Reply to: ‘Subfunctionalization versus neofunctionalization after whole-genome duplication’

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Models for gene evolution after whole-genome duplication.

References

  1. 1.

    Sandve, S. R., Rohlfs, R. & Hvidsten, T. R. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0162-4 (2018).

  2. 2.

    Braasch, I. et al. Nat. Genet. 48, 427–437 (2016).

  3. 3.

    Lien, S. et al. Nature 533, 200–205 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Force, A. et al. Genetics 151, 1531–1545 (1999).

  5. 5.

    Ohno, S. Evolution by Gene Duplication (Springer, Berlin, 1970) .

  6. 6.

    Inoue, J., Sato, Y., Sinclair, R., Tsukamoto, K. & Nishida, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14918–14923 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Blanc, G. & Wolfe, K. H. Plant Cell 16, 1679–1691 (2004).

  8. 8.

    Moore, R. C. & Purugganan, M. D. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8, 122–128 (2005).

  9. 9.

    Brunet, F. G. et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 1808–1816 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grants R01 OD011116 (alias R01 RR020833) and R24 OD01119004 (J.H.P.); a Feodor Lynen Fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the Volkswagen Foundation Initiative Evolutionary Biology, grant I/84 815 (I.B.); and Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) grant ANR-10-GENM-017 (PhyloFish; J.B. and Y.G.).

Author information

I.B., J.B., Y.G. and J.H.P. designed studies, conducted studies, analyzed data and wrote the letter.

Correspondence to John H. Postlethwait.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading