Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform

Nature Biotechnology volume 38, pages 675–678 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

To the Editor — There is a great need for easy-to-use cancer genomics visualization tools for both large public data resources such as TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas)1 and the GDC (Genomic Data Commons)2, as well as smaller-scale datasets generated by individual labs. Commonly used interactive visualization tools are either web-based portals or desktop applications. Data portals have a dedicated back end and are a powerful means of viewing centrally hosted resource datasets (for example, Xena’s predecessor, the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC) Cancer Browser (currently retired3), cBioPortal4, ICGC (International Cancer Genomics Consortium) Data Portal5, GDC Data Portal2). However, researchers wishing to use a data portal to explore their own data have to either redeploy the entire platform, a difficult task even for bioinformaticians, or upload private data to a server outside the user’s control, a non-starter for protected patient data, such as germline variants (for example, MAGI (Mutation Annotation and Genome Interpretation6), WebMeV7 or Ordino8). Desktop tools can view a user’s own data securely (for example, Integrated Genomics Viewer (IGV)9, Gitools10), but lack well-maintained, prebuilt files for the ever-evolving and expanding public data resources. This dichotomy between data portals and desktop tools highlights the challenge of using a single platform for both large public data and smaller-scale datasets generated by individual labs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Xena’s architecture to securely join public and private data.
Fig. 2: An example Xena Browser Visual Spreadsheet examining published ERG–TMPRSS2 (ETS transcription factor–transmembrane serine protease 2) fusion calls in TCGA PRAD (prostate cancer) by combining data from local and public Xena Hubs.

References

  1. Chin, L., Hahn, W. C., Getz, G. & Meyerson, M. Genes Dev. 25, 534–555 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grossman, R. L. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 1109–1112 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu, J. et al. Nat. Methods 6, 239–240 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cerami, E. et al. Cancer Discov. 2, 401–404 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, J. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 367–369 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leiserson, M. D. M. et al. Nat. Methods 12, 483–484 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, Y. E., Kutnetsov, L., Partensky, A., Farid, J. & Quackenbush, J. Cancer Res. 77, e11–e14 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Streit, M. et al. Bioinformatics 35, 3140–3142 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Robinson, J. T. & Mesirov, J. P. Brief. Bioinform. 14, 178–192 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perez-Llamas, C. & Lopez-Bigas, N. PLoS One 6, e19541 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium. Nature 578, 82–93 (2020).

  12. Zhou, W. et al. Nat. Genet. 50, 591–602 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Corces, M. R. et al. Science 362, 6413 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cieślik, M. & Chinnaiyan, A. M. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 93–109 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Langmead, B. & Nellore, A. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 208–219 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoadley, K. A. et al. Cell 173(291–304), e6 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. GTEx Consortium et al. Nature 550, 204–213 (2017).

  18. Vivian, J. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 314–316 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma, X. et al. Nature 555, 371–376 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao, Q. et al. Cell Rep. 23(227–238), e3 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the US National Institutes of Health under award numbers 5U24CA180951-04 and 5U24CA210974-02. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This project has also been made possible in part by grant number 2018-182812 from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative DAF, an advised fund of the Silicon Valley Community Foundation. We would also like to thank AWS Cloud Credits for Research and Google Summer of Code.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Mary Goldman, Brian Craft.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

    Mary J. Goldman, Brian Craft, Angela N. Brooks, Jingchun Zhu & David Haussler

  2. Clever Canary, New York, NY, USA

    Mim Hastie, Fran McDade & Dave Rogers

  3. Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Kristupas Repečka

  4. Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Goa, India

    Akhil Kamath

  5. National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India

    Ayan Banerjee

  6. Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Yunhai Luo

  7. Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

    Angela N. Brooks

Authors
  1. Mary J. Goldman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian Craft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mim Hastie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kristupas Repečka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fran McDade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Akhil Kamath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ayan Banerjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yunhai Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Dave Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Angela N. Brooks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jingchun Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. David Haussler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary J. Goldman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Editorial note: This article has been peer reviewed.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–10, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Note and Supplementary Methods

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldman, M.J., Craft, B., Hastie, M. et al. Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform. Nat Biotechnol 38, 675–678 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0546-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0546-8

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer