Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Whole-organism phenotypic screening for anti-infectives promoting host health

Abstract

To date, antibiotics have been identified on the basis of their ability to kill bacteria or inhibit their growth rather than directly for their capacity to improve clinical outcomes of infected patients. Although historically successful, this approach has led to the development of an antibiotic armamentarium that suffers from a number of shortcomings, including the inevitable emergence of resistance and, in certain infections, suboptimal efficacy leading to long treatment durations, infection recurrence, or high mortality and morbidity rates despite apparent bacterial sterilization. Conventional antibiotics fail to address the complexities of in vivo bacterial physiology and virulence, as well as the role of the host underlying the complex, dynamic interactions that cause disease. New interventions are needed, aimed at host outcome rather than microbiological cure. Here we review the role of screening models for cellular and whole-organism infection, including worms, flies, zebrafish, and mice, to identify novel therapeutic strategies and discuss their future implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Conventional and nonconventional approaches to treating bacterial infection.
Fig. 2: Disease-tolerance curve analysis of parameters that affect host health.
Fig. 3: Small molecules with host-targeting activity and/or identified through whole-organism screening.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown, E. D. & Wright, G. D. Antibacterial drug discovery in the resistance era. Nature 529, 336–343 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandes, P. The global challenge of new classes of antibacterial agents: an industry perspective. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 24, 7–11 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Young, M. H., Aronoff, D. M. & Engleberg, N. C. Necrotizing fasciitis: pathogenesis and treatment. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 3, 279–294 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Young, M. H., Engleberg, N. C., Mulla, Z. D. & Aronoff, D. M. Therapies for necrotising fasciitis. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 6, 155–165 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vinh, D. C. & Embil, J. M. Device-related infections: a review. J. Long Term Eff. Med. Implants 15, 467–488 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Song, T., Duperthuy, M. & Wai, S. N. Sub-optimal treatment of bacterial biofilms. Antibiotics (Basel) 5, 23 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Horsburgh, C. R. Jr., Barry, C. E. III & Lange, C. Treatment of tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 2149–2160 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baddour, L. M. et al. Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association. Circulation 132, 1435–1486 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Deutschman, C. S. & Tracey, K. J. Sepsis: current dogma and new perspectives. Immunity 40, 463–475 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prina, E., Ranzani, O. T. & Torres, A. Community-acquired pneumonia. Lancet 386, 1097–1108 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaukonen, K. M., Bailey, M., Suzuki, S., Pilcher, D. & Bellomo, R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 311, 1308–1316 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E. J. The failure of biologics in sepsis: where do we stand? Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 42, S45–S47 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marshall, J. C. Such stuff as dreams are made on: mediator-directed therapy in sepsis. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2, 391–405 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Czaplewski, L. et al. Alternatives to antibiotics-a pipeline portfolio review. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 239–251 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Allen, R. C., Popat, R., Diggle, S. P. & Brown, S. P. Targeting virulence: can we make evolution-proof drugs? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 300–308 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rasko, D. A. & Sperandio, V. Anti-virulence strategies to combat bacteria-mediated disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 117–128 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Orth, P. et al. Mechanism of action and epitopes of Clostridium difficile toxin B-neutralizing antibody bezlotoxumab revealed by X-ray crystallography. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 18008–18021 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ewald, H. et al. Adjunctive corticosteroids for Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia in patients with HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, CD006150 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prasad, K., Singh, M. B. & Ryan, H. Corticosteroids for managing tuberculous meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 4, CD002244 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Feldman, C. & Anderson, R. Corticosteroids in the adjunctive therapy of community-acquired pneumonia: an appraisal of recent meta-analyses of clinical trials. J. Thorac. Dis. 8, E162–E171 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yadav, H. & Cartin-Ceba, R. Balance between hyperinflammation and immunosuppression in sepsis. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 37, 42–50 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Louie, A., Song, K. H., Hotson, A., Thomas Tate, A. & Schneider, D. S. How many parameters does it take to describe disease tolerance? PLoS Biol. 14, e1002435 (2016). This study describes disease-tolerance curves in L. monocytogenes infected D. melanogaster as sigmoidal and governed by the parameters of vigor, slope, EC50, and the severity of disease.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MacRae, C. A. & Peterson, R. T. Zebrafish as tools for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 721–731 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Swinney, D. C. & Anthony, J. How were new medicines discovered? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 507–519 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mattiazzi Usaj, M. et al. High-content screening for quantitative cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 598–611 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Raby, A. C. et al. Targeting the TLR co-receptor CD14 with TLR2-derived peptides modulates immune responses to pathogens. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 185ra64 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hancock, R. E., Nijnik, A. & Philpott, D. J. Modulating immunity as a therapy for bacterial infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 243–254 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dowling, J. K. & Mansell, A. Toll-like receptors: the swiss army knife of immunity and vaccine development. Clin. Transl. Immunology 5, e85 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stanley, S. A. et al. Identification of host-targeted small molecules that restrict intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis growth. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1003946 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Napier, R. J. et al. Imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases regulate mycobacterial pathogenesis and represent therapeutic targets against tuberculosis. Cell Host Microbe 10, 475–485 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuijl, C. et al. Intracellular bacterial growth is controlled by a kinase network around PKB/AKT1. Nature 450, 725–730 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schiebler, M. et al. Functional drug screening reveals anticonvulsants as enhancers of mTOR-independent autophagic killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through inositol depletion. EMBO Mol. Med. 7, 127–139 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fatehullah, A., Tan, S. H. & Barker, N. Organoids as an in vitro model of human development and disease. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 246–254 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ranga, A., Gjorevski, N. & Lutolf, M. P. Drug discovery through stem cell-based organoid models. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 69-70, 19–28 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bartfeld, S. et al. In vitro expansion of human gastric epithelial stem cells and their responses to bacterial infection. Gastroenterology 148, 126–136.e6 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ng, S. et al. Human iPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells support Plasmodium liver-stage infection in vitro. Stem Cell Rep. 4, 348–359 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaufmann, S. H. Paul Ehrlich: founder of chemotherapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 373 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Raju, T. N. The Nobel chronicles. 1939: Gerhard Domagk (1895–1964). Lancet 353, 681 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Campbell, W. C. Ivermectin: a reflection on simplicity (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Edn. Engl. 55, 10184–10189 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Omura, S. & Crump, A. The life and times of ivermectin - a success story. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 984–989 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yarnell, A. in Chemical and Engineering News, Vol. 83 (ed. Baum, R.M.) p. 63 (American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 2005).

  42. Powell, J. R. & Ausubel, F. M. Models of Caenorhabditis elegans infection by bacterial and fungal pathogens. Methods Mol. Biol. 415, 403–427 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ewbank, J. J. & Zugasti, O. C. elegans: model host and tool for antimicrobial drug discovery. Dis. Model. Mech. 4, 300–304 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Irazoqui, J. E., Urbach, J. M. & Ausubel, F. M. Evolution of host innate defence: insights from Caenorhabditis elegans and primitive invertebrates. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 47–58 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Richardson, C. E., Kooistra, T. & Kim, D. H. An essential role for XBP-1 in host protection against immune activation in C. elegans. Nature 463, 1092–1095 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Moy, T. I. et al. Identification of novel antimicrobials using a live-animal infection model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10414–10419 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Conery, A. L., Larkins-Ford, J., Ausubel, F. M. & Kirienko, N. V. High-throughput screening for novel anti-infectives using a C. elegans pathogenesis model. Curr. Protoc. Chem. Biol. 6, 25–37 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Moy, T. I. et al. High-throughput screen for novel antimicrobials using a whole animal infection model. ACS Chem. Biol. 4, 527–533 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Pukkila-Worley, R. et al. Stimulation of host immune defenses by a small molecule protects C. elegans from bacterial infection. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002733 (2012). This study describes the use of whole-organism transcriptional profiling, classical epistasis analysis, and RNAi screens in C. elegans to define pathways perturbed by the small molecule RPW-24, identified through whole-organism screening in C. elegans.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Buchon, N., Silverman, N. & Cherry, S. Immunity in Drosophila melanogaster—from microbial recognition to whole-organism physiology. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 796–810 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Apidianakis, Y. & Rahme, L. G. Drosophila melanogaster as a model host for studying Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1285–1294 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Tzelepis, I., Kapsetaki, S. E., Panayidou, S. & Apidianakis, Y. Drosophila melanogaster: a first step and a stepping-stone to anti-infectives. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 13, 763–768 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ayres, J. S., Freitag, N. & Schneider, D. S. Identification of Drosophila mutants altering defense of and endurance to Listeria monocytogenes infection. Genetics 178, 1807–1815 (2008). This study identified D. melanogaster mutants that were more susceptible to L. monocytogenes infection, though their ability to control bacterial burden was unchanged compared to wild type.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Corby-Harris, V., Habel, K. E., Ali, F. G. & Promislow, D. E. Alternative measures of response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 526–533 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Chang, S. et al. Identification of small molecules rescuing fragile X syndrome phenotypes in Drosophila. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4, 256–263 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Qurashi, A. et al. Chemical screen reveals small molecules suppressing fragile X premutation rCGG repeat-mediated neurodegeneration in Drosophila. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 2068–2075 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Gladstone, M. et al. A translation inhibitor identified in a Drosophila screen enhances the effect of ionizing radiation and taxol in mammalian models of cancer. Dis. Model. Mech. 5, 342–350 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Willoughby, L. F. et al. An in vivo large-scale chemical screening platform using Drosophila for anti-cancer drug discovery. Dis. Model. Mech. 6, 521–529 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Markstein, M. et al. Systematic screen of chemotherapeutics in Drosophila stem cell tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4530–4535 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Fernández-Hernández, I., Scheenaard, E., Pollarolo, G. & Gonzalez, C. The translational relevance of Drosophila in drug discovery. EMBO Rep. 17, 471–472 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kesarwani, M. et al. A quorum sensing regulated small volatile molecule reduces acute virulence and promotes chronic infection phenotypes. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002192 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Bandyopadhaya, A. et al. The quorum sensing volatile molecule 2-amino acetophenon modulates host immune responses in a manner that promotes life with unwanted guests. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1003024 (2012). This study demonstrated that pretreatment with 2-AA prior to lethal infection with P. aeruginosa resulted in downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, upregulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines, higher bacterial burden, and a significant survival benefit in treated animals, suggesting that 2-AA is an immunomodulatory molecule that ‘tolerizes’ the host to the presence of the pathogen.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Bandyopadhaya, A., Tsurumi, A., Maura, D., Jeffrey, K. L. & Rahme, L. G. A quorum-sensing signal promotes host tolerance training through HDAC1-mediated epigenetic reprogramming. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16174 (2016). This study demonstrated that the effect of 2-AA on downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine induction is mediated through HDAC-1, and the survival benefit provided by 2-AA in infected animals could be inhibited with HDAC inhibitors.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Davis, J. M. et al. Real-time visualization of mycobacterium-macrophage interactions leading to initiation of granuloma formation in zebrafish embryos. Immunity 17, 693–702 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Prajsnar, T. K., Cunliffe, V. T., Foster, S. J. & Renshaw, S. A. A novel vertebrate model of Staphylococcus aureus infection reveals phagocyte-dependent resistance of zebrafish to non-host specialized pathogens. Cell. Microbiol. 10, 2312–2325 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. van der Sar, A. M. et al. Zebrafish embryos as a model host for the real time analysis of Salmonella typhimurium infections. Cell. Microbiol. 5, 601–611 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Brannon, M. K. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III secretion system interacts with phagocytes to modulate systemic infection of zebrafish embryos. Cell. Microbiol. 11, 755–768 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Clatworthy, A. E. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of zebrafish involves both host and pathogen determinants. Infect. Immun. 77, 1293–1303 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Renshaw, S. A. & Trede, N. S. A model 450 million years in the making: zebrafish and vertebrate immunity. Dis. Model. Mech. 5, 38–47 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Dalton, J. P. et al. Screening of anti-mycobacterial compounds in a naturally infected zebrafish larvae model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72, 421–427 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Takaki, K., Cosma, C. L., Troll, M. A. & Ramakrishnan, L. An in vivo platform for rapid high-throughput antitubercular drug discovery. Cell Rep. 2, 175–184 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Deans, R. M. et al. Parallel shRNA and CRISPR-Cas9 screens enable antiviral drug target identification. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 361–366 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Neggers, J. E. et al. Identifying drug-target selectivity of small-molecule CRM1/XPO1 inhibitors by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Chem. Biol. 22, 107–116 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Nijman, S. M. Functional genomics to uncover drug mechanism of action. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 942–948 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Ziegler, S., Pries, V., Hedberg, C. & Waldmann, H. Target identification for small bioactive molecules: finding the needle in the haystack. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn. Engl. 52, 2744–2792 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. North, T. E. et al. Prostaglandin E2 regulates vertebrate haematopoietic stem cell homeostasis. Nature 447, 1007–1011 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Owens, K. N. et al. Identification of genetic and chemical modulators of zebrafish mechanosensory hair cell death. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000020 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Yu, P. B. et al. Dorsomorphin inhibits BMP signals required for embryogenesis and iron metabolism. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4, 33–41 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Adams, K. N. et al. Drug tolerance in replicating mycobacteria mediated by a macrophage-induced efflux mechanism. Cell 145, 39–53 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Carvalho, R. et al. A high-throughput screen for tuberculosis progression. PLoS One 6, e16779 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Veneman, W. J. et al. Establishment and optimization of a high throughput setup to study Staphylococcus epidermidis and Mycobacterium marinum infection as a model for drug discovery. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, e51649 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Veneman, W. J. et al. A zebrafish high throughput screening system used for Staphylococcus epidermidis infection marker discovery. BMC Genomics 14, 255 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Spaink, H. P. et al. Robotic injection of zebrafish embryos for high-throughput screening in disease models. Methods 62, 246–254 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Tobin, D. M. et al. The lta4h locus modulates susceptibility to mycobacterial infection in zebrafish and humans. Cell 140, 717–730 (2010). This study identified the requirement of the lta4h gene for defense against M. marinum infection in zebrafish and SNPs in the human homolog of lta4H that were associated with and provided heterozygous advantage for pulmonary and meningeal tuberculosis.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Tobin, D. M. et al. Host genotype-specific therapies can optimize the inflammatory response to mycobacterial infections. Cell 148, 434–446 (2012). This study demonstrated that host-directed therapies can be used to fine tune the inflammatory response—which may be either excessive or deficient dependening on host genotype—and improve host outcome during mycobacterial infection in both zebrafish and human tuberculous meningitis patients.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Figueiredo, N. et al. Anthracyclines induce DNA damage response-mediated protection against severe sepsis. Immunity 39, 874–884 (2013). This study demonstrated that anthracyclines provide a profound protective effect on host survival yet have no effect on bacterial burden in a severe sepsis model and that the survival effect is mediated through ATM and the autophagy pathway in the lung.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Moayeri, M., Leppla, S. H., Vrentas, C., Pomerantsev, A. P. & Liu, S. Anthrax Pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 69, 185–208 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Liu, S. et al. Key tissue targets responsible for anthrax-toxin-induced lethality. Nature 501, 63–68 (2013). This study demonstrated that anthrax-toxin-induced mortality in mice is dependent on LT targeting of cardiomyocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells and ET targeting of hepatocytes.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Fink, M. P. Animal models of sepsis. Virulence 5, 143–153 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Munford, R. S. Murine responses to endotoxin: another dirty little secret? J. Infect. Dis. 201, 175–177 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Seok, J. et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3507–3512 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Takao, K. & Miyakawa, T. Genomic responses in mouse models greatly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1167–1172 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Shay, T., Lederer, J. A. & Benoist, C. Genomic responses to inflammation in mouse models mimic humans: we concur, apples to oranges comparisons won’t do. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E346 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Hackam, D. G. & Redelmeier, D. A. Translation of research evidence from animals to humans. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 296, 1731–1732 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. van der Worp, H. B. et al. Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies? PLoS Med. 7, e1000245 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Mak, I. W., Evaniew, N. & Ghert, M. Lost in translation: animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment. Am. J. Transl. Res. 6, 114–118 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Rex, J. H. et al. A comprehensive regulatory framework to address the unmet need for new antibacterial treatments. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13, 269–275 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Lloyd, N. C., Morgan, H. W., Nicholson, B. K. & Ronimus, R. S. The composition of Ehrlich’s salvarsan: resolution of a century-old debate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 44, 941–944 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Ayres, J. S. & Schneider, D. S. Tolerance of infections. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 30, 271–294 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Dillman, A. R. & Schneider, D. S. Defining resistance and tolerance to Cancer. Cell Rep. 13, 884–887 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge E. Office and S. Son for assistance with preparing the graphical abstract.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah T. Hung.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declore no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clatworthy, A.E., Romano, K.P. & Hung, D.T. Whole-organism phenotypic screening for anti-infectives promoting host health. Nat Chem Biol 14, 331–341 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-018-0018-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-018-0018-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing