Technical Report | Published:

Digestion-ligation-only Hi-C is an efficient and cost-effective method for chromosome conformation capture

Nature Geneticsvolume 50pages754763 (2018) | Download Citation


Chromosome conformation capture (3C) technologies can be used to investigate 3D genomic structures. However, high background noise, high costs, and a lack of straightforward noise evaluation in current methods impede the advancement of 3D genomic research. Here we developed a simple digestion-ligation-only Hi-C (DLO Hi-C) technology to explore the 3D landscape of the genome. This method requires only two rounds of digestion and ligation, without the need for biotin labeling and pulldown. Non-ligated DNA was efficiently removed in a cost-effective step by purifying specific linker-ligated DNA fragments. Notably, random ligation could be quickly evaluated in an early quality-control step before sequencing. Moreover, an in situ version of DLO Hi-C using a four-cutter restriction enzyme has been developed. We applied DLO Hi-C to delineate the genomic architecture of THP-1 and K562 cells and uncovered chromosomal translocations. This technology may facilitate investigation of genomic organization, gene regulation, and (meta)genome assembly.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Cremer, T. & Cremer, C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 292–301 (2001).

  2. 2.

    Maher, B. ENCODE: the human encyclopaedia. Nature 489, 46–48 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Dekker, J. et al. The 4D nucleome project. Nature 549, 219–226 (2017).

  4. 4.

    Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306–1311 (2002).

  5. 5.

    Cullen, K. E., Kladde, M. P. & Seyfred, M. A. Interaction between transcription regulatory regions of prolactin chromatin. Science 261, 203–206 (1993).

  6. 6.

    Denker, A. & de Laat, W. The second decade of 3C technologies: detailed insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev. 30, 1357–1382 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Zhao, Z. et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat. Genet. 38, 1341–1347 (2006).

  8. 8.

    Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat. Genet. 38, 1348–1354 (2006).

  9. 9.

    Dostie, J. et al. Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 16, 1299–1309 (2006).

  10. 10.

    Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).

  11. 11.

    Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).

  12. 12.

    Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Burton, J. N. et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1119–1125 (2013).

  14. 14.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148, 908–921 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Kalhor, R., Tjong, H., Jayathilaka, N., Alber, F. & Chen, L. Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 90–98 (2011).

  16. 16.

    Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Hsieh, T. H. et al. Mapping nucleosome resolution chromosome folding in yeast by micro-C. Cell 162, 108–119 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Gabdank, I., Ramakrishnan, S., Villeneuve, A. M. & Fire, A. Z. A streamlined tethered chromosome conformation capture protocol. BMC Genomics 17, 274 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Ma, W. et al. Fine-scale chromatin interaction maps reveal the cis-regulatory landscape of human lincRNA genes. Nat. Methods 12, 71–78 (2015).

  20. 20.

    Jäger, R. et al. Capture Hi-C identifies the chromatin interactome of colorectal cancer risk loci. Nat. Commun. 6, 6178 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Mifsud, B. et al. Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C. Nat. Genet. 47, 598–606 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Schmitt, A. D., Hu, M. & Ren, B. Genome-wide mapping and analysis of chromosome architecture. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 743–755 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Zeng, P. Y., Vakoc, C. R., Chen, Z. C., Blobel, G. A. & Berger, S. L. In vivo dual cross-linking for identification of indirect DNA-associated proteins by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Biotechniques 41, 694–698 (2006).

  24. 24.

    Hsieh, T. S., Fudenberg, G., Goloborodko, A. & Rando, O. J. Micro-C XL: assaying chromosome conformation from the nucleosome to the entire genome. Nat. Methods 13, 1009–1011 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Cost, G. J. Enzymatic ligation assisted by nucleases: simultaneous ligation and digestion promote the ordered assembly of DNA. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2198–2202 (2007).

  26. 26.

    Belton, J. M. et al. Hi-C: a comprehensive technique to capture the conformation of genomes. Methods 58, 268–276 (2012).

  27. 27.

    Li, G. et al. ChIA-PET tool for comprehensive chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing. Genome Biol. 11, R22 (2010).

  28. 28.

    Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

  29. 29.

    Imakaev, M. et al. Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nat. Methods 9, 999–1003 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 3, 95–98 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Odero, M. D., Zeleznik-Le, N. J., Chinwalla, V. & Rowley, J. D. Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of the acute monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 with an MLL-AF9 translocation. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 29, 333–338 (2000).

  32. 32.

    Zhou, X. et al. Exploring long-range genome interactions using the WashU Epigenome Browser. Nat. Methods 10, 375–376 (2013).

  33. 33.

    Adati, N., Huang, M. C., Suzuki, T., Suzuki, H. & Kojima, T. High-resolution analysis of aberrant regions in autosomal chromosomes in human leukemia THP-1 cell line. BMC Res. Notes 2, 153 (2009).

  34. 34.

    Chandra, P. et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with t(9;11)(p21-22;q23): common properties of dysregulated ras pathway signaling and genomic progression characterize de novo and therapy-related cases. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 133, 686–693 (2010).

  35. 35.

    Choi, H. M., Beck, V. A. & Pierce, N. A. Next-generation in situ hybridization chain reaction: higher gain, lower cost, greater durability. ACS Nano 8, 4284–4294 (2014).

  36. 36.

    Zhang, J. et al. ChIA-PET analysis of transcriptional chromatin interactions. Methods 58, 289–299 (2012).

  37. 37.

    Fullwood, M. J. et al. An oestrogen-receptor-α-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 462, 58–64 (2009).

  38. 38.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Chromatin connectivity maps reveal dynamic promoter–enhancer long-range associations. Nature 504, 306–310 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Callahan, S. J. et al. Structure of type IIL restriction-modification enzyme MmeI in complex with DNA has implications for engineering new specificities. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002442 (2016).

  40. 40.

    Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).

  41. 41.

    Yaffe, E. & Tanay, A. Probabilistic modeling of Hi-C contact maps eliminates systematic biases to characterize global chromosomal architecture. Nat. Genet. 43, 1059–1065 (2011).

  42. 42.

    Hu, M. et al. HiCNorm: removing biases in Hi-C data via Poisson regression. Bioinformatics 28, 3131–3133 (2012).

Download references


We are thankful to Nature Research Editing Service for language editing. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2016YFA0102500, to G.C.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 91440114, to G.L., and 31421064, to G.C.), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grants 2662014PY001 and 2662015PY164, to G.C.), the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2017YFD0500303, to G.C.), the Huazhong Agricultural University Scientific & Technological Self-innovation Foundation (program 52204-13002, to G.C.), and the Huazhong Agricultural University Independent Scientific & Technological Innovation Foundation (program 2014bs13, to D.L.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Da Lin, Ping Hong


  1. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China

    • Da Lin
    • , Siheng Zhang
    • , Weize Xu
    • , Muhammad Jamal
    • , Keji Yan
    • , Yingying Lei
    • , Liang Li
    •  & Gang Cao
  2. Bio-Medical Center, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China

    • Da Lin
    • , Guoliang Li
    •  & Gang Cao
  3. College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China

    • Da Lin
    • , Siheng Zhang
    • , Weize Xu
    • , Muhammad Jamal
    • , Keji Yan
    • , Yingying Lei
    • , Liang Li
    •  & Gang Cao
  4. National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China

    • Ping Hong
    •  & Guoliang Li
  5. Agricultural Bioinformatics Key Laboratory of Hubei Province, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China

    • Ping Hong
    • , Guoliang Li
    •  & Gang Cao
  6. Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA

    • Yijun Ruan
  7. Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

    • Zhen F. Fu


  1. Search for Da Lin in:

  2. Search for Ping Hong in:

  3. Search for Siheng Zhang in:

  4. Search for Weize Xu in:

  5. Search for Muhammad Jamal in:

  6. Search for Keji Yan in:

  7. Search for Yingying Lei in:

  8. Search for Liang Li in:

  9. Search for Yijun Ruan in:

  10. Search for Zhen F. Fu in:

  11. Search for Guoliang Li in:

  12. Search for Gang Cao in:


G.C., D.L., and G.L. contributed with conception of the project and experiment design. D.L. conducted the DLO Hi-C experiments and generated data. G.L., P.H., and W.X. performed data analysis and interpretation. D.L., S.Z., and Y.L. conducted the HCR experiment. D.L., P.H., G.L., G.C., L.L., K.Y., and M.J. wrote the manuscript, with input from all other authors. Z.F. and Y.R. revised the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guoliang Li or Gang Cao.

Integrated supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Figure 1 Half-linker ligation by T4 DNA ligase and T7 DNA ligase.

