Calls for more diverse data in genetics studies typically fall short of offering further guidance. Here we summarize a policy framework from the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health designed to fill this gap. The framework prompts researchers to consider both what types of diversity are needed and why, and how aims can be achieved through choices made throughout the data life cycle.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Wojcik, G. L. et al. Nature 570, 514–518 (2019).
Manrai, A. K. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 655–665 (2016).
Martin, A. R. et al. Nat. Genet. 51, 584–591 (2019).
Hardcastle, F. et al. Camb. Prism Precis. Med. 2, e1 (2023).
Global Alliance for Genomics & Health. Diversity in Datasets Policy v2.4; https://go.nature.com/3Z87nui (2024).
Dauda, B. et al. Front. Genet. 14, 1044555 (2023).
Mathieson, I. & Scally, A. PLoS Genet. 16, e1008624 (2020).
Bliss, C. Hastings Cent. Rep. 50, S15–S22 (2020).
Lewis, A. C. F. et al. Perspect. Biol. Med. 66, 225–248 (2023).
Jooma, S., Hahn, M. J., Hindorff, L. A. & Bonham, V. L. Ethn. Dis. 29, 173–178.
Beauchamp, T. L. & Childress, J. F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics 7th edn, Ch. 1, 17–19 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).
Greely, H. T. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 222–227 (2001).
Garrison, N. A. et al. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 20, 495–517 (2019).
Bedeker, A. et al. BMJ Glob. Health 7, e008096 (2022).
Thaldar, D. & Shozi, B. J. Law Biosci. 10, lsad018 (2023).
Acknowledgements
The Diversity and Datasets taskforce acknowledges the contributions from other members of the Regulatory and Ethics Workstream, members of the public and other commenters who attended our many meetings. In particular, we acknowledge M. Afolabi, S. H. Chen, M. Doerr, J. S. Hsu, Z. Lombard, M. Mackintosh, A. Saadat and S. Singh. A.C.F.L. is supported by the NHGRI (1K99HG012809). S.S.J. is supported by National Medical Research Council, Singapore Clinician Scientist Award (NMRC/CSAINVJun21-0003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.C.F.L. owns stock in Fabric Genomics. T.H.-B. reports consulting fees from Grai-Matter and Paul Hartmann AG outside the submitted work. Y.B. owns stock in Genetics Adviser. S.S.J. is a co-founder of Global Gene Corporation. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Genetics thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raven-Adams, M.C., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Joly, Y. et al. Defining and pursuing diversity in human genetic studies. Nat Genet (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01903-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01903-7