacey

Authors
  1. Valerie Siahaan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruensern Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tereza Humhalova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lenka Libusova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Samuel E. Lacey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tracy Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mariah Dacy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kassandra M. Ori-McKenney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Richard J. McKenney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Marcus Braun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zdenek Lansky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The manuscript was conceptualized by R.T., K.M.O.M., R.J.M., M.B., and Z.L.; methods were developed by V.S., T.H., L.L., S.E.L., R.J.M., M.B., and Z.L.; recombinant proteins were generated by V.S., R.T., T.T., and M.D.; TIRF experiments were performed by V.S., R.T., and R.J.M.; optical tweezers experiments by V.S.; cryo-EM experiments by S.E.L.; live-cell experiments by T.H.; data were formally analyzed by V.S., R.T., T.H., S.E.L., K.M.O.M., and R.J.M.; the manuscript was written by V.S., L.L., K.M.O.M., R.J.M., M.B., Z.L., with reviewing and editing by T.T. and M.D.; the project was supervised by K.M.O.M., R.J.M., M.B., and Z.L.; funding was acquired by V.S., T.H., L.L., K.M.O.M., R.J.M., M.B., and Z.L.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kassandra M. Ori-McKenney, Richard J. McKenney, Marcus Braun or Zdenek Lansky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Chemical Biology thanks Arne Gennerich and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs 1–4, Supplementary Movie captions, Source data files, Supplementary Data files.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Video related to Fig. 1c. Structural changes in the microtubule lattice upon cooperative binding of tau. Time-lapse movie of tau-mCherry (green) envelopes growing on a taxol-lattice microtubule. Twenty nanomolar tau-mCherry is added to an initially bent microtubule. The microtubule straightens out when the tau envelope forms in the curved region. Scale bar, 2 µm.

Supplementary Video 2

Video related to Fig. 1e. Kinesin-1 walking on taxol- and GMPCPP-lattice microtubules in presence of elevated concentrations of tau. Time-lapse movie of kinesin-1 (magenta) stepping on taxol- and GMPCPP-lattice microtubules in the presence of elevated concentrations of tau (green). Sixty nanomolar kinesin-1-GFP was added to a taxol-lattice microtubule (top) and a GMPCPP-lattice microtubule (bottom) in the presence of 600 nM tau-mCherry. Processive movement of kinesin-1 was detected over the entire length of GMPCPP-lattice microtubules, while no processive movement of kinesin-1 was detected on taxol-lattice microtubules, indicating the presence of tau envelopes on taxol-lattice microtubules, and the absence of tau envelopes on GMPCPP-lattice microtubules even at these elevated concentrations of tau. Scale bar, 2 µm.

Supplementary Video 3

Video related to Fig. 1g. Compaction of a speckled-labeled microtubule upon cooperative binding of tau. Time-lapse movie of a speckled microtubule after the addition of tau. 200 nM tau-eGFP (green) was added to a speckled-labeled taxol-lattice microtubule (speckles in white). Upon cooperative binding of tau, speckles can be seen moving closer to each other, indicating the compaction of the microtubule lattice. Scale bar: 2 µm

Supplementary Video 4

Video related to Fig. 1i. SiR-tubulin dissociation of microtubule lattice within tau envelopes regions. Time-lapse movie of 2 μM SiR-tubulin (magenta) on the microtubule lattice after the addition of 20 nM tau-mCherry (green). At the positions where tau envelopes grow on the microtubule lattice (left), the density of SiR-tubulin locally decreases (middle). Right, overlay. Scale bar, 2 µm.

Supplementary Video 5

Video related to Fig. 2a. Local extension of GDP-lattice microtubule induces tau envelope disassembly in the presence of taxol. Time-lapse movie of 20 nM tau-mCherry (green) on a GMPCPP-capped GDP-lattice microtubule. At t = 0 s, tau is removed from the solution and microtubules are bent using hydrodynamic flow. During the hydrodynamic flow, imaging buffer with 10 μM taxol is added to the measurement chamber. In the presence of taxol, tau envelopes disassemble from their boundaries as well as from the location of the initially bent position. Scale bar, 5 µm.

Supplementary Video 6

Video related to Fig. 2a. Local extension of GDP-lattice microtubule does not induce tau envelope disassembly in the absence of taxol. Time-lapse movie of 20 nM tau-mCherry (green) on GMPCPP-capped GDP-lattice microtubules. At t = 0 s, tau is removed from the solution and microtubules are bent using hydrodynamic flow. During the hydrodynamic flow, imaging buffer without taxol is added to the measurement chamber. In the absence of taxol, no tau envelope disassembly was observed and disruptions in the tau envelopes owing to bending the microtubule lattice were found to reform within a 200 s timeframe. Scale bar, 5 µm.

Supplementary Video 7

Video related to Fig. 2g. Global extension of the microtubule lattice in the optical tweezers induces faster envelope disassembly. Time-lapse movie of the disassembly of tau envelopes on a microtubule suspended between two beads and stretched using external force. Initially, a single taxol-lattice microtubule is suspended between two beads and 60 nM tau-mCherry is added to the measurement chamber. The microtubule is then globally extended by slowly moving the beads apart until a set force of 40 pN is measured. Tau is then removed from solution so that envelope disassembly is observed. Global extension of the microtubule lattice in the optical tweezers induces faster envelope disassembly. Scale bar, 3 µm.

Supplementary Video 8

Video related to Fig. 2i. In the absence of global extension of the microtubule lattice in the optical tweezers, tau envelopes disassemble slower. Time-lapse movie of the disassembly of tau envelopes on a microtubule attached to a single bead and relaxed in the absence of external force. Initially, a single taxol-lattice microtubule is attached to a bead and 60 nM tau-mCherry is added to the measurement chamber. Tau is then removed from solution so that envelope disassembly is observed. In the absence of global extension of the microtubule lattice in the optical tweezers, tau envelopes disassemble slower. Scale bar, 3 µm.

Supplementary Video 9

Video related to Fig. 4a. Tau dissociates from microtubules in vivo upon addition of taxol. Time-lapse movie of a U-2 OS cell expressing eGFP-tau (white) after the addition of 0.01 μM taxol. Tau signal can be seen gradually dissociating from the microtubules in vivo after the addition of taxol. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Supplementary Video 10

Video related to Fig. 4a. Tau does not dissociate from microtubules after the addition of DMSO. Time-lapse movie of a U-2 OS cell expressing eGFP-tau (white) after the addition of DMSO in the absence of taxol. Tau remains on the microtubules in vivo in the control experiment in the absence of taxol. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Supplementary Video 11

Video related to Fig. 4c. MAP4 does not dissociate from microtubules in vivo upon addition of taxol. Time-lapse movie of a U-2 OS cell expressing eGFP-MAP4 after the addition of 0.01 μM taxol. In contrast to tau, MAP4 remains on the microtubules in vivo after the addition of taxol. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Supplementary Video 12

Video related to Fig. 4c. MAP4 does not dissociate from microtubules in vivo upon addition of DMSO. Time-lapse movie of a U-2 OS cell expressing eGFP-MAP4 after the addition of DMSO in the absence of taxol. MAP4 remains on the microtubules in vivo in the control experiment in the absence of taxol. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Supplementary Video 13

Video related to Fig. 4e. Tau dissociates from microtubules in vivo strongly resembling tau envelope disassembly in vitro. Time-lapse movie of a single microtubule in a U-2 OS cell expressing eGFP-tau after the addition of 0.01 μM taxol at t = 0 min. During the dissociation of tau from the microtubules, fissions appear in the tau density that disassemble from their boundaries, closely resembling tau envelope disassembly in vitro. Scale bar, 2 µm.

Supplementary Video 14

Video related to Supplementary Figure 4d. Tau dissociates from microtubules in vivo strongly resembling tau envelope disassembly in vitro. Time-lapse movie of a second example of a single microtubule in a U-2 OS cell expressing eGFP-tau after the addition of 0.01 μM taxol at t = 0 min. During the dissociation of tau from the microtubules, fissions appear in the tau density that disassemble from their boundaries, closely resembling tau envelope disassembly in vitro. Scale bar, 1 µm.

Supplementary Video 15

Video related to Supplementary Figure 4d. Tau dissociates from microtubules in vivo strongly resembling tau envelope disassembly in vitro. Time-lapse movie of a third example of a single microtubule in a U-2 OS cell expressing eGFP-tau after the addition of 0.01 μM taxol at t = 0 min. During the dissociation of tau from the microtubules, fissions appear in the tau density that disassemble from their boundaries, closely resembling tau envelope disassembly in vitro. Scale bar, 1 µm.

Supplementary Data 1

Statistical Source Data for Supplementary Figure 1.

Supplementary Data 2

Statistical Source Data for Supplementary Figure 2.

Supplementary Data 3

Statistical Source Data for Supplementary Figure 3.

Supplementary Data 4

Statistical Source Data for Supplementary Figure 4.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical Source Data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical Source Data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical Source Data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Unprocessed gels.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical Source Data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical Source Data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siahaan, V., Tan, R., Humhalova, T. et al. Microtubule lattice spacing governs cohesive envelope formation of tau family proteins. Nat Chem Biol 18, 1224–1235 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-022-01096-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-022-01096-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing