Abstract
Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as a promising biomarker of immunotherapy response across multiple cancer types; however, clinical outcomes among patients with low TMB tumors are heterogeneous. Herein, we demonstrate that tumor aneuploidy provides independent prognostic value among patients with lower TMB (<80th percentile) tumors treated with immunotherapy. A higher aneuploidy score is associated with poor prognosis following immunotherapy among tumors with low TMB, but not those with high TMB. Importantly, aneuploidy scores can be calculated from existing clinical targeted sequencing infrastructure, facilitating deployment of aneuploidy scores as a clinical biomarker.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data are available from the cBioPortal study found at https://www.cbioportal.org/study/summary?id=tmb_mskcc_2018 and the GENIE v.7.1 release: https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn7222066/wiki/405659. Aneuploidy scores and FGA values for each sample are provided in the GitHub repository referenced below. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
All code necessary to replicate these analyses are provided in the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/lfspurr/Aneuploidy-ICB16.
Change history
03 January 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01288-5
References
Samstein, R. M. et al. Tumor mutational load predicts survival after immunotherapy across multiple cancer types. Nat. Genet. 51, 202–206 (2019).
Strickler, J. H., Hanks, B. A. & Khasraw, M. Tumor mutational burden as a predictor of immunotherapy response: is more always better? Clin. Cancer Res. 27, 1236 (2021).
Schumacher, T. N. & Schreiber, R. D. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science 348, 69–74 (2015).
Hellmann, M. D. et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in lung cancer with a high tumor mutational burden. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 2093–2104 (2018).
Fehrenbacher, L. et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387, 1837–1846 (2016).
Romero, D. TMB is linked with prognosis. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 16, 336–336 (2019).
Rousseau, B. et al. The spectrum of benefit from checkpoint blockade in hypermutated tumors. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1168–1170 (2021).
Taylor, A. M. et al. Genomic and functional approaches to understanding cancer aneuploidy. Cancer Cell 33, 676–689.e3 (2018).
Lamberti, G. et al. Clinicopathological and genomic correlates of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 31, 807–814 (2020).
Davoli, T., Uno, H., Wooten, E. C. & Elledge, S. J. Tumor aneuploidy correlates with markers of immune evasion and with reduced response to immunotherapy. Science 355, eaaf8399 (2017).
Hieronymus, H. et al. Tumor copy number alteration burden is a pan-cancer prognostic factor associated with recurrence and death. eLife 7, e37294 (2018).
Ben-David, U. & Amon, A. Context is everything: aneuploidy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 44–62 (2020).
Spurr, L. F. et al. Highly aneuploid non-small cell lung cancer shows enhanced responsiveness to concurrent radiation and immune checkpoint blockade. Nat. Cancer https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-022-00467-x (2022).
Spurr, L. F. et al. Quantification of aneuploidy in targeted sequencing data using ASCETS. Bioinformatics 37, 2461–2463 (2020).
Cerami, E. et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2, 401–404 (2012).
Spurr, L. F. lfspurr/Aneuploidy-ICB: v1.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7181524 (2022).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ludwig Cancer Research Foundation (S.P.P. and R.R.W.), a Career Development Award from the LUNGevity Foundation (S.P.P.), an Ullman Scholarship in Translational Cancer Immunology from the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center (UCCCC) (S.P.P.), a Cancer Spotlight Grant (S.P.P.) from the UCCCC, a Fight Against Cancer Grant from the United-4 A Cure Foundation (S.P.P.) and a National Institutes of Health NCI-SOAR Grant 1R25CA240134-01 (L.F.S.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the conceptualization, investigation, visualization, writing and editing of this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
L.F.S. declares no competing interests. R.R.W. reports having stock and other ownership interests with Boost Therapeutics, ImmVira LLC, Reflexion Pharmaceuticals, Coordination Pharmaceuticals Inc., Magi Therapeutics and Oncosenescence; serving in a consulting or advisory role for Aettis Inc., AstraZeneca, Coordination Pharmaceuticals, Genus, Merck Serono S.A., NanoProteagen, NKMax America Inc., Shuttle Pharmaceuticals and Highlight Therapeutics, S.L.; having research grants with Varian and Regeneron; and receiving compensation including travel, accommodations or expense reimbursement from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd. and Merck Serono S.A. S.P.P. has patents outside of the submitted work.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Genetics thanks Douglas Johnson and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 2
Statistical source data.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Spurr, L.F., Weichselbaum, R.R. & Pitroda, S.P. Tumor aneuploidy predicts survival following immunotherapy across multiple cancers. Nat Genet 54, 1782–1785 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01235-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01235-4
This article is cited by
-
Optimizing cancer immunotherapy response prediction by tumor aneuploidy score and fraction of copy number alterations
npj Precision Oncology (2023)
-
Nivolumab and ipilimumab in recurrent or refractory cancer of unknown primary: a phase II trial
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Chromosomal instability and inflammation: a catch-22 for cancer cells
Chromosome Research (2023)
-
Mechanisms of chromosomal instability (CIN) tolerance in aggressive tumors: surviving the genomic chaos
Chromosome Research (2023)