    Unlike T4 DNA ligases, T7 DNA ligase cannot efficiently catalyze blunt-end ligation. Thus, after ligating the 20-bp MmeI half-linker by T7 DNA ligase, a 40-bp linker dimer is shown in the gel. T4 DNA ligase can ligate both blunt and sticky DNA ends, leading to a DNA smear in the gel. The experiment has been repeated four times independently with similar results.

  2. Supplementary Figure 2 The structure of the 80-bp DLO Hi-C DNA fragment, Illumina sequence adapter, and PCR primers used in this study to construct the DLO Hi-C library.

    a, The structure of the 80-bp DLO Hi-C DNA fragment, which contains a 40-bp complete linker and a pair of 20-bp interaction genomic sequences. b, The sequence of the Illumina sequence adaptor used to ligate the 80-bp DLO Hi-C DNA fragment. Because the overhang of the 80-bp DLO Hi-C DNA fragment is unknown, we designed a random 3′ cohesive end (5′-NN-3′) in the adaptor for ligation. c, The primers used to construct the DLO Hi-C DNA sequencing library are shown.

  3. Supplementary Figure 3 Proof-of-principle experiment demonstrating the DLO Hi-C method.

    a, K562 cells were double cross-linked with EGS and formaldehyde, digested with or without HindIII, and subjected to electrophoresis. b, The digested chromatin was ligated with or without the half-linkers by simultaneous digestion and ligation using T7 DNA ligase and HindIII and subjected to electrophoresis. c, Excessive linkers were removed by centrifugation. The linker-ligated chromatin complexes were precipitated after centrifugation, while the excessive MmeI linkers remained in the supernatant. d, Linker-ligated chromatin complexes were proximity ligated in gel by T4 DNA ligase, with the unligated sample (left lane) serving as a control. e, The proximity-ligated DNA was digested by MmeI to release the 80-bp DLO Hi-C DNA fragments, as indicated in the native PAGE image. f, Electrophoresis of the DLO Hi-C sequencing library. The experiment has been repeated three times independently with similar results.

  4. Supplementary Figure 4 In situ DLO Hi-C experiment in K562 cells.

    a, Violin plots showing the theoretical DNA fragment length distribution after digestion of human genome DNA by HindIII (n = 830,216), MboI (n = 7,067,604), and MseI (n = 18,882,492) (****P < 2.2 × 10–16, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test). The box plot shows the first and third quartiles (top and bottom of boxes), the median (band inside the boxes), and the lowest and highest points within 1.5 times the interquartile range of the lower and higher quartile (whiskers). b, Nuclei were digested by MseI and subjected to electrophoresis. c, Verification of the integrity of the nuclei after proximity ligation by microscopy. d, Digestion of the in situ DLO Hi-C library by NheI for rapid early estimation of the portion of Hi-C ligation junctions. The experiments from bd have been repeated three times independently with similar results.

  5. Supplementary Figure 5

    Conformation and sequences of the full linkers.

  6. Supplementary Figure 6 Delineation of the 3D genome structure of THP-1 cells.

    a, Heat maps of THP-1 genome interactions reconstructed from the HindIII, BglII, and MseI datasets. b, Comparison of the topologically associated domains (TADs) of THP-1 chromosome 7 (from 8 Mb to 14 Mb) reconstructed from the HindIII, BglII, and MseI datasets. c, Venn diagram of the TAD boundaries from the HindIII, BglII, and MseI datasets.

  7. Supplementary Figure 7 Density plot of normalized interchromosomal interaction counts.

    The plot shows the smoothed density of normalized interaction counts (>0) between different chromosomes at a resolution of 1 Mb from the combined HindIII, BglII, and MseI datasets.

  8. Supplementary Figure 8 New strong translocation sites in THP-1 cells identified by DLO Hi-C.

    ad, The x and y axes show the regions of each chromosome at a resolution of 1 Mb, and the z axis reveals normalized contact counts of interchromosomal interactions from the combined HindIII, BglII, and MseI datasets.

  9. Supplementary Figure 9 Expected mapping efficiency using different restriction enzymes.

    ad, As the last base(s) of the restriction enzyme cutting site were removed during linker ligation, we re-added the lost base(s) back to the mapping tail. e, Plot of mapping efficiency and tail length. The x axis indicates the mapping tail length; The y axis indicates the ratio of uniquely mapping reads to total reads.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1–9 and Supplementary Tables 1–7

  2. Reporting Summary

About this article

Publication history





Further reading