Mapping spatial transcriptome with light-activated proximity-dependent RNA labeling

Article metrics

Abstract

RNA molecules are highly compartmentalized in eukaryotic cells, with their localizations intimately linked to their functions. Despite the importance of RNA targeting, our current knowledge of the spatial organization of the transcriptome has been limited by a lack of analytical tools. In this study, we develop a chemical biology approach to label RNAs in live cells with high spatial specificity. Our method, called CAP-seq, capitalizes on light-activated, proximity-dependent photo-oxidation of RNA nucleobases, which could be subsequently enriched via affinity purification and identified by high-throughput sequencing. Using this technique, we investigate the local transcriptomes that are proximal to various subcellular compartments, including the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. We discover that messenger RNAs encoding for ribosomal proteins and oxidative phosphorylation pathway proteins are highly enriched at the outer mitochondrial membrane. Due to its specificity and ease of use, CAP-seq is a generally applicable technique to investigate the spatial transcriptome in many biological systems.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Development and characterization of CAP-seq method.
Fig. 2: CAP-seq reveals subcellular transcriptome in the mitochondrial matrix.
Fig. 3: Mapping of the ER-proximal transcriptome.
Fig. 4: Mapping local transcriptome at the OMM.
Fig. 5: Validation of RNAs identified in OMM CAP-seq.
Fig. 6: OMM CAP-seq with drug perturbation.

Data availability

All data presented in this study are available in the main text and Supplementary Information. Sequencing data are included in Source Data Figs. 24 and 6a,d.

References

  1. 1.

    Buxbaum, A. R., Haimovich, G. & Singer, R. H. In the right place at the right time: visualizing and understanding mRNA localization. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 95–109 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Jung, H., Gkogkas, C. G., Sonenberg, N. & Holt, C. E. Remote control of gene function by local translation. Cell 157, 26–40 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Sepulveda, G. et al. Co-translational protein targeting facilitates centrosomal recruitment of PCNT during centrosome maturation in vertebrates. eLife 7, e34959 (2018).

  4. 4.

    Martin, K. C. & Ephrussi, A. mRNA localization: gene expression in the spatial dimension. Cell 136, 719–730 (2009).

  5. 5.

    Cioni, J. M., Koppers, M. & Holt, C. E. Molecular control of local translation in axon development and maintenance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 51, 86–94 (2018).

  6. 6.

    Glock, C., Heumuller, M. & Schuman, E. M. mRNA transport & local translation in neurons. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 45, 169–177 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Engreitz, J. M., Ollikainen, N. & Guttman, M. Long non-coding RNAs: spatial amplifiers that control nuclear structure and gene expression. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 756–770 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Diehn, M., Bhattacharya, R., Botstein, D. & Brown, P. O. Genome-scale identification of membrane-associated human mRNAs. PLoS Genet. 2, e11 (2006).

  9. 9.

    Chen, Q., Jagannathan, S., Reid, D. W., Zheng, T. & Nicchitta, C. V. Hierarchical regulation of mRNA partitioning between the cytoplasm and the endoplasmic reticulum of mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 2646–2658 (2011).

  10. 10.

    Marc, P. et al. Genome-wide analysis of mRNAs targeted to yeast mitochondria. EMBO Rep. 3, 159–164 (2002).

  11. 11.

    Mercer, T. R. et al. The human mitochondrial transcriptome. Cell 146, 645–658 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Cajigas, I. J. et al. The local transcriptome in the synaptic neuropil revealed by deep sequencing and high-resolution imaging. Neuron 74, 453–466 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Minis, A. et al. Subcellular transcriptomics-dissection of the mRNA composition in the axonal compartment of sensory neurons. Dev. Neurobiol. 74, 365–381 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Hocine, S., Raymond, P., Zenklusen, D., Chao, J. A. & Singer, R. H. Single-molecule analysis of gene expression using two-color RNA labeling in live yeast. Nat. Methods 10, 119–121 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Femino, A. M., Fay, F. S., Fogarty, K. & Singer, R. H. Visualization of single RNA transcripts in situ. Science 280, 585–590 (1998).

  16. 16.

    Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S. & Zhuang, X. RNA imaging. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348, aaa6090 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Lee, J. H. et al. Highly multiplexed subcellular RNA sequencing in situ. Science 343, 1360–1363 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Wang, X. et al. Three-dimensional intact-tissue sequencing of single-cell transcriptional states. Science 361, eaat5691 (2018).

  19. 19.

    Rhee, H. W. et al. Proteomic mapping of mitochondria in living cells via spatially restricted enzymatic tagging. Science 339, 1328–1331 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Kaewsapsak, P., Shechner, D. M., Mallard, W., Rinn, J. L. & Ting, A. Y. Live-cell mapping of organelle-associated RNAs via proximity biotinylation combined with protein-RNA crosslinking. eLife 6, e29224 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Benhalevy, D., Anastasakis, D. G. & Hafner, M. Proximity-CLIP provides a snapshot of protein-occupied RNA elements in subcellular compartments. Nat. Methods 15, 1074–1082 (2018).

  22. 22.

    Fleming, A. M. & Burrows, C. J. Formation and processing of DNA damage substrates for the hNEIL enzymes. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 107, 35–52 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Bulina, M. E. et al. A genetically encoded photosensitizer. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 95–99 (2006).

  24. 24.

    Shu, X. et al. A genetically encoded tag for correlated light and electron microscopy of intact cells, tissues, and organisms. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001041 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Westberg, M., Holmegaard, L., Pimenta, F. M., Etzerodt, M. & Ogilby, P. R. Rational design of an efficient, genetically encodable, protein-encased singlet oxygen photosensitizer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 1632–1642 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Vegh, R. B. et al. Reactive oxygen species in photochemistry of the red fluorescent protein ‘Killer Red’. Chem. Commun. 47, 4887–4889 (2011).

  27. 27.

    Makhijani, K. et al. Precision optogenetic tool for selective single- and multiple-cell ablation in a live animal model system. Cell. Chem. Biol. 24, 110–119 (2017).

  28. 28.

    Moan, J. On the diffusion length of singlet oxygen in cells and tissues. J. Photoch. Photobio. B. 6, 343–347 (1990).

  29. 29.

    Morikawa, M. et al. Analysis of guanine oxidation products in double-stranded DNA and proposed guanine oxidation pathways in single-stranded, double-stranded or quadruplex DNA. Biomolecules 4, 140–159 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Xu, X., Muller, J. G., Ye, Y. & Burrows, C. J. DNA-protein cross-links between guanine and lysine depend on the mechanism of oxidation for formation of C5 vs C8 guanosine adducts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 703–709 (2008).

  31. 31.

    Ding, Y., Fleming, A. M. & Burrows, C. J. Sequencing the mouse genome for the oxidatively modified base 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine by OG-Seq. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 2569–2572 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Bisby, R. H., Morgan, C. G., Hamblett, I. & Gorman, A. A. Quenching of singlet oxygen by Trolox C, ascorbate, and amino acids: effects of pH and temperature. J. Phys. Chem. A. 103, 7454–7459 (1999).

  33. 33.

    Jan, C. H., Williams, C. C. & Weissman, J. S. Principles of ER cotranslational translocation revealed by proximity-specific ribosome profiling. Science 346, 1257521 (2014).

  34. 34.

    Linden, A. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 12, 132–139 (2006).

  35. 35.

    Williams, C. C., Jan, C. H. & Weissman, J. S. Targeting and plasticity of mitochondrial proteins revealed by proximity-specific ribosome profiling. Science 346, 748–751 (2014).

  36. 36.

    Lesnik, C., Golani-Armon, A. & Arava, Y. Localized translation near the mitochondrial outer membrane: an update. RNA Biol. 12, 801–809 (2015).

  37. 37.

    Calvo, S. E., Clauser, K. R. & Mootha, V. K. MitoCarta2.0: an updated inventory of mammalian mitochondrial proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1251–D1257 (2016).

  38. 38.

    Anger, A. M. et al. Structures of the human and Drosophila 80S ribosome. Nature 497, 80–85 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Khatter, H., Myasnikov, A. G., Natchiar, S. K. & Klaholz, B. P. Structure of the human 80S ribosome. Nature 520, 640–645 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Li, Y., Aggarwal, M. B., Nguyen, K., Ke, K. & Spitale, R. C. Assaying RNA localization in situ with spatially restricted nucleobase oxidation. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 2709–2714 (2017).

  41. 41.

    Li, Y., Aggarwal, M. B., Ke, K., Nguyen, K. & Spitale, R. C. Improved analysis of RNA localization by spatially restricted oxidation of RNA-protein complexes. Biochemistry 57, 1577–1581 (2018).

  42. 42.

    Fazal, F. M. et al. Atlas of subcellular RNA localization revealed by APEX-Seq. Cell 178, 1–18 (2019).

  43. 43.

    Chen, C. Y., Ezzeddine, N., & Shyu, A. B. & Messenger, R. N. A. MehMessenger RNA half-life measurements in mammalian cells. Methods Enzymol. 448, 335–357 (2008).

  44. 44.

    Bustamante, J., Boisson-Dupuis, S., Abel, L. & Casanova, J. L. Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease: genetic, immunological, and clinical features of inborn errors of IFN-gamma immunity. Semin. Immunol. 26, 454–470 (2014).

  45. 45.

    Kumar, K. G. et al. Identification of adropin as a secreted factor linking dietary macronutrient intake with energy homeostasis and lipid metabolism. Cell Metab. 8, 468–481 (2008).

  46. 46.

    Brigelius-Flohe, R. & Maiorino, M. Glutathione peroxidases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1830, 3289–3303 (2013).

  47. 47.

    Kaur, S. J., McKeown, S. R. & Rashid, S. Mutant SOD1 mediated pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Gene 577, 109–118 (2016).

  48. 48.

    Maiorino, M., Conrad, M. & Ursini, F. GPx4, lipid peroxidation, and cell death: discoveries, rediscoveries, and open issues. Antioxid. Redox. Signal 29, 61–74 (2018).

  49. 49.

    Liang, H. et al. Short form glutathione peroxidase 4 is the essential isoform required for survival and somatic mitochondrial functions. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 30836–30844 (2009).

  50. 50.

    Kawamata, H. & Manfredi, G. Import, maturation, and function of SOD1 and its copper chaperone CCS in the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Antioxid. Redox Signal 13, 1375–1384 (2010).

  51. 51.

    Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357–360 (2015).

  52. 52.

    Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).

  53. 53.

    Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

  54. 54.

    Kall, L., Krogh, A. & Sonnhammer, E. L. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J. Mol. Biol. 338, 1027–1036 (2004).

  55. 55.

    Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G. & Nielsen, H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 8, 785–786 (2011).

  56. 56.

    Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G. & Sonnhammer, E. L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 305, 567–580 (2001).

  57. 57.

    Tsanov, N. et al. smiFISH and FISH—a flexible single RNA detection approach with super-resolution capability. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e165 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from the National Key R&D Program of China (Ministry of Science and Technology, grant nos. 2017YFA0503600 and 2018YFA0507600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 91753131 and 21675098), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 5182011), the Interdisciplinary Medicine Seed Fund of Peking University (grant no. BMU2017MC006), Li Ge-Zhao Ning Life Science Junior Research Fellowship and Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology. P.Z. and J.W. are sponsored by the National Thousand Young Talents Award. We thank X. Chen (Peking University, Beijing, China), K. Sarkisyan (Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia) and A.Y. Ting (Stanford University, USA) for providing plasmids, and J. Yang (Peking University, Beijing, China) for providing HEK293T cells. T. Ding assisted with photo-oxidation product characterization. C. Xiao assisted with streptavidin dot blot analysis. We thank Y. Wang, M. Conrad and Y. Sun for advice, and the National Center for Protein Sciences at Peking University in Beijing, China, for assistance with Fragment Analyzer 12.

Author information

P.W., W.T. and P.Z. conceived the project. P.W., W.T., Z.L., J.W. and P.Z. designed the experiments. P.W. and W.T. performed all experiments, unless otherwise noted. Z.L. and J.W. designed sequencing data analysis. Z.Z. and R.L. carried out mass-spec experiments. Y.Z. carried out probe synthesis. P.W. and T.X. carried out FISH experiments. P.W., W.T., Z.L., J.W. and P.Z. analyzed data. P.W., W.T. and P.Z. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Correspondence to Jianbin Wang or Peng Zou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–5 and Supplementary Figures 1–33

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Note

Synthetic Procedures

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, P., Tang, W., Li, Z. et al. Mapping spatial transcriptome with light-activated proximity-dependent RNA labeling. Nat Chem Biol 15, 1110–1119 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41589-019-0368-5

Download citation