A concerning trend in genetics is the common use of the term ‘trans-ethnic’ to describe analyses that combine or compare several ancestrally diverse populations. In this commentary, we discuss how this term is inaccurate and alienating. We propose that geneticists avoid using the term trans-ethnic entirely and that researchers across disciplines reach a new consensus about the best terms to use to describe the populations we study.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
The interplay of ethics and genetic technologies in balancing the social valuation of the human genome in UNESCO declarations
European Journal of Human Genetics Open Access 15 February 2024
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Li, W. H. & Sadler, L. A. Genetics 129, 513–523 (1991).
Auton, A. et al. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).
Rosenberg, N. A. et al. PLoS Genet. 1, e70 (2005).
Novembre, J. et al. Nature 456, 98–101 (2008).
Barton, N., Hermisson, J. & Nordborg, M. eLife 8, e45380 (2019).
Martin, A. R. et al. Nat. Genet. 51, 584–591 (2019).
Popejoy, A. B. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 107, 72–82 (2020).
Birney, E., Inouye, M., Raff, J., Rutherford, A. & Scally, A. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.10041 (2021).
Flanagin, A., Frey, T., Christiansen, S. L. & Bauchner, H. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 325, 1049–1052 (2021).
Brown, B. C., Ye, C. J., Price, A. L. & Zaitlen, N. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99, 76–88 (2016).
Mägi, R. et al. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 3639–3650 (2017).
Shi, H. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 106, 805–817 (2020).
Chen, M.-H. et al. Cell 182, 1198–1213.e14 (2020).
Todd, J. A. et al. Nature 338, 587–589 (1989).
McKenzie, C. A. et al. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 1077–1084 (2001).
Tekola-Ayele, F. et al. PLoS Genet. 16, e1008747 (2020).
Gouveia, M. H. et al. Sci. Rep. 11, 4075 (2021).
Iyengar, S. K. et al. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005352 (2015).
Liu, C.-T. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99, 56–75 (2016).
van Rooij, F. J. A. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 100, 51–63 (2017).
Kichaev, G. & Pasaniuc, B. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 97, 260–271 (2015).
Asimit, J. L., Hatzikotoulas, K., McCarthy, M., Morris, A. P. & Zeggini, E. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 24, 1330–1336 (2016).
Naito, T. et al. Nat. Commun. 12, 1639 (2021).
Morris, A. P. Genet. Epidemiol. 35, 809–822 (2011).
Shi, H. et al. Nat. Commun. 12, 1098 (2021).
Guo, J. et al. Sci. Rep. 11, 5240 (2021).
Coram, M. A., Fang, H., Candille, S. I., Assimes, T. L. & Tang, H. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 101, 218–226 (2017).
Cavazos, T. B. & Witte, J. S. Human Genet. Genom. Adv. 2, 100017 (2021).
Giri, A. et al. Nat. Genet. 51, 51–62 (2019).
Mariner, K.A. Contingent Kinship: The Flows and Futures of Adoption in the United States (Univ. California Press, 2019).
Brubaker, R. Trans: Gender and Race in an Age of Unsettled Identities (Princeton Univ.Press, 2016).
Bureau, U.C. About Race. The United States Census Bureau https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html (accessed 12 May 2021).
Bryc, K., Durand, E. Y., Macpherson, J. M., Reich, D. & Mountain, J. L. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 96, 37–53 (2015).
Yudell, M., Roberts, D., DeSalle, R. & Tishkoff, S. Science 351, 564–565 (2016).
Green, E. D. et al. Nature 586, 683–692 (2020).
Bonham, V. L., Callier, S. L. & Royal, C. D. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 2003–2005 (2016).
Bonham, V. L., Green, E. D. & Pérez-Stable, E. J. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 320, 1533–1534 (2018).
Kevles, D.J. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity (Harvard Univ. Press, 1995).
Roberts, D. Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty-First Century (New Press/ORIM, 2011).
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Bloemendal, S. Callier, A. Jabloner, E. Hammonds, B. Ogbunu, A. Price, D. Reich and P. Turley for critical reading and comments on this manuscript. L.C. is supported by an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship and a David & Lucile Packard Fellowship for Science and Engineering. H.F. was supported by NIH DP5 OD024582.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamariza, M., Crawford, L., Jones, D. et al. Misuse of the term ‘trans-ethnic’ in genomics research. Nat Genet 53, 1520–1521 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-021-00952-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-021-00952-6
This article is cited by
-
The interplay of ethics and genetic technologies in balancing the social valuation of the human genome in UNESCO declarations
European Journal of Human Genetics (2024)
-
Including multiracial individuals is crucial for race, ethnicity and ancestry frameworks in genetics and genomics
Nature Genetics (2023)
-
Multiancestry genomic and transcriptomic analysis of gastric cancer
Nature Genetics (2023)