Abstract
Genomic association studies of common or rare protein-coding variation have established robust statistical approaches to account for multiple testing. Here we present a comparable framework to evaluate rare and de novo noncoding single-nucleotide variants, insertion/deletions, and all classes of structural variation from whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Integrating genomic annotations at the level of nucleotides, genes, and regulatory regions, we define 51,801 annotation categories. Analyses of 519 autism spectrum disorder families did not identify association with any categories after correction for 4,123 effective tests. Without appropriate correction, biologically plausible associations are observed in both cases and controls. Despite excluding previously identified gene-disrupting mutations, coding regions still exhibited the strongest associations. Thus, in autism, the contribution of de novo noncoding variation is probably modest in comparison to that of de novo coding variants. Robust results from future WGS studies will require large cohorts and comprehensive analytical strategies that consider the substantial multiple-testing burden.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
A Cre-dependent massively parallel reporter assay allows for cell-type specific assessment of the functional effects of non-coding elements in vivo
Communications Biology Open Access 13 November 2023
-
MSV: a modular structural variant caller that reveals nested and complex rearrangements by unifying breakends inferred directly from reads
Genome Biology Open Access 17 July 2023
-
A collection of read depth profiles at structural variant breakpoints
Scientific Data Open Access 06 April 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature 511, 421–427 (2014).
Astle, W. J. et al. The allelic landscape of human blood cell trait variation and links to common complex disease. Cell 167, 1415–1429 (2016).
de Lange, K. M. et al. Genome-wide association study implicates immune activation of multiple integrin genes in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Genet. 49, 256–261 (2017).
Sanders, S. J. et al. Insights into autism spectrum disorder genomic architecture and biology from 71 risk loci. Neuron 87, 1215–1233 (2015).
Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study. Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders. Nature 542, 433–438 (2017).
Marshall, C. R. et al. Contribution of copy number variants to schizophrenia from a genome-wide study of 41,321 subjects. Nat. Genet. 49, 27–35 (2017).
MacArthur, J. et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog). Nucleic Acids Res. 45 (D1), D896–D901 (2017).
Power, R. A. et al. Fecundity of patients with schizophrenia, autism, bipolar disorder, depression, anorexia nervosa, or substance abuse vs their unaffected siblings. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 22–30 (2013).
Jin, S. C. et al. Contribution of rare inherited and de novo variants in 2,871 congenital heart disease probands. Nat. Genet. 49, 1593–1601 (2017).
Visel, A. et al. ChIP–seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854–858 (2009).
Shibata, M., Gulden, F. O. & Sestan, N. From trans to cis: transcriptional regulatory networks in neocortical development. Trends Genet. 31, 77–87 (2015).
Silbereis, J. C., Pochareddy, S., Zhu, Y., Li, M. & Sestan, N. The cellular and molecular landscapes of the developing human central nervous system. Neuron 89, 248–268 (2016).
Sanders, S. J. et al. Whole genome sequencing in psychiatric disorders: the WGSPD consortium. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1661–1668 (2017).
Caskey, C. T., Tompkins, R., Scolnick, E., Caryk, T. & Nirenberg, M. Sequential translation of trinucleotide codons for the initiation and termination of protein synthesis. Science 162, 135–138 (1968).
Fischbach, G. D. & Lord, C. The Simons Simplex Collection: a resource for identification of autism genetic risk factors. Neuron 68, 192–195 (2010).
Turner, T. N. et al. Genome sequencing of autism-affected families reveals disruption of putative noncoding regulatory DNA. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 98, 58–74 (2016).
Sudmant, P. H. et al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature 526, 75–81 (2015).
McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
O’Roak, B. J. et al. Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations. Nature 485, 246–250 (2012).
Kong, A. et al. Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk. Nature 488, 471–475 (2012).
Lek, M. et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536, 285–291 (2016).
Darnell, J. C. et al. FMRP stalls ribosomal translocation on mRNAs linked to synaptic function and autism. Cell 146, 247–261 (2011).
Ernst, J. & Kellis, M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat. Methods 9, 215–216 (2012).
Genovese, G. et al. Increased burden of ultra-rare protein-altering variants among 4,877 individuals with schizophrenia. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1433–1441 (2016).
Purcell, S. M. et al. A polygenic burden of rare disruptive mutations in schizophrenia. Nature 506, 185–190 (2014).
Chaste, P. et al. A genome-wide association study of autism using the Simons Simplex Collection: does reducing phenotypic heterogeneity in autism increase genetic homogeneity? Biol. Psychiatry 77, 775–784 (2015).
Collins, R. L. et al. Defining the diverse spectrum of inversions, complex structural variation, and chromothripsis in the morbid human genome. Genome Biol. 18, 36 (2017).
Talkowski, M. E. et al. Sequencing chromosomal abnormalities reveals neurodevelopmental loci that confer risk across diagnostic boundaries. Cell 149, 525–537 (2012).
Redin, C. et al. The genomic landscape of balanced cytogenetic abnormalities associated with human congenital anomalies. Nat. Genet. 49, 36–45 (2017).
Brand, H. et al. Paired-duplication signatures mark cryptic inversions and other complex structural variation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 97, 170–176 (2015).
Turner, T. N. et al. Genomic patterns of de novo mutation in simplex autism. Cell 171, 710–722 (2017).
Hirschhorn, J. N. & Daly, M. J. Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 95–108 (2005).
Dudbridge, F. & Gusnanto, A. Estimation of significance thresholds for genomewide association scans. Genet. Epidemiol. 32, 227–234 (2008).
Neale, B. M. et al. Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nature 485, 242–245 (2012).
Sanders, S. J. et al. De novo mutations revealed by whole-exome sequencing are strongly associated with autism. Nature 485, 237–241 (2012).
Yuen, R. K. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of quartet families with autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Med. 21, 185–191 (2015).
Cummings, B. B. et al. Improving genetic diagnosis in Mendelian disease with transcriptome sequencing. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaal5209 (2017).
Akbarian, S. et al. The PsychENCODE project. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1707–1712 (2015).
van Berkum, N. L. et al. Hi-C: a method to study the three-dimensional architecture of genomes. J. Vis. Exp. 39, e1869 (2010).
Melnikov, A. et al. Systematic dissection and optimization of inducible enhancers in human cells using a massively parallel reporter assay. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 271–277 (2012).
Johnson, E. C. et al. No evidence that schizophrenia candidate genes are more associated with schizophrenia than noncandidate genes. Biol. Psychiatry 82, 702–708 (2017).
Farrell, M. S. et al. Evaluating historical candidate genes for schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 20, 555–562 (2015).
Munoz, A. et al. De novo indels within introns contribute to ASD incidence. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/137471 (2017).
Brandler, W. M. et al. Paternally inherited noncoding structural variants contribute to autism. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/102327 (2017).
Iossifov, I. et al. The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder. Nature 515, 216–221 (2014).
Ioannidis, J. P. Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology 19, 640–648 (2008).
Li, H. Toward better understanding of artifacts in variant calling from high-coverage samples. Bioinformatics 30, 2843–2851 (2014).
Zook, J. M. et al. Integrating human sequence data sets provides a resource of benchmark SNP and indel genotype calls. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 246–251 (2014).
Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2987–2993 (2011).
Wei, Q. et al. A Bayesian framework for de novo mutation calling in parents–offspring trios. Bioinformatics 31, 1375–1381 (2015).
Ramu, A. et al. DeNovoGear: de novo indel and point mutation discovery and phasing. Nat. Methods 10, 985–987 (2013).
Narzisi, G. et al. Accurate de novo and transmitted indel detection in exome-capture data using microassembly. Nat. Methods 11, 1033–1036 (2014).
Lai, Z. et al. VarDict: a novel and versatile variant caller for next-generation sequencing in cancer research. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e108 (2016).
Yang, H. & Wang, K. Genomic variant annotation and prioritization with ANNOVAR and wANNOVAR. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1556–1566 (2015).
Harrow, J. et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project. Genome Res. 22, 1760–1774 (2012).
Pollard, K. S., Hubisz, M. J., Rosenbloom, K. R. & Siepel, A. Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies. Genome Res. 20, 110–121 (2010).
Siepel, A. et al. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res. 15, 1034–1050 (2005).
Willsey, A. J. et al. Coexpression networks implicate human midfetal deep cortical projection neurons in the pathogenesis of autism. Cell 155, 997–1007 (2013).
Wright, C. F. et al. Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data. Lancet 385, 1305–1314 (2015).
Cotney, J. et al. The autism-associated chromatin modifier CHD8 regulates other autism risk genes during human neurodevelopment. Nat. Commun. 6, 6404 (2015).
Sugathan, A. et al. CHD8 regulates neurodevelopmental pathways associated with autism spectrum disorder in neural progenitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E4468–E4477 (2014).
Bayés, A. et al. Characterization of the proteome, diseases and evolution of the human postsynaptic density. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 19–21 (2011).
Visel, A., Minovitsky, S., Dubchak, I. & Pennacchio, L. A. VISTA Enhancer Browser—a database of tissue-specific human enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D88–D92 (2007).
Andersson, R. et al. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature 507, 455–461 (2014).
Doan, R. N. et al. Mutations in human accelerated regions disrupt cognition and social behavior. Cell 167, 341–354 (2016).
Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317–330 (2015).
Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Kent, W. J. et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12, 996–1006 (2002).
Rausch, T. et al. DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis. Bioinformatics 28, i333–i339 (2012).
Layer, R. M., Chiang, C., Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. LUMPY: a probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol. 15, R84 (2014).
Chen, X. et al. Manta: rapid detection of structural variants and indels for germline and cancer sequencing applications. Bioinformatics 32, 1220–1222 (2016).
Kronenberg, Z. N. et al. Wham: identifying structural variants of biological consequence. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004572 (2015).
Handsaker, R. E. et al. Large multiallelic copy number variations in humans. Nat. Genet. 47, 296–303 (2015).
Abyzov, A., Urban, A. E., Snyder, M. & Gerstein, M. CNVnator: an approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing. Genome Res. 21, 974–984 (2011).
Klambauer, G. et al. cn.MOPS: mixture of Poissons for discovering copy number variations in next-generation sequencing data with a low false discovery rate. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e69 (2012).
Gardner, E. J. et al. The Mobile Element Locator Tool (MELT): population-scale mobile element discovery and biology. Genome Res. 27, 1916–1929 (2017).
Pedersen, B. S., Collins, R. L., Talkowski, M. E. & Quinlan, A. R. Indexcov: fast coverage quality control for whole-genome sequencing. Gigascience 6, 1–6 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the families participating in the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI) Simplex Collection (SSC). This work was supported by grants from the Simons Foundation for Autism Research Initiative (SFARI 385110 to N.S., A.J.W., M.W.S., S.J.S.; 385027 to M.E.T., J.D.B., B.D., M.J.D., X.H., K.R.; 388196 to G.M., H.C., A.R.Q.; and 346042 to M.E.T.), the US National Institutes of Health (R37MH057881 and U01MH111658 to B.D. and K.R.; HD081256 and GM061354 to M.E.T.; U01MH105575 to M.W.S.; U01MH111662 to M.W.S. and S.J.S.; R01MH110928 and U01MH100239-03S1 to M.W.S., S.J.S., A.J.W.; U01MH111661 to J.D.B.; K99DE026824 to H.B.; U01MH100229 to M.J.D.), the Autism Science Foundation to D.M.W., and the March of Dimes to M.E.T. M.E.T. was also supported by the Desmond and Ann Heathwood MGH Research Scholars award. We thank the SSC principal investigators (A. L. Beaudet, R. Bernier, J. Constantino, E. H. Cook Jr, E. Fombonne, D. Geschwind, D. E. Grice, A. Klin, D. H. Ledbetter, C. Lord, C. L. Martin, D. M. Martin, R. Maxim, J. Miles, O. Ousley, B. Peterson, J. Piggot, C. Saulnier, M. W. State, W. Stone, J. S. Sutcliffe, C. A. Walsh, and E. Wijsman) and the coordinators and staff at the SSC clinical sites; the SFARI staff, in particular N. Volfovsky; D. B. Goldstein for contributing to the experimental design; the Rutgers University Cell and DNA repository for accessing biomaterials; and the New York Genome Center for generating the WGS data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Experimental design: D.M.W., H.B., J.-Y.A., M.R.S., J.T.G., M.J.W., X.H., N.S., B.M.N., H.C., A.J.W., J.D.B., M.J.D., M.W.S., A.R.Q., G.T.M., K.R., B.D., M.E.T., and S.J.S. Identification of de novo SNVs and indels: D.M.W., J.-Y.A., S.D., M.C.G., J.D.M., L.S., A.J.W., and S.J.S. Identification of structural variants: H.B., J.-Y.A., M.R.S., J.T.G., R.L.C., R.M.L., A.F., H.Z.W., X.Z., M.C.G., R.E.H., S.K., L.S., S.A.M., A.R.Q., G.T.M., and M.E.T. Confirmation of de novo variants: D.M.W., H.B., S.D., G.B.S., H.Z.W., B.B.C., J.D., C.D., C.A.E., R.Y., M.F.W., and M.J.W. Annotation of functional regions: D.M.W., J.-Y.A., S.D., E.M.-P., J.D.M., Y.L., S.P., J.L.R., N.S., M.E.T., and S.J.S. Generation of midfetal H3K27ac and ATAC–seq data: E.M.-P., T.J.N., A.R.K., and J.L.R. Development of genomic prediction score and de novo score: L.Z., L.K., K.R., and B.D. Analysis of SNVs and indels (Figs. 1–3): D.M.W., J.-Y.A., and S.J.S. Analysis of structural variants (Fig. 4): H.B., M.R.S., J.T.G., X.Z., and M.E.T. Assessment of P-value correlations, effective number of tests, and power analysis (Figs. 3 and 5): D.M.W., J.-Y.A., L.Z., G.B.S., K.R., B.D., and S.J.S. Manuscript preparation: D.M.W., H.B., J.-Y.A., M.R.S., L.Z., J.T.G., R.L.C., S.D., B.M.N., H.C., J.D.B., M.J.D., M.W.S., A.R.Q., G.T.M., K.R., B.D., M.E.T., and S.J.S.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
J.L.R. is cofounder, stockholder, and currently on the scientific board of Neurona, a company studying the potential therapeutic use of interneuron transplantation. B.M.N. is an SAB member of Deep Genomics and serves as a consultant for Avanir Therapeutics. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figures 1–15 and Supplementary Note
Supplementary Tables
Supplementary Tables 1–13
Supplementary Data
Visualization plots of de novo structural variants
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Werling, D.M., Brand, H., An, JY. et al. An analytical framework for whole-genome sequence association studies and its implications for autism spectrum disorder. Nat Genet 50, 727–736 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0107-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0107-y
This article is cited by
-
MSV: a modular structural variant caller that reveals nested and complex rearrangements by unifying breakends inferred directly from reads
Genome Biology (2023)
-
A Cre-dependent massively parallel reporter assay allows for cell-type specific assessment of the functional effects of non-coding elements in vivo
Communications Biology (2023)
-
ParseCNV2: efficient sequencing tool for copy number variation genome-wide association studies
European Journal of Human Genetics (2023)
-
GATK-gCNV enables the discovery of rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data
Nature Genetics (2023)
-
A collection of read depth profiles at structural variant breakpoints
Scientific Data (2023)
